Conference Session

Engineering Design Graphics Division Technical Session 3 - Spatial Visualization Topics

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lelli Van Den Einde, University of California, San Diego; Nathan Delson, University of California, San Diego; Elizabeth Rose Cowan, Spatial Vis & Spatial Kids

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

gateway to computer-based technology,” Journal Special Education Technology, Vol. 12(3), pp. 195–206. 1994.[12] S. Sorby, “Educational research in developing 3-D spatial skills for engineering students”. International Journal of Science Education. Vol 31(3), pp 459-80, Feb. 2009.[13] S. Sorby, “Spatial Skills Training to Improve Student Success in Engineering,” 2012 Specialist Meeting—Spatial Thinking Across the College Curriculum, pp. 1– 4, 2012.[14] A. Bandura, Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, Vol. 84(2), pp. 191-215. 1977.[15] A. Bandura, Self Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman. 1997.[16] “Teaching Tip Sheet: Self-Efficacy”, American Psychological Association

Conference Session

Something New??? within Engineering Design Graphics Education

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Timothy Daniel Kostar, Daniel Webster College; John Glossner, Daniel Webster College; Linda Marquis, Daniel Webster College; Nicholas Bertozzi, Daniel Webster College

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

Conference Session

Pedagogy and Learning Within Engineering Design Graphics II

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Luz Adriana Amaya-Bower, Central Connecticut State University; Steven Joseph Kirstukas, Central Connecticut State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

continue to be used in some sections of the CAD class andcompared with the full flipped classroom. The authors will review the videos with fresh eyes andenhance them as appropriate. The goal is to retain the ease of tutorial creation without affectingexercise and exam performance.The authors will create more uniform grading criteria between instructors to evaluate andcompare the results from the video-only cohort and the flipped cohort.References[1] Litzinger T. A., Lattuca L. R., Hadgraft R. G. Newstetter W. C. Engineering Education and the Development of Expertise. Journal of Engineering Education January 2011; 100: 123-150.[2] Albanese M. A., Mitchell S. Problem-Based learning: A Review of Literature on its Outcomes and Implementation

Conference Session

Graphics and Visualization

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jon Duff, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

crossroad. Will data visualizationremain the provenance of an elite few or will structures and approaches arise to distribute itsfunctionality to those who can best make use of its potential? It is the modern equivalent of the1990’s centralized versus decentralized computing conflict. As with most digital technologies, itis not a question of if current visualization activities are introduced into the day-to-day activitiesof technical curricula, only the matter of when and how. It has been a general practice to implement visualization technologies in a centralized anddedicated “center,” a facility separated physically, intellectually, and pedagogically fromacademic enterprises that might use it best. The centers sampled in this study ran the

Conference Session

Visualization tools and uses in graphics

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Thomas Delahunty, University of Limerick; Niall Seery, University of Limerick; Raymond Lynch Dr., University of Limerick; Diarmaid Lane, University of Limerick

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

Cognition: Theory, Research and Applications1992, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.4. Lane, D., N. Seery, and S. Gordon, The Intermediate Role of the Visuo-Spatial Sketchpad in Developing Sketching Expertise, in EDGD 66th Midyear Meeting2012: Galveston, TX. p. 79-91.5. Reisberg, D. and F. Heuer, Visuospatial Images, in The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking, P. Shah and A. Miyake, Editors. 2005, Cambridge University Press: New York.6. Fish, J. and S. Scrivener, Amplifying the Mind's Eye: Sketching and Visual Cognition. Leonardo, 1990. 23(1): p. 117-126.7. Humphreys, G.W. and V. Bruce, Visual Cognition: Computational, Experimental and Neuropsychological Perspectives1989, London

Conference Session

Spatial Visualization

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Diarmaid Lane, University of Limerick; AJ Hamlin, Michigan Technological University; Norma L. Veurink, Michigan Technological University; Niall Seery, University of Limerick

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

., External Representations Contribute to the Dynamic Construction of Ideas in Diagrammatic Representation and Inference, M. Hegarty, Meyer, B., Narayanan, N.H., Editor. 2002, Springer Berlin / Heidelberg. p. 341-343.3. Suwa, M., Tversky, B. How do designers shift their focus of attention in their own sketches? in Papers from the AAAI-97 Fall Symposium. 1997: AAAI Press.4. Fish, J., Scrivener, S., Amplifying the Mind's Eye: Sketching and Visual Cognition. Leonardo, 1990. 23(1): p. 117-126.5. Deregowski, J.B., Illusions, Patterns and Pictures. 1970, New York: Academic Press.6. Storer, I., Reflecting on professional practice : capturing an industrial designer's expertise to support the development of the

