these men. These traits would besuccessfully incorporated into their coaching styles at the university level. Core values,organizational skills and mentorship were the standard ingredients used by all four coaches in themanagement of their staff and team players. Each is important as a stand alone option, but whenused together they form a strong and flexible base which enables the player and staff members toperform more effectively.Principle #1-Strong Value SystemA strong value system is a fundamental building block in coaching and management. The valuesystem of the coach and librarian lays the foundation, and sets the desired culture for the playingfield as well as the library. Peter Drucker, the famous management expert said
andestablished as a national committee in 1942, ELD achieved divisional status within ASEE in1967. This year, 2017, marks the 50th anniversary of ELD’s division status and the 75thanniversary of the first Engineering School Libraries Committee. This paper explores the historyof ELD from 1960 to the present. The author’s preceding paper, published in 2016, covered thehistory of librarians in ASEE from 1893 through the 1950s.[1]The history of ELD over the past fifty years has been marked by three major themes or trends.The first trend is rapid and continuous technological change, beginning in the late 1950s, that hastransformed how scientific and technical information is created, disseminated, stored, andretrieved. The 1970s and 1980s was a time of rapid
science and engineering in a variety of contexts, both in and out of school.Participation in informal science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) activities,along with interest in STEM subjects, is associated with interest in STEM careers when studentsreach the university level [1]. Out-of-school, informal learning can occur at a variety of sites,including everyday experiences; designed sites such as museums, nature preserves, and libraries;and structured programs such as after-school activities and summer camps [2]. This paperdescribes the programming provided at one academic library to a STEM summer camp formiddle schoolers [3] and explores the opportunities and challenges of this kind of programmingin an academic library.STEM
byproviding instruction and activities on the left-hand of the screen 1. Recognizing that not allexisting video tutorials were often used, we saw the necessity of conducting a usability study ondifferent tutorial formats: video tutorials versus Guide-on-the-Side tutorials. This usability studyhad two purposes. One was to determine the effectiveness of tutorials and which tutorial formatwas more effective. The other was to discover the students’ preference for which tutorial format.In addition, the captured qualitative information on the database search process from this studywould help us better understand students’ database search behavior.Literature ReviewOnline tutorials including text-and-image and video are commonly used to provide
materials, and standardization in the useof quick-response systems (clickers, etc.)1. In response to this statement by the associatedstudents, the Provost’s Office established a task force, which evolved into a steering committeethat recommended, among other things, the increased use of open education resources (OERs) oncampus2.Washington State University is not alone in its recent interest in open educational resources.Open education has been a rising trend throughout the 2000s, since the phrase was coined by theUnited Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) in 20023. Asdefined by UNESCO, OERs are “teaching, learning or research materials that are in the publicdomain or released with an intellectual property license
Resource Center Association. She holds a M.L.I.S. from the University of South Carolina, a M.A. from the University of Michigan, and a B.A. from Calvin College. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 From Creativity to Classification: A Logical Approach to Patent SearchingEngineering students and professors need to understand and search intellectual property. In thepast, librarians have instructed them on using the United States Patent Classification (USPC). In2015, after a period of transition, the United States Patent and Trademark Office phased out theUSPC and began exclusively classifying in the Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC).1
Technical ReportCenters in the country. Three agencies, the Department of Defense, NASA and AEC, thatproduced an estimated 90% of the government’s unclassified technical reports at the time, hadagreed to provide copies of their reports for deposits in each of the centers. The Georgia TechLibrary served the southeast region, which included Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi,South Carolina, and Tennessee (Georgia Tech Library Notes, 1962, v.5 n.6 p.1).From time to time, Crosland spent considerable effort to write to or to visit in person UnitedStates Senators and other officials regarding specific government publications and successfullysecured many documents from various agencies. In 1963, the Georgia Tech Library wasdesignated as an official
