. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Beyond Our Horizon: Reaching out to Engineering Faculty to Teach Spatial Literacy Beyond Our Horizon: Reaching out to Engineering Faculty to Teach Spatial LiteracyAbstractThe National Research Council of the National Academies has recognized the importance ofspatial thinking as an important skill in the 21st century, and in its report “Learning to ThinkSpatially”, supports its integration in the K-12 curriculum. Building on universities’ increasinglyrecognized and integral support for Information Literacy, comes the realization that SpatialLiteracy should be another of those skills that should be taught at the tertiary level. Recognizingthe
. Jean L Bossart P.E., University of Florida Jean Bossart is an Associate Engineering Librarian at the University of Florida (UF). Ms. Bossart assists students with research, data support, and citation management. In addition, she investigates and integrates creative technologies, such as 3D printing into the STEM discipline library services. She has a BS in chemical engineering and MS in environmental engineering from UF, over 20 years of experience in industry and consulting, and is a licensed professional engineer in Florida.Dr. Neelam BhartiDr. Mickey S. Schafer, University of Florida lapsed linguist teaching discipline-specific prose c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018
not properly cite sources from handbooks and webresources. Google still appeared to be the preferred choice to find scholarly papers even thoughlibrary instruction clearly demonstrated the importance of library-subscribed electronicresources.The engineering librarian has observed that many students in their middle college years contacthim for more research help, and sometimes these students are asking basic questions, so it isclear that students would benefit from more library instruction geared towards this specificgroup. As Nerz and Weiner have described, an approach to integrating information literacyinstruction into the engineering curriculum across each year of the undergraduate program can bean effective way to meet this need (2001)3
Fosmire [2] have made the argument that informationliteracy can be integrated into a number of student outcomes. However, the engineeringtechnology (ETAC) student outcomes changed around 2011 by explicitly mentioninginformation skills, extending the old 3.g, “ability to communicate effectively,” [3] to 3.g, “anability to apply written, oral, and graphical communication in both technical and non-technicalenvironments; and an ability to identify and use appropriate technical literature.” [4]With this change to the student outcomes in engineering technology, there is the potential fornew opportunities for collaboration between librarians and those programs. While the work oflibrarians in EAC programs has been well documented, for example, at every
knowledge and enthusiasm whichhas also helped shape the library presentation.The very first library workshop in 2001 was given in a classroom, with a combination oflecture and hands-on activity. The librarian demonstrated how researching a topic wasdifferent based on whether students used the UBC catalogue, journal indexes or theInternet. She included a process to help the students start their research with an academicpaper, and discussed the differences between primary and secondary sources. Shefocused on how to find information on topics gleaned from the course curriculum, suchas tsunamis, volcanoes, supernovae, and glaciers and demonstrated how to find thesetopics in encyclopedias and handbooks as well as how to find videorecordings, books
Connecticut and a Ph.D. in Polymer Science in 1977 from the Institute of Materials Science at the University of Connecticut. Tom was the past international chairman of the IEC (International Electrotechnical Commission) Tech- nical Committee, TC 113 on Nanotechnology Standardization for Electrical and Electronic Components and Subsystems. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Maximizing the effectiveness of one-time standards instruction sessions with formativeassessmentAbstractThere are multiple obstacles associated with integrating standards education into the collegecurriculum, including the limited experience faculty may have with standards, and the difficultyto fit such training into an
Paper ID #22892Ten Ways Academic Libraries Can Help their Departments Increase Reten-tion of Women Engineering StudentsMs. Jean L Bossart P.E., University of Florida Jean Bossart is an Associate Engineering Librarian at the University of Florida (UF). She assists students with research, data support, and citation management. She investigates and integrates creative technolo- gies, such as 3D printing into the STEM discipline library services. She has a BS in chemical engineering and MS in environmental engineering from UF, over 20 years of experience in industry and consulting, and is a licensed professional engineer in
