trendcontinues, the learning curve for tomorrows’ engineers grows steeper and the gap betweendesigning embedded systems in industry and teaching embedded systems development at auniversity widens. Educators are therefore challenged to adapt to advances in embedded systemswhile maintaining courseware that is broken into simple building blocks capable of maintainingcontinuity along the growth path. This requires a rich hands-on curriculum that encapsulatesmodular hardware, software, and courseware that can scale from fundamental concepts to moreadvanced topics.This paper introduces a modular demonstration, development and learning hardware platformand an example set of progressive laboratory exercises that help to meet this challenge. Theplatform includes
industrystandard to an FPGA-based intelligent controller for daily life applications. Such project willcontribute to the feasibility study of industry standard of wireless IEEE 802.11 and VHDL,FPGA for real world applications [2]. The developed system of FPGA-based microwave ovencontroller integrated with IEEE 802.11 wireless communication is illustrated in Figure 1. Figure 1 The system design of the wireless intelligent micrwave controllerStudents implemented the intelligent controller on FPGA and also developed IEEE 802.11communication functionality for remote control. The features of this team-based project are asfollows. • The project provides students with a great opportunity to obtain extensively hands-on experience to deal with
. Forassessment to be formative, facilitating feedback to students to nurture improvement such thatstudents will perform better in the future, the assessment tasks would have to be progressive /continuous. These tasks can be weekly short WebCT quizzes, fortnightly short reports, and shortwritten tests. Figure 2: Aligning Curriculum Objectives, Teaching and Learning Activities, and Assessment Tasks“If the curriculum is reflected in the assessment, …, the teaching activities of the teacher and the Page 13.111.7learning activities of the learner are both directed towards the same goal” [7]. To this end, wehave designed a system for teaching an
- munications. Dr. Talarico research interests include digital and mixed analog/digital integrated circuits and systems, computer-aided design methodologies, and design and analysis of embedded systems-on- chip.Dr. George D. Ricco, Gonzaga University George D. Ricco is the KEEN Program Coordinator at Gonzaga University in the School of Engineer- ing and Applied Science. He completed his doctorate in engineering education from Purdue University’s School of Engineering Education. Previously, he received an M.S. in earth and planetary sciences studying geospatial imaging, and an M.S. in physics studying high-pressure, high-temperature FT-IR spectroscopy in heavy water, both from the University of California, Santa Cruz. He
use, but not how to configurethem. Finally, as the students become more capable, the hardware design configuration optionsmay be left completely to the students.The PSoC, like many inexpensive microcontrollers, does not provide an address/data bus formemory expansion. In practice, designers of projects that require additional memory of one typeor another will choose parts with two-wire interfaces such as I2C or SPI. However, mostmicrocontroller systems courses include understanding memory bus timing and address decodingas course objectives. The case may be made that this portion of the curriculum may be moved toa digital systems course, as most low-cost microcontrollers do not include memory bussesanymore. However, if it is considered
the middle of the pack in the final standings.One disadvantage they felt that contributed to their lackluster finish was that many other teamshad some form of course that went along with the competition so the unskilled students couldobtain background knowledge and have structured time to work on the project instead of learningand creating everything on an extracurricular basis. With this in mind this robot-based studentorganization looked to use the course described in the paper as the first step at forming the 2015ASEE robot team as well as an opportunity to recruit and mentor many future organizationmembers. The remaining sections of this paper will describe the curriculum of this course,learning objectives, and the mentoring structure
, there isgreat latitude in the equipment choices that one can make. Equipment decisions can be madebased on the type of laboratory experiences desired. This particular type of concern becomessecondary when the equipment is donated.Laboratory experiences are used in academic curriculums to bring experiential learning tostudents. This type of learning emphasis practical application, i.e. learning to do by doing, and istherefore and example of an “Active Experimentation” learning style. There is a broad base ofresearch supporting this type of instructional model2, 3, 4, 5, 10, and 13. Page 12.1404.3Kolb 7 in his book on experiential learning model