Literacy for Higher Education, was designed in conjunction with the creation of acurriculum map covering all of the College of Engineering’s undergraduate programs. The goalof this ongoing project is to provide opportunities for students to engage in short, thoughtfulexperiences with IL at strategic points throughout their time as undergraduates. To accomplishthis, the following steps were taken: (1) Syllabi from 300 courses were analyzed to determinepotential for compatibility with IL instruction, (2) sequences of required courses for each of the10 undergraduate engineering programs were visualized to facilitate scaffolding of ILinstruction, (3) a list of discrete IL concepts and skills were derived from the ACRL Framework,(4) assignments were
States representative on the Governing Council of the Sponsoring Consortium for Open Access Publishing in Particle Physics (SCOAP3) and has served as Chair of the Science & Technology Section of the Association of College & Research Libraries of the American Library Association. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Understanding the research practices and services needs of civil andenvironmental engineering researchers - a grounded theory approach1. IntroductionResearchers have different needs and behaviors during the life cycle of their research [1].Understanding the behaviors related to a suite of research-related activities can help librariansdevelop deeper knowledge about the
new theoretical frameworks. There should be a focus in engagingcross-disciplinary stakeholders in the research process.IntroductionEngineering education places a growing emphasis on design and capstone-based projectsfounded in a students’ ability to effectively seek, understand, and apply information.Engineering students are required to create, problem solve, and improve, usingengineering principles to develop their skills in technical, environmental, socioeconomicand political aspects of the engineering design process. Engineering students areincreasingly not taking a traditional scientific approach to research, mirroringprofessional engineers and scientists [1]. Henry Petroski stated that “Science is aboutknowing, engineering is about doing
steeply upward trend in enrollment reported by the Institute for AdvancedAnalytics [1]. The incentive for universities to add these programs, and for students to enroll, isfueled by the increasing demand for workers with skills in this area. In 2017, research by IBMAnalytics, the Business-Higher Education Forum, and Burning Glass Technologies forecast thatby 2020, the number of Data Science and Analytics (DSA) job openings would increase by 20%(364,000) over the number of openings in 2015 [2].To meet the increasing demand for skilled DSA graduates, U.S. universities and colleges haveresponded by developing and offering degree programs in this area. From the beginning of 2014through 2018, the total number of programs offering master’s degrees in
instruction session. The first iteration of this module has beendelivered twice, first in a small class (10 students) and then in a large class (95 students) in twoconsecutive semesters. The effectiveness of the first session was evaluated by conducting pre-and post-tests and by collecting students’ feedback. Based on the results, changes wereimplemented for the second session. This paper presents the evolution of the project and thechallenges encountered.IntroductionTechnical standards are vital for providing quality, safe, and sustainable products and have agreat impact on the global market. The critical role that standards play in every aspect of life isreflected in expectations employers have for standards knowledge among college graduates [1]–[3
Engineering senior lab course. The objective of this research project wasto determine if, and to what extent, integrating information fluency instruction pertaining to theethical use of images into engineering lab sessions improves the quality of information fluencyskills demonstrated in student presentations. A rubric was used to assess the use of images instudent presentations for two criteria: 1) attribution and 2) use of images that have appropriateCreative Commons license, have public domain status, or are original creations. Studentscompleted an initial lab presentation early in the semester with no information fluencyinstruction. Students then received direct in-person instruction in the ethical use of imagery froma librarian specifically
requirements that focus on scientificfundamentals and practical applications. However, ABET, the Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology, Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs is driving some ofthe science and engineering departments to see more need for information literacy instruction.ABET General Criterion 3(g), (h), (i), and (j) - Student Outcomes, requires “an ability tocommunicate effectively”, “the broad education necessary to understand the impact ofengineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context”, “a recognitionof the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning”, and “a knowledge ofcontemporary issues’ [1]. To meet this criteria, more writing assignments are being included
of 25 and interpretedthe research topics based on the visualization of the LDA results.In conclusion, our experiment with the LDA approach helped us quickly develop an understanding offaculty research interests, would provide good evidence from which to make decisions on collectionmanagement, reference and library instruction, and show the possibility of academic libraries to make useof data and data science techniques in the era of big data.IntroductionLiaison librarians face the challenge of learning faculty research and teaching needs in a timely manner.Wood and Griffin gave an overview of the current approaches including website analysis, interview,course syllabus analysis and large-scale surveys [1]. Department websites, especially
