practical situations and settings.Feature films can offer a trove of ideas that can be very impactful, if used selectively andjudiciously.Portrayal of certain professions in the popular media has a deep and lasting effect not only ongeneral public's understanding of these professions (with all potential misconceptions andattitudes), but also has an impact on future career choices. While movie screens and televisionshows put a spotlight on lawyers, doctors and policemen (and occasionally also on forensicscientists), they only occasionally pick entrepreneurs as the characters of interest.This paper has identifies and reviews a number of known and available portrayals ofentrepreneurs in feature films. A brief selection of titles is included. A few
Materials Technology at the Instituto Federal de Educac¸a˜ o, Ciˆencia e Tecnologia da Bahia. He is a mechanical engineer and holds a Bachelor’s degree in law and a Master’s degree in mechanical engineering. He has been teaching at different levels, from the first year of technical high school to the final year of mechatronic engineering course, since 1995. He also has considerable experience in the design and implementation of mechatronic and production engineering courses. His non-academic career is centered on product development and manufacturing processes.Prof. M. D. Wilson, Purdue University, West Lafayette M.D. WILSON is a lecturer for the Krannert School of Management, the entrepreneur-in-residence for the
Committee S802 - Teaching Methods and Educational Materials.Ms. Kelsey Z. Musa, Saint Louis University Kelsey Musa is a Civil Engineering student currently pursuing the MS Program in Engineering at Saint Louis University with a focus on Structural Engineering. Her experience in engineering education ranges from developing STEM related modules to moderating STEM camp activities for K-12 students. She aspires to practice engineering professionally in addition to pursuing future engineering education en- deavours and continuously encouraging students to pursue careers in STEM.Dr. Shannon M. Sipes, Indiana University, Bloomington Shannon Sipes serves as an instructional consultant providing professional development and
learning programs such as the Enterprise and Pavlis Global Technological Leadership programs. She received her BS in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Michigan and MBA from Wayne State University and is currently working on her PhD at Michigan Technological University. Before joining MTU she held various engineering and management positions during a 15 year career in the automotive industry.Dr. James R. Baker, Michigan Technological University Jim Baker currently serves in a split role as Executive Director of Innovation and Industry Engagement and as Co-Director of the Innovation Center for Entrepreneurship (ICE) within the Pavlis Honors College at Michigan Technological University. In this role he
. Future work implies the application of a quantitativequestionnaire to discuss national and international implications.Introduction Over the last two decades, ABET has become a major change agent in engineeringeducation worldwide. In 1996, ABET’s Board of Directors shifted its emphasis on outcomesrather than inputs by adopting the widely known accreditation criteria EC2000. Criterion 3specified five technical and six professional skills that engineering graduates must face thechallenge of international competitiveness.1 Lattuca, Terenzini and Volkwein (2006) documentedthe impact of the engineering criteria EC2000 on engineering programs2. Schools of Engineeringworldwide have modified their curriculums to reinforce career preparation and
in new strategies to problem solution. Inthinking of these two extremes in mindset, it becomes apparent that neither is a “correct” mindset for all engineeringdisciplines or career opportunities. However, making both faculty and students aware of this difference may providesubstantial advantages in both the educational, and future career, environments. The present study is recognized as being very preliminary. For example, the students in this particularuniversity are selected through a relatively rigorous admission process, likely resulting in a number of impacts onthe mindset of the incoming student. Further, the sample size (approximately 250 responses) is relatively limited.Despite the preliminary nature of this research, a
business experiences in international companies, and startup experiences. This has helped him lead a very successful industry career. Currently he is using his technical business experiences to develop and run entrepreneurial programs for the College of Entineering. These include Aggies Invent, TAMU iSITE, Invent for the Planet, Engineering Inc., and curricular classes. In addition, he mentors multiple entrepreneurial teams. Formerly he was a Senior Vice President of Fujitsu Network Communications, headquartered in Richard- son, Texas. With over 30 years of experience in telecommunications, Rodney was responsible for de- veloping partnerships with leading network technology providers and driving marketing efforts for op
