as an elective, reaching arelatively small audience. Recently, authors increasingly argue that teaching an entrepreneurialmindset requires an integrated approach.2,3,4Kettering University has adopted this approach by trying to incorporate entrepreneurial ideasdirectly into existing classes. This can be difficult to accomplish for several reasons. First,engineering professors find it difficult to make room in the course syllabus for an entrepreneurial Page 22.845.2education. Further, many faculty have not been exposed to the “entrepreneurial mindset” andthus do not feel prepared to broach the subject in class. Kettering University has
Paper ID #23833Incorporating the Entrepreneurial Mindset into a System Dynamics CourseDr. Louis A. DiBerardino III, Ohio Northern University Dr. DiBerardino is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Ohio Northern University. His teaching and research interests are in first-year engineering, dynamic systems, and musculoskeletal biome- chanics, and integrating curriculum with the entrepreneurial mindset.Dr. Lawrence Funke, Ohio Northern University Dr. Funke received his PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Notre Dame in 2017. He is currently an assistant professor at Ohio Northern University.Dr
universityeducation tends towards an integral formation, where teachers take a role as process facilitators,adapting strategies to students' needs. In this approach, all actors are relevant since theycontribute with ideas, reflections, and feedback en-route to a shared learning experience;therefore, everybody learns continuously, which allows us to develop continuous improvementsand apply what we teach. Here lies the value of feedback provided by each student.As can be seen in figure 5, the Questionnaire proposes seven areas to evaluate by students. Thetotal of responses was 817, the rate of responses with comments: 23.75%. The results of thisevaluation are as follows. Figure 6. Item: The facilitator created an atmosphere of trust.Given the
senior-level students with an opportunity tolearn more about innovation and entrepreneurship. In their final year of undergraduatestudy, groups of three to four students come together as new start up companies thatcomplete the two-semester capstone design requirements by transitioning from an Idea toa fully functional Prototype (I2P). Most of these projects are now externally sponsoredby companies that are trying to increase their design bandwidth, jumpstart a new productidea, or in some cases become more involved with students to develop a better pipelinefor new hires. Intellectual property developed by these student companies is transferredto the Texas A&M System Office of Technology Commercialization that manages thelicensing of the IP to
Pennsylvania in 2020. Meagan conducted research on the biomechanics and physiology of chronic pain for her doctorate degree and has experience teaching undergraduate first-year engineering and mid-level biomechanics courses. Meagan is currently working with the KEEN partnership at OSU, integrating her interests in STEM edu- cation, entrepreneurial partnerships, and community engagement. Meagan values authenticity, connection with others, & integrity and prioritizes these values as an educator, bioengineer, and scientist.Laine Rumreich, Ohio State University Laine Rumreich is a graduate student studying Computer Science and Engineering at The Ohio State University. She completed her undergraduate research thesis in the
recently awarded University of Windsor’s Golden Jubilee Professorship in Business. Page 24.912.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Modern Engineering Sandwich: Management, Globalization and Entrepreneurship on Top of Product DevelopmentIntroduction As globalization leads to an internationally integrated production and consumption ofgoods, cultural products, and services, local and national identities are challenged. Globalizationcreates challenges and opportunities for companies providing goods or services. The coursediscussed in this paper reviews the impact
experiential and inter-disciplinary learning intheir curricula. For instance, some courses attempt to introduce experiential leaning throughinter-disciplinary projects.4 Others teach loosely related topics using a unifying theme in fieldssuch psychology5 and biology.6 However, most inter-disciplinary courses usually focus on thedepth of specific content in a couple of disciplines rather than the breadth, i.e. integration ofcontent across a variety of disciplines. More specifically, all students taking such an inter-disciplinary course are required to master the skills and the content equally well regardless oftheir core discipline. An immediate shortcoming of this approach is that it severely restricts thediversity of student participants with respect
with the ‘teacherless education’-example. This is anexample which could be characterized as ‘live experimenting’, meaning that the instructors areperforming an experiment with their students without either prior information or consent. In thepaper describing the experiment, the author provides all information necessary to reproduce thesetup, including the course curriculum and other info. Even if the experiment itself is a majoreffort to reproduce, the article could be used in education to elaborate a discussion abouteducation in creativity.ConclusionsOur ambition has been to find, investigate, evaluate and present what we have defined as rolemodels for education in product innovation, to serve as examples for our continuous work
