Paper ID #43540Uncovering Information Behavior: AI-Assisted Citation Analysis of MechanicalEngineering Technology Senior Capstone ReportsMark Chalmers, University of Cincinnati Mark Chalmers is the Science & Engineering Librarian in the CEAS Library at the University of Cincinnati.Aja Rachel Bettencourt-Mccarthy, University of Cincinnati Aja Bettencourt-McCarthy is the Science and Engineering Global Services Librarian at the University of Cincinnati. Prior to joining the faculty at the University of Cincinnati, Aja was the STEM Instruction Librarian at the University of Kentucky Libraries and the Head of Public Services at
Berry is a Professor in the School of Engineering Technology at Purdue University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Using “Micro” Approaches to Prepare Engineering Technology and Business Students for the Informed WorkplaceAbstractThe information landscape of today’s workplace is very different from the one our studentsexperience in academia. As such, it is critical for students graduating and entering thetransdisciplinary, information-rich workplace to have solid information literacy skills andunderstand how to seek out and use information from traditional and non-traditional sources.With the support of an internal grant, librarians and an engineering technology professor at alarge
Paper ID #41008The Role of University Research Libraries on Improving Education in Science,Technology, Engineering, Arts and Mathematics: A Focus on InstitutionalCollaborative CultureDr. Jason M. Keith, Mississippi State University Jason Keith is the Dean and Earnest W. and Mary Ann Deavenport, Jr. Chair in the Bagley College of Engineering at Mississippi State University, a position he has held since March, 2014. Keith received his B.S. in Chemical Engineering from The University of Akron and his Ph.D. from the University of Notre Dame. Keith is a Fellow of ASEE.Lis Pankl, Mississippi State University
Paper ID #43092Equipping First-Year Engineering Students with Artificial Intelligence Literacy(AI-L): Implementation, Assessment, and ImpactDr. Uri Feldman, Wentworth Institute of Technology Uri Feldman is an Associate Professor of Biomedical Engineering in the School of Engineering at Wentworth Institute of Technology in Boston. He received a Ph.D. from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Media Lab, a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, and an M.S. in Electrical Engineering from University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign. As a Postdoctoral Fellow at Harvard Medical
doesn’t usually match the mental models that undergraduate searchers areaccustomed to when using Google. In human cognition, mental models are important schemas of the world that people use toreason, solve problems, and make inferences across situations [1]. When students apply theirmental models of Google-like search expectations to single search bars on library websites orscientific databases, they are often met with confusing, unexpected, or incorrect results. Thepurpose of this exploratory study is to evaluate undergraduate College of Engineering andCollege of Sciences and Arts students’ real-world search strategies during a library instructionsession at Michigan Technological University (MTU). College of Engineering students
smaller set, in order to guarantee textbook usage.To ensure we identified only textbooks used to educate engineering students, we used libraryreserve lists. We obtained these lists from five institutions: Massachusetts Institute of Technology(MIT), University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), State University of New York Polytechnic(SUNY Poly), California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo (CalPoly SLO), andCarnegie Mellon University (CMU). These institutions were selected to ensure a mix of publicand private institutions, and for the availability of their reserve lists—either by request orthrough publicly available information. Reserve list policies vary by institution; some institutionslist permanent reserves, while other institutions
Paper ID #37118Research in Progress: Engineering Research for Indigenous EngineeringTechniquesMs. Jeanette M. Mueller-Alexander, Arizona State University Library Has been a Librarian for over 40 years specializing in cross-disciplinary database searching and retrieval of scholarly articles. A special interest has always been retrieval of research about or by Native Americans.Alexander Soto, Labriola National American Indian Data Center Alexander Soto (Tohono O’odham) is director of the Labriola National American Indian Data Center at Arizona State University (ASU) Library. Under his leadership, the Labriola Center has
Urbana-Champaign Elisandro is an Assistant Professor, Emerging Technologies and Immersive Scholarship Librarian, and Director of the Grainger IDEA Lab Digital Scholarship Center at the University of Illinois Urbana- Champaign (UIUC). In addition, from 2020 to 2023, he served as Interim Head of the Mathematics Library at UIUC. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Collection Management in Preparation for Building Restoration: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Mathematics LibraryAbstractThe Mathematics Library at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (UIUC) is currentlyhoused in Altgeld Hall, a building established in 1897 and listed on the National Register
