Asee peer logo
Displaying results 1 - 30 of 34 in total
Conference Session
Pedagogical Advancements in Engineering Management
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
S. Jimmy Gandhi, Stevens Institute of Technology; Brian Sauser, Stevens Institute of Technology; Brian E. White, Complexity Are Us - Systems Engineering Strategies; Alex Gorod, Visiting Fellow, University of Adelaide; Vernon Ireland, University of Adelaide
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineering
Management and Systems Engineering EducationAbstractAs engineering system complexity has increased over the years, numerous complex systems pro-jects have failed due to the lack of an appropriate systemic perspective. Since the solution to thischallenge is itself a complex system, educating and training our current and future technicalleaders on these challenges, and providing suggested changes in their mind sets, is imperative.As an educational tool, case studies can be a platform through which the analysis, knowledgeapplication, and drawing of conclusions can occur to facilitate coping with the most complexsystems. Case study learning has proven successful in the training of business leaders with reallife examples of the
Conference Session
Engineering Economy -- Outside the Introductory Course
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
William Peterson, Arizona State University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy
offended by this author’s grading of the paper.These last two incidents were the genesis of this paper. In thinking about these two incidentswhich this author saw as very problematic, remembrances of the way engineering economytopics were treated in other courses taught were brought to mind. The following discussion ofthese remembrances is only a partial list based on limited time spent going through some of thetexts used in the 58 courses mention on this author’s curriculum vita.An Innocuous ExampleIn one human factors text2 there is a section on cost/benefit analysis (not benefit costs as theequation is done). The example given ignores the time value of money – it uses the initial cost toperform the human factors analysis and then looks at the
Conference Session
New Topics in Engineering Economics
Collection
2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
John Ristroph, University of Louisiana-Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy
Method a b c d e f g h Frequency 0% 3% 6% 10% 13% 52% 10% 6%Alternative ParadigmThe survey suggests that students should accept an approach to engineering homework similar tomethod f or the alternative examined in question 3. The method examined in this paper is craftedwith that in mind as well as addressing concerns of professors; it ‚ provides problems with the same structure, but different numbers; ‚ confirms when a student has entered a correct answer rather than giving the answer be- forehand as a target; ‚ can provide solutions to similar problems (with different numbers) before the due date
Conference Session
Engineering Economy Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Paul C. Lynch, Penn State University Erie, The Behrend College; Joseph Wilck, United States Air Force Academy; Omar Ashour, Pennsylvania State University Erie, The Behrend College
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy
, Engineering, and EntrepreneurshipAbstractCreative minds often times have innovative ideas for designing products and services that maylead to successful businesses but these potential entrepreneurs often need an outside perspectivefrom practitioners trained in business and engineering that can analyze potential ideas, performengineering economic analyses, and help construct business plans to help entrepreneurs proceedin a fiscally responsible and systematic manner. Engineering economy is at the center of eachand every business decision made in today’s fast paced business world. Whether it be a rate ofreturn analysis, payback analysis, net present worth analysis or a host of other engineeringeconomic analyses, the ultimate
Conference Session
Engineering Economy Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Wolter J. Fabrycky P.E., Virginia Tech
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy
. EE@SL Section V: Extending Equivalence to the System level It should be noted again that the general Design Evaluation Function (DEF) is a combined equivalence approach with its genesis in monetary time value and economic optimization. There is nothing new here except recognition that Engineering Economy content and life-cycle mapping, as in Figure 6, have much in common. System thinking at a higher level is the key consideration, with EE@SL in mind.6VI. Choosing the Preferred System DesignThe Decision Evaluation Display (DED) method of making decisions in the face of multi-criteriais presented (and preferred for choosing from among mutually exclusive design alternatives -candidate systems). Some decision makers consider
Conference Session
Including Engineering Economy in All Curricula
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Leland Blank, Texas A&M University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy
techniques of engineering economicsin a small number of classes or laboratory sessions, with possibly some material in therequired senior-level design course. This approach meets the accreditation requirement;however, it does little to adequately prepare graduates to be economically-minded as theyenter the engineering workforce.The purpose of the panel discussion is to develop innovative, plausible approaches toincluding the most important concepts and topics of engineering economics in allengineering curricula in such a fashion that faculty might accept them as a primaryknowledge base, even in the face of these external pressures.Following a brief stage-setting introduction and potential discussion questions/topics bythe moderator, the session will
