Paper ID #12723Integrating Entrepreneurship into Capstone Design: An Exploration of Fac-ulty Perceptions and PracticesMs. Victoria Matthew, VentureWell Victoria Matthew is Senior Program Officer for Faculty Development at VentureWell, where she plays a lead role in the Pathways to Innovation Program, Epicenter’s faculty development and engagement strategy. She designs in-person and online convenings, engages experts, and curates content that foster the Pathways faculty goals of integrating entrepreneurship and innovation into undergraduate engineering. Prior to joining VentureWell, Victoria worked for over a decade in
Paper ID #12850Blending Entrepreneurship and Design in an Immersive EnvironmentDr. Bryan O’Neil Boulanger, Ohio Northern University Dr. Boulanger is an Associate Professor of Environmental Engineering in the Department of Civil En- gineering at Ohio Northern University. His academic interests include immersive learning, experiential learning, risk management, and surface chemistry.Prof. Joe Tranquillo, Bucknell University Joe Tranquillo is an Associate Professor of Biomedical and Electrical Engineering at Bucknell University. Joe was the founder and inaugural chair of the Biomedical Engineering Society Undergraduate
, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and the University of Florida. His research on the longitudinal study of engineering students, team assignment, peer evaluation, and active and collaborative teaching methods has been supported by over $14.5 million from the National Science Foundation and the Sloan Foundation and his team received Best Paper awards from the Journal of Engineering Education in 2008 and 2011 and from the IEEE Transactions on Education in 2011. Dr. Ohland is Chair of the IEEE Curriculum and Pedagogy Committee and an ABET Program Evaluator for ASEE. He was the 2002–2006 President of Tau Beta Pi and is a Fellow of the ASEE and IEEE.Dr. Senay Purzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette enay Purzer is an
innovations, the College of Engineering was an earlyand enthusiastic adopter of the program, serving as both a source of expertise (e.g. fabrication,coding) and as the largest pool of participants. Through involvement and sponsorship of theuniversity-wide Cal Poly Center for Innovation & Entrepreneurship, the program is broadeningand maturing. Engineering students are seeing significant benefits from working with diversemajors on designs that sometimes involve technology in only a minor supporting role. This typeof problem solving develops abstract, innovative “soft” skills that complement the technicaldepth they develop in their traditional curriculum. These skills are critical to producingengineers that can thrive in a global environment. At
above letter, the US Department of Commerce conducted a series ofinterviews with institutions across the nation in an effort to understand howuniversities are nurturing and promoting innovation/entrepreneurship and publishedthe “The Innovative and Entrepreneurial University; Higher Education, Innovation &Entrepreneurship in Focus” (2). While there is significant research on innovation andentrepreneurship within the formal curriculum (3, 4) there is less focus on extra-curricular programs. Authors believe informal programs offer a great opportunity toengage engineering students in activities promoting innovation and entrepreneurshipas it has been shown by the impact of Innovation Challenges on the development ofinnovative skills (5). Per C
concept ofstudent engagement through innovation and entrepreneurship and who were committed tointegration of the space within and across the engineering curriculum. The committee agreed tomeet monthly during the academic year to evaluate equipment needs, listen to reports on facilityusage, and actively develop educational programs to foster innovation and entrepreneurshipamong the student body. Through funding made available by the Halliburton Foundation, facultymembers from the committee were able to travel to professional development courses to enhancetheir respective knowledge in emerging pedagogy surrounding innovation and entrepreneurship.Engagement became integrated. An operations manager was retained through the associate dean for
animatronics. In the fall of 2011, Jos´e became an assistant professor of Mechanical Engineering at Western New England University, where he now teaches various courses in solid mechanics, mechatronics, and first-year engineering.Prof. Robert Gettens, Western New England University Rob Gettens is an Associate Professor of Biomedical Engineering and the Director of the First Year Engineering Program at Western New England University.Prof. Anthony D. Santamaria, Western New England University Dr. Anthony D. Santamaria completed his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering at the University of California, Davis specializing in nuclear imaging of transport phenomena in fuel cell and battery technology. While completing his engineering