the Sloan Center on Online Education at Olin and Babson Colleges.Stephen Schiffman, Olin College Dr. Schiffman is an associate professor of entrepreneurship at Olin and Babson Colleges. Prior to Page 11.1255.1 joining the Olin faculty, Dr. Schiffman was the dean of the Undergraduate Program at Babson College and a Senior Partner at Olin College. In his two years as a Senior Olin Partner, Dr. Schiffman worked closely with the faculty to develop and improve the Olin curriculum. He has been a Babson faculty member in Entrepreneurship, Mathematics and MIS since 1986. He was the
AC 2008-1729: IMPACT: A MULTIDISCIPLINARY APPROACH FOR CREATINGHIGH-TECH STARTUPSKelly Crittenden, Louisiana Tech University Dr. Kelly Crittenden received his BS and PhD in BioMedical Engineering from Louisiana Tech University in 1996 and 2001 respectively. He is often involved in multidisciplinary work at Louisiana Tech, either through the Integrated Engineering Curriculum or through the IMPaCT (Innovation through Multidisciplinary Projects and Collaborative Teams) program. He is also very involved in STEM education at both the pre-college and college levels.Jon Pratt, Louisiana Tech University Dr. Jon Pratt received his BA in Physics in 1976 from Centenary College. He completed his
understand the key elementsof strategic planning, and be exposed to the operational challenges of the company, includingfailures and successes. This EIP at Lawrence Tech fosters the involvement of companiesfounded and operated by entrepreneurial alumni. The Legends of Lawrence Tech is anorganization of entrepreneurial alumni that has taken a strong interest in the EIP.Internship ProgramsAt the heart of a strong internship experience is the ability to integrate concepts and theories thatare taught in a classroom setting and bring those concepts to a higher level of understandingthrough observation and practice in an actual work environment. At Drexel University co-opactivities are integrated into every student’s experience. They point-out the value
. Engineering entrepreneurshipeducation is seen as a means to develop entrepreneurial mindset and skills that are essential for asuccessful professional life. In an effort to integrate entrepreneurship education into an alreadydense curriculum, universities and colleges offer a range of entrepreneurship programming fromindividual classes, certificate programs, and minors and or majors. With these various options,students have several different pathways to entrepreneurship education. However, research hasshown that student demographics influence their participation in entrepreneurship programming.Further, self-efficacy, which is the belief in one’s ability, is seen as a key characteristicmotivating intent and activity. To continue to understand the
includedlunch and opening remarks from an Epicenter Research Team leader who described thepurpose of the gathering. Later in the afternoon, the hosts launched a series of panel sessions.Each session was convened around a theme aligned with the FIGS research questions, i.e.,“students,” “programs,” and “curriculum.”6 The panels featured a moderator who was acontent-area expert and three to four panel members who were content-area expert scholars orpractitioners, selected on the basis of biographical and research statements that each attendeeprovided as part of the Summit registration process.Table 1 shows the central questions around which panelists were asked to organize theircomments, by session (names and affiliations of all presenters are included in
-2013 6 1693 0.53%Table 1 shows that about a tenth of a percent of students can be expected to enroll for anentrepreneurship minor. This situation may not be unique to Stevens, as a major study by Cao etal. [4] found that just 18 students out of the 7197 that were surveyed had a minor inentrepreneurship (0.25 percent). Studies by Duval-Couetil et al. [11] have shown that interest inentrepreneurship strengthens when students take one or more courses in entrepreneurship. Tobuild entrepreneurial thinking into our curriculum, we concluded that a required course thatbuilds and integrates elements of entrepreneurial thinking into our existing curriculum wasnecessary.Integrating senior design and
solving. If they are only studied and are not used in practice by astudent, then the “head” knowledge is not integrated with the rest of the worldview and is noteasily or readily applied.Wisdom can be taught in tandem with diligence – pushing and stretching students to evaluaterisks and opportunities, to ask the right questions, and to be self-motivated in an iterative processof constant refinement – all of these activities to promote diligence can then lead students toconsider and wrestle with broader contextual questions beyond just solving a specific problembut generalizing and seeing the larger pattern.4.4 Curriculum4.4.1 Incremental and repeatedMultiple classes, projects, and problems allow students to grow and learn at a reasonable