Conference Session
Engineering Management Applications
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Craig G. Downing, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering
competitive advantage that any organization has is in the unique, unduplicated[diverse] intellectual capital of its people10. Diverse engineering teams harness differingperspectives and ideas that individuals bring to the workplace in a complementary fashion forinnovation and problem-solving success—two critical elements needed to survive in today’sglobal marketplace. Keep in mind that résumés only partially reflect potential and degree titlesshould not be the primary proxy for skill and competency. Hiring must be based on eachcandidate’s display of competence and ability to fulfill an organization’s current and futuretechnical needs.The differences in academic preparation and professional contributions of Engineers andEngineering Technologists are
Conference Session
Engineering Economy Education
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Louis Reifschneider, Illinois State University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy
AC 2011-496: RESIDENTIAL RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES CASESTUDIES OF RETURN ON INVESTMENTLouis Reifschneider, Illinois State University Associate Professor Registered Professional Engineer Research interests include product design, net- shape manufacturing, and sustainable technology. Page 22.1245.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Residential Renewable Energy Sources Case Studies of Return on InvestmentRenewable energy is a popular topic today because of concern over rising energy costs. Federaltax credits for renewable energy
Conference Session
Engineering Economy Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jerome P. Lavelle, North Carolina State University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy
you mind if we ask your mother’s mother about this recipe?” “Of course not” was the reply of the first chef, however he probably wasn’t ready for the answer that his grandmother gave. Her reply was “Goodness no, that’s not how one cooks roast beef, how wasteful! You see, when your mother was growing up the only cooking pot that I owned was somewhat small, so whenever I had a large cut of meat like a roast beef I would cut off the ends so that it could fit in the pan.”  As engineers we know that after a process is designed and implemented the initial internal and external design assumptions, constraints and opportunities change over time. What fit and worked well in one timeframe may not hold over time. With this
Conference Session
Innovation in Teaching Engineering Economics
Collection
2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ahmad Sarfaraz, California State University-Northridge; Tarek Shraibati, California State University-Northridge
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy
2006-2182: INCREASING STUDENT ENGAGEMENT IN ENGINEERINGECONOMY CLASSAhmad Sarfaraz, California State University-NorthridgeTarek Shraibati, California State University-Northridge Page 11.750.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 INCREASING STUDENT ENGAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING ECONOMY CLASSESAbstractThere are many strategies that can be used to encourage student engagement for an engineeringeconomy class. Two engagement strategies including weekly quizzes and group problem-solvingactivities are considered in this paper. Our goal was to experiment with the selected strategies todetermine which strategy worked best to promote deeper
Conference Session
Engineering Economics Teaching Tools
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jerome P. Lavelle, North Carolina State University; Matthew T. Stimpson, North Carolina State University; E. Downey Brill, North Carolina State University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy
Criterion 3(i) “a recognition of the need for, and anability to engage in life-long learning.”14 With this in mind, and considering the format of theFundamentals of Engineering Exam15, the grading structure was also modified so that theentire grade was based on the final exam. To assist students in preparing for the final examand provide feedback on their learning through the semester, two optional practice exams wereprovided. These exams were graded and provided the basis for students to obtain feedback andwork on deficient learning areas.Results: Of note this semester was the particularly high percentage of students who failed thecourse. Additionally, the grade distribution of the fall 2012 and spring 2013 offerings differedsignificantly from one
Conference Session
Engineering Economy Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ted Eschenbach, TGE Consulting; Jerome P. Lavelle, North Carolina State University; Neal A Lewis, University of New Haven
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy
not translate to final costs, or where loanamounts are manipulated to include hidden fees or added interest. Mortgage lenders have beenknown to unlawfully demand high escrow balances in order to reap additional interest. The onlycourse where most engineering students get any information related to personal finance isengineering economy. We as instructors need to be mindful of that fact.Engineers tend to have a lower percentage of their college costs paid with borrowing than peoplewith other majors, and they are better positioned to pay off their loans. Even so, manyengineering students and recent graduates can be described by the following statistics. Studentloan debt is now over $1 trillion, and is the second largest form of consumer debt
