different ActionGroups and is designed to be cross disciplines and across different learning environments.In this paper, the Learning in Action! pedagogy will be discussed and learning experiences willbe outlined in details. Reactions to 11 University and 4 Public School learning experiences willbe discussed and selected final projects will be shown. For example, we will demonstration howthe Santa Fe case can be used to redevelop a small down town area where the “big box stores”and interstates have created ghost towns and we will investigate other engineering cases relate topower sources and home land security systems.Our process is designed to be a creative force to help students see new and different ventures inlife and to help the US regain
our School of Engineering Technology and ComputerScience (SETCS) with in-house internship experience and the School with a source of increasedfunding through CART, the operation of our own Course Management System (CMS) as a fee-based self-sustaining business operation, our ongoing applied research projects for industry andagencies, our partnerships with other colleges, universities, industry, and government, and theoperation of the shop CART store.The vision of CART is to become a highly respected resource for innovative engineering andmerging technologies in the discovery of applied research and design of applications that driveour economic viability, solve industrial problems, and strengthen homeland security and nationaldefense.Our
2006-76: DEVELOPING ENGINEERS WITH AN ENTREPRENEURIAL SPIRITGerald Nelson, Mississippi State University Gerald Nelson, an industrial engineering graduate (1974) with an MBA (1985) from Mississippi State University, began his career with a co-op experience at Rockwell International. Nelson worked five semesters with Rockwell before joining them full time after graduation as a Project Engineer and Program Manager. Nelsons career includes former positions as Plant Manager, Trinity Industries; President and Chief Operating Officer of the Wear Resistance Group of Thermadyne Industries, Inc.; Executive Vice President of Operations, Viasystems Group, Inc.; and Chief Operating Officer of
within engineering courses, labs, and programs. The analysis focuses on facultyawardees and their motivations linked to this opportunity. An assessment is presented looking atthe types of projects proposed, how EM was incorporated, when the idea was first conceived,how many times an individual faculty member applied, motivation to apply, and the role offunding in the actual implementation of the project.IntroductionChanging engineering faculty practices in classrooms, labs and programs is challenging and anongoing undertaking within engineering units [1-2]. A major reason for the challenge is thereluctance of faculty to change if what they are doing is familiar and seems to be “working.”Difficulties associated with change are faculty’s readiness
indoor/outdoor applications. He is a member of Institute of Navigation (ION); and a senior member of Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE).Prof. John B Jackson, California State University, Fullerton Jackson is the Director of the Center for Entrepreneurship and the Small Business Institute (SBI) which deploy an applied learning model that engages undergraduate and graduate students with local businesses. These student-led consulting projects challenge the students to practice what they have learned in the classroom. Jackson’s student team was recently awarded first place in the nation at the Small Business Institute national competition. (LINK) John Bradley Jackson is also a Full-time Lecturer in
, providing the participants not only a formal program inentrepreneurship education, but also immersing them in a research endeavor that seeks totranslate a concept or idea to an eventual product and introduces students to the process by whichthat translation occurs.Structure - Faculty Research Projects:The E-REU program follows an intensive, immersive model, which is cited as being high-impactby the Bridge Report. The foundation of the program is a 10-week intensive research projectunder the direction of a faculty mentor. Many typical REUs focus on a particular major ordiscipline, or are narrowly focused on a specific area of research within a discipline. One of theunique features of this entrepreneurial REU is the focus on projects with a high
Acquisition and Processing course. In this course a smart design project forms thebasis of the EML experience which includes such skills as seeking opportunities usingbrainstorming, accessing market interest, accessing technical feasibility, designing formanufacturability, and providing a cost analysis of an eventual finalized product.The entrepreneurial impact of this comprehensive program is assessed through surveys whichgage the students' awareness of EML concepts.This paper will present an overview of the ACL, PBL and EML techniques used in the First YearEngineering Program at Western New England University. Page 26.969.2IntroductionThis paper
