Paper ID #22264Integrating Entrepreneurial-minded Learning in Electronic Design CourseDr. Jing Guo, Colorado Technical University Dr. Jing Guo is a Professor in Engineering Department at Colorado Technical University. She is the course director in circuits and electronics area. She taught variety of underrated and graduate courses including capstone design in Electrical and Computer Engineering area.Prof. John M. Santiago Jr., Colorado Technical University Professor John Santiago has been a technical engineer, manager, and executive with more than 26 years of leadership positions in technical program management
Paper ID #22296Changing Minds, Transforming Learning Environments: A CollaborativeApproach to Innovation and EntrepreneurshipDr. Brian Bielenberg, Khalifa University of Science and Technology Dr. Brian Bielenberg is an Educational Linguist with over 20 years of teaching experience. Holding degrees in engineering and education, he currently serves as Academic Effectiveness Specialist at Khal- ifa University of Science and Technology in Abu Dhabi, where he also teaches a freshmen engineering success seminar and sophomore level cornerstone design courses.Dr. Ali Bouabid, Khalifa University of Science and Technology Dr. Ali
Engineering CoursesAbstract Traditional chemical engineering curriculum focus on the math, science and engineeringfundamentals culminating in a senior year process design course. These courses are excellentpreparation for most chemical engineering jobs, but they typically omit very practical skills suchas curiosity, connections and creating value. The lack of these fundamentals of the entrepreneurialmindset puts chemical engineers at a disadvantage in today’s workplace. The faculty at VillanovaUniversity have made the effort to focus on EML (entrepreneurial minded learning) by creatingmodules that can be implemented in already existing courses. These modules all vary in time,scale, and application, but have the same goal: to introduce chemical
Paper ID #22705Incorporating Design Thinking into the First-year Engineering CurriculumMs. Mary Raber, Michigan Technological University Mary Raber currently serves as Assistant Dean for Academic Programs in the Pavlis Honors College at Michigan Technological University. She also serves as co-Director of the Innovation Center for En- trepreneurship and Director of the Global Leadership program. She received her BS in Mechanical En- gineering from the University of Michigan and an MBA from Wayne State University and is currently working on her PhD at Michigan Technological University. Before joining MTU she held various engi
.” Students cited two ways inwhich courses in the Engineering Entrepreneurship Minor were distinctive from other courses:they foster a “new way of thinking” and they emphasize application over theory.Students disclosed that courses in the minor encouraged them to think in ways that they did notencounter in their other engineering courses. For example, one junior said that the minor,“emphasizes creativity which, for engineers, we don’t really have that opportunity in our otherclasses.” Other elements of this “different way of thinking” included constantly searching foropportunities to create solutions and considering the next step to fix problems. One studentexplained that “learning how to get your mind to think a certain way – to look for
-curriculum/15. Wheadon, Jacob & Duval-Couetil, Nathalie. (2017). Elements of Entrepreneurially Minded Learning: KEEN White Paper. Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship. 7. 3-2016.16. Bont, de, C., Ouden, den, P. H., Schifferstein, H. N. J., Smulders, F. E. H. M., & Voort, van der, M. (Eds.) (2013). Advanced design methods for successful innovation. Den Haag: Design United.17. Brown, Tim, and Barry Katz. 2009. Change by design: how design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation, Harper Business.18. Osterwalder, Alexander, and Yves Pigneur. (2010) Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.19. Hixson, C., Kline, W. A., Atkin, S., & Bruemmer, T
KernEntrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN) [1]. As these efforts strengthen, approaches toassess the entrepreneurial mindset have also been developed. A popular approach is the use ofsurvey instruments. Lichtenstein and Zappe [2] reviewed 22 instruments developed to assessentrepreneurial mindset.We have developed a rigorously validated assessment instrument to explore the entrepreneurialmindset of engineering and computer science students [3], [4]. This instrument was developedbased on a framework in which an entrepreneurially minded engineer is defined as one whopossesses curiosity about our changing world, habitually makes connections to gain insight frommany sources of information, and focuses on creating value for others. The italicized words
and influential authors with historical developments that might have motivated them.As Philip Wiener put it in his preface to his five-volume Dictionary of the History of Ideas:Studies of Selected Pivotal Ideas (1973), “the historian of ideas makes his [sic] particularcontribution to knowledge by tracing the cultural roots and ramifications of the specializedconcerns of the mind” (p. vii).Search engines such as Google Scholar and databases of publications have made the quantitativeanalysis of large bodies of texts far less labor-intensive than it was in the days of card cataloguesand print bibliographic resources. Although it is possible to do sophisticated assessments of theimpact of publications, for this initial analysis we used
Paper ID #23599Developing an Entrepreneurial Mindset Using the KEEN Framework for aDigital Communication System CourseProf. John M. Santiago Jr., Colorado Technical University Professor John Santiago has been a technical engineer, manager, and executive with more than 26 years of leadership positions in technical program management, acquisition development and operation research support while in the United States Air Force. He currently has over 16 years of teaching experience at the university level and taught over 40 different graduate and undergraduate courses in electrical engineer- ing, systems engineering, physics
