UniversityDr. Annmarie Ward c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Hands-On Knowledge on Cybersecurity with a Self-Learning KitAbstractThere is an exponential growth in the number of cyber-attack incidents resulting in significantfinancial loss and national security concerns. Secure cyberspace has been designated as one ofthe National Academy of Engineering (NAE) Grand Challenges in engineering. Broadly, thesecurity threats are targeted on software programs, operating system and network with theintention to launch confidentiality, integrity and availability violations. Existing undergraduateand graduate-level cybersecurity education curriculum rely primarily on didactic teachingmethods with little focus
of the ASEE and IEEE.Dr. Jeffrey E. Froyd, Texas A&M University Dr. Jeffrey E. Froyd is a TEES Research Professor in the Office of Engineering Academic and Student Affairs at Texas A&M University, College Station. He received the B.S. degree in mathematics from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. He was an Assistant Professor, Associate Professor, and Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. At Rose-Hulman, he co-created the Integrated, First-Year Curriculum in Science, Engineering and Mathematics, which was recognized in 1997 with a Hesburgh Award
. Learning in one area supports learning in another.”The study also calls the labs a missed opportunity and states that3: “…[The labs] can be more effectively used in the curriculum to support integration and synthesis of knowledge, development of persistence, skills in formulating and solving problems, and skills of collaboration. Design projects offer opportunities to approximate professional practice, with its concerns for social implications; integrate and synthesize knowledge; and develop skills of persistence, creativity, and teamwork.” Our work is motivated by the study. Instead of treating the labs as the adjuncts that followthe learning of the theories and presenting them in a limited “component context,” we use
students at Rochester Institute of Technology and broughtthem very well up to speed which resulted in successful research (publications in top-tierelectrical and computer engineering IEEE Transactions journals for the case study of side-channel analysis attacks and reliability).We have had the following goals in such integration: (a) Exposing the challenges of deeply-embedded system security education; (b) Hardware and software secure system co-design teaching and research integration (in previous work, theory and practice are combined for such purpose: A co-design course applying symmetric key ciphers has been presented6, a helicopter-like robot motion control has been implemented7, and co-design as an emerging discipline in
changes to the department curriculum and course structures,departmental interactions and community-building efforts, departmental mentoring efforts,student recruitment, department recruiting efforts, and departmental partnerships withcommunity colleges.Due to the overlapping nature of the individual program goals and the department’s efforts tocreate broad change, adhering to the Program Evaluation Standards of utility, feasibility,propriety, and accuracy (Yarbrough et al., 2011) necessitated taking a comprehensive evaluationapproach. This approach would enable an understanding of not just individual programs, but alsoallow us to gain an understanding of the ways in which the department was, and was not,changing as a whole.Researchers have noted
from data collected at the mastery levelwill generate sets of action items which feedback to the program for improvement. Even withdata collected only at the mastery level, for instance at a large university, the amount of datacollected will still be an issue for a timely evaluation. Figure 3 shows a commonly used processof how the GR assessment model is implemented [9, 15]. Figure 2: Sample curriculum outcomes-mapping matrix Figure 3: The GR assessment processSince there are vast amounts of data collected even for the mastery level courses, a sample ofdata, 10% for example, are actually being assessed by an independent multi-rater team. Theindependent raters are in general selected to be
curriculum that can be used to practice deepconceptual learning and the higher stages of Bloom’s Taxonomy, therefore improving theirretention, application, and creative problem solving. A narrative arc is defined here as a student’sability to form a cohesive net of concepts, reasonings, and relationships that can be explainedwithout using formulae as a crutch. While being able to apply and understand mathematicalformulae is an invaluable tool for students, too often courses rely solely on the evaluation of themathematical formulae related to concepts instead of emphasizing the conceptual definitions andrelationships. This imbalance results in students being weak in the areas of explaining why andhow things happen using words and unable to formulate
Paper ID #25610Board 66: Work in Progress: Integrating Differentiated Instruction and Project-Based Learning to Teach Embedded SystemsDr. Sohum A Sohoni, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Dr. Sohoni is an Assistant Professor in Engineering at the Polytechnic School at Arizona State University. Prior to joining ASU, he was an Assistant Professor at Oklahoma State University. His research inter- ests are broadly in the areas of computer architecture and performance analysis, and in engineering and computing education. He has published in ACM SIGMETRICS, IEEE Transactions on Computers, the International Journal of