Conference Session
Engineering Economics New Frontiers
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Zia A. Yamayee, University of Portland; Mojtaba B. Takallou P.E., University of Portland; Robert J. Albright P.E., University of Portland
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy
and evaluated every year.The choice of courses for course-embedded assessment is guidedby two principles: (1) each Student Outcome is assessed withstudent work in a benchmark course, and (2) only required courses,not elective courses, in the curriculum are selected as benchmarkcourses.Assessment of a benchmark course is conducted with the followingin mind: (1) assessment of student work measures the extent towhich SOs are being attained, (2) it is not necessary to use all ofthe student work to assess an outcome, and (3) outcomesassessment is based upon student work and is guided by thegrading of that work.The implementation of our course-embedded assessment methodto a benchmark course, namely Engineering Economics, ispresented in this paper
Conference Session
Engineering Economy Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ted Eschenbach P.E., TGE Consulting; Jerome P. Lavelle, North Carolina State University; Neal A. Lewis, Fairfield University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy
changing orrepealing MACRS. The corporate tax rate has not only been lowered dramatically, it has alsobeen changed to a flat tax rate rather than progressively increasing with taxable income. Inaddition, some of the significant changes in the tax law have been implemented as temporarywith scheduled phase-outs beginning in 5 years.With all of this in mind, the decisions of what we should and will cover are complicated by boththe near and long-term law changes. Laws can change faster than textbooks can keep up with, yetstudents need to leave our classrooms with accurate data and current understanding.Literature ReviewThe Engineering Economy Division of ASEE has a history of publishing conference works thatexplore how we teach engineering economics
Conference Session
Engineering Economy Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy
context of the subjects of their coursework.Research indicates that if students understand the real-life context of a problem, they are morelikely to retain their knowledge. John Bransford chronicled this in his book, How people learn,Brain, Mind, Experience, and School.4 Real-life context, stories, and personal interactions helpframe this in engineering economy courses. Textbook author, William Sullivan, in his 2008 papersaid, “Developing examples and exercises that are interesting, engaging, and provide context is achallenging problem for courses with students enrolled from a variety of majors. Yet, we knowthat without proper context to their discipline, students will not find relevance or understand whythey should care to learn engineering
Conference Session
Pedagogical Advancements in Engineering Management
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mysore Narayanan, Miami University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineering
AC 2012-5561: ASSESSMENT OF DISCOVERY APPROACHDr. Mysore Narayanan, Miami University Mysore Narayanan obtained his Ph.D. from the University of Liverpool, England in the area of electrical and electronic engineering. He joined Miami University in 1980 and teaches a wide variety of electrical, electronic, and mechanical engineering courses. He has been invited to contribute articles to several ency- clopedias and has published and presented dozens of papers at local, regional, national, and international conferences. He has also designed, developed, organized, and chaired several conferences for Miami University and conference sessions for a variety of organizations. He is a Senior Member of IEEE and is a member
Conference Session
Engineering Economy Division Technical Session
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
James Burns, Western Michigan University; Bob White P.E., Western Michigan University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy
, the instructor’s role becomes that of a discussion facilitator asanswers to the quiz questions are read. Naturally, quiz questions are developed with the post-quiz discussion in mind. For example, the recent quiz featured an article about the Vale Damcollapse in Brazil. A good, discussion prompting question might be:Why did the Vale Dam collapse?This simple question is somewhat open ended and could allow for several acceptable answers(since the true cause was not known yet), such as improper design, shoddy construction, orinadequate maintenance. As students consider whether their peer’s answer is correct, follow-upquestions can be asked by the instructor:What role did engineers have in enabling or preventing the collapse?Who is to blame for
Conference Session
Engineering Economy Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
James Burns, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Bob E. White P.E., Western Michigan University; Azim Houshyar, Western Michigan University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy
Paper ID #23300Integrating Ethics in Undergraduate Engineering Economy Courses: An Im-plementation Case Study and Future DirectionsDr. James Burns, Purdue University, West Lafayette Jim Burns, Ph.D. Assistant Professor, Department of Technology Leadership & Innovation Bio: Jim joined the faculty at Purdue Polytechnic in 2015 after completing a Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from Western Michigan University, and has more than 10 years industry experience in the manufacturing sector in a variety of roles including process engineering, operations management, and technical sales. His area of expertise centers on applying