approach to information literacy instruction could be easily integrated into existingproblem-based engineering programs. The Smart House project will provide the problem-basedstructure that has been found to improve student retention, satisfaction, diversity and learning18.Library-Smart House CollaborationThe Library involvement with the Smart House initiative began at an early stage when the groupinvited the current engineering librarian to a meeting to discuss possible collaboration with theinitiative. It was apparent that the group was keen on having librarians on board since studentsinvolved in this project are required to use appropriate library resources in their research. Sincethe initiative is interdisciplinary in nature, focusing on areas
bothlove to work directly with students through in-person instruction, but know that at an institutionof this size we need to provide quality instruction in other ways as well.Course-based Live InstructionEach of our departments offers a Senior Design class with 50-100 students each. The library iscurrently integrated into the Mechanical Engineering and Biomedical Engineering classes. Thosetwo departments are Jon's liaison assignments. Jon, working with the faculty and from the notesof his predecessors, has taught these classes solo this first year in a lecture-style format thatbriefly discusses the different types of information that can be found in the various forms ofengineering literature, as well as best practices in searching. Over the
required collaboration with the Assistant Dean of Freshman Experience in theengineering college and the freshman engineering professors to define content, identify logisticproblems and solutions to those issues, and address the inherent challenges of teaching bothfreshmen and engineering students. Because of these different filters, the class was developed inconsideration of the ABET and ALA/ACRL/STS standards1. Additionally, ENGR 101 hasevolved over time through continued collaboration with the ENGR 101 professors.In spring 2011, an Information Literacy grant was given to the Assistant Dean of Engineering.This grant enabled the two engineering librarians to develop curriculum to be included in allENGR 101 classes to address library information
of the curriculum and teaching from the instructor’s perspective. Seldin11focuses on assessing plan, procedures, preconditions, and products as elements of teachingevaluation. Stevenson and Kokkinn12 propose a method of evaluation of teaching using lists ofevaluative statements. Ramsden and Dodds13 recommend the use of generalized questions inevaluation of content (what should be conveyed to the student) and structure (teaching methods).Recognizing that “[c]ommunication and collaboration with faculty are increasingly important inthe development of both curriculum-integrated and stand-alone “just in time” library tutorials,”Appelt and Pendell14 employ faculty feedback on tutorial structure, discipline-specific content,and content integration
Paper ID #33612Student to Scholar: A Professional Skills Focused Library CollaborationDr. Matthew Frenkel, New York University Matthew Frenkel is the engineering librarian at NYU’s Bern Dibner Library, and an adjunct faculty in Mechanical Engineering at NYU Tandon. He is a member of the ASEE Engineering librarian division (ELD). Matthew’s background is in the experimental study of optical whispering gallery sensors, but his current research interests are in how undergraduate and graduate engineering students develop their professional skills.Dr. Azure Janee Stewart Azure is an interactional ethnographer whose research
educational resources survey. Florida Virtual Campus. [cited 2017 March 15] Available from http://www.openaccesstextbooks.org/%5Cpdf%5C2012_Faculty-Admin_OER_Survey_Report.pdf.29. Allen IE, Seaman J. 2014. Opening the curriculum: Open educational resources in US higher education, 2014. Babson Survey Research Group. [cited 2017 March 15] Available from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/openingthecurriculum2014.pdf.30. Kursun E, Cagiltay K, Can G. 2014. An investigation of faculty perspectives on barriers, incentives, and benefits of the OER movement in Turkey. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 15(6):15-32.31. Hilton J. 2016. Open educational resources and college
School of MinesAllyce Horan, Colorado School of Mines Allyce Horan’s interdisciplinary background includes a B.A. in History and French, an M.A. in History, and a certification in TEFL (Teaching English as a Foreign Language). She has been the Mines Writ- ing Center Director since 2018 where she has provided support to faculty, graduate, and undergraduate students on projects ranging from composition curriculum development to grant proposals. Allyce has taught a wide range of academic, technical, and ELL composition classes and workshops since 2012. She is passionate about supporting her campus community, empowering individuals to find their voice and effectively communicate their ideas not only to STEM fields but
are youdoing to work with 10,000 students? It's not possible! You have to take a strategic approach. Soyou have to meet with … deans, associate deans, you have to know all of them. …Every departmenthad a director or a chair – you have to know them, which means you have to meet with them all atleast once a year. Every department has an undergraduate curriculum person and a graduatecurriculum person. You have to know them. Those roll in and out, so you have to stay on top of it.So you are going to meet all of them. And then the courses that you want to be integrated to, youhave to meet and know the faculty.[I4]"An important element of the strategic approach is to use a top-down approach to explain theimportance of ILI to University
