positive andcognitive psychology to help them develop a sense of awareness, define a sense of purpose,and constructively modify thoughts and behaviors. In the second part, students lead andimplement a project that will positively involve and impact between 50 and 200 people.Through this guided experiential process students learn to intentionally create possibility, toface and overcome adversity, to enroll volunteers into their programs and to create a positivenurturing environment through Master Mind Groups, Accountability Partnerships, and Co-coaching strategies.A train the trainer and pilot program was launched in multiple campuses at Tecnológico deMonterrey with interesting results. Students successfully reached out to their communities
. Dr. Traum coordinated MSOE’s first crowd-funded senior design project. He also co-founded with students EASENET, a start- up renewable energy company to commercialize waste-to-energy biomass processors. Dr. Traum began his academic career as a founding faculty member in the Mechanical & Energy Engineer- ing Department at the University of North Texas - Denton where he established a successful, externally- funded researcher incubator that trained undergraduates to perform experimental research and encouraged matriculation to graduate school. Traum received a Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology where he held a research assistantship at MIT’s Institute for Soldier
Paper ID #15994Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration and Innovation for Engineering and Busi-ness Student TeamsDavid G. Alexander Ph.D., California State University - Chico Dr. Alexander’s research interests and areas of expertise are in teaching pedagogy, capstone design, renewable energy systems, thermal sciences, vehicle system modeling and simulation, heat transfer, new product development, entrepreneurship, and technology transfer. He is PI and adviser of the Department of Energy Collegiate Wind Competition 2016. He is also working on an undergraduate research project modeling solar cells using a thermodynamics approach and
AC 2008-1729: IMPACT: A MULTIDISCIPLINARY APPROACH FOR CREATINGHIGH-TECH STARTUPSKelly Crittenden, Louisiana Tech University Dr. Kelly Crittenden received his BS and PhD in BioMedical Engineering from Louisiana Tech University in 1996 and 2001 respectively. He is often involved in multidisciplinary work at Louisiana Tech, either through the Integrated Engineering Curriculum or through the IMPaCT (Innovation through Multidisciplinary Projects and Collaborative Teams) program. He is also very involved in STEM education at both the pre-college and college levels.Jon Pratt, Louisiana Tech University Dr. Jon Pratt received his BA in Physics in 1976 from Centenary College. He completed his
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 The evolution of a course on Creativity and New Product DevelopmentAbstractCreativity and New Product Development is a two semester senior design course for MechanicalEngineering students at the University of Virginia. Design thinking is fundamental to all stagesof this course. It emphasizes creative thinking and stimulates the students to generate diversesolutions to problems. Students are required to work in teams developing new product ideas.Each team carries their idea through to a working prototype, and manufacturing and businessplans. They also submit a proposal for funding and a draft patent application. In its current form,the class project is usually the basis for the senior
regarding “team performance” or “team dynamics,” typically assessedthrough measures of team communication, leadership, and project management. The pervasiveassumption underlying much of this research is that effective team functioning results ineffective innovation outcomes. Yet, the relationship between team dynamics and innovationoutcomes has not been well studied. Most of the existing research does not assess theeffectiveness of the final product of teamwork, nor does most existing research examineinnovation outcomes in relation to team functioning. In this paper, we examine the relationshipbetween team dynamics and innovation outcomes. Using an entrepreneurial simulation in anupper division thermodynamics course, this mixed-methods study
students to learn,adopt and implement attributes of social innovation philosophies and servant leadership via case studiesand discussion during the class meeting times. Weekly modules were developed to include one socialinnovation case study (including presentation rubric) per week and leadership lessons. The classproceeded in the flipped classroom approach, where each student presented their perspective andanalysis of the assigned social innovation case study, followed by interactive discussion within thegroup. Throughout the class, students advanced their understanding of the attributes of socialinnovation and leadership and its context to globalization and social equity. Concurrently, students weredivided among two groups for the class project
Technology. At Rose-Hulman, he co-created the Integrated, First-Year Curriculum in Science, Engineering and Mathematics, which was recognized in 1997 with a Hesburgh Award Certificate of Excellence. He served as Project Director a Na- tional Science Foundation (NSF) Engineering Education Coalition in which six institutions systematically renewed, assessed, and institutionalized innovative undergraduate engineering curricula. He has authored over 70 papers and offered over 30 workshops on faculty development, curricular change processes, cur- riculum redesign, and assessment. He has served as a program co-chair for three Frontiers in Education Conferences and the general chair for the 2009 conference. Prof. Froyd is a