-efficacy model [10] and the social cognitive career theory [22] have been widelyutilized in engineering education research. These models define self-efficacy as an individual’sbelief in their ability to successfully complete tasks and reach desired outcomes. Further, it isclaimed that an individual’s perceived self-efficacy towards a specific activity influences theirinterest towards it, both of which indirectly influence the individual’s choice to further practicethe activity and gain proficiency at it. This finding was repeated in engineering education by across-sectional study on educators and students, where it was found that engineering design self-efficacy was influenced by experience and correlated with task-specific motivation (i.e
US Department of Labor10. This funding hasresulted in the development of the various curricula and has provided start-up funding forthe IPD program and Entrepreneurship minor.K-12 entrepreneurship outreach: The Integrated Product Development program hasteamed with Lehigh’s Iacocca Institute for Global Entrepreneurship (www.iacocca-lehigh.org/cap/) to sponsor Career Awareness Programs (CAP) for highly qualified,underrepresented high school students. The focus of these one-week summer programsincluded business, engineering and design arts, all with a technical entrepreneurshipfocus11. In 2001 in conjunction with Lehigh’s Global Village, the Lehigh team from theIacocca Institute and the College of Education was awarded a grant for a
. Page 23.191.2Given this great loss of potential engineers, the Kern Family Foundation (KFF) has partneredwith several engineering institutions to implement means by which to raise the success rate ofstudents throughout the course of their engineering career starting at the educational level first byevaluating students with a trimetric analysis tool developed by TTI. As one of the KEEN (KernEntrepreneurship Education Network) institutions embracing this challenge, MUSE has alreadybegun to make a step forward towards optimizing its level of undergraduate academicachievement by providing 104 enrolled students with TTI’s trimetric survey tool in the academicyear 2011-2012.BackgroundGenerally speaking, most institutions only address subject-matter
, seminars, workshops, competitions, and volunteerism, Mtech’sstudents are part of a special experiential learning model. While providing entrepreneurship andinnovation education and helping teams to start and operate ventures are important, a continuumof hands-on mentoring helps students not yet engaged in founding and managing start-ups todevelop their entrepreneurial skills. Over the course of students’ careers in Mtech programs, theycan develop innovative ideas and write business plans. Students may also compete in the Page 15.5.4University’s $75K Business Plan Competition, attend the Technology Start-up Boot Camp eachfall, and
number of competitively selected professors from U.S. and international universities to key elements and the business realities of industry by enabling them to "look over the shoulder" of working professionals at several levels of the technical, business, and management career paths. They will leave the program with an understanding of Boeing's business including its research needs, with an improved understanding of the practical application of technical and business skills and with a network of contacts within Boeing and among their faculty peers that can form the basis of long-term relationships. There have been 149 university participants since the establishment of the program in 1995.”The
AC 2011-1868: TRANSFORMING THE PRACTICES AND RATIONALEFOR EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS TO AID ACADEMIC RESEARCHERSIN TRANSLATING RESEARCH INTO INNOVATIONS AND VENTURESJudith Giordan, NCIIA Judith C. Giordan has held executive and leadership positions in R&D and operations spanning a 30 year career. Currently, Judy is Director of VentureWell (www.venturewell.org) a venture development and funder; Managing Director of Steel City Re, LLC, an intangible asset services firm; Senior Advisor to the National Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Alliance; a member of the Board of Directors of start- up companies, and Professor of Practice in the College of Science and Technology of the University of Southern Mississippi from
optimummaterials, design, feature sets, and engineering processes. This approach to engineering anddesign may be counter-intuitive to the well-trained engineer who has not previously consideredthe power of markets in establishing the prevailing definition of “value”.The notions of “difficult to copy” and “difficult to substitute” are also market or, at least,industry specific terms, but they are not difficult for engineers or scientists to appreciate. Theirstandard training involves the competitive quest to be original and to strive for recognition basedon this originality. This training focuses on career development through originality, not businessdevelopment. Still, the concepts transfer well. Scientists and engineers are taught to regardoriginality as
development presented by the American Eco- nomic Development Council. Prior to starting his economic development work, Ed worked for Telesis, a corporate strategy consulting firm. In this position, he served on consulting teams for clients such as Ford Motor Company, Volvo, and General Electric. He conducted manufacturing cost studies in the U.S., Japan, Mexico, Canada, Italy, Sweden, and France. Ed started his professional career in Washington, D.C., where he has served as a legislative assistant to an Ohio Congressman, staff attorney in the Federal Trade Commission, and staff counsel in the US Senate. He holds a BA degree cum laude with honors from Yale University and MBA and JD degrees from the University of
