innovative pedagogies that can help enhancethe employability of students. In response to this need, an exploratory study was conducted at asatellite campus of a large, Midwestern research-focused university. The intervention includedthe implementation of an entrepreneurially minded and communication-focused project,developed by the instructor of an upper-level undergraduate manufacturing course. Post-completion of the project, a metacognitive reflection assignment was administered to theparticipants and subsequently, data was collected. Participant responses were qualitativelyanalyzed using thematic analysis which led to the discovery of three themes: (1) identifyingvalue in nature-inspired design, (2) confidence in communication and self-expression
and deliverables of the project are clearlystated in advance to keep students informed. The objective of this project is to incorporateIndustry 4.0 skills and knowledge to the students in addition to learn the methods to stay currentin industry. The project deliverables are (1) students will present their work to the rest of theclass, and (2) submit a reflective paper on their experience. This paper will discuss the setup ofresearch problems, survey results of the student experience before and after working on theproject, and summary of findings on the student experience from the reflective papers. Reflectivepapers serve as a tool both to summarize the student experience and for continuous improvementin the context of this project and future
produce a total of 84 Volts DC that was fed to the inverter’s input. The inverter wasconfigured to operate off-grid and produce a 120 Volts AC output connected to the ACdisconnect box, as well as a 50 Volt DC output that charged the battery bank. Thedisconnect box fed the power distribution box which fed the load and 24-volt sourcesthat powered the LIMS box and all the sensors. Although the connection of the sensorsto the LIMS box is straightforward, care must be taken to ensure that the sensors werewired correctly using the appropriate load resistor.Once the sensors were connected, the LIMS “engine” was configured and data wassuccessfully collected reflecting the use of voltage, current and temperature from theload. (a soldering station). The
technology students enrolled in the Principles ofMechanical Systems course participated in this study, and were tasked with the design of avehicle that would solve overcrowdedness in urban areas in the next century. Focus of theresearch was on innovative bio-inspired design that is backed by scientific evidence and the useof arts to convey the design. The students then expressed their opinions on their design projectusing a photovoice reflection of their learning. Student responses to the photovoice reflectionprompts related to the design were qualitatively categorized under three themes: 1)demonstrating the importance of entrepreneurial thinking from the end user’s perspective 2)stressing the importance of teamwork and communication and 3) using
knowledge gained from reading publications from professional journalssuch as the International Society of Automation (ISA) - InTech Journal, in implementingIndustry 4.0 in the ET curriculum. (2) Present the results along with a reflective analysis of theimplementation in the pilot Summer III 2022, Control Systems course. (3) Present the process forintegration of additional professional journals such as IEEE, Journal of Engineering Technology(ASEE), and Journal of Manufacturing Processes (SME), in the concentration-specific courses inthe ET Program. (4) Deliberate the importance of integration of professional journals as ateaching strategy to augment the classroom learning experience in the department’s ETAC(Engineering Technology Accreditation
,foliage), and navigation processes (i.e. changing user viewpoint and maneuvering around site);and bringing all of these elements together into a working system prototype. The students wereprovided with mentorship from two faculty members of the San Francisco State University, onefrom Computer Science department and the other one from Civil/Structural Engineeringdepartment), along with feedback from the SEAONC DES committee to advance their work.This support system provided them the necessary technical support while providing expertise inthe context of the application.3. ResultsNote: The following reflects the experience of the student participants reported as co-authors tothis paper.Pre-Assessment: Reflecting on the computer science curriculum
] focuses on assessing student learning and experience to ascertainwhether students have acquired the skills, knowledge, and competencies related to their programof study. The ET department faculty use a combination of direct and indirect methods forassessment and evaluation of the SOs. The results and findings of these evaluations aresystematically utilized as input for the program’s CI actions[1], [13]. Direct methods requirestudents to exhibit their knowledge and skills as they respond to the instrument itself. Objectivetests, projects, laboratory work, presentations, and classroom assignments all meet this criterion[14]. Indirect methods such as surveys and interviews require students to reflect on their learningrather than to display it [12
methods.The assessment results from a student self-reflection survey for exposing vibration and modalanalysis support the need to expose mechanical engineering technology students to theseconcepts. Student responses to open ended questions indicate they are able to grasp someconcepts of vibration analysis using FEA as an analysis tool.IntroductionIt is understood that undesirable vibrations in mechanical structures can potentially lead toexcessive deflections and system failures. When the natural frequency of vibration of a structurecoincides with the natural frequency of excitation, resonance occurs, leading to excessivedisplacements [1]. These excessive displacements can cause an annoying oscillation in minorcases or can cause catastrophic failures