Conference Session

Assessment in Graphics Education

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary A. Sadowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Judith A. Birchman, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Brandon Xavier Karcher, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

course of theirsearch. An additional question asked—Did your parent(s) or guardians(s) assist you in your Page 25.1341.9search for a college? —to which, 74.0 percent (77.0 percent previous) responded “yes.” Whenasked to indicate all of the methods they used to search, the replies indicated that it waspredominantly the Internet, 90.0 percent (82.0 percent previous); followed by campus visits, 74.0percent (72.0 percent previous); and printed materials, 42.0 percent (67.0 percent previous). Thetop three choices remained the same although printed materials ranked lower than on theprevious survey. Answer

Conference Session

Design and Graphics Potpourri

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Holly K. Ault, Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

these systems and solving as an entire system, the parametric adjustability of the sketches can also be easily calculated on the fly... The operation of these systems does require highly robust equations and smart thinking when defining relations by the user. It also requires that systems are neither under nor over defined for the system to come to a solution. This was a problem initially when setting up the relations on my chair back cutout. However by studying the system and thinking of each entities individual DOF‟s, it is often easy to find the over defining relation.”For the solid modeling portion of the project, students were enthused with the opportunity to becreative and come up with their own original designs

Conference Session

Innovative Techniques in Graphics

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James Sherwood, University of Massachusetts-Lowell; Peter Avitabile, University of Massachusetts-Lowell

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

digits of your student ID number to determine what dimensions you should use for your individual design (see Table 1). Table 1. Dimensions based on student ID number SIDN1 X (in.) SIDN2 Y (in.) SIDN3 Z (in.) SIDN4 s (deg) 0-2 3.740 0-2 0.984 0-4 1.968 0-2 50 3-4 3.937 3-4 1.181 3-4 2.099 3-4 55 5-6 4.331 5-6 1.378 5-6 2.231 5-6 60 7-9 4.528 7-9 1.575 5-9 2.362 7-9 65Each team must submit the following: ‚ A memorandum report for each lab. Each memo report is due by noon on the Friday of the week following the week that the lab was

Conference Session

Curriculum Development and Applications

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gregory Nail, University of Tennessee-Martin

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

, Fourth World Conference onEngineering Education Proceedings, October 1995, Saint Paul, MN, pp. 187-191.6. Kissoff, N. V., Integration of Third Party Design Software in a Civil Engineering Design and Graphics Classin Construction Engineering Technology, Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering EducationAnnual Conference and Exhibition, June 16-19, 2002, Montreal, Canada, pp. 1721-1728.7. Newton, R. S., Microstation V8 2004 Edition, Cadalyst, v21, n7, July 2004, pp. 26-30.8. Newton, R. S., Microstation V8 XM: New Interface promises to triple User Efficiency on Routine Tasks,Cadalyst, v23, n11, November 2006, pp. 26-30.9. Nicholas II, T.; Brizendine, A. L.; Stilgenbauer, T., Microstation® Applications for Highway andTransportation

Conference Session

EDGD: CAD, CAM, and AI

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Steven C. Zemke, Whitworth University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

holistically in a 3D sense.In terms of future study, this case suggests that the use of blindfolded activities may be areasonable curricular option to explore to help sighted students develop spatial abilities.AcknowledgementsThe author wishes to thank Jason Varnado at the Center for Student Academic Success office atGonzaga University for his unfailing support in developing curricular materials for the blindstudent. Without his efforts, the course content would have been diminished. The author alsowishes to thank the blind student for her efforts in the course and explaining how parts andswelled drawings were perceived throughout the course.References[1] S. A. Sorby, "Educational research in developing 3‐D spatial skills for engineering

Conference Session

Topics Related To Engineering Design Graphics Division

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Vimal Viswanathan, Tuskegee University; Maria Calhoun, Tuskegee University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

] Benjamin, S.," Learning for Mastery", UCLA Evaluation Comment Vol. 1, 1968, pp. 1-12.[27] Block, J.H., Airasian, P.W., Bloom, B.S., and Carroll, J.B., Mastery learning: Theory and practice: Holt, Rinehart and Winston New York, 1971. 15[28] Keller, F.S., Sherman, J.G., and Bori, C.M., The Keller plan handbook: Essays on a personalized system of instruction: WA Benjamin, 1974.[29] Sangelkar, S., Ashour, O.M., Warley, R.L., and Onipede, O., "Mastery Learning in Engineering: A Case Study in Statics", ASEE Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN, 2014.[30] Brosvic, G.M., and Cohen, B.D.," The horizontal-vertical illusion and knowledge of results", Perceptual and motor