outcomes [3] .Additional questions asked about perceived value of curriculum, and participantlikelihood of future entrepreneurial pursuits. Finally, the survey investigated studenttolerance for risk by directly asking about aversion to various forms (General, Financial,and Career), and presenting a hypothetical business investment scenarios. Thesevalidated measures have also been identified as important for individuals consideringbusiness creation [4] [5]. Collected data were analyzed in aggregate, and a Student's t-test was used to determine if there was a statistically significant (p < .05) positivechange for all survey questions.Results and Discussion Figure 8 shows average participant response to complete startup related actions. Forall
of these pedagogical interventions to enhance the innovation capacity of the students.We derive our findings by analyzing data collected as a part of the Educate to Innovate projectthat was initiated to understand what factors contribute to the success of innovators, and howthese factors can be incorporated into our education system. Charles Vest, the former presidentof the National Academy of Engineering (NAE), appointed an advisory committee for the projectwho provided guidance to this research team at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign(UIUC) who would interview a select group of successful American innovators and ask them toreflect on their education and careers, and to identify factors that contributed to them
and his MFA from Rochester Institute of Technology.Bryan Howell, Brigham Young University Bryan Howell received his MFA in Design from the University of Texas Austin in 2003 and his under- graduate degree in Industrial Design from Brigham Young University in 1984. He started his professional career working with frogdesign in Germany. He then worked at Dell Computer in Design and Engineering Management following which he successfully directed his own Design consulting business. He has re- ceived IDEA, ID and G-Mark design awards and has 29 utility patents. He has lived in England, Germany, Singapore and the USA. Since 2006 he has been teaching Design courses at Brigham Young University in Provo, Utah
paper describes our origins and approach, andsummarizes some of our progress and challenges to date.IntroductionThere is increasing demand for higher education to produce graduates who are job- or career-ready 1,2. For example, most technical companies expect that new hires will be able to tacklecomplex multidisciplinary problems, and the ability to innovate is now an “integrative meta-attribute” desired in all engineering graduates 3. Pulling together disparate fields in innovativeways is now an expectation. A series of reports from the National Academies, e.g., “Educatingthe Engineer of 2020” 4 and “Rising Above the Gathering Storm” 5 emphasize the need forlifelong learning that bridges multiple disciplines. Engineering educators in
brief discussion of future directions forresearch. Figure 1: Picture of the author’s paper-shredding Rube Goldberg machine Page 13.1.3Background and contextReuben Lucius Goldberg (1883 – 1970) started his engineering career designing sewer systems.In 1914 after six months, he left engineering practice to become a cartoonist. His cartoons took asatirist point of view on technology, with his major underlying message being that technologymisapplied often makes life unnecessarily complicated. According to Goldberg, his cartoonsrepresent “a symbol of man’s capacity for exerting maximum effort to achieve minimal results.”He conveyed this
technologies on a global scale than at any othertime.These realities have been well-documented by others, so we only note here one outcome– the emergence of a new paradigm for startup-ventures which are “born global 1”.Presutti et al. conclude that born-global ventures represent the final stage of developmentfor serial entrepreneurs and point to the development of a global network as an importantfactor in the readiness of the individual entrepreneur for a successful born-global launch. 2Whether or not a series of ventures is needed to prepare an individual for such a career-capping event, this model can serve as a guiding paradigm as educators design andexecute educational experiences that will accelerate the preparation of graduates for aworld in
Accounting• Required Engineering Foundation Course for Business Students: - IE 4320, Fundamentals of Systems• Required Courses for All Certificate Program Students: - MGT 4376, Entrepreneurship II: Discovering Entrepreneurial Opportunity - IE 4331 Individual Studies in Industrial Engineering: Engineering EntrepreneurshipAlso, the area of Management at the Rawls College of Business Administration (COBA) isdeveloping an Entrepreneurship and Family Business Program that utilizes two sequentialfoundation courses (Entrepreneurship Creation and Entrepreneurship Discovery) to preparestudents to exploit any three additional courses as the “practice ground”, and to generateactionable opportunities regardless of their major or career settings, be it
lamp is still undergoing reengineeringto improve its stability and proportions. Access to the CD slots near the shade is alsoproblematic; and the switch, which is currently in-line, is being analyzed.Integration of business students into the projectThe business students who participate in MIMIC, the entrepreneurial component, are enrolledin a capstone course, Integrated Business Operations, required in their Associate in AppliedScience degree programs. They are from a variety of career fields, including marketing,accounting, management, computer systems and information systems, which allows themakeup of the "companies" to be representative of an industry. Integrating students fromvarious disciplines not only fulfills the technical needs of the
