well-known lessons. For example, see Chickering1.Also, the Learning Pyramid from the National Training Laboratories, Bethel, ME emphasizes theimportance of hands-on experimentation.Guidelines for Course DevelopmentThe major results, somewhat obvious after the fact, were reflected in the objectives used inredesigning the course. These are:• A hands-on exercise in Matlab, Simulink or Excel should be included as part of class sessions.• Attempts should be made to have the exercise done BEFORE the material is explained. In this way, these were used to motivate the material rather than demonstrate the material after the fact.• Frequent opportunities for questions, discussions and interactions on the material should be
providestatistically significant outcomes. We ask for your participation in this study.The authors acknowledge support from the National Science Foundation through awardNSF0530588. Mr. Pitts and Mr. Teague would like to acknowledge support from a NationalScience Foundation REU award (NSF0631565) which enabled them to conduct the researchpresented in this paper. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressedin this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation. Page 12.588.8Bibliography1. Cheville, Alan, et al. Engineering Students for the 21st Century. 2006. 3 Dec 2006. .2
means to stop). Students developflowcharts to plan the control and timing structure of their program and then program theirrobots to respond reliably to their clap commands.Associated technical subdiscipline overviews: electronic design and microsystemsThe Light Sensor: The NXT light sensor is able to distinguish gray-scale light levels fromambient light or reflected from its self-generated light. A common use of the light sensor isto allow a robot to follow lines drawn on a surface. In this lab students learn how to use thelight sensor to follow a black figure drawn on a white surface. The initial algorithm modelsthe sensor as making binary black/white decisions, but in the final challenge students usesimple prediction and feedback from the
readily understandable to one “skilled in the art” – if 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 X1 course staff can’t understand, it isn’t clear. Appropriateness of content – lab notebook should not be a “blog” (i.e., not be a log of time 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 X1 spent in class or what you ate at a meeting, etc.) Update record – daily entries should be made as work is done (not days “after the fact”), and 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 X2 should reflect steady, consistent progress Weekly summaries – weekly entries should be a concise summary of the major accomplishments 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 X1 for the preceding Sunday – Saturday period Formatting – must use global style-sheet and prescribed page layout; also, use links
insists that the terminal voltage of the "We refuse tocircuit is 2V, while the right source insists that compromise."the same voltage is 3V. In Figure 2b, the upper (a) (b)source insists that the branch current is 10 mA, Page 13.293.2while the lower source insists that the same Figure 2: Impossible Source Combinationscurrent is 15 mA. Since ideal sources lack the ability to compromise, such cases either reflect atheoretical stalemate, or a situation in which at least one of the sources has to either becomenon-ideal or non-functional.The
% response rate to Q2.The data reflects the uneasiness that the students had on the teaching of Course A. Incomparison to the responses to the control Course B, the data seems to suggest that while thestudents do like the new teaching method, there are at the same time also many places that can beimproved.Combining both numerical assessment data and the open-ended question response, the SAI dataseems to suggest that the students indeed feel they are learning better in a more intentionallearning environment.In addition to SAI, we also conducted two sessions of SGA that are more specifically targeted onthe student learning experiences. In both responses, the students largely embrace the newteaching method in Course A with less than 10% of students
necessarily reflect the views of theNSF.References0 Eric Freudenthal, Mary K. Roy, Alexandria Ogrey, Sherri Terrell, Olga Kosheleva, Pilar Gonzalez, and Ann Gates, Work in Progress - Initial Evaluation of an Introductory Course in Programming that Assists in Career Choices, Proc Frontiers in Education, 2008.1 Design Process for a Non-Majors Computing Course, Proc.36th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE), ACM, 2005.2 Mark Guzdial, Narrating Data Structures: The Role of Context in CS2, The Journal of Educational Resources in Computing (JERIC), ACM, 2008.3 David Hestenes, Malcolm Wells, and Gregg Swackhamer, Force Concept Inventory, The Physics Teacher, Vol. 30, March 1992, 141-158.4 Dan