visionary faculty champions makeefforts to integrate these 21st century skills into the curriculum in an incremental fashion(adding a course or launching an elective program). However, the partners involved withthe Epicenter project observed that deeper change and sustainability did not directlyfollow these efforts. Existing efforts to stimulate entrepreneurship had clearly had some Page 26.1401.2impact, but the overall landscape of engineering education had only shifted to a smalldegree.Pathways program development began with an independent literature review to identifypromising models and practices that could guide the design and implementation of
papers, and provides faculty development workshops on effective teaching. In 2006, the Kern Family Foundation named Dr. Carpenter a Kern Fellow for Entrepreneurial Education recognizing his efforts to bring innovative team based problem solving into the engineering curriculum to promote the entrepreneurial mindset. In addition to his work on ethics and entrepreneurial skills, Dr. Carpenter is an accredited green design professional (LEED AP) and practicing professional engineer. As founding Director of the Great Lakes Stormwater Management Institute, he conducts research on water management and routinely provides professional lectures/short courses on innovative stormwater treatment design and its role in Low Impact
successful. However, webelieved that we could reach even higher and improve the students’ learning experience. As aresult, we performed an overall class evaluation that included input from students, College ofEngineering faculty members, and employees and cast members from the ETO13. The outcomeof the evaluation was to create a new semester-long course featuring the same fieldtrip in themiddle of the semester over fall break. The motivation for change was three-fold. First, therewas a desire to teach creativity and innovation more effectively and thoroughly. Second, pastparticipants consistently wanted to extend the duration of the class and see additional examplesof applying creativity and innovation to real-world problems. Finally, by integrating
6mentioned6. The other is in the area marked “T-shaped Education” in Figure 4. This will be thefocus of the remainder of this paper, and will be used as an example to convey the final of step ofthe intrapreneurship study process, which is to build intrapreneurship competency throughengineering educational opportunities. Potential challenges and obstacles to achieve this areidentifying what new and differentiated educational opportunities should be provided, how bestto integrate these into the engineering education experience without adversely affecting otherparts of the curriculum, and how to assess their effectiveness in developing the competenciesneeded for intrapreneurship. The ultimate measure of how effective this approach is will be inthe
themthroughout the curriculum, Ohio State formed a new program called the Integrated Business andEngineering (IBE) program as described in more detail below.The IBE ProgramBased on the authors' research, interpretation of the "voice of the customer" (i.e. industry), andyears of personal industrial and academic experience, the following interpretation of a T-shapedengineer is offered: 1. Sound technical expertise in one discipline Page 26.1507.8 2. A solid business acumen including the issues associated with product commercialization 3. An entrepreneurial mindset supplemented with design thinking 4. Ability to function effectively on
, particularlycommunity service and humanitarian engineering projects, by creating intentional linkagesbetween the formal curriculum (e.g. developing global awareness) and these informal learningexperiences (e.g. engineering-related study abroad). Such linkages may be particularly effectivein helping develop students’ contextual awareness.” As engineering entrepreneurship education takes shape and continues to leverage co-curricular experiences for learning, Lattuca et al.’s findings suggest that a more in depth analysisof entrepreneurial co-curricular experiences in the context of the Terenzini and Reason’s collegeimpact framework is warranted. There is an organizational reliance on both entrepreneurshipacademic and co-curricular programs, required
includedlunch and opening remarks from an Epicenter Research Team leader who described thepurpose of the gathering. Later in the afternoon, the hosts launched a series of panel sessions.Each session was convened around a theme aligned with the FIGS research questions, i.e.,“students,” “programs,” and “curriculum.”6 The panels featured a moderator who was acontent-area expert and three to four panel members who were content-area expert scholars orpractitioners, selected on the basis of biographical and research statements that each attendeeprovided as part of the Summit registration process.Table 1 shows the central questions around which panelists were asked to organize theircomments, by session (names and affiliations of all presenters are included in