Los Angeles. Her research and teaching interests include algorithmic bias, ethical AI, virtual reality for lab instruction, and open science.Clara Llebot, Oregon State UniversitySheree Fu, California State University, Los Angeles Sheree Fu is the Engineering, Computer Science, and Technology Librarian at California State University, Los Angeles. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Engineering Data Repositories and Open Science Compliance: A Guide for Engineering Faculty and LibrariansIntroductionAs engineering and data management specialist librarians, we advocate for the core values ofopen science, open access publishing, and open data that further accessibility
suchentrepreneurship education expressed positive feedback to the value of the programs forproviding engineering students with professional skills and an entrepreneurial mindset [6], [13].Entrepreneurial activity in engineering has even prompted some to suggest a change to ABET(Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology), the organization which overseesaccreditation of engineering schools, outcomes to further develop business and entrepreneurshipskills. In their article, Sababha et al. [2] wanted to add the following ABET learning outcome:“to develop and evaluate a business plan that transforms an engineering design (system,products, services, and solutions) into a business opportunity utilizing entrepreneurial skills andknowledge” [2, p. 2]. They go
also highlighted the widespread optimism for the future of OER [6].OER in Engineering:Given the decentralized nature of creating and hosting OER, it is challenging to quantify theexact number produced. One of the most commonly used reference libraries, The Open TextbookLibrary [7], lists a total of 1,361 resources as of Jan 1, 2024. As seen in Figure 1, most OERshave been written for the Humanities, followed by the Natural and Social Sciences. WhileComputer Science has 116 developed OER, other Engineering & Technology branches have onlydeveloped 70 OER. Furthermore, 48 of the OER in Engineering & Technology have been writtenfor either general Engineering & Technology or Electrical Engineering. This leaves only 22 OERin the Open
Paper ID #41063Teaching Engineering Information Literacy with INCLUSIVE ADDIEMr. Paul McMonigle, Pennsylvania State University Paul McMonigle is the Engineering Instruction Librarian at the Pennsylvania State University. He graduated from Syracuse University with a MS-LIS degree in December of 2018 and from the Pennsylvania State University with a BA degree in History in 2017. His research interests include information literacy instruction for STEM students, student engagement and outreach programs (especially military and veteran students in STEM), and the early history of libraries and collections.Ms. Denise Amanda
– Library, 6/12/2020 906 librar* AND engineer* AND (academic OR Information Science “higher education” OR college or university & Technology OR post*secondary) Abstracts (LISTA) Limiters Publication Date: 20150101-20191231 Publication Type: Academic Journal Document Type: Article Language: English EBSCO – Library 6/17/2020 724 librar* AND engineer* AND (academic OR Literature &
Dartmouth College. She had a BA degree from BostonUniversity but no BLS. Only data for engineering librarians, other librarians, faculty members,and library administrators were analyzed in this study.5. The Directory of College Engineering Library PersonnelIn 1948, the Executive Committee of the Engineering School Libraries Section (ESLS) of theAssociation of College and Reference Libraries (ACRL), which was chaired by Madeline Gibsonof the Michigan College of Mining and Technology, decided to compile a directory of librarystaff and faculty associated with academic engineering libraries in the U.S. and Canada. Manylibrary staff directories had been published previously but this was the first to focus onengineering libraries. The project was
highereducation settings, particularly for disabled students, who are often forgotten or less emphasizedin DEI efforts. In some disciplinary areas, such as in science, technology, engineering, and math(STEM) fields, disabled students are more likely to experience discrimination due to a reportedlymore competitive and less flexible and supportive environment. Academic librarians and othereducators can make a difference for these students by contributing to a more inclusive campusenvironment for disabled people in STEM by implementing universally accessible and inclusivepedagogy, resources, services, and spaces. Such efforts are more effective when they incorporatea disability justice perspective, which provides an intersectional framework to understand
