Paper ID #29446Changing an Electrical and Computer Engineering Department Culture fromthe Bottom Up: Action Plans Generated from Faculty InterviewsElise A. Frickey, Iowa State University Elise is a graduate student at Iowa State University. As a doctoral student in Counseling Psychology, she has been involved with research on the application of self-determination theory to different domains to allow for better understanding of the relationships between contextual factors, basic psychological needs, and indices of well-being. Prior to attending Iowa State University, she obtained a Bachelor of Arts in Psychology and Spanish
, andcreating and managing budgets are inherently entrepreneurial activities. The three Cs, curiosity,connections, and creating value, used in the KEEN EM framework, are useful for facultydevelopment. Engineering faculty instill curiosity in their students every day and are curiousabout solving research problems, they make connections when they teach in class and performresearch, and create value when they teach courses students want to take and solve researchproblems organizations wish to fund. This paper prepares the foundation for a robust, holisticapproach to faculty development using the three Cs. The career planning support at threedifferent institutions is summarized and the concept of a career strategic plan is discussed.Recommended
physical activity levels to travel modes, transportation mobility for the transportation disadvantaged, and the development of planning and transit performance measures for access to opportunities, integrating sustainability into the engineering curriculum and creating an engi- neering sustainability minor. He has published several articles in the Transportation Research Record, other journals and conferences on these and other related topics. He is currently serving on the Transportation Research Board (TRB) Committee on Aircraft/Airport Compatibility and is a past member of the TRB Committees on Traffic Flow and Characteristics and Transportation Network Modeling. Stephen is also a member of the Ameri- can Society
. Teresa Lee Tinnell, University of Louisville Terri Tinnell is a STEM Education Curriculum and Instruction PhD Candidate and Graduate Research As- sistant at the University of Louisville. Research interests include: interdisciplinary faculty development, first-year engineering student retention, STEM teacher education, and collaborative, team-based learning experiences.Dr. Thomas Tretter, Thomas Tretter is professor of science education and director of the Gheens Science Hall & Rauch Plan- etarium at the University of Louisville. His scholarship includes collaborative efforts with science and engineering faculty targeting retention of STEM majors in entry-level STEM courses.Dr. Marie Brown
Paper ID #34459Lessons Learned: College Student Surveys as a Professional DevelopmentToolDr. Dick Apronti, Angelo State University Dick Apronti is an assistant professor at Angelo State University. He teaches transportation engineering courses, engineering graphics, and plane surveying. His research interests are in transportation safety and planning. Dick Apronti also has interests in projects that improve access to higher education and college retention for minorities and under-represented groups. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Lessons
evolved into during the pilot phase. By describing in detail ourprocess, we aim to provide a flexible guide by which other units might adapt and develop similarprograms to help faculty enhance their teaching. We show that program success—as far as wecan see it in these early stages—is characterized by a focus on understanding stakeholder—especially instructor—needs around teaching, embracing a process that distributes power andleadership throughout planning and decision-making, investing organizational support throughtime and money, and assessing progress and goals regularly.To do this, we first situate our peer review of teaching program within the broader context of ourdepartment’s formation and existing models for evaluation of teaching. We
of professional valuesand attitudes). According to Eaton et al. [1], some teaching activities in the online environmenthave “the potentials to cultivate deeper learning experiences, but they can fail to do so ifactivities are not designed and implemented properly.” The rapid switch to online instruction inMarch 2020 did not allow faculty members to train, plan and reflect upon the best teachingmodes for online instruction, unless they had previously taught an online class. Therefore, aswith many other researchers, we consider the Spring semester to be an example of remotelearning rather than planned online learning [3].In October 2020, the Chronicle of Higher Education conducted a survey among faculty membersin US institutions to gain
to involve the stakeholders in solutiondevelopment if the solution is to be adopted by them. A human-centered design orientation isespecially important when creating and implementing strategies that require the stakeholders tochange, because it integrates local and often contradictory knowledge and contexts with thecreation and implementation processes [13-15].It is worth taking note that industries are increasingly taking a design thinking approach [16, 17]to develop and implement solutions for employee engagement, and strategic planning [17].However, the application of design thinking approach to education sector/ educational reformseems under-utilized in higher education [19-22] and mostly limited to K-12 grades [18]. Here,we hypothesize
distributed. 2. A workshop for faculty in the College of Engineering (COE) that was conducted during every departments’ regular faculty meetings. 3. Discussion sessions were conducted with faculty who taught project-based courses. 4. Informal lunch sessions to encourage sharing of effective strategies were proposed.Each component of this approach is described in greater detail below.1. Resource (‘One Pager’)An important part of the initiative was the creation of a detailed resource which containedinformation in the form of organized steps on how to make a traditional classroom moreinclusive. The authors initially planned on creating a one-page resource but quickly realized thedifficulty in this task due to the volume of information that