/layout designer, integrating sophisticated security/cryptographic capabilities into a single accelerated processing unit. In 2012, he joined the Electrical Engineering Department, Princeton University, New Jersey, as an NSERC post-doctoral research fellow, having the pleasure of working with Prof. Niraj K. Jha. Currently, he is with the Department of Electrical and Microelectronic Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY. His current research interests include emerging security/privacy measures for deeply em- bedded systems, cryptographic hardware systems, fault diagnosis and tolerance in cryptographic hard- ware, VLSI reliability, and low-power secure and efficient FPGA and ASIC designs
first module coversMEMS / NEMS devices / sensors with applications. Module I course outcomes, lecturetopics and sample course project titles are outlined in Tables 2, 3 and 4 respectively. Table 2: Module I Course Outcomes Module I - Upon successful completion of the course, students should be able to: 1. Learn the features of the smart materials from nanoscale microscales [a] 2. Apply both types of materials into MEMS/NEMS [c, e] 3. Design for integrated sensor systems [c] Table 3: Module I Lecture Topics Module I - Lecture Topics No. of Lectures 1. An overview on semiconductors and nanomaterials 1 lecture 2
the engineeringprofession.3. Breaking Stovepipes and Interweaving Anchoring Concepts Through Knowledge IntegrationPedagogically, students’ lack of perceived utility and low self-efficacy can be attributed to thelack of threads throughout the curriculum that weave foundational concepts and the creativityand professional aspects of engineering throughout the curriculum. This is particularly true forthe sophomores and juniors that are asked to comprehend complex subjects such as electronics,signals and systems, and electromagnetics, in isolation. Knowledge integration (KI) acrossdifferent core competency areas will become an essential piece in the curriculum to weavetogether anchoring concepts from different subject contents to make learning
we seek to addressare: ● How does integration of project-based lab and lecture contribute to students’ perceptions of value, motivation and success? ● How does integration of project-based lab and lecture contribute to instructors’ perceptions of value and motivation to modernize instruction?In this paper we discuss the historical approach to the design of the course, which we discoveredwas from the early 1980s, the time of the last major curriculum revision. In addition, using theMUSIC Model of Academic Motivation together with course data, we present baseline data fromcurrent students and instructors in regards to overall performance. Finally, using the MUSICModel and course data from instructors and students in
Paper ID #30981Integration of C programming and IoT in a Raspberry Pi Controlled RobotCar in a Freshmen/Sophomore Engineering Core ClassDr. Shaghayegh Abbasi, University of San Diego Shaghayegh Abbasi received her Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from University of Washington in 2011. In her thesis, titled ’Integrating top-down and bottom-up nanomanufacturing: Controlling the growth and composition of seeded nanostructures’, an innovative nanomanufacturing method is explored and optimized. Upon graduation, she started her career as Senior System Design Engineer at Lumedyne Technologies. She worked on design, simulation, and
Paper ID #17044Developing a Creative K-12 Manipulative: An ECECS CapstoneDr. Mike Borowczak, Erebus Labs Mike is the chief scientist and founder of Erebus Labs - a Hardware Security and Engineering Outreach company located in Laramie, WY. He is also the Senior Data Scientist at a recently acquired startup. He has worked with university faculty to promote and extend K20 STEM outreach in Ohio, Oregon, Texas and Wyoming. He also has over a decade of industry and research experience - mostly revolving around the semiconductor and bio-informatics industries - with specific experience at Texas Instruments, Intel and
workforce; and does not directly promote diversity.At UM, we have completed exploratory studies through focus groups with undergraduateengineering students and analysis of student transcripts, as well as a review of curriculuminnovations implemented at other institutions. These suggest the importance of both (1)providing students with an early integrative foundation to allow them to make informeddecisions in choosing an engineering discipline and to effectively navigate through their degreeprogram and (2) offering more complex, hands-on experiences that are aligned with solvinghigh-impact problems. Introducing these changes in the curriculum is expected to both providestudents with the tools needed to address tomorrow’s cross-disciplinary global