emphasis on teaching technical standards.Additionally, there is concensus that a technical standards course would be beneficial to students,new hires, and new professional engineers, but also to engineers at more experienced levels.Course content was the primary (81.9%) course feature of interest to survey participants with themost desirable topics including technical standards basics (84.1%), practical applications ofstandards (70.1%), and how to read standards (69.7%).IntroductionThe incorporation of technical standards into engineering program curriculums has been listedwithin the ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology) criteria for accreditingengineering programs since 2001 when the ABET criteria underwent a reevaluation
illustrate that librarians face a challenging task in supportingresearchers who need to access such diverse formats as blogs, datasets, fact sheets, memoranda,research proposals, and myriad others. Some, though certainly not all, of the most commonformats of GL used by engineering scholars and practitioners include standards, patents,technical reports, conference proceedings, case studies, preprints, datasets, and dissertations andtheses.Historically, because these resources are not produced by commercial publishers withstandardized distribution networks and because their formats are so diverse and numerous, GLhas been difficult to identify, locate, and access. Lawrence summarizes some of the issues drivenby major technological advances surrounding
and implementation of technical standards. These challenges are expressed intechnical committee meetings, in office rooms after hiring a new engineering intern, and byeducators across engineering disciplines seeking ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineeringand Technology, Inc.). We hypothesize that the technical standards challenges faced by thecollective engineering profession are similar. A survey about the importance of and challengespresented by technical standards was completed by participants (N = 201) from multipledisciples, educational levels, and backgrounds across the United States. This paper analyzes thewritten responses provided in response to the survey (N = 149). Participant responses highlightseven technical standards
] M.J. Khoo, L. Rozaklis, C. Hall, and D. Kusunoki, D., “A really nice spot: evaluating place, space, and technology in academic libraries,” College & Research Libraries, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 51–70, 2016.[5] J.-A. Kim, “User perception and use of the academic library: a correlation analysis”. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 43, 49–53, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-04- 2021-0122.[6] B. Chang and H. Eskridge, “What engineers want: lessons learned from five years of studying engineering library users,” in ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, Seattle Jun. 14-17, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/11829. [Accessed Jan. 6, 2023].[7] C. Tenopir and D. King, Communication Patterns of Engineers
of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), and a BS in Biotechnology from Jiangsu University of Science and Technology (Zhenjiang, China). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Is There a Relation Between Research Topics and High-Impact Journals in Biomedical Engineering?AbstractSome early-career biomedical engineering researchers believe in a theory that some researcharticles are more likely to get published in high-impact journals simply because their researchtopics are favored. This theory is tested by regressing the journal impact metric against thebiomedical engineering research topics across thousands of recent academic journal articles inbiomedical engineering. The
Paper ID #43714Board 103: Developing a User Experience Study (Work in Progress)James M. Cox, The University of Iowa James M. Cox has been a member of the University of Iowa Lichtenberger Engineering Library Staff since August 2014. In his current role as the Public Services and Emerging Technologies Librarian, since 2019, he oversees a team of 12 student employees at the Service Desk. Additionally, James manages the library’s technology resources, including the prototyping equipment available in the Creative Space/Makerspace and the extensive Tool Library containing over 275 pieces of equipment. James is interested in
-Champaign. Originally trained as a geologist, she is interested in the sociology and social history of academic research in STEM disciplines.Lucy Marie Alice Esteve, Duke University Lucy Esteve is an Endocrinology Research Fellow in the Department of Medicine at Duke University. Her academic interests focus on the use of technology (in particular wearable smartwatches) for early detection of diabetes and prevention of diabetes-related complications.Karnika Singh, Duke University Karnika Singh is a PhD candidate in Biomedical Engineering at Duke University. Her research is focused on the use of digital health technologies for health monitoring. ©American Society for Engineering Education
his home in academic librarianship, he worked as a reliability engineer in the nuclear power industry and later as an attorney. Eric has a BS in Physics from Harvey Mudd College, an MA in Information Resources and Library Science from the University of Arizona, an MS in Management of Technology from Arizona State University, a JD from the University of San Diego, and he is currently enrolled in ASU’s PhD program for Engineering Education Systems and Design. Outside of the library, he enjoys travel, skiing, and trivia contests. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 A Qualitative Analysis of Library Chat Reference Transcripts: Examining Engineering Student