intern’s research project. They sharedthat being involved in designing their interns’ project improved their ability to develop a“realistic clear experimental plan." Because of the rigid and time-bound structure of the program,the mentors had to ensure the plan was achievable within eight-weeks and that the intern wouldhave data to present at the conclusion of their summer internship. Additionally, the interns’limited background knowledge and lack of research experience required that mentors createprojects that specifically fit their abilities. This is supported by the following evaluation data: It has strengthened my ability in terms of developing a research project that is tractable for a fresh person to come in and contribute
, because such teaching brought them into closer proximity with students andsuch experiences brought out students’ passion [19]. We argue that the 2020 pandemic, whichbrought about an abrupt shift to teaching online, provided a fair test of faculty beliefs andrevealed a great deal about their values related to student learning. With little time to plan,faculty might have “relapsed” into well-known ways of teaching, suggesting the change wasincomplete or superficial.In this paper, we present evidence of successful and sustained faculty change during thistransitional period based on our previous work. We were particularly interested in investigatingwhether shifts in faculty instructional practices were sustained during the COVID-19 pandemic.This
Central New Mexico Community College where she manages the college-wide accreditation and strategic plan. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020From Q&A to Norm & Adapt: The Roles of Peers in Changing Faculty Beliefs and PracticeAbstractThis research paper reports on the impact of professional development across four years of amajor change initiative. Research suggests students from groups underrepresented in engineeringare particularly vulnerable to poor teaching, drawing inaccurate conclusions about their fit andpotential. However, supporting faculty to make their teaching more inclusive and learner-centered can be challenging. Faculty may not have experienced such
systems mapping approach that can be used byfaculty developers and CTLs to engage faculty, students, administrators, and other stakeholders;2) highlight an example application of this systems thinking approach to student success andretention in engineering; and 3) explore potential benefits of systems mapping. The expectedoutcomes of this paper are to provide the reader an introduction to systems mapping via anexample application and prompt the reader to consider using systems thinking and systemsmapping in their faculty development and CTL planning or as an alternative way to gatherperspectives from faculty, students, and other stakeholders. Here, the focus is on using systemsmapping as a way to gather stakeholders’ perspectives to help identify
, 2020Lessons Learned: Teaching and Learning Academy Workshop to Promote an Asset-based Mindset among STEM facultyAbstractThis lessons learned paper describes the strategies in planning, organizing, and delivering aTeaching and Learning Academy Workshop that focused on bridging the cultural and perceptiongap between faculty and students in math and engineering classrooms. Grounded in Yosso’sCommunity Cultural Wealth model, the workshop was designed to engage participants in asequence of reflective and conversational activities that allowed the faculty to connect their owneducational experiences with their expectation towards the students, and recognize the strengthof the students in terms of their cultural wealth in Aspirational
competitive edgein STEM [6].The COVID-19 pandemic interrupted the traditional residential REU experience atuniversities and colleges, halting many plans for summer undergraduate research. Studentslost jobs and internship opportunities. With a whole cohort of students and faculty at risk, theComputing Alliance of Hispanic Serving Institutions (CAHSI) researchers realized that theAffinity Research Group model [7] could be migrated to the virtual environment, providingfaculty and students with research experiences and opportunities that would otherwise be lost.During the summer of 2020, supported by a NSF grant, 51 students and 21 faculty participatedin a virtual REU (vREU) 8-week experience. The results from this work have been analyzedand are shared
technology advancement, the challenges of online instruction can be daunting as seen inthe lack of immediacy or engagement between instructors and students. Course design is asystematic planning process for developing learning experiences and it aims at ensuring learningoutcomes, assessments and activities support one another to provide students the best opportunityto learn [19]. The appropriateness of a course for online delivery relies on its consistent structurewhich allows learning, communication, and collaboration. As a result, the ease of online learningdepends on factors including cognitive complexity of course design elements such as alignmentbetween instruction and assessments, active pedagogy, and faculty support [19]. Ko & Rossen [20
-seated beliefs about the curriculum that were the cause ofthe problem they wished to examine. In the short workshop time available, we were not able todislodge these beliefs.Recommendations for staff developers and workshop organizersBased on our reflective analysis of the workshops conducted to date we make the followingrecommendations as initial determinants:1. The participants should be required to pre-read the materials and to complete pre-workshopactivities to explore their own problems. Also, workshop leaders should communicate the entirecourse content to the participants in advance of the workshop, allowing for modifications. If wehad, the participants could have framed their problems in light of the planned discussion. Thefacilitators
Completed by Adjunct FacultyAdditionally, participants noted a need for improved access to course materials for planning andpreparation purposes. One participant suggested that the availability of an online syllabirepository accessible by adjunct faculty, on-demand would allow them to not only prepare forfuture course assignments earlier but also suggest additional courses they would like to becomecleared to teach. Others suggested that the contact with the course monitor (or course-specificPOC) for any issues or questions related to the courses can be difficult.There were also several comments that scheduling related issues impacted adjunct facultypreparation- i.e. short lead time between assignment and class start, frequency of assignment