of the 21st century," IEEE Engineering Management Review, vol. 37, no. 1. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., p. 38, 2009, doi: 10.1109/EMR.2009.4804347.[2] D. H. Cropley, "Promoting creativity and innovation in engineering education," Psychol. Aesthetics, Creat. Arts, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 161–171, May 2015, doi: 10.1037/aca0000008.[3] "Creating a Culture for Scholarly and Systematic Innovation in Engineering Education American Society for Engineering Education." https://www.asee.org/member- resources/reports/CCSSIE (accessed Feb. 26, 2021).[4] F. O. Soares, M. J. Sepúlveda, S. Monteiro, R. M. Lima, and J. Dinis-Carvalho, "An integrated project of
partnership between two well-established programs at Butler University and the Purdue School of Engineering and Technologyat Indiana-University Purdue-University Indianapolis (IUPUI). The EDDP allows students tostudy at Butler University, a small private school, which is known for its quality science,humanities, social science, fine arts, and professional programs and also have access to ABETaccredited engineering programs at IUPIU, a large state school.Completion of this program results in two degrees from both institutions. This program is not a3-2 program where students are expected to transfer after three years to an engineering school tocomplete their studies. The EDDP has a curriculum that integrates engineering, science,mathematics, computer
). Bending Moments to Business Models : Integrating an Entrepreneurship Case Study as Part of Core Mechanical Engineering Curriculum. In Proceedings of the 2013 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. Atlanta.Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline : the art and practice of the learning organization. New York : Doubleday/Currency.Shaw, M. E. (1976). Group dynamics : the psychology of small group behavior. New York : McGraw-Hill.Takaya, K. (2008). Jerome Bruner’s Theory of Education: From Early Bruner to Later Bruner. Interchange, 39(1), 1–19.The Bootcamp Bootleg. (n.d.). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford d school.Thinc. | The Spirit of Entrepreneurship at UGA. (n.d.). Retrieved May 26, 2014
effectiveness of theassessment in measuring our abilities to teach and integrate the entrepreneurial mindset into ourdegree plans. This paper will document the selection of the assessment instrument, itsdeployment, and an initial analysis of the results in how they impact retention, professionaldevelopment, and the entrepreneurial mindset of the students at these institutions.IntroductionIn many engineering programs in the United States and around the world, it is no longersufficient to adequately train engineers with excellent left-brain skills – analysis, logicalthinking, and quantitative thought. According to Dean Julio M. Ottino of the Robert R.McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science at Northwestern University, solvingproblems is not
moremobile applications are designed and developed for the M-Learning. In this paper, a novelmobile-optimized application architecture is proposed to integrate the remote laboratory intomobile environment for the M-Learning. With this mobile optimized application architecture, theremote experiment applications can use a common codebase to deploy native-like applications onmany different mobile platforms (such as, iOS, Android, Window Mobile, etc.). To demonstratethe effectiveness of proposed new architecture for M-Learning, an innovative remote networkedSmart Vibration Platform (SVP) experiment is successfully implemented based on this newapplication architecture. This remote SVP experiment has been used in several
includedtopics such as troubleshooting failures, analysis of systems, integration of parts into a whole,prototyping, and designing to meet specifications. As most, if not all, of the projects focusedintensely on the development of a product, students were regularly challenged to design forspecific needs and to prototype, as well as learn from failure and integrate components into awhole. Students generally had significant confidence increases in their engineering abilities as aresult of their participation in the REU, and we attribute this to the specific and applied nature ofthe research projects, as opposed to other REU projects where the applicability of the subjectmatter may be more theoretical and further removed from an everyday product with
Paper ID #17938Promoting Entreprenuerially Minded Learning through Online DiscussionsDr. Lisa Bosman, Marquette University Dr. Lisa Bosman holds a PhD in Industrial Engineering from the University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee. Her research interests include solar energy performance modeling, entrepreneurial minded learning, and STEM education.Dr. Brooke K. Mayer, Marquette UniversityProf. Patrick McNamara, Marquette University Dr. McNamara is beginning his 4th year as an assistant professor at Marquette University. His research group focuses on understanding how consumer product chemicals impact microbes and antibiotic resis
. Browder’srecognition that the broadband capability would enhance this core business reliability inproviding improved services for effective power delivery to electric customers. This is a majorlesson to be learned. In an existing business you always have to enhance the core competenciesof the business to ensure that your innovation can be effectively and efficiently deployed. So in2007 the BTES Triple Play was launched and Bristol Tennessee Electrical System changed itsname to Bristol Tennessee Essential Services. Because these three students were all employeesof BTES their trustworthiness, ethics, honesty and integrity were proven because they had beenlong term employees of the company. Their passion was obvious from the enthusiastic work forthe past six