librarians to befamiliar with the conventions of this methodology. This paper will examine systematic reviewsin engineering by answering these three research questions: 1. Has there been an increase in the use of systematic reviews in the engineering literature? 2. Are systematic reviews more prevalent in some engineering disciplines than others? 3. Do systematic reviews see greater use than other types of papers?We also examine the librarian’s role in systematic reviews, so engineering librarians can beprepared to negotiate levels of responsibility and acknowledgement of their contributions.Literature ReviewSystematic reviews seek “to systematically search for, appraise and synthesis research evidence,often adhering to guidelines on the
[1]. Assessment of every aspect of curricular, co-curricular, and larger educational environmental aspects is the norm. Evidence-based decision-making leads those working in every aspect of higher education today to seek out or deviseassessment tools and plans to observe efficacy and introduce well-considered evidence-basedchanges where room for improvement in outcomes seems indicated. The National Survey ofStudent Engagement, or NSSE, is a widely applied instrument in the U.S. and Canada. NSSEallows participating institutions to get a periodic high-level snapshot of how their incoming First-year and near-graduation (Senior) students compare to one another, and compare to those fromother similar institutions, in their self-perceptions of
Fundamentals 1 Pump 201 Advanced Pump Fundamentals 2 • Past Subjects, Undergraduate IDIS 303 Mechanical Power Transmission IDIS 403 Fluid Power Technol- ogy IDIS 281 Manufacturing Processes ENTC 206 Non-Metallic Materials ENTC 429 Managing People and Projects Research Interests: Strategic business development, Product innovation, Entrepreneurship in Engineer- ing, Project management, Fluid Power Technologies, Mechanical Power Transmission, Condition based monitoring and Reliability. BIOGRAPHICAL DATA Name: Michael R. Golla Department: Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution, Manufacturing and Mechanical Engineering Technology Program Date hired or assigned to department: 2002 Number of years of service to
collectiondevelopment, training that runs the gambit from in-depth to informal, and reviews that show theevolution of selection and collection development processes over time.Jensen [1] describes how the University of Alaska Fairbanks, as a result of budget cuts,retirement and attrition, moved from liaison collectors to a patron-driven model where facultyare allotted a budget to purchase materials. This article questions the hard data suggesting thatliaisons are better able to build a collection than other models. While a faculty driven model isfar removed from the current method used at UTL, where increasing numbers of liaisons aretaking on selection duties, it is interesting to note the direct involvement by faculty was howselection occurred at the
increased visibility for the Libraryresources and services. It also discusses the positive impact on the students’ research skills andon their literature reviews. Consequently, the training sessions contribute to achieving theUniversity learning objectives for graduate students in research programs.IntroductionIntroductionFounded in Montreal in 1873, Polytechnique Montréal is a francophone engineering universityoffering more than 120 academic programs. In Fall 2019, the institution had 9,000 studentsenrolled, with more than 2,200 in a graduate program [1]. Polytechnique Montréal stronglyencourages diversity among its student population, so as of Fall 2019, 28% of its students werewomen and 29% were international students. Moreover, international
of 81 students from eight sessions over the past 2.5 years completed theassessment. This presentation will discuss the structure of the information sessions, preliminaryfindings from the assessment, and strategies taken to incorporate the identified needs into futuresessions.IntroductionInformation literacy support is well-established as a core component of university libraryservices, with many institutions providing subject specific information literacy instruction.Within engineering librarianship, providing information literacy support via one-shot, classroom-based instruction is fairly common within senior design or project-based courses. However,librarians supporting undergraduate engineering research is not as widespread [1]. Our paper
commitment to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion [1] there is a push foreducators to make a greater effort to improve outcomes for students from marginalized andlegally protected social identities. With this commitment in mind this research investigates ifengineering librarian members of ASEE have the knowledge, training, and support to incorporateinclusive teaching practices into their library instruction. This research examines the currentclimate for engineering librarians through an anonymous survey. The survey will collect data oninclusive teaching by engineering librarians. The study aims to answer whether librarians havethe knowledge, training, and support from their library, college, and institution to engage withinclusive teaching