about the value that their design or project brings to serving their customer.”Accordingly, “the EME demonstrates their value to the organization because they understand thebusiness and what is required to serve, support or push forward the corporate agenda.” Accordingto Tabat, “the EME wants to make sure they are defining the problem or situation correctly andthen providing the project leadership to push the development to the point of use.” [7] Characteristics of Entrepreneurially Minded Engineers[8]1. Opportunity Orientation – searching to identify and solve real world problems that improve people‟s lives through value creation2. Technical Empowerment – view technology as an enabler used to solve problems and create
students’ innovation-related skills as well as students’ reflections on the class. Themain idea is to develop a student-centered environment that helps students to develop a can-do,proactive, innovative mindset; an environment that will light their spark of innovation, and providethem with resources to translate their ideas from paper to prototype. We have identified four majorgroups of relevant skills, namely, problem solving, “big picture”, personal and social skills, and usedseveral different activities to try to boost them. A variety of projects and challenges, and multi-sensory activities were synthesized to create an empirical, authentic, and multi-disciplinaryexperience. This effort is in line with our college longer term goal to infuse
the 18 modules; some will complete all 18modules.Introduction Engineering graduates who will be leaders in today’s rapidly changing environment mustpossess an entrepreneurial mindset and a variety of professional skills in addition to technicalknowledge and skills. Efforts at developing technical communication, project management, andteamwork skills have been underway at many institutions over the last decade. A newer initiativeis the development of entrepreneurial thinking skills.1-3 At its core, entrepreneurial thinkingrequires: (1) insatiable curiosity to investigate a rapidly changing world; (2) the ability toinnovate by make connections between different streams of information; and (3) to create valuefor others. Entrepreneurial
certificates on aircraft from Boeing 727’s to Piper PA-31. He has authored or co-authored twenty papers in the areas of aircraft testing, aircraft systems design, systems troubleshooting and project management.Craig A. Turner, East Tennessee State University CRAIG A. TURNER is an Assistant Professor of Strategic Management at East Tennessee State University. His areas of interest and research pertain to the effects of risk on decision-making and contextual determinants of entrepreneurial success and failure. He received his Ph.D. in Strategic Management from the University of Tennessee at Knoxville in 1999. His previous experience included 11 years at various positions involving financial and
. 6. Apply design knowledge and skills in the production of a variety of intermediate-level detail and assembly drawings. 7. Analyze the mass properties of, and perform necessary interference checks and stress analysis on CAD parts and assemblies. 8. Interpret industry-accepted dimension and tolerance callouts on blueprints. 9. Work in small groups to analyze, plan, model, and present an intricate product design.The course grade is split between assignments (30%), exams (30%), and a final project with apresentation (40%). If one looks a the program objectives and the associated student objectives,it's quite evident that the topics of entrepreneurship and Innovation (E&I) don't touch.Entrepreneurship and Innovation are
, areanalyzed. These industries are then dissected in order to determine potential opportunities fornew business or new lines of business. Once the opportunity is identified, the question of whattechnology may be required to enable this technology is determined. The content-driven lectureson strategy, marketing, financing and innovation are illustrated using video clips and case studiesdrawn from entrepreneurial and corporate examples. The hands-on experience focuses onhomeworks, a team-based project in a technology space selected after a student competition, anda presentation to business developers. It is our observation that the main challenge for thestudents is to be able to reassess/modify their original technology-based solution to one informedby
Paper ID #31189A Summer Program Focused on Developing an Entrepreneurial Mindset intheContext of the NAE Grand Challenges for EngineeringDr. Jared Schoepf, Arizona State University Jared Schoepf is the Director of Operations for Engineering Projects in Community Service (EPICS) at Arizona State University. Jared received his PhD in Chemical Engineering at ASU, developing a tiered approach to rapidly detect nanomaterials in the environment and consumer products. Jared has been a lecturer of EPICS for 6 years, mentoring over 300 teams. Currently he teaches introduction to engineering, EPICS, and chemical engineering courses
campus and propose action plans, and estimate the economic impact of theirsolution. As a result of this project, students learn how to create value and communicate anengineering solution in terms of economic benefits. Students provide a report for each modulewhich is graded based on designed rubrics. All these modules are performed in teams which inturn improves students’ team work and collaboration skills. This paper elaborates the details ofeach module and learning outcomes, and presents the student evaluation results, and at the enddiscusses the lessons learned.1. IntroductionIn the past few years the attitude that considers engineers as sole reactive specialists has evolvedto team player entrepreneurs. This fact is critical while designing