Conference Session

Assessment in Graphics Education

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Thomas Delahunty, University of Limerick; Niall Seery, University of Limerick; Raymond Lynch, University of Limerick; Diarmaid Lane, University of Limerick

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

Conference Session

Teaching Strategies for Solid Modeling

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Seokyoung Ahn, University of Texas - Pan American; Robert A. Freeman, University of Texas, Pan American; Stephen W. Crown, University of Texas, Pan American; Gregory Allen Potter, The University of Texas - Pan American

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

, S., and Freeman, R., 2007, “Challenge- Based Instruction: The VaNTH Biomechanics Learning Modules,” Advances in Engineering Education, pp. 1-30. 2. McKenna, A., Walsh, J., Parsek, M., and Birol, G. , 2002, “Assessing Challenge-Based Instruction in Biomedical Engineering,” Proceeding of the 2002 ASEE Annual Conference, pp. 12783-12795. 3. LaPorte, James, 1995, "Collaborative Learning Enhances Critical Thinking." Journal of Technology Education, pp. 1-7. 4. Freeman, R., & Vasquez, H., & Fuentes, A., 2010, “Development and Implementation of Challenge-based Instruction in Statics and Dynamics,”, AC 2010-2141, Proceeding of the 2010 ASEE Annual Conference 5. Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K

Conference Session

Teaching Strategies in Graphics

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jorge Dorribo-Camba, East Tennessee State University; Marty Fitzgerald, East Tennessee State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

, November 1990.Lily Lee. Gait Analysis for Classification. AI Technical Report 2003-014. Massachusetts Institute of Technology —Artificial Intelligence Laboratory. 2003.Yam, C. Y., Nixon, M. S. and Carter, J. N. (2001) Extended Model-Based Automatic Gait Recognition of Walkingand Running (Speech). In Proceedings of Proceedings of 3rd Int. Conf. on Audio- and Video-Based BiometricPerson Authentication, AVBPA 2001, pp. 278-283. Page 12.57.9

Conference Session

Graphics and Visualization

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marty Fitzgerald, East Tennessee State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

3D Animation. Proceedings of the 1st international symposium on Non-photorealistic animation and rendering. 2000.3. Nick Halper, Mara Mellin, Christoph S. Herrmann, Volker Linneweber, and Thomas Strothotte. Towards an Understanding of the Psychology of Non-Photorealistic Rendering. In Jochen Schneider, Thomas Strothotte, Page 12.392.12 and Winfried Marotzki, editors, Proc. Workshop Computational Visualistics, Media Informatics and Virtual Communities (April 4-5, 2003), pages 67-78, Wiesbaden, 2003.

Conference Session

Innovative Teaching Strategies in Engineering Graphics

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Johnson, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

being beneficial. These results were used to facilitate adiscussion regarding the importance of design intent in modern CAD modeling and productdevelopment environments. Page 14.421.8References1 D. A. Field, "Education and Training for CAD in the Auto Industry," Computer-Aided Design 36 (14), 1431-1437 (2004).2 S. D. Eppinger and A. R. Chitkara, "The New Practice of Global Product Development," MIT Sloan Management Review 47 (4), 22-30 (2006).3 B. Caldwell and G. M. Mocko, "Ttite," in ASME 2008 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conferences

Conference Session

Engineering Design Graphics Division Technical Session 2: Instructional

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Myela A. Paige, Georgia Institute of Technology; Katherine Fu, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

technical, complex topic. The authors plan to assess theeffectiveness of the learning tools in the near future, through a direct measurement of GD&Tknowledge acquisition and retention, in addition to self-reported satisfaction and self-efficacydata collection from the students. These data will be compared with a control group of a similarpopulation taught GD&T in a more traditional manner, such as through diagrammatic lecture-based delivery.References[1] S. A. Sorby, "Educational Research in Developing 3‐D Spatial Skills for Engineering Students," International Journal of Science Education, vol. 31, pp. 459-480, 2009/02/01 2009.[2] G. M. Bodner and R. B. Guay, "The Purdue visualization of rotations test," The Chemical

Conference Session

Assessment Within Engineering Design Graphics

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Theodore J. Branoff, Illinois State University; Kevin L Devine, Illinois State University; Josh Brown, Illinois State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