first year engineering experience, authentic projects and assessments, and P-12 engineering.Heather Sapp, Ohio Northern University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Curiosity, Connection, Creating Value: Improving Service Learning by Applying the Entrepreneurial MindsetIntroductionProviding students with meaningful learning experiences can be challenging. One approach is touse authentic learning, where knowledge is applied in real world contexts. Through contentanalysis of relevant journal articles from different disciplines, Rule outlined four characteristicsof authentic learning.1 First, the problem at hand is rooted in the
sophomore level two-coursesequence (required for engineering students in all disciplines) in which the primary learningoutcomes are engineering design and technical communication. These courses are team-taughtby faculty from Engineering and from Communications; specifically, Writing Arts in the fall andPublic Speaking in the spring. Historically, the fall course has featured three major coursedeliverables: (1) a “research sequence” consisting of a rhetorical analysis, an annotatedbibliography, and a literature review, (2) a humanities assignment in which students explore theimpact of technology on societal needs, and (3) laboratory and design reports stemming fromhands-on engineering projects completed in lab.During the summer of 2019, the faculty
-customer data at the beginning of thesemester to help inform their project proposals and then to evaluate alternate designs aroundmidterm. The first two lessons help the students to broaden their ideas about who theirstakeholders could be and to think beyond the technical aspects of the project to address thepotential value of the project. At the end of term, they produce an elevator pitch video andconduct a technical design review (TDR). The final lesson about responding to a failed pitch canhelp students move forward using the critiques from their TDR and video pitch.The contributions of this paper include (1) illustration of active learning exercises developed forteam-based, in-class activities to support the online content, and (2) development
Technology Innovation Center(ETIC). The ETIC will consolidate and expand the School’s ongoing industry-academicpartnerships by fostering innovation and promoting collaborations between industries, theacademic community, professional organizations, and government. The ultimate goal of thepartnerships is to strengthen the SoECS’ educational and programmatic offerings in order tograduate engineering professionals for the 21st Century. The premise is that by creating the rightlearning environment for students to engage with industry in innovative real-world problemsolving, project-based learning, teamwork, direct contact with practitioners, they will gain keycompetency and entrepreneurship skills required in today’s rapidly evolving
representatives. Selected projects may follow one of two paths:the new venture path (regional start-ups) or the technology transfer path (licenses).The most promising products/systems take the new venture path, and the student developers whohave now graduated are offered the opportunity to continue in the development of a newbusiness through an undergraduate-dedicated technology incubator located at Texas A&MUniversity. To develop and grow its business, each company receives one full year of support inthe incubator. After this, the company leaves the incubator and local economic developmentcouncils work with these start-up businesses by offering incentives to keep them in local area .If the project is not selected for incubator support, the student
Paper ID #20567Setting the Foundations for International and Cross-disciplinary Innovation:The U.S.-Denmark Summer School ”Renewable Energy: In Practice”Dr. Tela Favaloro, University of California, Santa Cruz Tela Favaloro received a B.S. degree in Physics and a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the Univer- sity of California, Santa Cruz. She is currently working to further the development and dissemination of alternative energy technology; as project manager of a green building design initiative and researcher with the Center for Sustainable Engineering and Power Systems. Her background is in the development of
of Education, is leading a guest“lecture” on her particular view on innovation. With her are two students who worked withProfessor Henry to found a student-run non-profit organization they call the Poolpass Project.Also with her are the inspiration for the project, Mr. Rotolo and his minister. Professor Henrytells the story of how she was inspired to start this venture after reading in the newspaper abouttwo elementary school children who drowned in the nearby Susquehanna River one summerafternoon. Despite a newly remodeled and improved public swimming complex in town, thechildren were swimming in the dangerous river because they could not afford the $4 fee to go tothe pool. One child drowned when trapped by submerged rocks in the river and