). Bending Moments to Business Models : Integrating an Entrepreneurship Case Study as Part of Core Mechanical Engineering Curriculum. In Proceedings of the 2013 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. Atlanta.Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline : the art and practice of the learning organization. New York : Doubleday/Currency.Shaw, M. E. (1976). Group dynamics : the psychology of small group behavior. New York : McGraw-Hill.Takaya, K. (2008). Jerome Bruner’s Theory of Education: From Early Bruner to Later Bruner. Interchange, 39(1), 1–19.The Bootcamp Bootleg. (n.d.). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford d school.Thinc. | The Spirit of Entrepreneurship at UGA. (n.d.). Retrieved May 26, 2014
Page 26.1498.8curriculum, review the readings, structure the exercises and craft the work, provide feedback,leading and coaching, and include the students in the entire developmental process. Storytelling Based Learning is intended to assist both the students taking a course and theinstructors teaching and creating the curriculum. Specifically, it guides and assists participantsbecause it fills the gap between disciplinary engineering learning, which is a cognitive processand embedded in logics of natural sciences. Storytelling is a socio-cognitive process. Yet it ismore so an experiential learning process where the hands-on or theoretical engineering learningis replaced by hands-on socio-cognitive experiential process of Tell/Make
Page 26.1565.13This paper outlines a course that allows the integration of entrepreneurial topics before the seniorcapstone. But the PAC could be integrated into senior design, put earlier in the curriculum, beoffered as an interdisciplinary elective or serve as a thread that appears through a curriculum. Asthe PAC does not require a deep background in math and science, the framework could in principlebe used very early in the curriculum. The PAC can support many learning objectives that will beassociated with individual boxes, but because it is conducted on a real device, the canvas naturallycreates a way to bind together topics. In addition it will quite naturally touch upon nearly all softskills required by ABET 53,54 . There are several
. in curriculum and instruction with a focus on higher education. In her current professional role, Shannon performs assessment functions at all levels, from small classroom projects through assessment at the institute level. Additionally, she spends a substantial portion of her time collaborating with faculty on educational research projects and grant-funded projects requiring an assess- ment component. Her own research interests are in inquiry methodology, gifted students, and curriculum design. Page 26.264.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015
problems that they are asked to solve.Engineering graduates entering industry require business and entrepreneurial skills, so LawrenceTechnological University and others, have implemented comprehensive transformations of theengineering curriculum to instill an entrepreneurial mindset in students (Carpenter et al., 2011).These developments, funded by the Kern Entrepreneurship Education Network (KEEN), includedan entrepreneurial certificate program and a seminar series that were strongly tied with the businessprograms. Entrepreneurial education was also integrated across the curriculum, throughoutengineering, science, arts and humanities courses (Gerhart and Carpenter, 2013). Starting withfreshman (Gerhart et al., 2014), the College of Engineering
National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellow. He received his B.S. in Civil Engineering in 2011 with a minor in philosophy and his M. S. in Civil Engineering in 2015. His research focuses on understanding engineers’ core values, dispositions, and worldviews. His dissertation focuses on conceptualizations, the importance of, and methods to teach empathy within engineering. He is currently the Education Director for Engineers for a Sustainable World and an assistant editor for Engineering Studies.Mr. Paul D. Mathis, Purdue University, West Lafayette Engineering Education PhD undergraduate student at Purdue University. Previously a high school educa- tor for six years with a masters in education curriculum and BS
Paper ID #11383Car Storytelling and Interaction DesignProf. Barbara A. Karanian A., Stanford University Barbara A. Karanian, Ph.D. , Lecturer, previously visting Professor, in the School of Engineering, in the Mechanical Engineering Design Group, helps teams discover yet to be satisfied customer needs with her proven methods- from a theoretical perspective of both socio-cognitive psychology and applied design thinking - that she has developed and refined over the past few decades. In addition to helping a team uncover this information, the companies she has worked with eventually have an easily deployable tool kit
(construction) 2. Take risks and learn from failures IBM, Lockheed Martin 3. Low fear of failure BASF, Campbell Soup 4. Be a self-starting seeker of opportunities Air Force, Lockheed Martin, Pankow, IBM 5. Have the pride and motivation to make a big BASF, IMDS (medical devices), Lockheed difference Martin, Pankow 6. Have the integrity to tell the truth, even when Ford its bad news 7. Live with and function well with ambiguity FordAll of these capabilities were suggested as important to being an innovative engineer and anintrapreneur in corporations, and all depend to a significant degree on ones