onhow product or service concepts grow and evolve over time. This work is a result of acollaborative project by ten PUI faculty and staff from seven institutions that was initially fundedby NCIIA. While the collaborators represent a range of disciplines, the group includes aconcentration of faculty in or affiliated with engineering programs. As such, the group isinvested in furthering entrepreneurship education in engineering at PUIs and across disciplines.1. IntroductionThis paper presents efforts to document best practices and develop resources to facilitate andstrengthen entrepreneurship at primarily undergraduate institutions (PUIs) nationwide. Itdescribes a multi-dimensional framework for entrepreneurship education, and specificallyfocuses
31 out of 31business plans according to their expected financial performance. This program was anexperiment to see if the search model can improve the odds of aspiring PhD entrepreneurs todevelop successful business ventures in the growing biomedical device industry.The program consists of three integrated components incorporating the search model: (1) anInnovation Training Program for researchers and PhD level graduate bioengineering students; (2)an Innovative Research Fund to provide “discovery grants” for early stage research projects; and,(3) the Business Development Network to assist innovators with one-stop shopping forpatenting, determining market feasibility, business planning, licensing, and new business start-ups (Figure 1).PhD
, marketing strategy, marketing, and public pol- icy. She has published research in Organization Science, International Journal of Engineering Education, Educational Philosophy and Theory, and Journal of Business & Management. She employs project-based learning and multi-method research in many of her courses. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Developing Intrapreneurship in the Next Generation of Engineering Innovators and LeadersabstractThis National Science Foundation Scholarships in STEM (S-STEM) project responds to agrowing disparity among technology firms and the number of under-represented people inmanagerial and
developing such programs.Keywords: New Product Development, MS-MBA, multidisciplinary, entrepreneurship.Introduction The main aim of this dual-degree MS/MBA project was to further the economicdevelopment of the area by encouraging cooperation and coordination between academiaand industry. As a part of this endeavor, the following main tasks were envisaged: Page 14.1234.2o Graduate Program Developmento Interface with College of Lawo Development of "Idea Bank"o Product Development and Commercialization Forumo Entrepreneurial Board.Graduate Program Development The focus of this innovative dual-degree program was to integrate the skills andknowledge
Paper ID #17811Using Simulation Experiences, Real Customers, and Outcome Driven Inno-vation to Foster Empathy and an Entrepreneurial Mindset in a SophomoreEngineering Design StudioDr. Cristi Bell-Huff, Lawrence Technological University Cristi L. Bell-Huff, PhD is the Director of the Studio for Entrepreneurial Engineering Design at Lawrence Technological University where she teaches courses on fundamentals of engineering design projects and entrepreneurial engineering design. In addition to her PhD in Chemical Engineering, she also has an MA in Educational Studies and is a certified teacher in Michigan. She has industrial
develop and build up theirentrepreneurial mindset.The paper reviews the CoE’s experience and preliminary evaluation results of integrating EMLin our junior level course EE375 Electronic Design I. EE375 is the first electronics course of athree-course electronics design sequence. The course covers circuits design using diodes andtransistors with several laboratory experiments.“The three Cs: Curiosity, Connections, and Creating Value [3]” found in the KEEN frameworkare added as course outcomes. CoE included EML activities into the existing problem-basedlearning (PBL) laboratory projects. For example, the projects help students investigate themarket and assess policy and regulatory issues. The paper will provide preliminary results fromthese
Paper ID #18234Year Two, Setting Up the Right Path: 3D Printing for Low Expense CollegeCoursesHector Erick Lugo Nevarez, University of Texas, El Paso Mr. Hector Lugo works as a Student Technology Success Coordinator at The University of Texas at El Paso. He holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering. He is currently enrolled as a Master of Science with a Major in Electrical Engineering. His motivation and passion pushes him into research in wireless commu- nication, especially in Bluetooth Low Energy and Near Field Communication as well as building projects and fostering innovation with faculty and staff members. As part of