information fluencycontent for the Engineering 101 curriculum. Using a PBL approach, the curriculum has evolvedover the past three years and used a combination of venues, including in–person lectures, in-library assignments, and online learning modules. An overview of the current format of theinformation fluency cycle is presented in Appendix A. Despite changes, PBL has remained animportant part of the teaching/learning environment. Collaboration has also been an importantpart in the development of the information literacy curriculum. Weekly meetings with faculty inthe Fall 2013 semester allowed for increased dialog and feedback for the course. Thediscussions in these meetings have brought greater buy-in from the professors as well as requestsfor
active in SPEE throughout his career, serving as president in 1906-07 and in numerous other roles well into the 1940s. He was the fourth recipient of SPEE’sLamme Award in 1931 and was honored with many other awards during his long career.20Jackson was also a strong supporter of libraries, believing that they were integral to theinstructional and research programs of engineering schools.21In his paper, Burgess expressed a concern that public libraries were failing to provide appropriatebooks for young people, artisans and industrial workers who had an interest in science andengineering. The main reason for this, he argued, was that few, if any, librarians had thetechnical knowledge and experience that would allow them to assess the quality of
data, but given what we learned from the post-session survey about lack of time as apotential contributing factor for students’ lower scores, it was an adjustment worth making.Faculty SurveyFaculty who integrated the library sessions into their course were surveyed after the Fall 2019semester and again in Fall 2020. Seven faculty members responded, all of whom had made theworkshop mandatory for their students to attend. They were sent a survey to assess theirperceptions of a measurable increase in the number of citations from the previous year,improvement in the quality of research from last year, whether the students conveyed a sense ofvalue, and whether the instructors themselves thought the workshops had value and wouldcontinue to require
to IL:Graduates of WPI will:_ be able to make connections between disciplines and to integrate information from multiple sources._ have the skills, diligence, and commitment to excellence needed to engage in lifelong learning.The IQP has been in place for almost 40 years; specific Interactive Qualifying Project outcomeswere adopted by faculty in 2004. The numbers in parentheses correspond with WPI curriculum-wide undergraduate outcomes.3 Students who complete an Interactive Qualifying Project will: _ Demonstrate an understanding of the project’s technical, social and humanistic context. (1, 7, 8) _ Define clear, achievable goals and objectives for the project. (6) _ Critically identify, utilize, and properly cite information
in teams to solve a problem posed by an industry partner. Information literacy skillswere incorporated into the curriculum and related to the real-life industry problems. This was afor-credit, semester-long course making it different is some ways than the other studiesmentioned here as well as the one conducted for this paper. David H. Jonassen, who delivered aDistinguished Lecture during the 2010 ASEE Annual Conference wrote a book entitled Learningto Solve Problems: A Handbook for Designing Problem-Solving Learning Environments. Page 22.1676.3Jonassen, while never mentioning information literacy, does provide a detailed framework
Paper ID #25604Board 79: Engineering Source: how robust is the coverage of the engineeringliterature?Prof. Amy S. Van Epps, Harvard University Amy S. Van Epps is Director of Sciences and Engineering Services in the Faculty of Arts and Sciences Li- braries at Harvard University. She was recently an associate professor of Library Science and Engineering Librarian at Purdue University. She has extensive experience providing instruction for engineering and technology students, including Purdue’s first-year engineering program. Her research interests include finding effective methods for integrating information literacy
students represented 50%of Master's students and 78% of PhD students [2].For many years now, the need for enhancing information literacy (IL) training in universities hasbeen well documented. It has been nearly 20 years since Polytechnique Montréal introduced inits academic curriculum a mandatory and credited IL course for graduate students. This coursewas created and updated with guidance from the Association of College & Research Library(ACRL), most notably the Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education [3]and the Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education [4].The main objectives of this paper are to describe the evolution of the course and to discuss thefactors that have contributed to its success. An