interests are in integrating physical models with data driven approaches for information extraction using remote or minimally intrusive sensing. He has over 160 publications. He is Fellow of SPIE and the Academy of Arts and Sciences of Puerto Rico. Received the Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers award from the US President in 1997. He chairs the SPIE Conference on Algorithms, Technologies and Applications for Multispectral, and Hyperspectral Imaging. He is board member of the Inclusive Engineering Consortium (IEC).Dr. Shiny Abraham, Seattle University Shiny Abraham is an Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Seattle University. She received the B.E. degree in
Paper ID #6714Use of Flash Simulations to Enhance Nanotechnology EducationDr. Lifang Shih, Excelsior College Li-Fang Shih received her Ph.D. in curriculum and instruction with specialization in online instruction from the State University of New York at Albany. Dr. Shih is current the Associate Dean for the School of Business and Technology at Excelsior College. Her researches have focused on issues related to quality online instruction, outcome assessments, online communication, and the development of online commu- nity, etc. Her papers have been presented in national conferences such as American Education Research
Reality - Build and integrate the LAMPI UI for Microsoft HoloLens • Alexa - integrate Amazon Alexa into the lamp (including adding microphone and speaker) and create an Alexa Skill to control LAMPI • Google Home - integrate Google Home into the lamp (including adding microphone and speaker) and create a Google Home integration to control LAMPI • Building Enchanted Objects [28] for student campus life (weather, laundry, campus transportation) • Extend Locust.io, the tool used for HTTP load testing in the course, to load test MQTT • Build a light-based alarm clock with LAMPI • Build an SMS interface for LAMPI with Twilio • Build an IFTTT integration for LAMPIThe Final Project grading rubric has 4
” aspect of the education process. In addition, considering the complexity nature ofengineering disciplines themselves, teaching such subjects needs an integral approach. In thisholistic view, and for engaging students in engineering topics, other disciplines need to be calledand used to convey the course, namely mathematics and other sciences backed by technologicalrealities and advancements. This is a very similar approach to the science-technology-engineering-1 Thus, is the focus on the pedagogy of learning in this paper through the “learning moment” recording/recallingmathematics STEM curriculum program [1] launched by the U.S. Department of Education since2009 and which is expected to have a positive impact on U.S. economy providing much
contributing faster and bring greater value to their new organizations. The demand fornew engineers ready to “jump in” and tackle some of these RF technology breakthroughs is onlyincreasing.The Keysight RF Industry Ready Certification Program serves as a collaboration betweenindustry and universities to produce and recognize industry-ready engineers. This allowsindustry to hire with confidence knowing that the productivity of the new employee is assuredfrom day one. More than 40 universities around the globe have adopted and use this Program intheir curriculum. The panel will share different strategies they have created at their universitiesto embed hands-on engagement activities using Keysight solutions. This represents a newconcept of an industry
2006-459: SO YOU SURVIVED THE ABET VISIT… HOW TO CONTINUE ASUSTAINABLE ASSESSMENT EFFORTSandra Yost, University of Detroit Mercy Sandra A. Yost, P.E., Ph.D., is an Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering at the University of Detroit Mercy, where she teaches in the areas of control systems, digital and analog circuits and electronics, and design. She is currently serving on the ASEE Board of Directors as Chair, Zone II. Page 11.1134.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 So You Survived the ABET Visit… How to Continue a Sustainable Assessment
, teaching activities, and related pursuits include advanced electric power and energy generation, transmis- sion, and distribution system technologies; power electronics and control technologies (FACTS, HVDC, and MVDC systems); renewable energy systems and integration; smart grid technologies and applica- tions; and energy storage. Dr. Reed has over 27 years of combined industry and academic experience in the electric power and energy sector, including engineering, research & development, and executive man- agement positions throughout his career with the Consolidated Edison of New York, ABB Inc., Mitsubishi Electric Corp., and DNV-KEMA. He is an active member of the IEEE Power & Energy Society and the American
(i.e., inphase samples and quadraturesamples), the ADALM-PLUTO SDR platform by Analog Devices was used in this course due toits capabilities and compact form factor.IntroductionIn 2010, several of the authors of this paper presented an educational paradigm for teachingdigital communications via a hands-on approach using software defined radio (SDR)technology 1. At the time, SDR technology was only beginning to mature, the number of optionswere limited, access to the various features of the SDR platform was limited, and the cost of thehardware was relatively high (˜$2000USD). Based on this proposed paradigm, the authorspublished an undergraduate textbook that presented a curriculum for teaching hands-on digitalcommunications education using SDR