they also mustlearn to control a complex system containing sensors, end-effectors, and pneumatic subsystems,all contained on a mobile robot that must be able to both respond to the operator’s control andoperate autonomously.As noted above, this method of outreach, challenge, and inspiration has proven to be successfulwith measurable increases in the numbers of students entering related disciplines in college. Inaddition, the percentages of minorities entering into engineering reflect the percentages of FIRSTalumni entering engineering as well. Women are more than 16 times as likely to enter intoengineering (33% versus the national average of 2%) , African Americans are more than 5 timesas likely to enter into engineering (27% versus 5%), and
Page 14.175.7As seen in Table 3 above, at Drexel University, the ECE curriculum provides a certain level offlexibility in the selection of courses to fulfill B.Sc requirements. This table reflects the five yearversion which is taken by the majority of students. With respect to where the emulator fits, onefinds a few options: a) as an experimental component module of the sequence of lab courses thatrun from Years 3-5; b) as an experimental module within one of two junior (Year 4) level powerengineering courses called ECEP354 Energy Management Systems and c) as a experimentalmodule within the second quarter of the three course sequence in Power Systems (ECEP401, 402and 403) offered to all power engineering majors. The next section provides
asa group of critical friends and provides constructive advice on how to improve implementation of Page 14.696.5the program, keeping in mind the purposes of the original award: to increase the quality and quantity of under-represented minorities who earn degrees in science and engineering. Recommendations from the committee have positively impacted the program and the university. Based on the positive influence and recommendations of the committee, the School of Engineering adopted its own student advisory board to reflect student concerns. The School then went to the next level and developed a strategic partnership with some of the
videostreams, automated inspection of semiconductor chips finding the boundaries of organs inmedical images, etc.The designed system used many of the software components available in the reference designsprovided by Xilinx. Some of these components need to be modified to take advantage of the IPcores available in the current version of the EDK These modification included the use ofUARTlite, the generation of addresses to connect the UARTlite to the PowerPC 405, and tomodify the microprocessor software specification (MSS) to reflect the use of the UARTlite. AScreen shot of the original image is shown in Figure 1. The detected edges are shown in figures2-4.Figure 1 – Original image Figure 2 – edges using Sobel method
LCD, seven segment display and accelerometer boards. Fabricated together, then split apart.Course and lab scheduleAfter adopting the HC08 we had to modify both labs and lectures to reflect the host ofdifferences between the MPU types; both the MPU and the I/O boards were different comparedwith the HC12 demo board. Laboratory exercises were particularly in need of revision. Wemaintain our overall course objectives while taking advantage of some of the additional I/Ofeatures we have on our homemade boards. Even though many of the labs are introductions tovarious topics, the ability to apply the software to the application specific boards has changed thenature of the lab experience a bit and made the use of
example,according to an electromagnetic signal attenuation test performed at the U.S. National Institute ofStandards and Technology (NIST)’s Gaithersburg laboratories, the signal attenuation for ½ inchdrywall and plywood is below 1dB around 2GHz frequency band.10 However, if a house is builtusing steel frames or with a concrete structure (e.g., high-rise apartment buildings and hurricane-resistant houses), the 802.15.4 transmission performance is expected to experience greaterdegradation by the house structure than from the nearby wireless signal interference, especiallywhen the 802.15.4 signal needs to be transmitted over a long range and pass through walls. Thisis because steel frames partly reflect radio signals and create multipath
lectures in ECE3183 helps me conduct experiments involtage and current measurement”, “the lectures in ECE3183 helps me conduct LabViewexperiments in resistance measurement”, “the lectures in ECE3183 helps me conduct straingauge analysis”, “the schedule coordination between ECE3183 and ME3701 is reasonable”.Possible open-ended questions are “any other help that I get from the coordination of ECE3183and ME3701”, “suggestions for improvement”.For a small number of ME students who have taken ME3701 before, they will only participate inthe exit interview as a group. The purpose of such an in-person interview is to collect the mostauthentic data that reflects the student perspective about the class. Because it is quite time-consuming, the subjects