background drove the identification of an infraredand software systems development process. During (IR) proximity sensor (i.e., λ = 870 ±70 nm).the early stage of the project, students defined Electrical engineering knowledge is utilized torequirements to accurately indicate the vehicle’s design and implement a system using the Raspberrylocation relative to any in path obstacles, whether Pi 2B single board computer, the I/O ports and itsstatic or dynamic and their position relative to integrate functional capability within two remote-fabricated road, lane markers, and edge boundaries. controlled (RC) vehicles. Upon incorporating designStudents pressed forward to present and validate
the Analog Discovery Board helped them learn. An increase of studentsexpressing interest in graduate programs and research was also noted [6].Expanding on the LiaB and Mobile Studio concept, we wanted to investigate the feasibility ofimplementing a similar structure at West Virginia University. What difficulties must beovercome with integrating into existing infrastructure? What resources are best situated for theuse of the TA? What effects does this method have on student learning outcomes? How dostudents’ respond to this approach?WVU LiaB SetupThe setup chosen for this pilot investigation included: Digilent Analog Discovery 2 Board, BNCAdapter Board, BNC Oscilloscope x1/x10 Probes (Pair), Shielded USB cable, and WaveForms2015 software [14
learn in class. This paper introduces a software based educational tool designed to be used in introductoryrobotics courses. The software simulates the geometry of motion (kinematics) of any multilinkindustrial robotic arm and is to be used in place of or along with an actual robotic arm. Thestudents can use this tool to support their learning much the same way they use an actual roboticarm. The tool includes an integrated development environment that models the environments thattypically included with robotics packages. This tool allows the student to input the characteristicsof the arm they wish to program allowing the student to program any type of arm they wish. Thistool provides a low cost solution to situations where purchasing
Systems Firmware Development. Her current interests include recruitment and retention of under-represented students in STEM, integrative training for graduate teaching assistants, and curriculum innovation for introductory programming courses. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020Not standing at the same starting line - investigation of prior programmingexperience on student performance in an introductory programming course in ECEAbstractThere have been a good number of studies on computer preparedness of incoming engineeringstudents, but majority of them focus on simply having access to computers. As personalcomputers are becoming more and more prevalent, this
; advances in its enabling technologies. This includes miniaturization of devices,low-cost and high-speed networking and communication, and the rise of cloud computing anddata analytics5. In the realm of ECE education, IoT is an ideal platform that encompasseshardware and software design, along with a systems integration approach. The traditionalundergraduate ECE curriculum may include core or elective courses that introduce students tovarious enabling technologies of IoT, such as data acquisition, computer networks, wirelesscommunication, embedded system design, and digital signal processing, among many others.This provides an opportunity to leverage existing courses in order to incorporate aspects ofconnectivity and remote monitoring in
graduating from the United States Air Force Academy(USAFA). In 2010 there were 28 graduates. In 2020 there were 15 ECE graduates. This declineis not necessarily unique to USAFA. The United States saw only 10% of the global science,technology, engineering, and math (STEM) bachelor’s degrees in 2018 [1]. About half ofstudents who enter a STEM program do not graduate with a STEM degree; most of thesestudents drop out during their first or second year of college due to the increasing difficulty andcomplexity of STEM programs [2], [3], [4]. To motivate and engage students, undergraduateeducators must design a curriculum that integrates hands-on learning early in the program that isrelevant and can provide students a sense of ownership of their educations
hardware. For the Fall 2015semester, the class was transformed to utilize microprocessors and focus on hardware limitations.The transformation was done for primarily two reasons. 1) To advance the course’s curriculum.2) Improve student retention.Every day we interact with and are surrounded by embedded systems. From cars to microwaves,they have become an integral part of everyday life. It’s no surprise then that the area ofembedded system design has grown tremendously in the past few years [1]. More graduates areworking with microprocessors as a result of the growing embedded systems field and wouldbenefit from working with them and coding during their undergraduate coursework. Therefore, itwas decided that the courses’ new focus would be centered
Paper ID #13650A Hybrid Approach to a Flipped Classroom for an Introductory CircuitsCourse for all Engineering MajorsDr. Steven G Northrup, Western New England University Dr. Steven G. Northrup, an Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Western New England University, earned a BSEE from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, and an MSEE & Ph.D. from Vanderbilt University. Before attending Vanderbilt University, he worked in the defense industry in Whites Sands, NM and in the automotive electronics industry designing climate control systems for Ford Motor Company. At Western New England University