- ing. Dr. Konak has published papers in journals such as IIE Transactions, Operations Research Letters, Informs Journal on Computing, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, International Journal of Production Re- search, and Production Economics. He has been a principal investigator in sponsored projects from the National Science Foundation, the US Department of Labor, and the National Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Alliance. Dr. Konak currently teaches courses on Database Management Systems, Information Security, and Technology-based Entrepreneurship. He is a member of IEEE and INFORMS.Dr. Sadan Kulturel-Konak, Pennsylvania State University, Berks Campus Sadan KulturelKonak is a professor of Management Information
Association. Email: Shankar@fau.edu. Phone: (561) 297-3470Mr. Francis Xavier McAfee, Florida Atlantic University In 1991, Francis X. McAfee joined the newly established Florida Center for Electronic Communication which was created to demonstrate communications technology and digital media production techniques. As Associate Director of the CEC in 1998, he supervised all aspects of digital video production and 3D computer visualization projects. His grant funded projects included collaborations with Florida Interna- tional University’s International Hurricane Research Center, the Centre for the Arts at Mizner Park, and archaeological visualization of soon to be lost ancient tombs in Sicily. His recent computer animated
evolving innovativeideas into business ventures, convincing students of the importance of being entrepreneurial intheir future endeavors, improving students’ communication and teamwork skills, and recruitingstudents for further academic and entrepreneurial pursuits in the University of Kentucky (UK)College of Engineering. In order to meet these objectives, the students participate in a number ofactivities including team building exercises, hands-on engineering labs, engineering companytours, networking opportunities, a group business venture competition, and recreationalactivities. Through the group project, students are involved in concept development, productdesign, prototyping, business plan development, and public presentation.This paper will
promote experiential and interactive learning in the entrepreneurialsurrounding. Students took two courses for credits: (i) Introduction to Customer-Driven TechnicalInnovation and (ii) Introduction to Product prototyping at Silicon Valley. During the program,students experienced the technology-driven world of Silicon Valley. Silicon Valley is theinnovators’ and entrepreneurs’ dream world and is ground zero for customer-driven technologyevaluation, innovation, invention, and prototyping. It is also an ideal location for inspiringinteractive and non-traditional college learning experiences. Students spent time visiting start-upsand large corporations and worked on a project where they advanced, through multiple iterationsof the design cycle, an
Environmental Engineering from the University of Arkansas. She previously served as a project manager at a water resources center, but returned to the University of Arkansas to teach general Introduction to Engineering and to coordinator for the First-Year Honors Innovation Experience.Dr. Alan E. Ellstrand, University of Arkansas Alan Ellstrand is the Associate Dean for Programs and Research in the Walton College of Business. He is also a professor in Management. He received his Ph.D. from Indiana University, and has an MBA degree in Strategic Management from Northern Illinois University. He also holds a Bachelor’s Degree in Political Science from the University of Illinois. His major areas of research include corporate
. (1991)). Page 26.207.4 5. Preparation for moot-court appellate arguments (1 week) 6. Midterm exams, exam preparation, exam review (2 weeks) 7. Project reports (2) (1 week)DeliveryThe course provided students with a preview of law school, including use of a law-school IPtextbook, but with greatly advanced pedagogy, including explicit learning outcomes, practicetests, practice arguments, and real IP attorneys as moot-court judges.The first two editions of the course used a traditional law-school casebook, which provided botha solid foundation in IP law and the look and feel of law school. However, importantdevelopments in IP law in 2012 and 2013
specialist. As explored in this paper, the cooperative structure allows for differentdegrees ownership based on an individual’s contribution to the project. The authors believe thatthe cooperative structure will increase entrepreneurial activity on campus by resolving ownershipissues and enabling interdisciplinary teams.Cooperatives are one the four forms of business that include sole proprietorship, partnerships andcorporations. The cooperative business model allows a variety of members to contributediffering amounts of labor, resources and capital to a business venture. Although cooperativeshave been traditionally used to develop agricultural distribution networks, today cooperatives areinvolved in products ranging from electricity to internet
process are represented by thepartner personnel – entrepreneurs, engineering, project managers, CEO’s, intellectual propertylawyers, state economic development officials, and venture capital representatives. Thesepartners are involved in the following activities: 1) evaluating the dual degree program as a whole; 2) evaluating student projects and advising the student teams; 3) offering student teams technical and business expertise; 4) advising dual degree program in development and curricular issues; 5) contributing intellectual property (ORNL alone has a portfolio of over 1000 patents) and project ideas; 6) serving as guest lecturers in graduate product development courses;Advising student teams involves attending