Ergodicity Karhunen-Loeve expansion Power spectral density 4. Analysis and Processing of Response of linear systems to random signals Random Signals Optimum linear systemsMany graduate students do not like this course, because the content is difficult and the classesare boring. This has been reflected by historically low student evaluation. Students usuallyavoid taking this course, unless their academic advisors force them to take it.2.2 Improvement ApproachThe approach to improving the teaching and learning effectiveness of ECE8803 is to designapplication-oriented computer projects with four objectives: to help students
Department Chair Senior Reflection Advisory Council Faculty Reviews Alumni Surveys Administration Program Faculty Other Program Dean objective Improvement Evaluation
, the voltage across the resistor R2 is calculated as: (100𝐾) ∗ (5𝑉) 𝑉2 = = 4.16 𝑉 120𝐾The measured value was 4.088 V, which is about 1.7 percent deviation from the calculated value.The students were asked to reflect on the differences between the measured voltage and thecalculated one, and to give reasons for the discrepancy between the measured and calculatedvoltage. The measurements made by the students allowed them to have a deeper understandingof the Voltage divider rule. (a) (b)Figure 4: (a) Resistive Circuit (b) Voltmeter Readings of the
theUniversity of Texas at San Antonio, funded and supported by National Science Foundation(#1525345).References[1] F. Martin and J. C. Whitmer, "Applying learning analytics to investigate timed release in online learning," Technology, Knowledge and Learning, vol. 21, pp. 59-74, 2016.[2] J. Mott, "Envisioning the post-LMS era: The open learning network," Educause Quarterly, vol. 33, pp. 1-9, 2010.[3] Y. Xie, F. Ke, and P. Sharma, "The effect of peer feedback for blogging on college students' reflective learning processes," The Internet and Higher Education, vol. 11, pp. 18-25, 2008.[4] P. Black, C. Harrison, C. Lee, B. Marshall, and D. Wiliam, "Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the
our undergraduate students who plan to take thecourse discussed in this paper as an elective.The main goals of the course are (1) to teach students the fundamental concepts in the 4 areasmentioned before and (2) to clearly illustrate the way in which advanced FPGA-based systemsare designed on PYNQ platform, using computer aided design (CAD) tools. During the lecturesession of the course, the first 90 minutes are used to present the theory materials in the form ofpower-point slides and journal articles to not only reflect the current trends in FPGA-basedembedded system design but also enforce the basic concepts needed by the engineering and thecomputer science students. During the remaining 90 minutes of the lecture session, students
andretaining a workforce that reflects the gender and racial diversity of the Nation. At the sametime, the evolution of the industry is also creating a number of new workforce opportunities,including jobs in renewable energy, natural gas, and information and communicationstechnology (ICT) [7]. The second edition of the U.S. Energy and Employment Report(USEER) published in January 2017 reported that about 862,000 people are employed injobs related to electric power generation [8].In recent years, various efforts [9]- [13] have explored how to incorporate Smart Grid topicsinto the engineering curricula however many of these proposed curricula have focused onmodifications of current electrical engineering courses. Supported by a grant from the
level of agreement onwhether the session changed their perception of ECE, and the corresponding responses areshown in Figure 1.d. It can be observed that 80 percent of the respondents indicated a change inperception, while 20 percent didn’t. Of the two respondents who stated that the IoT sessiondidn’t change their perception of ECE, one was a student who maintained an interest in ECEafter the session. Responses to survey questions #5 and #6 are shown in Figures 1.e and 1.f, and they reflect theimpact of the IoT session on the respondents’ enhanced interest of ECE, and their motivation tostrongly consider it as a choice of engineering discipline. It can be observed that 80 percent ofthe respondents indicated an enhanced interest in ECE, and 60
criteria [7, 8, 9], the changes overall reflect the need to keep the criteria relevant andrealistic [10]. It is important to note that the Engineering Technology Accreditation Commission(ETAC) has also made changes to Criteria 3, 5, and 6. These changes go into effect during the2019-2020 accreditation cycle [11].The revised EAC general criteria is helpful as it includes several concise definitions [12]: - Basic Sciences: Consist of chemistry, physics, and other natural sciences including life, earth, and space. - College-level Mathematics: Consist of mathematical topics that require a degree of sophistication, such as calculus, differential equations, probability, statistics, linear algebra, and discrete mathematics