Conference Session
Applications of Engineering Economy
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Donald Merino, Stevens Institute of Technology; Jakob Carnemark, SKANSKA
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy
Jersey, 07030 Work telephone: 201-216-5504; E-mail: dmerino@ stevens.edu.Jakob Carnemark, SKANSKA Jakob Carenmark is the head of SKANSKA's Mission Critical Center of Excellance (COE). Jakob developed this team to showcase SKANSKA's expertise in constructing Mission Critical facilities and to share best practices among various regions. Within this CEO team, Jacob leads some of the most creative and innovative minds in the data center construction industry. Mr. Carnemark has a degree in Civil Engineering from the University of Virginia, as well as 25 years of experience. His expertise covers all aspects of construction and enables him to provide meaningful and accurate insight to a project. His
Conference Session
Curricula Innovations in Engineering Economics
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Gloria Margarita Fragoso-Diaz, Tarleton State University; Billy Gray, Tarleton State University; Erick Jones, University of Texas, Arlington
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy
in table 2supports the previous statement. With this in mind, the next step would be to evaluate theassignments that the students worked to compare against their survey responses as is planned infuture work.The CaseA simulation for a mass casualty event caused by a tornado hitting the community was plannedand executed by the Nursing department at TSU. The initial goal was for the Nursing departmentto provide a simulated experience in mass casualty treatments for their students. As the Nursingstaff proceeded to plan for the event they came to the point where they asked for help from otherareas to support their activities. Faculty and students from the Engineering Technologydepartment participated in the simulation that was run in real time
Conference Session
Engineering Economics New Frontiers
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Hector E. Medina, Liberty University; Kyle Michael Ceffaratti, Liberty University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy
Paper ID #14237NOVEL VISUAL ALGORITHM TO TEACH BENEFIT-COST RATIO ANAL-YSISDr. Hector E. Medina, Liberty University Dr. Medina is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Liberty University in Lynchburg, Virginia. He obtained a B.Sc. in Engineering from the Colorado School of Mines, and both a M.Sc. and Ph.D. in Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering from the Virginia Commonwealth University. Prior to graduate school, he worked in industry and as a high school teacher for several years, in his native Venezuela and Aruba. Since 2012, he has published about a dozen articles in peer-review journals and conference
Conference Session
Student Development and Assessment in IE Programs
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mysore Narayanan, Miami University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineering
AC 2012-3013: ASSESSMENT OF TQM IN THE 21ST CENTURYDr. Mysore Narayanan, Miami University Mysore Narayanan obtained his Ph.D. from the University of Liverpool, England in the area of electrical and electronic engineering. He joined Miami University in 1980 and teaches a wide variety of electrical, electronic, and mechanical engineering courses. He has been invited to contribute articles to several ency- clopedias and has published and presented dozens of papers at local, regional, national, and international conferences. He has also designed, developed, organized, and chaired several conferences for Miami University and conference sessions for a variety of organizations. He is a Senior Member of IEEE and a
Conference Session
Engineering Economy Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Deborah Ann Pedraza, Texas Tech University; Mario G. Beruvides P.E., Texas Tech University
Tagged Topics
ASEE Diversity Committee
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy
Paper ID #17478The Relationship Between Course Assignments and Academic Performance:An Analysis of Predictive Characteristics of Student PerformanceMrs. Deborah Ann Pedraza, Texas Tech University I am a Systems and Engineering doctoral student at Texas Tech University. I have Bachelor’s degree in the Mathematics from The University of Houston - Victoria, an MBA - The University of Houston - Vic- toria, and a Master’s Degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering - The University of Massachusetts- Amherst. I teach Mathematics, Engineering, and Computer Science at Cuero High School in Cuero, TX and adjunct for The Victoria
Conference Session
Engineering Economics New Frontiers
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Oscar M. Bonilla, Baruch College of the City University of New York; Donald N. Merino P.E., Stevens Institute of Technology (SES)
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy
enterprise mission critical and capital projects. His research interests are in the field of engineering management and technology transfer, specifically on the economics and commercialization of renewable energy tech- nologies. His intellectual work has been published in international engineering management and systems engineering journals. His professional experience includes more than 10 years of work on industrial automation, dynamic systems control, reliability, six sigma, lean manufacturing, continuous processes improvement, and project and operations management. He obtained a bachelor degree in automation en- gineering from La Salle University in Colombia, a master’s degree in industrial processes’ automation