a M.S. in Chemical Engineering (2001) from the University of Toledo and a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from The Ohio State University (1997). Prior to entering graduate school in 1999, he worked as a Project Engineer and a Process Engineer for Pilkington, Inc. in Ohio and Michigan. Throughout graduate school and beyond his research has focused on catalysis. He has extensive experience preparing, testing, and characterizing heterogeneous catalysts in addition to experience with supercritical fluids. Dr. Tadd has authored and coauthored 18 papers and presentations in catalysis and catalysis integration, and holds a patent for a control methodology for hydrocarbon reforming reactors. Concurrently with his
projects. In the field of international development, her primary interests are in safe water supply access, environmental conservation and sustainable livelihoods. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Igniting creativity and innovation in engineering students: the case for technology and society courses in engineering curriculaAbstract: Engineering educators have long struggled with coaxing creativity from their students,given the massive amount of prescriptive material that must be covered in their curricula. Ifstudents want to graduate in four years, they have very limited time to explore unique interestsoutside of their specific engineering discipline. A technology and society
motivation for being a leader.Again, comparison yields a shift in perception. Upon completion of the course, the studentscompleted a course evaluation survey to aid the course developer in determining if the course ismeeting the university’s leadership education goals. In addition, the students completed a peerassessment of leadership skills and characteristics near the beginning and at the conclusion of thecourse. The peer assessment yields some shifts in leadership development. Finally, as a finalassessment at the conclusion of the final team course project, the students completed a peerperformance evaluation, and the results are reported.1. IntroductionEntrepreneurshipLawrence Technological University (LTU) has offered students entrepreneurial
solving, e.g. lateralthinking. The students would spend the next 20-30 minutes working on in-class exercisesusing that particular tool. More details on the guest speakers are presented below.One class was used for a field trip. The classes spanned the first eight weeks of thesemester. For the remainder of the semester the students worked on a term project.Details of the term project are presented below. The textbook used for the course was“The Art of Innovation” by Tom Kelley and students were assigned readings from thisbook as homework exercises.Creativity ToolsThe creativity tools taught in the course are well-established techniques such as“Brainstorming” and “Provocation”. DeBono’s “Six Thinking Hats” and “LateralThinking” were also described
also includes leadership of STEM initiatives with Penn State and Virginia Tech. She earned her BA from Stanford University and an MBA from Northeastern University.Dr. Edward F. Morrison, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Ed Morrison is Director of the Agile Strategy Lab at Purdue University. Ed has been developing a new approach to developing strategies for complex collaboration in open, loosely connected networks. Called ”strategic doing”, this methodology emphasizes the strategic value of collaboration in today’s global econ- omy. For over twenty-five years, he conducted strategy projects throughout the U.S. His work won the first Arthur D. Little Award for excellence in economic
due to the instructor’s personal interest in the topic,but it was also due to a perceived need that innovative capabilities should be fostered amongEngineering Technology students. This perception was bolstered by published expressions ofthe same sentiment, for example as put forth by Duderstadt3 and by the Council onCompetitiveness4.Students were assigned a multi-phased project in which they developed design concepts, guidedby requirements provided to them in a given scenario, completing activities in parallel with thecourse’s progression. The course topic and the structure of its term project offered anopportunity to include some lesson units about innovation, and to incorporate related activitieswithin the project. The goal was to help
skills” and encourages trust and respect for individuals and ideas. The most relevant skills are clustered in four categories: (a) Problem solving, (b) “Big picture”, (c) Personal, and (d) Social. Following these skill “list”, we describe multiple hands-on activity-based innovation modules, each ofwhich aims at specific skills, with focused objectives and outcomes. The modules are divided into tencategories, specifically: Community, Camps, Short Courses, Competitions, Projects, Challenges, Puzzles,Workshops, Meetings, Beyond Engineering, and Business and Industry. Each module is detailed anddiscussed. Implementation of a program that deals with the above skills has begun. The College ofEngineering and Computer Science began the first