), such as “Explain the advantages anddisadvantages of using linked lists over arrays.”DiscussionTo summarize the evolution of assessments in the course, the challenges, lessons learned andmotivation for improvement in each phase is listed in Table 1. These reflected the experience ofthe course staff throughout the changes. However, it would be valuable to look at this processfrom the students’ perspective. To understand students’ perception on quizzes and exams, weanalyze the results of the end of course evaluation. In particular, there are two questions regardingfairness of assessment contents and fairness of assessment grading. In order to study the overalltrend, we collected six semesters of data from the fall of 2015 to the spring of 2018
improvement compared to technical skills.Students’ abilities to design, implement and test digital systems has improved to “Good andExcellent” by 14%-54% while “communication skills” did not reflect any improvement.Students felt more confident in their ability to design, test and implement digital systems at theend of the semester and hesitated to confirm advancement in their communication skills. Table 2: learning outcomes Pre and Post survey results Somewhat Not Sure
and the Maker Movement(Halverson & Sheridan, 2014; Jordan & Lande, 2016; Larson, Lande, Jordan, & Weiner,2017; Weiner, Lande, & Jordan, 2017; Wigner, Lande, & Jordan, 2016).Like Differentiated Instruction (DI), Project-Based Learning (PBL) is also used as astudent-centered and student-driven approach which enables teachers to help studentsmeet their learning needs (Miller, 2012). Miller (2012) proposes six strategies forDifferentiated Instruction in Project-Based Learning; (1) differentiate through teams:structuring teams is important as it helps teachers facilitate the teams through instructionbased on their needs, (2) reflection and goal setting: an important part of PBL is reflectionas it helps students know their
learn about functions, procedures and test-benches. Theyspecifically develop a test-bench to verify the 4-bit ripple carry adder functionality using the ripplecarry design (and its associated full adder module) that they developed in lab 2. This latter lab isimportant because it allows the students to reflect back on a previous lab exercise and enables thereinforcement of previously acquired knowledge. In all of the above mentioned labs, the studentsnot only simulate the design, but also synthesize and implement the design, generate the bit stream,and download it onto the board in order to demonstrate its functionalities.The second laboratory module also consists of four structured labs starting with lab 5. This modulefocuses on sequential
the proposed course model was reflected intheir final course evaluation administered towards the end of the semester. Samples of theseresponses are as follows:“I loved the examples and class work. Definitely made the content more understandable.”“I liked best in this course the in-class homework where the instructor was there to answerquestions this helped me understand the concepts a lot better.”ConclusionsIn this paper, a novel hybrid lecture-based/problem-based classroom model for acceleratedsummer courses was presented. A typical summer teaching week using this model consists offive 2-hours lectures, two 2-hours classwork sessions, and two 2-hours lab, with classwork andlab sessions offered in an alternating fashion. The classwork
1734 $o&! WBYZ 6289 n%pqT4 $BCD W234 6%&! nXYZ A789 1opq* Time 0 represents member’s original teams. Each team at any given time point after Time 0was composed of three original or “core” members and one guest member. No team had morethan one guest member from the same team throughout the duration of the course. The onlyindividuals a member had contact with on more than one occasion were those individuals whowere apart of that member’s core team.Materials All scales were framed in order to have members reflect on the most recent project theycompleted with that specific team, whether it be the members home team or a guest team.Behavioral integration
distinct from sex. Connellnotes that gender is not a supposedly biologically-obvious division between men and women, butinstead the way human society collectively makes relevant these reproductive distinctions Page 26.1007.5between human bodies in a social context. For us, the context is engineering education. In its simplest form, gender reflects the set of characteristics, behaviors, and practices that we think ofas “feminine” or “masculine” – characteristics that any individual biological male or female mayor may not embody.Race, like gender, is not a biological category but a social one. And unlike sex, race has nobiological basis, despite a
shows the current short-time spectrum of the input signal. If the input signal isthe chirp signal, for example, the display will show a spike that slowly moves to the right as thefrequency of the chirp signal increases. If the input signal is music, the graph continuouslychanges to reflect the current sounds, which is interesting to watch. Page 26.1306.7 Figure 6: Close-up of Display for FFTThe demonstration program was based on a publically available example program that initializesthe board and the codec, and sets up an efficient double buffering scheme using the directmemory access (DMA) controller27. The