departmentsamong these participants were: computer science and engineering (n = 19); technology, culture,and society (n = 7); and technology, management, and innovation (n = 7).The survey asked participants to quantify their usage of ChatGPT and to describe specificinteractions they had with the tool. Due to the length of the survey, the exact questions used arenot included in this proceeding, but can be directly shared with any interested reader. Figure 1offers a look at how student survey respondents perceived the accuracy and usefulness ofChatGPT’s responses based on a Likert scale where 0 indicates lack of consideration forusefulness or accuracy, 1 indicates not at all useful or accurate, and 5 indicates extremely usefulor accurate. Students who
, technology,engineering, mathematics, and medical science (STEM) courses. We surveyed college anduniversity STEM instructors to determine if they were utilizing Open Education Resources(OER) and Open Access (OA) books, articles, or other resources. We also asked whetherinstructors are selecting materials based on accessibility, diversity of format types, representationof a variety of identities within STEM professions, or other criteria. We asked what informationresources are consulted when instructors select instructional materials. Using qualitative codinganalysis of free text responses, we identified several themes in the data that will help librariansand publishers to find, curate, and advertise more useful materials for STEM course
processes to the Library’s accessibility services, ensuring respectful andattentive support for all students. These efforts resulted in more engineering students usingaccessibility services in the Library. With increased awareness and utilization of thesespecialized Library services, the librarian successfully advocated for the purchase of additionalborrowable assistive technologies at other libraries across campus. Finally, the librariancollaborated internally with the Library’s Communications team and accessibility specialist staffto develop and share social media content. This social media content was then shared with theEngineering Wellness team, to be further distributed through their social media accountsutilizing their network to reach
seminarsinfluenced a student’s study skills or their use of library technology. The answer was not verymuch – in fact, they found that 22% of first year engineering students had never used the library[7]. Engineering graduate students' needs tend to be quite different from their undergraduatecounterparts. Many graduate programs assume students enter the program with foundationalinformation literacy knowledge obtained during their undergraduate programs. However, this isat odds with our understanding of theory-heavy undergraduate programs. Previous research ongraduate student populations indicates that confidence in their information literacy skills is high,but this confidence may not translate into practical skills [8]. A survey of Electrical
Paper ID #41165Undergraduate Engineering Transfer Students and the One-Shot LibraryResource Instruction: Using Nearpod to Promote Active Student EngagementBeth Carpenter, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Beth Carpenter is the Undergraduate Engineering & Instruction Librarian at the University at Buffalo. Innovating instruction, instructional technology, and supporting undergraduates through library instruction are her main areas of research, scholarship, and librarian activity.Ms. Erin Rowley, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Erin Rowley is the Head of Science and Engineering
Paper ID #38580Using Decision-based Learning to Develop Expert Information LiteracyBehaviors in Engineering UndergraduatesMr. David Pixton, Brigham Young University David Pixton is a subject liaison at the Harold B. Lee Library at Brigham Young University. In this role, he is responsible for providing research training and assistance to students and faculty within the majority of engineering and technology fields offered at the university. He holds degrees in Mechanical Engineer- ing and Library & Information Science. David’s current research is focused on improving learning in a library environment, including the
Engineering launched anexploratory survey to determine the amount declared engineering majors spent on textbooksacross their classes. At Dartmouth College, major declarations occur at the conclusion ofsophomore year, therefore junior and senior engineering majors were the target audience for thesurvey. Because Dartmouth is a liberal arts college, engineering students must take courses in art,literature, thought, international study, social analysis, quantitative or deductive sciences, naturaland physical sciences, and technology and applied sciences [4]. While engineering classes fulfillthe science and technology portions, engineering majors take many classes outside of thedepartment. It is important to note this fact because the costs of textbooks