motivated efforts to expand the definition of student outcomes across countries. By the mid-1990s, ABET anticipated this need by shifting the accreditation basis toward outcomes ratherthan inputs, affecting engineering programs’ practices in the U.S. and in other countries, includedAustralia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom2. These criteria, widelyknown as EC2000, specified 11 learning outcomes (see Appendix 3)16: a) Five technical skills: Related to the development of students’ mathematical, scientific, and technical knowledge. b) Six professional skills: Those that emphasize communicating and working effectively on teams, besides the awareness of ethical and contextual
valuedMaintain high ethical standards Demonstrates high ethics in their interactions and fairness in their decisionsTo augment the KEEN [2] definition and give multiple perspectives on Maker characteristics, theFive Roles framework [3] is also used. It was selected due to it being constructed from behaviorsEntrepreneurs reported doing. Table 2 shows an excerpt from the Five Roles framework [3], thefull framework is shown in Appendix 2.Table 2: Five Roles Framework [3]Roles Attributes DefinitionFraming the Challenge Performance Orientated Sets high standards of(specifying highly challenging
and written andoral communication skills by reporting progress through presentations and reports. They practicecreative problem solving, developing ethical standards, and analyzing ideas or solutions. Becauseof this, the learning outcomes of engineering design courses typically mirror – or are the same as– outcomes identified for engineering students in general,3,31,32 such as those defined by theEngineer of 2020 report,1 listed in Table 2. Table 2. Engineer of 2020 outcomes. Attributes of the Engineer of 2020 Definition Strong analytical skills Applying math science, and design principles; consider social
, time, and performance and; 5. Become aware of ethical and societal concerns relating to the problems being solved.Using ABET’s concept of outcomes based learning, there should be learning outcomes that aremeasurable and targeted to help the students in reaching the stated objectives. The learningoutcomes for the workshop are listed below.The student will: 1. Apply the Lean LaunchPad process to engineering design; 2. Analyze a problem, and identify and define the requirements appropriate to a solution; 3. Design, implement, and evaluate an engineering design to meet desired needs; 4. Function effectively on teams to accomplish a common goal; 5. Understand professional, ethical, legal, security and social issues and
Describe assemblies rules and behaviors that Create proper patterns contribute to engineering drawings effective to communicate a teamwork design Identify the “Explode” an relevance of assembly and to professional animate the explosion ethics in to show the intended project work
management, Hangzhou Dianzi University 2007-2012 Associate Pro- fessor, School of management, Hangzhou Dianzi University 2005-2007 Assistant Professor, School of management, Hangzhou Dianzi UniversityMiss Yuexin Jiang, Zhejiang University Master degree candidate in School of Public Affairs in Zhejiang University. Research direction: Educa- tional Economy and Management.Dr. Xiaofeng Tang, Pennsylvania State University Xiaofeng Tang is a postdoctoral fellow in engineering ethics at Penn State University. He received his Ph.D. in Science and Technology Studies from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 University Innovation & Entrepreneurship
Through a Humanistic Lens” in Engineering Studies 2015 and ”A Game-Based Approach to Information Literacy and Engi- neering in Context” (with Laura Hanlan) in Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference 2015. A classroom game she developed with students and colleagues at WPI, ”Humanitarian Engineering Past and Present: Worcester’s Sewage Problem at the Turn of the Twentieth Century” was chosen by the Na- tional Academy of Engineering as an ”Exemplary Engineering Ethics Activity” that prepares students for ”ethical practice, research, or leadership in engineering.” c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Negotiating a Nineteenth-Century Solution AbstractThis
goal was to prepare graduates forengineering practice by equipping them with contextual (also sometimes called “professional”)skills. These calls for reform resulted in the EC2000 accreditation criteria, which require, amongother things, that graduates demonstrate the ability to integrate “realistic constraints such aseconomic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, andsustainability” into the design process, including the development of new products. This ability,in turn, rests on other abilities including an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams; anability to define and solve problems; an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility;an ability to communicate effectively; the
develop a large range of the skills that arecurrently being underdeveloped. Maker spaces go beyond the traditional machine shopenvironment familiar to the undergraduate curriculum offering access to rapid prototypingequipment and conceptual design spaces coupled with a unique culture that can betransformative to its users.”In their synthesis on the humanitarian engineering literature, Campbell and Wilson suggest thathumanitarian engineering “provides a broader context than is found in mainstream engineeringcourses” and therefore can better address ABET learning outcomes F (professional and ethicalresponsibility), H (understanding the impact of solutions), and C (design within realisticconstraints), with a particular emphasis on ethics (Cambell