-correlations-icc-as-estimates-of-interrater-reliability- in-spss/23. Lieu & Sorby, (2009). Visualization, Modeling, and Graphics for Engineering Design. Clifton Park, NY: Delmar, Cengage Learning.24. Giesecke, F. E., Mitchell, A., Spencer, H. C., Hill, I. L., Dygdon, J. T., Novak, J. E., & Lockhart, S. (2009). Technical Drawing (13th ed.). Upper Saddle, NJ: Pearson/Prentice-Hall.25. Miller, M.D., Linn, R.L., & Gronlund, N. (2013). Measurement and Assessment in Teaching. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.26. Brookhart, S.M. (2008). How to give effective feedback to your students. Alexandria, VA:ASCD.

Conference Session

Assessment Within Engineering Design Graphics

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Steven Nozaki, Ohio State University; Nancy E. Study, Pennsylvania State University, Erie; Heidi M Steinhauer, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach; Sheryl A. Sorby, Ohio State University; Mary A. Sadowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Ronald L. Miller, Colorado School of Mines

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

Graphics Curriculum: Past, Present, Future. Proceedings of the NSF Symposium on Modernization of the Engineering Design Graphics Curriculum, Austin, TX, August 1990, pp. 43-52.2 Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhamer, G., (1985). The Initial Knowledge State of College Physics Students. The Physics Teacher Vol. 30, (March 1992), pp. 141-158.3 Evans, D. L., Gray, G. L., Krause, S., Martin, J., Midkiff, C., Notaros, B. M., Pavelich, M., Rancour, D., & Reed-Rhodes, T., Progress on concept inventory tools. In 33rd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings, (Nov. 2003), Boulder, CO, pp. T4G1-T4G8.4 J. Pellegrino, N. Chudowsky and R. Glaser, Knowing What Students Know: The Science and

Conference Session

Pedagogy and Learning Within Engineering Design Graphics II

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel P. Kelly, North Carolina State University; Aaron C. Clark, North Carolina State University; Jeremy V. Ernst, Virginia Tech; Kevin Gregory Sutton, North Carolina State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

the need for student accountabilitymeasures to be part of the flipped classroom design. Students and faculty are used to that modelof instruction and there is evidence that a more behaviorist approach to the online content is acomponent of the flipped classroom model.4 More research and development of the flippedclassroom model is needed to determine the most effective methods and theoretical framework(s)from which to best design and implement the flipped classroom instructional model in highereducation.Conclusion It is clear that the flipped classroom instructional model is being used in engineeringgraphics education at the university level. The extent of its use and how the model isoperationalized across the field is not clear. This

Conference Session

Engineering Design Graphics Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

David Torick, Washington State University; Nandita Biswas, Washington State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

initialimplementation in an IEG has been discussed and is shared at our course websitehttps://hub.wsu.edu/me-116/pdm/ to promote further implementation across academic institutionsand provide reasonable insight into implementation.Our university will be sharing our implementation with a club shortly, and we also plan to utilizethe data mining capabilities associated with SWPDMS in future educational research.References[1] E. Wiebe, "Impact of Product Data Management (PDM) trends on Engineering Graphics Instruction," 1998.[2] D. S. Kelley, "Product Lifecycle Management Philosophies Within a Computer-Aided Design Program of Study," 2003.[3] R. T. Frame, C. Pezeshki, and M. Grant Norton, "Integrating PLM Methods into the Undergraduate

Conference Session

Engineering Design Graphics Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Oziel Rios, University of Texas at Dallas

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

, Mission, KS.[4] Bethune, J. D., 2015, Engineering Design and Graphics with Solidworks 2014, PearsonEducation, Upper Saddle River, NJ.[5] Zeid, I., 2005, Mastering CAD/CAM, McGrall-Hill, New York, NY.[6] Lieu, D. and Sorby, S., 2009, Visualization, Modeling, and Graphics for Engineering Design,Delmar Cengage Learning, Clifton Park, NY.