Engineering. He currently teaches first-year engineering courses as well as various courses in Mechanical Engineering, primarily in the mechanics area. His pedagogical research areas include standards-based assessment and curriculum design, including the incorporation of entrepreneurial thinking into the engineering curriculum and especially as pertains to First-Year Engineering.Brock Alexander Hays, Ohio Northern University Brock Hays is currently an undergraduate student at Ohio Northern University. At Ohio Northern, he is studying Middle Childhood Education, with concentrations in both Mathematics and Language Arts, with generalist certifications in both Social Studies and Science. c
asa foundation for future research related to developing curriculum for and assessingentrepreneurship education. It will also be of benefit to engineering educators who are interestedin understanding the degree to which entrepreneurship education supports the goals ofengineering education.The Rise of Entrepreneurship EducationIn recent decades, entrepreneurship has been increasingly emphasized as an engine for economicgrowth in developed and developing countries. Many key measures of economic growth havebeen stronger in small startups than in large established firms (Acs & Audretsch, 1987;Audretsch, 2002). The need for innovation and entrepreneurship has become more apparent asthey have been tied to job creation (Drucker, 1985).Embedded
who completed the workshopbecame strong contributors and leaders in the Innovation Space.The workshop itself utilizes team-based experiential learning [6], coupled with real-life problemsto demonstrate the steps required to work through the engineering design process. By practicingand learning these skills the students become better prepared to interact in their engineeringcourses. Many of the personal interactions required of the workshop participants between facultyand their peers are what would be expected of them in their engineering curriculum. By havingthe students work on actual university related design problems, their interest level remains highand they tend to display more ownership of their solutions. Having an open-ended
" but provides little emphasis on "thinking." Assuch, little is known about how to incorporate competency-based education into traditionaland professional bachelor degree programs such as engineering, which requires a greaterfocus on knowledge and skill integration. The purpose of this paper is to highlight a newapproach to learning that goes beyond the proverbial "checking boxes" to provide anapproach for demonstrating the integration of abilities and reflection. This innovative andexperimental approach offers three unique attributes. First, it is competency-based in thatstudents are required to demonstrate mastery of meeting core innovative competenciesthrough submission of an artifact (“transdisciplinary-doing”) and reflection
, marketing and promoting their designs, while guiding students to turn their Page 12.1518.2innovative ideas into a successful enterprise. Arizona State University’s (ASU’s)Polytechnic campus is uniquely situated to encourage students to participate inentrepreneurial activities, as an integral part of their degree program. Many of thestudents are already in industry. They have gathered some of the skills mentioned above,are interested in entrepreneurship, and are encouraged by many of their employers to beinnovative and entrepreneurial. This is combined with a unique mission, the creation ofbusiness-ready graduates as an integrated component of the entire
information. Onthe other end of the spectrum a student can create their own framework and then fill it inthemselves. A canvas is an extraordinary balanced tool in this regard. It provides enoughstructure to explore a complex domain but not so much as to render it simplistic or prescribed.Just as it does for entrepreneurs, a canvas can serve as a framework for student-driven discoveryand practice.Interconnected DomainsMost traditional engineering courses have a tightly focused domain of content that has been wellestablished and refined. Some domains, however, are inherently transdisciplinary, meaning thatthey are formed from a diverse range of concepts that interact in complex ways. In anengineering curriculum, design, entrepreneurship, ethics, and
Page 26.1498.8curriculum, review the readings, structure the exercises and craft the work, provide feedback,leading and coaching, and include the students in the entire developmental process. Storytelling Based Learning is intended to assist both the students taking a course and theinstructors teaching and creating the curriculum. Specifically, it guides and assists participantsbecause it fills the gap between disciplinary engineering learning, which is a cognitive processand embedded in logics of natural sciences. Storytelling is a socio-cognitive process. Yet it ismore so an experiential learning process where the hands-on or theoretical engineering learningis replaced by hands-on socio-cognitive experiential process of Tell/Make