Suwon in 1994. Since 1999, he is with Howard University. Dr. Kim’s research interests include energy systems, fault detec- tion and anticipation, embedded computing, safety-critical computer systems, and intelligent systems application. Dr. Kim is active in practicing experiential learning in engineering education with personal instrumentation such as mobile studio.Dr. Otsebele E. Nare, Hampton University Otsebele Nare is an Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering at Hampton University, VA. He received his electrical engineering doctorate from Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD, in 2005. His research interests include System-Level Synthesis Techniques, Microgrids, and K-16 Integrative STEM education.Dr
Engineering Curriculum for HBCUs”. The project advances a process which willcreate a sustainable “HBCU Engineering Network” that is focused on the development,implementation, and expansion of an Experimental Centric-based instructional pedagogy inengineering curricula used in these HBCUs.The goal of the project was to increase the number of highly qualified and prepared AfricanAmerican engineers, and all students, to have a better understanding of technology and its role inSTEM education and the policy associated with it. Another key goal for the grant is to promotewide spread dissemination of portable hands-on mobile devices through proactive collaborationbetween educational institutions and industry partners. Collaborating partners are each
addition, integrating research into undergraduate courses allow them to conduct more meaningfulcase studies with realistic parameters, which familiarize them with the types of problems they shoulddeal with in their future career, while exercising the skills developed in the class. This approach alsoprovides an opportunity for those students who are interested to go beyond the course basics and attain amore advance knowledge about the materials thought in the class. Thus, herein, we propose ahierarchical Learner Capstone Panel (LCP) approach, which can benefit students with differentknowledge and interest levels and help them to improve their creativity and problem-solving skills.1.2 Essential Research Mechanisms for Undergraduate to Learn In
undergraduate Electrical Engineering students’ conceptual understanding of various topics in courses related to the fields of Signals and Systems and Electronics. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Work in Progress: Trending mistakes in Signals and Systems coursesAbstractSignals and Systems is a core course in undergraduate electrical engineering curriculum. Theconcepts taught in this course become foundational knowledge for many advanced courses,which necessitates conceptual understanding of the topics in this course. Despite many attemptsto make this course easy to understand for students, its conceptual understanding remains achallenge. The objective of this study is to identify students
level engineering courses and designing and enhancing curriculum to increase engagement and student motivation. Her interests within engineering education include inno- vative teaching pedagogies for improved retention, specifically focused on women and underrepresented minorities.Dr. Lindy Hamilton Mayled, Arizona State University Lindy Hamilton Mayled is the Director of Instructional Effectiveness for the Fulton Schools of Engineer- ing at Arizona State University. She has a PhD in Psychology of Learning, Education, and Technology from Grand Canyon University. Her research and areas of interest are in improving educational outcomes for STEM students through the integration of active learning and technology-enabled
complete the entire curriculum (expected in Spring 2023), the summative levelassessment can evaluate the overall effectiveness of the vertical integration of CPS/IoT. At thattime, through the analysis of the amount of CPS/IoT materials implemented in respectivecourses, number of students participated, grades, graduation rates, and specific aspects of projectactivities, how successful the CPS/IoT infusion could improve student learning and motivate thestudents to pursue advanced studies and careers in CPS/IoT areas will be revealed.Conclusions and future workThis paper presents an on-going effort that enhances undergraduate training in EE programthrough curriculum integration of CPS/IoT and improves the presentation of minorities in high-demand
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Paper ID #17030Dr. Otsebele E Nare, Hampton University Otsebele Nare is an Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering at Hampton University, VA. He received his electrical engineering doctorate from Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD, in 2005. His research interests include System-Level Synthesis Techniques, Microgrids, and K-16 Integrative STEM education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Growing Experimental Centric Learning: The Role of Setting and Instructional Use in Building Student OutcomesAbstract