Conference Session

Engineering Design Graphics Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Theodore J. Branoff, Illinois State University; Kevin L. Devine, Illinois State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

those on a physical part. The tactile aspect of handling the physical parts illustrated inpart drawings may help students develop a better understanding of DRF concepts.References1. Neumann, S., & Neumann, A. (2009). GeoTol Pro: A practical guide to Geometric Tolerancing. Longboat Key, FL: Technical Consultants, Inc.2. ASME (2009). Dimensioning and Tolerancing, ASME Y14.5-2009. NY: American Society of Mechanical Engineers. 2009. ISBN 0-7918-3192-2.3. Waldorf, D. J., & Georgeou, T. M. (June, 2016). Geometric dimensioning and tolerancing (GD&T) integration throughout a manufacturing engineering curriculum. Proceedings of the 123rd ASEE Annual Conference. New Orleans, Louisiana, June 26-29, 2016.4. Anderson, L

Conference Session

Teaching Strategies in Graphics

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Egoitz Sierra Uria, The University of the Basque Country; Mikel Garmendia Mujika, The University of the Basque Country

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

Higher Attended test(%) 58% 53% attendance, 5% Average visualization exercise 4% higher Passed visualization exercise 38% 34% More passed, 4%Conclusions and possible future studiesMost data show an improvement in the experimental group and better results inregards of assessments such as student´s work and tests. We analyzed data qualitativelyand not quantitatively, for this reason we consider no need of statistical analysis per se.The statistical analysis is not the aim of this study, the main aim of this study is tointroduce a new teaching strategy for part

Conference Session

Innovative Techniques in Graphics

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mark Holdhusen, University of Wisconsin-Marathon County

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

Page 12.1420.9of previous experience, improved their test performance and gained new information from thecollege-level engineering graphics course.Bibliography1. Guay, R. B., Purdue Spatial Visualization Test: Rotations, Purdue Research Foundation, West Lafayette, IN,1977.2. Vandenburg, S. G., and Kuse, A. R., “Mental Rotations, a Group Test of Three-Dimensional SpatialVisualization”, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47, 1978.3. Yue, Jianping, “Spatial Visualization Skills at Various Educational Levels,” Proceedings of the 2002 AmericanSociety for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2002.4. Sorby, Sheryl A. and Young, Michael F., “Assessment of a Visualization-Based Placement Exam for aFreshman Graphics Course,” Proceedings

Conference Session

Curriculum Development and Applications

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sohail Anwar, Pennsylvania State University-Altoona College; Janice McClure, Pennsylvania State University-Altoona College

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

number of hours spent oneach topic and making adjustments as needed.Bibliography1. Anwar, S. and J. McClure. “Teaching Engineering Design Methodology to First YearEngineering Technology Students: A Case Study.” Proceedings of the 2006 CIEC Conference.Available CD ROM.2. Anwar, Sohail, Todd Batzel, Ed Sell, “Integration of Project Based Learning into a FreshmanEngineering Design Course” Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for EngineeringEducation Annual Conference & Exposition.3. Bilén, Sven G., Richard F, Devon, Gül E. Okudan, “Cumulative Knowledge and the Teachingof Engineering Design Processes,” Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for EngineeringEducation Annual Conference & Exposition

Conference Session

Visualization

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amy Hamlin, Michigan Technological University; Sheryl Sorby, Michigan Technological University; Norma Boersma, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

. How many times did you scrap your engineering drawing for this assignment and start it over? a. zero b. 1-2 c. 3-4 d. 5-6 e. More than 6 10. Did you find this assignment difficult? No Yes If Yes, Why? 11. We have encouraged you to ask for help on individual homework assignments when necessary. This help can be from another student, your TA, or your instructor. How much help did you receive from another person(s) in completing this assignment? None Very little Some Quite a bit A Lot 1 2 3 4 5 12. In comparison to your team mates, how would you rate your ease of learning

Conference Session

Learning styles affect on students in graphic and design courses

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marjan Eggermont, University of Calgary

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

work: Gantt chart visual method choice for book chapterGantt Chart: Typical Development in an F1 Season(Graphic #15)31 Two distinctive race schedules are performed in each F1 season. While the race team desperately tries to win points for the overall championship, development of next season`s car is taking place simultaneously. With the new car being completed only weeks before the following season. Since engine design takes about 18 months two power engineering teams are required, with each leapfrogging the other, providing one engine per every 9 month car development cycle. Figure 8: Student work: Resulting Gantt chart chapter summary

Conference Session

CAD Assessments, Trends and Applications

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Douglas Howard Ross, University of Alabama, Birmingham

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

. Engr. Education, 2003. 37(4): p. 2.4. Lieu, D.K. and S. Sorby, Visualization, Modeling, and Graphics for Engineering Design. 1st ed. 2009, Clifton Park, NY: Delmar Cengage Learning.5. Bertoline, G.R. and E.N. Wiebe, Fundamentals of Graphics Communication. 5th ed. 2007: McGraw-Hill. Page 23.102.12