., “Continuing and emerging issues in engineering ethics education”, TheBridge, 32(2), 8–1, 2002[10] Forster, M., “Higher order thinking skills”, Research Developments, Vol. 11, 2004, Art.1[11] ABET, Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2015-2016 Accreditation Cycle,Engineering Accreditation Commission, 2014, http://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/E001-15-16-EAC-Criteria-03-10-15.pdf[12] National Academy of Engineering, “The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering inthe New Century”, The National Academies Press, https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10999/the-engineer-of-2020-visions-of-engineering-in-the-new, 2004[13] Hafkesbrink, J. & Schroll, M., ”INNOVATION 3.0: EMBEDDING INTOCOMMUNITY KNOWLEDGE - COLLABORATIVE ORGANIZATIONAL
and – so you could bring up a spreadsheet, essentially, to calculate if we sell it for 50-100, how much money are we going to make? How many – if we sell it for 100-150, how much money are we going to make that way? And then whichever number is the largest or from kind of an ethical business standpoint ~DanielWhat Daniel does, which was far from unique in our data, is assume that pricing categories arecan be summed either down or across the table. He assumes that those willing to pay a higherprice will not purchase the product at a lower price. Further, despite the request to select a singlemarket to sell to, he assumes that for a given price the venture will begin by targeting andcapturing all three markets
skillset and their entrepreneurial mindset in a year-long, real-world design project.Throughout the curriculum, professional skills such as oral and written communication,innovation, understanding constraints, sustainability, technical feasibility, customer value,societal benefits, economic analysis, and professional ethics are addressed with increasing depthas students develop their skillset.Course Overview The focus of this paper is the sophomore level EGE 2123: Entrepreneurial EngineeringDesign Studio course mentioned above. Specifically, in this course, students identifyopportunities for engineering design themselves within the context of the design theme“Accessibility in the Workplace”. The focus of this theme is to design and build a
on costs, revenue, channels, and market segments. In addition to technical andfinancial factors, ABET requires that students consider complementary priorities in design suchas environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, andsustainability. The proposed S*Metamodel canvas approach accommodates these considerationsin a straightforward manner by including them directly in the iterative design process as essentialinformation needed to identify and understand stakeholders as well as develop relevant features.Sustainability could be included in the design canvas by identifying the environment as thestakeholder with ‘sustainability’ as the general feature. Two possible attributes could then becarbon impact and
Plan Review and Annual Business Forum Committees. In addition, she has served on the Charlottesville Business Innovation Council and as a founding Director for the Business Growth Network. She also served on the board of the Division of Professional Affairs Advisory Council for the American Association of Petroleum Geologists. Known for her candor and high ethical standards, positive energy and astute people skills, she has become a valued resource for business incubator programs throughout Virginia and her success as a business consultant is reflected in the successful outcomes of her clients. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 The Social Mechanisms of Supporting
-specified student outcomes, namely the ability to:apply STEM principles, analyze and interpret data, assess feasibility of a design, function onmultidisciplinary teams, understand professional and ethical responsibility, communicateeffectively, use tools necessary for engineering practice, comprehend contemporary issues,identify value and participate in life-long learning, and understand the impact of solutions in aglobal context.28 Moreover, the US-Denmark Summer School’s defined learning outcomes alignwith desired traits of the successful future engineer. The National Academy of Engineeringacknowledges and even emphasizes the role of globalization on shaping these necessary traits,among which are: the ability to work within the framework of
economics, safety, ethics and project management. Introduction au génie de la conception pour les ingénieurs et les informaticiens. Expérience pratique et travaux en équipe. Les sujets traités comprennent l'approche conceptuelle, le processus de conception, le prototypage, l'économie d'ingénierie, la sécurité, l'éthique et la gestion de projet. GNG2101 Introduction to product development and management for engineers and computer scientists | GNG2501 Introduction à la gestion et au développement de produits en génie et en informatique (UG – sophomore) A hands-on, team-based introduction to product development and management principles for engineers and computer scientists and their impact on social and economic aspects of engineering