AC 2007-951: ENGINEERING ENTREPRENEURSHIP FOR HIGH SCHOOL ANDEARLY COLLEGE STUDENTSKaren High, Oklahoma State University KAREN HIGH earned her B.S. from the University of Michigan in 1985 and her M.S. in 1988 and Ph.D. in 1991 from the Pennsylvania State University. Dr. High is an Associate Professor in the School of Chemical Engineering at Oklahoma State University where she has been since 1991. Her main research interests are Sustainable Process Design, Industrial Catalysis, and Multicriteria Decision Making. Other scholarly activities include enhancing creativity in engineering practice and teaching science to education professionals. Dr. High is a trainer for Project Lead the Way pre
action; and 4) developing teaching methods with a storytelling focus in engineering and science educa- tion. Founder of the Design Entrepreneuring Studio: Barbara helps teams generate creative environments. Companies that she has worked with renew their commitment to innovation. She also helps students an- swer these questions when she teaches some of these methods to engineering, design, business, medicine, and law students. Her courses use active storytelling and self-reflective observation as one form to help student and industry leaders traverse across the iterative stages of a project- from the early, inspirational stages to prototyping and then to delivery.Dr. Ville M. Taajamaa, City of Espoo Ville M. Taajamaa
Paper ID #21481Analysis of Student Utilization and Activities in a Campus Innovation CenterDr. William A. Kline, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Bill Kline is Professor of Engineering Management and Associate Dean of Innovation at Rose-Hulman. His teaching and professional interests include systems engineering, quality, manufacturing systems, in- novation, and entrepreneurship. As Associate Dean, he directs the Branam Innovation Center which houses campus competition teams, maker club, and projects. He is currently an associate with IOI Partners, a consulting venture focused on innovation tools and systems. Prior
the December workshop to learn more about the subject.They then create modules in one of their courses that demonstrate some aspect of theentrepreneurial mindset. Once they complete the project they create documents to show othershow these modules can be used. Once this is done they receive a small stipend. By emphasizingmodules, rather than entire courses, our faculty create things that other faculty (both here and atother schools) can insert into existing courses. So far we have had 15 faculty members (about40% of our total engineering faculty) create modules. Another six professors are in the processof creating modules. The degree of this involvement is helping to change the culture within ourcollege concerning the important of helping our
NSF-funded projects that are advancing entrepreneurship education in STEM fields, including Epicenter and I-Corps(tm). She and her team are currently examining the experiences of innovators commercializing and scaling-up new technologies, products, and services, and are developing ways to assess the venture and product develop- ment status of innovation teams. She received her B.A. from Williams College, an Ed.M. from Harvard University and a Ph.D. in Applied Developmental and Educational Psychology from Boston College.Dr. Thema Monroe-White, SageFox Consulting Group Thema Monroe-White is a senior evaluator at SageFox Consulting Group, specializing on driving organi- zational and program performance through
. Professor Washington received his BS, MS and PhD degrees from NC State. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Integration of Entrepreneurship in a First-Year Engineering CourseAbstractThis evidence based practice describes the integration of entrepreneurship into a project-basedfirst-year engineering course to encourage student innovation, and to develop student leadershipand self-efficacy. A module featuring a series of lectures on entrepreneurship and business plandevelopment was introduced as part of the curriculum. The module was further enhanced withthe introduction of multiple company founders and industrial leaders who were invited to deliverpresentations and interact with students
Paper ID #18246Cultivating the Entrepreneurial Mindset through Design: Insights from The-matic Analysis of First-year Engineering Students’ ReflectionsMr. Mark Vincent Huerta, Arizona State University Mark Huerta is a PhD student in the Engineering Education Systems and Design program at Arizona State University. He earned a B.S. and M.S. in Biomedical Engineering at Arizona State University. Mark possesses a diverse background that includes experiences in engineering design, social entrepreneurship, consulting, and project management.Dr. Jeremi S. London, Arizona State University Dr. Jeremi London is an Assistant
, there is a wave of energy focused onlearning-by-doing and human-centered design. From the business and engineering domains,students are being introduced to the concepts of Lean and Agile to inspire new ways ofaccomplishing collaborative, team oriented projects that require rapid iteration towards solutionsfor open-ended problems. A significant portion of STEM Faculty spends a great deal of timeand energy incorporating these concepts into effective pedagogy applied to undergraduateengineering education. Often, these same faculty members are eagerly engaged in advancing theentrepreneurial learning ecosystem in their institutions. In engineering and other STEMprograms, we apply innovation and entrepreneurship as the catalysts used to help guide