Enhancing Student Learning Outcomes: A Library and University Writing Program Partnership IntroductionIn 2005, librarians at the Marston Science Library (MSL) began offering one-time libraryinstruction for ENC 3246: Professional Communication for Engineers. ENC 3246 is a requiredcourse with approximately 25 traditional sections a semester and 2 large-enrollment onlinesections (see Appendix 1). All 5,800 undergraduate engineering students enroll at some pointduring their academic career. The principal goal of ENC 3246 is to prepare engineering majors tocommunicate effectively in their fields by emphasizing the literacy skills employed inprofessional decision-making. Over time, library
, data and science literacy skills that will allow them to succeed in a global economy. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Graduate Research Data Management Course Content: Teaching the Data Management Plan (DMP)Introduction: The need for effective education of graduate students in the area of Research DataManagement (RDM) has been demonstrated through the number and types of recently developedcourses on this topic.[1-6] These courses tend to take one of two general forms: 1) a full-term,for-credit standalone course and 2) a workshop/seminar approach. However in both forms of theRDM course, one topic that is common to both approaches is the Data Management Plan (DMP).The
valuable insightsinto current campus information needs, and raise the level of library efficiency in collectiondevelopment and technical services processing.IntroductionThe development and maintenance of relevant library collections that support engineeringeducation and research experience many challenges. Foremost, the subscription costsof science, technology, engineering and medicine (STEM) journals and databases hadreached an unsustainable level, with the annual inflation rate being much higher than inother disciplines [1]. Moreover, the number of publications supporting traditionalengineering disciplines and new and/or interdisciplinary research is on the rise.Furthermore, the overall expansion of digital content availability lead to an
-Principal Investigator) Associate Professor and Head of Assessment, J. Murrey Atkins Library The authors are grateful for the collaborative support of UNC Charlotte’s William States LeeCollege of Engineering Office of Student Development and Success instructors: Don Blackmon,Chris McDaniel, Gwen Gill, Meg Harkins, Dan Latta, Kevin Lindsay, Bill Lindsey, and Sherman Mumford. This work was supported by funds provided by the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Program at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. 1 AbstractThis study
students; however, the MarstonScience Library focuses on programs geared specifically towards science and engineeringstudents. To help increase participation of women in engineering, we discuss ten ways academiclibraries can assist engineering departments to increase enrollment and retention of womenengineering students. These practices have been implemented during the past two years in thelibrary programs at UF. 1. Coordinate an engineering speakers series featuring women scientists and engineers; 2. Sponsor a girls technology summer camp where women engineering students help teach middle school girls; 3. Hold a human library book event showcasing women engineering contributions; 4. Conduct technology workshops for women engineering
of the Authorship and Data Management sessions, these sessions are broadoverviews that only briefly touch on topics such as literature reviews and data management bestpractices. Further, this program applies only to students who will be doing research; it is not arequirement of non-thesis master’s students.Saunders et al. state that “Faculty members and even librarians often seem to assume thatgraduate students enter programs already having attained the information literacy skillsnecessary for the research and analysis required of their programs…” Through their study, theyconclude, “The results of this study belie the assumption that graduate students have honed theirinformation literacy skills through their prior education…[1]”In 2017, the
experiences inestablishing a new engineering collection and services from the ground-up.IntroductionThe rapid growth of engineering programs across many different types of institutions is welldocumented. As a recent ASEE Prism [1] article noted, “the growth curve coincides with anational push for STEM education by policymakers at all levels. It also reflects a recession-chastened generation of students seeking a degree that translates to a stable, well-paying job, andwidening opportunities for engineers in advanced manufacturing, computer science, and thebiomedical and biotechnology fields.” Reflecting this national trend, Dixie State University, apublic comprehensive university recently moved from offering a pre-engineering associatesprogram to
Measures, Elsevier’s Pure andSymplectic Elements and open-source platforms such as Profiles and VIVO [1]. During the trend,some university libraries have become actively involved in the implementation of faculty profilesystems and expanded their roles in university leadership and stakeholders. For example,librarians from Duke University, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology recentlyreported use cases of implementation of Symplectic Elements at their home institutions andhighlighted libraries’ significant roles in the system adoption [1].Like many other institutions, the University of Iowa has started migrating faculty information toActivity Insight’s Digital Measures, locally branded as Academic and Professional Records(APR). The