Paper ID #23833Incorporating the Entrepreneurial Mindset into a System Dynamics CourseDr. Louis A. DiBerardino III, Ohio Northern University Dr. DiBerardino is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Ohio Northern University. His teaching and research interests are in first-year engineering, dynamic systems, and musculoskeletal biome- chanics, and integrating curriculum with the entrepreneurial mindset.Dr. Lawrence Funke, Ohio Northern University Dr. Funke received his PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Notre Dame in 2017. He is currently an assistant professor at Ohio Northern University.Dr
Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN). The KEEN framework [5]is based on the premise that an entrepreneurial mindset is characterized by a persistent curiosityof all things, the skills to make connections between seemingly unrelated things, and an ever-present goal to create value. The dimensions of curiosity, connections, and creating value areoften referred to as the 3C’s. In addition to these three dimensions, the KEEN framework addsopportunity and impact as complementary skills within the realm of the entrepreneurial mindset.The framework provides specific learning outcomes for the five dimensions; see Table 1. Table 1: KEEN Framework Dimension Entrepreneurial Minded Learning Outcome
Paper ID #23633Developing the Entrepreneurial Self: Integrating Professional Growth in anEngineering Design and Entrepreneurship Course SequenceDr. David G. Novick, University of Texas, El Paso David G. Novick, Mike Loya Distinguished Chair in Engineering and Professor of Engineering Education and Leadership, earned his J.D.at Harvard University in 1977 and his Ph.D. in Computer and Informa- tion Science at the University of Oregon in 1988. Before coming to UTEP he was on the faculty of the Department of Computer Science and Engineering at the Oregon Graduate Institute and then Director of Research at the European Institute
groups to uncover their own thought and biases before discussing difficult orcontroversial topics surrounding engineering innovation with the class as a whole. While thecourse is taught specifically with engineering design in mind, the course has attracted studentsfrom varying majors which has fostered collaboration and creativity in idea generation. Thecombination of critical thinking methodology with innovation concepts has led students to notonly expand their knowledge of potential applications of engineering, but has lead severalstudents to initiate communication with faculty members regarding their ideas for researchopportunities, innovation competitions, and initiated their own projects via applying forUniversity Innovation Fellows
Paper ID #22908Curious About Student Curiosity: Implications of Pedagogical Approach forStudents’ MindsetDr. Margot A. Vigeant, Bucknell University Margot Vigeant is a professor of chemical engineering at Bucknell University. She earned her B.S. in chemical engineering from Cornell University, and her M.S. and Ph.D., also in chemical engineering, from the University of Virginia. Her primary research focus is on engineering pedagogy at the undergraduate level. She is particularly interested in the teaching and learning of concepts related to thermodynamics. She is also interested in active, collaborative, and problem-based
about the problem and thus may not fulfill others’ need to a satisfactory level.The importance of incorporating customers in students’ training has been mentioned by a fewauthors [3-5].Fig. 1 The KEEN pyramid depicting the attributes of an entrepreneurially-minded engineer [1]In addition to an entrepreneurial mindset, engineers have increased need for interculturalcommunication competence. Both academic programs and professional environments areglobalized spaces [6] where intercultural communication competence is a necessary skill foradvancement. Effective intercultural communication requires an understanding of culture thatmoves beyond mere translation of language and into understandings of the cultural backgroundsof potential customers [7
Engineering Pune (COEP) as the founder head of the innovation Center. Dr Waychal earned his Ph D in the area of developing Innovation Competencies in Information System Organizations from IIT Bombay and M Tech in Control Engineering from IIT Delhi. He has presented keynote / invited talks in many high prole international conferences and has published papers in peer- reviewed journals. He / his teams have won awards in Engineering Education, Innovation, Six Sigma, and Knowledge Management at international events. His current research interests are engineering edu- cation, software engineering, and developing innovative entrepreneurs and intrapreneurs. He was chosen as one of the five outstanding engineering educators by
correlated to Innovation Self Efficacy andEntrepreneurial Learning Experiences. Finally, we draw practical implications of these relationshipsfor Entrepreneurship and Engineering Education, while at the same time keeping in mind that youcannot just “make” someone an Entrepreneur or change his or her personality. This paper is anexplorative starting point that results in various findings that suggest future research. We recommendfocusing on the three personality traits that showed significant results. 1. IntroductionSome of the biggest economic success stories were written by people who had an idea andfounded their own company. An example would be Sergey Brin and Larry Page who foundedGoogle in 1998. Today, the company employs over 72,000 people