multiples modes of delivery techniques. Such a method has been suggested by Fleming and Mills. Lectures, Reading, Writing, Visual Aids, Tactile and Kinesthetic modes of delivery help to reach students with diverse learning skills.DECIDE: Finally, there should be an assessment of the course, the curriculum, the learning environment, the student body, and the instructor. It is important to conduct separate assessment of all the above-mentioned five. Once the five sets of data are in placed in their appropriate context, one can judge the impact of problem based learning on the learning environment itself.Source: Narayanan, Mysore. (2010
recently an associate professor of Library Science and Engineering Librarian at Purdue University. She has extensive experience providing instruction for engineering and technology students, including Purdue’s first-year engineering program. Her research interests include finding effective methods for integrating information literacy knowledge into the undergraduate engi- neering curriculum. Ms. Van Epps has a BA in engineering science from Lafayette College, her MSLS from Catholic University of America, a M.Eng. in Industrial Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and is currently working on her PhD in Engineering Education at Purdue.Mrs. Nastasha E. Johnson, Purdue University, West Lafayette Nastasha
Pharmacy. Most of Kate’s publication history revolves around how health and technology interact, and her primary research focus is on how people are accessing, understanding and disseminating information.Ms. Kari D. Weaver, University of Waterloo Kari D. Weaver holds a B.A. from Indiana University, an M.L.I.S. from the University of Rhode Island, and is a doctoral candidate in the Department of Instruction & Teacher Education, School of Education at the University of South Carolina. Currently, she works as the Instructional Design Librarian at the University of Waterloo Library in Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. Her research interests include co-teaching, information literacy perceptions and behaviors of students across
Paper ID #29006Recent changes to the Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) exam and waysengineering libraries can support studentsMs. Jean L Bossart P.E., University of Florida Jean Bossart is an Associate Engineering Librarian at the University of Florida (UF). She assists students with research, data support, and citation management. She investigates and integrates creative technolo- gies, such as 3D printing into the STEM discipline library services. She has a BS in chemical engineering and MS in environmental engineering from UF, over 20 years of experience in industry and consulting, and is a licensed professional engineer
specifically looked at algorithm bias instruction, we did not find recent publishedwork in the field. However, compared to when we began our research in 2018, we find thatmany computer science programs now recognize and incorporate courses on algorithm bias intothe curriculum. An article published in 2019, “Embedded EthiCS: Integrating Ethics Across CSEducation” by Grosz et al. [14] outlines efforts at Harvard University to create amultidisciplinary approach to teaching ethics to CS students, utilizing instructors fromphilosophy and computer science to teach courses that address various ethical issues that facecomputer scientists.The Embedded EthiCS approach is being embraced at other institutions as well. StanfordUniversity [15] is one of the
produce answers for engineers.” Carlson thenchallenged engineering educators and librarians to find “three relevant information items” ineach course and assign students the responsibility of finding them. Carlson believed that such anapproach, adopted across an entire curriculum, would develop in students “a fairly sophisticatedknowledge of what the campus has to offer in the way of information resources.” Of course, theidea of integrating library resources with regular engineering courses had been proposed bylibrarians before.[38]Although ASEE President Easton’s vision, which was clearly inspired by the Weinberg Report,may have alarmed some librarians, he apparently had no intention of putting them out ofbusiness. In fact, he needed their help
across curriculum, as described in thearticle, “Promoting information literacy through a faculty workshop”4. An effective researchassignment (unlike generic assignments often found in university 101 or first-year writingcourses) • Originates from subject matter. • Shows students the purpose of research (and its benefits to them). • Emphasizes analysis over answers, (immersion in the professional debates). • Assists students with planning their research (before and during information retrieval). • Is progressive, with opportunities for feedback at stages (from a variety of sources: instructor, peers, librarians). • Discusses the process itself, (not just the project), to
Paper ID #5859Beyond JEE: Finding publication venues to get your message to the ’right’audienceProf. Amy S. Van Epps, Purdue University, West Lafayette Amy S. Van Epps is an associate professor of Library Science and Engineering Librarian at Purdue Uni- versity. She has extensive experience providing instruction for engineering and technology students, in- cluding Purdue’s first-year engineering program. Her research interests include finding effective methods for integrating information literacy knowledge into the undergraduate engineering curriculum