internationally over 30 years later, a wide variety of business experiences in international companies, and start up experiences that have helped him lead a very successful industry career. He holds a BS and ME in Electrical Engineering from Texas A&M University. Currently he is using his technical business experiences to develop and run innovation and entrepreneurial programs for the Engineering Innovation Center, a 20,000 sq ft rapid prototyping facil- ity. These include Aggies Invent, TAMU iSITE, Inventeer, and Pop Up Classes. In addition, he mentors multiple entrepreneurial teams. He is also formerly the Chief Operating Officer for GroundFORCE, a company that specializes in a unique patented construction technology
, mentoring models, areas of guidance/strength, programs/workshops, resourcesavailable, retention strategies, top priorities, and supporting mid-career/senior faculty. Theinterview protocol can be seen in Appendix A. One of the questions in the interview protocolasked about the role of entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial thinking within engineeringcolleges. The authors felt this question in particular elicited compelling responses and it was thusdecided to analyze these responses further through a separate thematic analysis. All of the interviews were audio recorded and later transcribed using REV’s transcriptionservices. These transcriptions were then uploaded to a qualitative analysis software calledDedoose [12]. A rigorous process was
some point later on in their careers, and also a generalquestion as to whether or not successful venture creation should be the primary metric by whichthe success of entrepreneurial education is judged. The Kern Entrepreneurial EngineeringNetwork (KEEN) model suggests that venture creation is just one potential aspect of successfulentrepreneurship education, and that the development of an ‘entrepreneurial mindset’, in whicheducators work to foster creativity and opportunity identification, results in graduates that arebetter prepared to solve meaningful problems within existing workplaces, in addition to startingnew ventures to address challenges [7], [8].A more recent review by Nabi, Liñan, Fayolle, Krueger, and Walmsley [9
and seven principles of good feedback practice. QualityAssurance Agency for Higher Education.13 Palladino Schultheiss, D. “Elementary Career Intervention Programs: Social ActionInitiatives.” Journal of Career Development, 31:3. 2005.http://jcd.sagepub.com/content/31/3/185.full.pdf+html p. 6614 Siok San Tan, C. K. Frank Ng, (2006) "A problem-based learning approach toentrepreneurship education", Education + Training, Vol. 48 Iss: 6, pp.416 – 42815 Brown, C. (1999), “Teaching new dogs new tricks: the rise of entrepreneurshipeducation in graduate schools of business”, CELCE Digest, Vol. 99 No. 216 Weaver, K.M. and Solomon, G. (2003), “Teaching entrepreneurship to small businessand small business to entrepreneurs?”, Proceedings of the
. Page 11.703.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 How to Weave Entrepreneurship into Engineering Education: the Experience at San Jose State UniversityAbstractThere is a growing consensus about the need for engineers and scientists to have entrepreneurialskills to be successful in their careers. However, there is a continued debate as to how best toimpart these skills at the undergraduate level. It is possible to identify two routes to accomplishthis objective. One route is to offer courses in engineering entrepreneurship and the other is toencourage students to participate in extracurricular activities that help to foster entrepreneurialskills.The most common approach adopted by a growing number of
not encourage creativity or innovation[1]. Innovation can bedefined as a new and valued product, process, or concept that has been introduced to the marketor society[2]. Engineering educators should better prepare students for careers in innovation. Indoing this, they must “undermine their students’ blind commitment to the engineering paradigm”[3] which is centered around the scientific approach to knowledge making. To accomplish thischallenge, the exploration of paradigms such as ones used in the schools of business,communications, and political science is suggested. Incorporating this exploration will allow theengineering and technology student to critically reflect on and debate the beliefs, practices, andvalues of their paradigms and
to thetwenty-three personal and professional competencies. This is the benchmark for the Baylorstudy, and will continue longitudinally throughout the students‟ academic careers at Baylor.The twenty-three personal and professional competencies on this assessment are: [12]1. Self management (time and priorities): Demonstrating self control and an ability to manage time and priorities.2. Customer service: Anticipating meeting and/or exceeding customer needs, wants, and expectations.3. Written communication: Writing clearly, succinctly and understandably.4. Goal orientation: Energetically focusing efforts on meeting a goal, mission or objective5. Flexibility: Agility in adapting to change.6. Persuasion: Convincing others to change the way