provided throughout thesemester to prepare for upcoming interventions. Mentors are trained to mentor kids in theexperience of Making, which means teaching them how to complete tasks such as connectingsimple circuits, using a 3D printer, and performing other simple Maker tasks to enhance theirSTEM learning.In addition to recruiting and mentoring practices, we report the reflections and suggestions fromstudent mentors to illustrate how they learn and progress. We also utilize descriptive data andconduct t-tests regarding training and mentoring outcomes to determine whether student mentorsmaster the knowledge and pedagogy, therefore, are confident to teach the 5th and 6th-grade kids.RecruitingOur mentors are mostly recruited from engineering and
themes in the data by examining theparticipant’s responses to the open-ended questions. The data was first reviewed to identify initialcodes, which were then grouped into categories and themes based on their similarity. The themeswere then reviewed to ensure they accurately reflected the data and were supported by theparticipants' responses. This mixed-methods approach provided a comprehensive understandingof student perspectives, and the results were used to develop recommendations to enhance theonline learning experience for engineering students.ResultsThe questionnaire was administered to 15 students enrolled in the Principles of Surveyingengineering course, and the results are presented below.Question 1 indicated that 80% of participants
inmore challenging open-ended analyses. Students begin by applying Ohm’s law to the seriescircuit, then learn to make power calculations, and eventually draw conclusions related toimpedance matching. This activity remains relevant because the calculations are reflected inlaboratory measurements with the VAWT.AssignmentsThe activity spans five weeks. A problem set is completed once a week in class and part of thatproblem set is a simple series circuit, the model for the VAWT. The lab component meets once aweek, and this is where concepts are reinforced. It is not unusual for some students, usually thosewith no prior experience, to find the circuit analysis problem so different that they react bydisengaging and deciding it is not worth their time
importanceof the capstone projects is reflected in Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology(ABET) criteria and assessment protocols. [7]2. EMET Senior Projects at Penn State - FayetteAt Penn State – Fayette EMET program the senior project coursework is based on requiredEMET 403 and EMET 440 courses. The EMET 403 is a one-credit course on design projectpreparation that includes the selection of the topic and initial design work that involves planning,creation of design schematics or blueprints, and design specifications, and culminates in thePreliminary Design Report (PDR) with a budget and schedule of all activities includingimplementation stage. Since the EMET program does not provide a separate course on projectmanagement principles with
reflect this change as well.The project is selected to be challenging in regards to high current delivery and has a practicalapplication with other laboratory experiences, with the following output voltages, currents, LoadRegulation (+/- 5%), and Line Regulation (+/- 10%) requirements. i. + 9V at 1.5A, ii. -9V at 1.5A, iii. and 5V at 2A. In order for students to accomplish their projects, they would be expected to follow therequired steps and procedures and utilize the knowledge and experiences they have gained: i. Design the project using circuit analysis to come up with the required components, ii. Specify parts and components,iii. Order parts using an online catalog, iv. Cost analysis, v. Design the layout, vi
situation of manageable complexity. This can enhance the students’ ability toidentify and solve real-world problems, experiment with new ideas, and reflect on theresults of their work.References 1. DeGarmo’s Materials and Processes in Manufacturing. Black and Kohser.2020. 2. The Technology of Metallurgy. Dalton. 1994 3. Engineering Materials 2 – An introduction to Microstructures, Processing and Design. by Ashby & Jones. 3rd Edition.2012 4. ASTM E8-E8M Standard Test Method for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials. 5. ASTM E18 Standard Test Methods for Rockwell Hardness of Metallic Materials. 6. Effect of cold rolling on microstructure and material properties of 5052 alloy sheet produced by continuous casting. Zhu, et
, makingthem to see themselves as entrepreneurially minded individuals [7, 8]. Storytelling, throughwhich students share specific work or school situations that might represent a wide variety ofethical concerns [9] also constitutes ways to enhance and to extend the ethics learning outside atypical classroom setting.The integration of informal peer assessments provides additional opportunities for students toengage with academic content vicariously and to learn from their peers’ stories. The informalassessment process lowers the stakes, focuses on students’ learning as reflected in each story’snarrative, and encourages participation and creativity. Moreover, the processes of generating andsharing stories and the peer assessment process connect to
4.1 0% (1 or 2) You employed the method with frequency typical of those teaching classes of simi- 71% (4 or 5) lar size and level of student motivation.Reflective and Integrative Learning Your Students Rating Suggested Action AverageEncouraged students to reflect on and evaluate what they have learned 4.4 6% (1 or 2) You employed the method more frequently than those teaching classes of
expand on the scope of this study by investigating the generalizability of the resultsto other regions and cultures and exploring potential ways to improve the program to support thedevelopment of future leaders in sustainable engineering.IntroductionEngineering education has transformed in recent years, emphasizing experiential learning todevelop students' competencies. One example of this trend is Engineers Without Borders (EWB),which provides students hands-on field experience through sustainable engineering projects. [1].EWB's experiential learning program is based on the principle of direct experience and reflection,which effectively develops the skills necessary for engineering practice, including problem-solving, teamwork, and leadership