related IT tasks, (ii) operational aspects, (iii) overall user reception of this approachand also about (iv) the cost vs value considerations of this approach.With minor operational modifications, this approach can be applied as a generic model for manyengineering courses that have compute-intensive lab components. It’s a modular cloud-basedsolution that can be rapidly deployed to address specific course needs. We begin with a briefdescription of the Digital VLSI course, as a running example.Running Example – Digital VLSI CourseThe Digital VLSI course constitutes an important component in upper division electrical andcomputer engineering curriculum in VLSI (Very Large Scale Integration) and System-On-Chip(SoC) design. In addition to in-class
, the operating money had to comeout of the existing EWU budget (an internal relocation). Many on campus were furious and, ofcourse, the BSEE program had to be approved by faculty committees. The administration wasextremely supportive of the BSEE effort and in the end EWU faculty committees did approve thenew program. Luckily, the HECB created opportunities for “high demand” fields to receiveadditional funding. This resulted in three new department faculty positions. Therefore, internalrelocations were kept to a minimum.III. Curriculum DevelopmentThe most important step in the planning of the electrical engineering degree was, obviously, thecurriculum. Before getting down to the actual four year plan, the Department sought help fromits
students are recruited by theadjunct to work for his or her company.Like many institutions, the number of hours in UTC’s BSEE is capped by the state at 128.Further restrictions are added by the University which require 21 hours of general educationcourses (excluding math and science requirements that count towards the engineeringcurriculum). To make the most of the remaining hours in the presence of an ever expanding bodyof knowledge, power-related projects were integrated into the College’s two-semester seniordesign projects 5. Student projects include the design of a substation, a building-wide energymonitoring system, and a wind turbine suitable for third world countries. As a mechanism toextend education beyond the 128 hour limit, UTC is
2016, he has joined the Department of Electrical and Computer Engi- neering at University of California, Davis as a Lecturer with Potential Security of Employment (Teaching Professor). His teaching interests include circuit theory as well as analog, digital and RF electronic circuits and systems. His educational research interests include applying technology to design modern circuits courses and laboratories.Mr. Jun Ouyang, University of California, Davis Jun Ouyang received two bachelor degrees in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science from Univer- sity of California, Davis, CA, United States. He worked as an IT professional prior to his college years. He is currently a Master’s student at University of
, initiative, continuous learning, and ethics”(Electrical Engineering Self-Study Report, p. 23). “Softer” skills, such as networking and careerpreparation, are developed outside the major’s curriculum in extracurricular workshops,advising, or in ENGR 101, a freshman-level course called Introduction to Engineering(Electrical Engineering Self-Study Report, p. 23). This focused is echoed in the computerengineering and software engineering majors (Computer Engineering Self-Study Report;Software Engineering Self-Study Report). The documents across the software, computer, and electrical engineering majors discussthe need to produce engineers who are well-rounded; that is, students who will have “an abilityto design a system, component, or process to
the common exam questions to evaluateimprovement in student understanding.Methodologyi. Original course designThis course is offered in a 10-week, quarter-based institute. In the original outline of the course,the first eight weeks were primarily focused on working with microcontrollers and developingembedded systems using the C programming language. In the last two weeks, we introduced theinstruction set architecture and discussed microcontroller organization and assemblyprogramming. Since the majority of students had no experience with C prior to this course, thefirst two weeks were primarily dedicated to a quick ramp-up in C programming. Hands-on laband project work is an integral part of the course. There are weekly lab projects, except
as feedback. Lecture notes andreadings are posted in advance to allow efficient coverage of the theory and more time for in-class examples and assessment. In-class “board-work” using the document camera is scannedand placed on the class webpage. Electronic submission of homework and projects isencouraged, allowing students to make fewer trips to campus. Fourth, flexibility should beincorporated into the course syllabus. Most non-traditional students have outside commitmentssuch as work and family which require missing at least 1 class per semester. Allowing studentsto drop their worst exam, quiz, homework, etc., helps students overcome such absences. Finally,assessment needs to be an integral part of each course. Instructors need to