Paper ID #21515Student-created Canvases as a Way to Inform Decision-making in a CapstoneDesign SequenceProf. Joe Tranquillo, Bucknell University Dr. Joseph (Joe) Tranquillo is an Associate Professor at Bucknell University in the Department of Biomed- ical Engineering, He is also co-director of the Institute for Leadership in Technology and Management, co-director of the KEEN Winter Interdisciplinary Design Program, and chair of the Biomedical Engineer- ing Division of ASEE. Tranquillo has published three undergraduate textbooks and numerous engineering education publications, and has presented internationally on
Paper ID #21252’Is Someone in Your Family an Entrepreneur?’: Examining the Influence ofFamily Role Models on Students’ Entrepreneurial Self-efficacy and its Varia-tion Across GenderDr. Prateek Shekhar, University of Michigan Prateek Shekhar is a Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the University of Michigan. His research is focused on examining translation of engineering education research into practice and evaluation of dissemination initiatives and educational programs in engineering disciplines. He holds a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineer- ing from the University of Texas at Austin, M.S. in Electrical Engineering from University of
Paper ID #24273Effect of Entrepreneurial Mindset on Funding Opportunities forFundamental ResearchSamarth Gupta, Purdue UniversityDr. Greg J. Strimel, Purdue Polytechnic Institute Dr. Greg J. Strimel is an assistant professor of engineering/technology teacher education in the Purdue Polytechnic Institute at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana. His prior teaching experience includes serving as a high school engineering/technology teacher and a teaching assistant professor within the College of Engineering & Mineral Resources at West Virginia University. ©American Society for Engineering
’ entrepreneurial skills and mind-set,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 233–243, 2005.[8] M. N. A. Bousaba and N. Carolina, “Promoting Entrepreneurial Skills through Senior Design Projects Promoting Entrepreneurial Skills through Senior Design Projects at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte,” 2014.[9] M. W. Ohland, S. A. Frillman, G. Zhang, C. E. Brawner, and T. K. I. Miller, “The effect of an entrepreneurship program on GPA and retention,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 293–301, 2004.[10] S. Fredholm et al., “Designing an Engineering Entrepreneurship Curriculum for Olin College,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exhibition, 2002.[11] L. Hirshfield, A. Huang-Saad, and J. Libarkin, “Mapping Engineering
Education atPurdue University, and Director of CATME. His day-long workshop was a demonstration of theCATME tools and an introduction to some newly deployed tools.The spring 2018 seminars will revisit Entrepreneurially-Minded Learning (EML), and willinclude: • What is the Entrepreneurial Mindset and Why is it so Important for Engineers? o Defining the Entrepreneurial Mindset o Why is the Entrepreneurial Mindset Important to Future Engineers? • Integrating the Entrepreneurial Mindset into Existing Engineering Curriculum o Being intentional about incorporating the Entrepreneurial Mindset into curriculum o ABET Student Outcomes and the Entrepreneurial Mindset • Where Do We Go from Here? o
for end-users [5]. Understanding end-users in engineering maycontribute to market success, as a majority of innovative breakthrough products involve noveluser interfaces [6]. Further, the established design process guides published by Stanford d.school[7] and IDEO [8] place empathy among the first steps to take when aiming for innovation. As forself-efficacy, it is currently hypothesized that it influences an engineer’s interest and ability tocarry out tasks associated with innovativeness [9], such as open-minded design exploration [10].However, despite educators attempting to teach empathy [11], [12] and innovation self-efficacyto engineering students, there is little understanding as to whether students develop either ofthese mindsets. Thus
clearly shows that students and teachers havedifferent perceptions; such discrepancy shall be kept in mind when designing STEM-learning projects; and communication towards mutual understanding among students andteachers are often needed for ensuring effective teaching and learning. In general, STEM-Inc students had higher interest and confidence towards engineering thanentrepreneurship, which is understandable since STEM-Inc essentially is a project for STEMlearning; and entrepreneurship has been used as a tool to engage students in STEM learning.However, it is worthwhile noting that activities incorporating both engineering andentrepreneurship (such as the field trip to a fast pitch competition where students presentbusiness ideas with
thinkdifferently about given tasks (Haynie, Shepherd, Mosakowski, & Earley, 2010), and thecognitive strategies which provide them with the ability to rapidly sense, act, and mobilize, evenunder uncertain conditions” (Ireland, Hitt, & Sirmon, 2003) (Wheadon & Duval-Couetil, 2016).Integrating entrepreneurship education into engineering education is therefore is not solelyfocused on the outcome of students’ entrepreneurial endeavors and development of specificbusiness skills and knowledge, but also on developing entrepreneurially minded engineers thatare prepared to identify and solve problems in innovative ways. These students can then utilizetheir entrepreneurial mindset to eventually become an entrepreneur or in other ways such asbecoming an
Paper ID #23135Critical Incidents in Engineering Students’ Development of More Compre-hensive Ways of Experiencing InnovationDr. Nicholas D. Fila, Iowa State University Nicholas D. Fila is a postdoctoral research associate in Electrical and Computer Engineering and Industrial Design at Iowa State University. He earned a B.S. in Electrical Engineering and a M.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University. His current research interests include innovation, empathy, design thinking, and instructional design