Conference Session
Effective Tools for Teaching Engineering Economy
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kailash Bafna, Western Michigan University; Betsy Aller, Western Michigan University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy
AC 2007-2641: ENHANCING THE LEARNING OF ENGINEERING ECONOMYWITH INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY AND TEACHINGKailash Bafna, Western Michigan University KAILASH M. BAFNA is Professor of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering at Western Michigan University. He is a Fellow of the Institute of Industrial Engineers and a registered Professional Engineer. He teaches Engineering Economics, Facilities Design and Materials Handling, and Quality Control. His current research interests are in the areas of incorporating technology in education and developing methodology to enhance web-based learning.Betsy Aller, Western Michigan University Betsy M. Aller is Assistant Professor of Industrial and Manufacturing
Conference Session
Integrating Engineering Economy into Curricula
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Joseph Wilck IV, East Carolina University; Paul C. Lynch, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA; Paul J. Kauffmann P.E., East Carolina University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy
. National Science Board, Task Committee on Undergraduate Science and Engineering Education, Homer A. Neal (Chairman), Undergraduate Science, Mathematics and Engineering Education: Role for the National Science Foundation and Recommendations for Action by Other Sectors to Strengthen Collegiate Education and Pursue Excellence in the Next Generation of U.S. Leadership in Science and Technology, Washington, D.C., National Science Foundation, 1986, NSB 86-100, 1986.43. J. Bransford, A. Brown, and R. Cocking, How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington D. C.: The National Academy of Sciences, 2000.44. P. Vail, Learning as a way of being: Strategies for survival in a world of permanent white water. San Francisco
Conference Session
Engineering Economy Course Strategy Panel Session
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Michael B. O'Connor P.E., New York University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy
Paper ID #34639Course Strategy: Low Stakes Assessment Approach to Engineering Economyinstruction using Revised Bloom TaxonomyMr. Michael B. O’Connor P.E., New York University Michael O’Connor, Retired Professional Civil Engineer (Maryland and California), M.ASCE, is a mem- ber of the ASCE Committee on Developing Leaders, History and Heritage, Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge (CEBoK), and Engineering Grades. Michael has been a practicing Civil Engineer with over 50 years of engineering, construction, and project management experience split equally between the pub- lic and private sectors. Programs ranged from the San
Conference Session
Assessment and Accreditation in Engineering Management
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
David S. Cochran, Southern Methodist University and Meijo University; Makoto Kawada, Meijo University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineering
AC 2012-4481: EDUCATION APPROACH IN JAPAN FOR MANAGEMENTAND ENGINEERING OF SYSTEMSProf. David S. Cochran, Southern Methodist University and Meijo University David Cochran is a professor of industrial and systems engineering management. He is Founder and Prin- cipal of System Design, LLC, Visiting Professor with the School of Business, Meijo University, Nagoya, Japan and faculty of systems engineering, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas. Cochran devel- oped the Manufacturing System Design Decomposition (MSDD) to determine the underlying design of the Toyota Production System (and ”lean”) from a systems engineering viewpoint and was Founder and Director of the Production System Design Laboratory in the
Conference Session
Using a Real-Options Analysis Tutorial in Teaching Undergraduate Students
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
John A. White Jr., University of Arkansas
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy
Paper ID #15270Using a Real-Options Analysis Tutorial in Teaching Undergraduate StudentsDr. John A. White Jr., University of Arkansas John A. White, Distinguished Professor of Industrial Engineering and Chancellor Emeritus, received his BSIE degree from the University of Arkansas, his MSIE degree from Virginia Tech, and his PhD from The Ohio State University. He is the recipient of honorary doctorates from Katholieke Universitiet of Leuven in Belgium and George Washington University. Since beginning his teaching career as a tenure-track instructor at Virginia Tech in 1963, he has taught more than 4,000 engineering
Conference Session
Innovative IE Curricula
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Saylisse Davila, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Viviana I. Cesani, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Alexandra Medina-Borja, University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering
a mentoring role. Most UPRM students completed two terms inthe REU program, one in the summer and the other one either in the spring or fall semester.Students from US-based institutions completed only the summer term in the program, which isstrictly the term of the REU program on which we are focusing in this work. Nonetheless, bothlocal students and students from US-based institutions were sponsored to present their researchprojects at conferences such as the Industrial and Systems Engineering Research Conference(ISERC), INFORMS Annual Meeting, and Great Minds in STEM. Page 23.890.6 1 - Be currently enrolled in an Industrial