. ObjectivesThe objectives of this phase of the research project are to: • Team with several instructors in integrating this experimental project and lessons learned into engineering curriculum. • Demonstrate this experimental project and evaluate its effectiveness as an innovative engineering design for students. • In collaboration with industrial partners, evaluate and explore the possibility of commercialization upon demonstrated success. Page 11.1185.3 • Work with industrial partners and other academic collaborators, to constantly improve on the modeling and simulation system design, based on the evaluations of this
1980s an expensive 16-bit ADC had a samplerate of only about 100Ksps. This could only unambiguously sample a signal with a bandwidth of50kHz or less, which was fine for audio, but not for broadband signals, and certainly not fordirect conversion of RF signals. Application specific integrated circuits (ASIC) helped advancehardware digital radios in the 1980s and 90s, and helped to usher in the era of digital mobilephones [2]. Today, ADCs operating with tens of Msps are relatively inexpensive, and for muchsteeper price, several Gsps sampling rates are available. This modern DSP technology hasallowed the ubiquitous use of SDRs, which has reversed the role of digital receivers. Relativelyinexpensive SDRs can now be quickly programmed for an
writing will not necessarily improvewriting skills. The students find the assignments disconnected from the course content, anddo not have the knowledge to move into disciplinary writing. Teaching writing, however,takes time away from content instruction. To integrate writing into their curriculum,engineering professors need pedagogical models that provide writing support to studentswithout eliminating content instruction time. The writing studio model, developed byresearchers in the field of rhetoric and composition, provides an environment outside of theclassroom to support the students as they develop into disciplinary writers. Using a case studyapproach, the researchers analyze initial data from this pilot course. Students not onlypractice
and M. Gonzalez, "Integrating Control Concepts in an Embedded Systems Design Course," IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), pp. 1273-1278, 2013.[13] R. Streveler, K. Smith and M. Pilotte, "Aligning Course Content, Assessment, and Delivery: Creating a Context for Outcome-Based Education," in Outcome-Based Education and Engineering Curriculum: Evaluation, Assessment and Accreditation, K. Mohd Yusof, S. Mohammad, N. Ahmad Azli, M. Noor Hassan, A. Kosnin and S. K, Syed Yusof (Eds.)Hershey, Pennsylvania: IGI Global, 2012.[14] G. P. Wiggins and J. McTighe, Understanding by design, ASCD, 2010.[15] J. McTighe and R. S. Thomas, "Backward Design," Educational Leadership, 2005.[16] J. D. Bransford, A. L. Brown, R. R. Cocking and
October 15, 2013].5. C.D. Troy, R.R. Essig, et al., “Writing to Learn Engineering: Identifying Effective Techniques for the Integration of Written Communication into Engineering Classes and Curricula,” 121st ASEE Annual Conference, Indianapolis, 2014, Paper #10122. http://www.asee.org/public/conferences/32/papers/10122/download [Accessed December 31,2014].6. D. Russell, “American origins of the writing-across-the-curriculum movement,” In C. Bazerman, & D. Russell, Landmark essays on writing across the curriculum, pp. 3-22. Davis: Hermagoras Press. 1992.7. J. Bean, Engaging ideas: The professor's guide to integrating writing, critical thinking,and active learning in the classroom. San Francisco: Jossey
.7. Ressler, S.J. and Lenox, T.A., “Implementing an Integrated System for Program Assessment and Improvement”, Proceedings of the 1998 ASEE Annual Conference.8. Shaeiwitz, J.A., “Closing the Assessment Loop”, Proceedings of the 1998 ASEE Annual Conference.9. Addington, J.S. and Johnson, R.A., “Closing the Loop - An Assessment Strategy for ABET 2000”, Proceedings of the 2000 ASEE Southeast Section Conference.10. Addington, J.S., Johnson, R.A., and Livingston, D.L., “A Work in Progress - Updating and Maintaining an Effective Assessment Program under ABET Engineering Criteria 2000”, Proceedings of the 2002 ASEE Annual Conference.11. Menger, F., Quotation source: The Western Kentucky University Faculty Center for
curriculum. The positive impacts of these examples have stimulatedexciting discussions among ME students. (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) Figure 4. Electrical / Hydraulic Analogy Example: (a) Hydraulic Mechaical System, (b) Mechanical parameters; Torque/Angular velocity/Angle analogy, (c)concept of resistance and capacitance, (d) Mechanical Flow and restriction in flow,(e) Hydraulic system with flow branching, and (f) analogous electrical system with current node.IV. Results and DiscussionAn issue of “too abstract and not too visible” ECE content materials was often cited bynon-electrical engineering majors when pursuing an
, P.E., Univ. of Wisconsin-Platteville, Department of Electrical Engineering, Electrical Engineering Curriculum ChairMesut Muslu, University of Wisconsin, Platteville Professor, P.E., Univ. of Wisconsin-Platteville, Department of Electrical Engineering, Previous Electrical Engineering Chair Page 14.329.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Closing the Loop on AssessmentAbstractIn recent years we have noticed an increase in the number of students making fundamentalmistakes in upper-division electrical engineering (EE) courses. In addition, we have found thatsome students have