Primary School Teachers. Asian Journal of education, 14(4), 125-147.Song, M. (2018). Learning to teach 3D printing in schools: how do teachers in Korea prepare to integrate 3D printing technology into classrooms? Educational Media International. doi:10.1080/09523987.2018.1512448Sullivan, P., & McCartney, H. (2017). Integrating 3D printing into an early childhood teacher preparation course: Reflections on practice. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 38(1), 39-51.TeachEngineering.org. (2022). Engineering Desing Process. Retrieved 2022, from TeachEngineering.org: https://www.teachengineering.org/design/designprocessteachHOUSTON. (2022). teachHOUSTON program. Retrieved from University of Houston: https
are not explainedby a single theory [1, 8]. One solution that may help resolve these concerns about computernetwork education would be the use of computer network simulations [9]. Computer networksimulation is the imitation of real-world network communication scenarios using the software.The purpose of this simulation software is to reflect the quality of a given network designthrough the analysis of the performance of the simulation [7, 10]. Since computer networksimulation is a tool that is used regularly in the professional setting of network design andresearch, it would make sense that it would also be useful for educational purposes [9]. Thispaper aims to introduce the integration of OMNeT++, a network simulation environment
emphasis on STEM learning is an importantkey to developing productive, responsible, and contributing members of society.Program Components and Activities:The MEWT project at ECSU adopted the experiential and authentic learning framework, whichmakes student engagement the top priority, where students learn by doing, discovering,reflecting, and applying. Authentic and experiential learning creates an environment necessary tonurture the 21st Century soft skills including critical thinking and problem-solving,communication, collaboration and teamwork, and learning to learn.The program activities were designed based on three tenets which include mentoring, research,and education/training. The education and training components included enhancing
Figure 2. It reflects the diversity of the collegeof ECST. 13 of 24 students responding to a question about ethnicity were LatinX. A majority of respondents(15) indicated an expected graduation date of 2023, meaning that they enrolled in the Robotics courseduring their second- or third-to last semester at college. More than half of the students (55%) werecommunity college transfer students. Figure 2. Student participants by race/ethnicity To understand the impact of the course, information on students’ previous experience with hands-onengineering projects in their major was also collected, as shown in Figure 3. Only 8 students (33%) hadtaken courses in the past that provided hands-on experience in their major
theirwork.Pedagogical approaches for teaching sustainability in civil engineeringSustainability concepts can be incorporated into civil engineering education through curriculumchanges to the course content, involving students in research on sustainability-related topics,collaborating with industry partners to allow students gain exposure and work on real-worldprojects, and pedagogical approaches such as project-based learning, problem-based learning,and case studies. Gutierrez-Bucheli et al. (2022) suggested teaching sustainability using project-based approaches that reflect the culture and context of the students to enable them to frame theirunderstanding of sustainability. Vemury et al. (2018) also found that problem and project-basedapproaches using real
refer to the culminative findings for all students on a givenassessment as it relates to the course learning outcome(s) which are a critical tool in evaluatinghow well the necessary material within a course is being delivered to and received by thestudents. Both student and course level assessments should be considered when evaluating theimpact of changes made within a course. These types of assessments will be the focus of thispaper as a means to measuring students’ ability to consciously assess their competence in realtime during exams. Instructor level assessments refer to those performed by students at the endof the semester. While these are vital to course improvement they do not always reflect studentunderstanding and for that reason are
adequate time was not allocated for testing. This affected their outcome at the competition.Cost of ImplementationDepending upon the number of students and teams, the cost is variable. In the first year using theVEX U platform, the cost was approximately $1200 per student (20 students = $24K). Themajority of robot component parts are reusable. The playing field and perimeter remain the same,with the addition of a new set of game elements. Miscellaneous new components includereplacement motors, hardware items, and sensors. Prices have risen over the past two years andapproximate current prices are reflected in Table 3. Table 3. Current Initial Cost – (Class of 20 students - 5 teams) Quantity Description
% 59% 1% Average* 69% 58% 11% 59% 57% 2% Sample SD 19% 13% 6% 20% 17% 3% Max Score 88% 81% 8% 91% 74% 17% *Average calculated without zero valuesIn the class data from the initial effort (2020), scores were higher for the group with theinstructor in the room than for the group using the video link. The biggest difference is seen inthe median scores (75% vs 58%); there is less difference in the maximum score (88% vs 81%).The results for Spring, 2022, reflect changes in the procedure for offering these courses. Theinstructor was still operating from one