faculty of color mentees to develop a career goal that attended totheir career stage and intended career trajectory. Pre-tenure mentee career goals centered aroundtenure and promotion, while post-tenure mentee career goals were more individualized, such asmoving into an administrative post. The mentees were required to select an emeriti faculty as amentor to specifically grow their mentoring network; thus, the inclusion of emeriti faculty wasmeant to supplement not supplant any existing mentoring relationships. Collaboratively, thementoring pairs were invited to co-determine a mentoring plan to include their planned mode andfrequency of communication and shared mentoring goals. Therefore, the mutual mentoringmodel served as the foundation of the
cybersecurity and networks course that theywould teach in the 2020-2021 academic year, and revise it to infuse EML. The faculty wereencouraged to review cards published in EngineeringUnleashed.com to find potential ideas andimplementations of EML in specific disciplines. As part of the application, they were asked todescribe their planned effort to promote EML in their course and identify the learning outcomes.The primary deliverables were to implement the proposed EML component and provide adetailed summary of their deployment including assessment efforts for dissemination throughEML focused college and external meetings and events.Participation from Faculty, Outcomes & AssessmentThe faculty development opportunities described above reached a
Paper ID #34135Faculty Mentorship and Research Productivity, Salary, and Job SatisfactionDr. Li Tan, Purdue University, West Lafayette Li Tan is currently a postdoctoral researcher in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University.Dr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette Joyce B. Main is Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate School of Education, and a Ph.D. degree in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University. Dr. Main examines student academic pathways and
success in STEM through psychological stress, inter- rupted STEM career trajectories, impostor phenomenon, and other debilitating race-related trauma for Black, Indigenous, and Latinx doctoral students.Dr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University at West Lafayette Joyce B. Main is Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate School of Education, and a Ph.D. degree in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University. Dr. Main examines student academic pathways and transitions to the workforce in science and engineering. She was a recipi- ent of the 2014 American Society for Engineering Education
participants will continue with the virtual writing group, part of which includescontinuing to write reflections after each weekly session. After participating in the virtual writinggroup across two semesters (Fall 2019 and Spring 2020), the authors plan to applyautoethnography data analysis techniques to formalize the study into a journal manuscript.Assuming this goes well, the authors will consider developing a “toolkit” to empower new andearly career faculty to develop individual and community potential through virtual writinggroups.WIP: Feedback RequestedGiven that this paper is a WIP (work-in-progress), the authors are seeking feedback from thecommunity in the following areas.1. Anecdotally speaking, if you have participated in a peer group, what
), thelack of interactivity (9 students) and the availability of lecture videos (9 students). More than halfof the students gave recommendations as to how faculty could improve their remote classes inFall 2020. Many faculty, according to the student interviews, were unprepared to teach remotely.They had difficulties in using the learning management system (LMS), Canvas, as well as Zoom.As well, some faculty would not record their lectures or not post them online. The studentcomments can give faculty insight into improving their classes in the future.IntroductionThe outbreak of COVID-19 in the world has caused many universities to move their classes toemergency remote learning. Instead of being a planned movement, this shift to remoteinstruction was
his life and career goals were in alignment, he stated, “No, I only havecareer goals, life goals will be on the back burner until tenure.” Similar themes were noted byanother former postdoctoral scholar who is now in a tenure-track faculty member role: “I’mworking on a home, life, and work balance, but it's difficult and I often feel pressure to beworking or at least be reading papers on the weekends and you know, that's probably the hardestaspect of it.”The absence of work-life balance was consistently noted as an inevitable component of theprofessoriate, examples were commonly shared that imbalance was exacerbated in academiacompared to other career fields. A Latinx female currently employed as a postdoctoral scholarand planning to pursue a
country and our families?), logistics and planning(for example, when will we have to engage with students in-person?), or even personal or healthrelated (for example, when will I have access to the vaccine?). Thus, we quickly understood thatthese COVID-19 websites were helping address concerns not only of students and their parentsbut also other stakeholders from diverse backgrounds, who just like us were facing a different setof challenges and looking for answers. We decided to study different university web pages tounderstand how universities were communicating information and changes through the pandemicand collate strategies that administrators were sharing to help their specific learning communitiesface the challenges brought on by the
classroom observation was conducted by two trained observers. Following the observation,the observers met with each faculty member to discuss each person’s goals as they pertain to theRTOP rubric. An individualized follow-up plan was devised among the participants andobservers and was also used to guide subsequent observations and instructional coaching. Inorder to examine how the active learning strategies that were presented in the workshopsimpacted student achievement, course-level data for undergraduate engineering classes betweenthe academic years of 2012-2013 (before the faculty development program) and 2017-2018 (afterthe faculty development program) was gathered. Seven disciplines of engineering were sampled:aerospace, biomedical, chemical
, University of Texas at El Paso Yamile is a graduate research assistant at The University of Texas at El Paso, pursuing a master’s degree in Engineering with concentrations in Environmental Engineering and Engineering Education. Yamile’s ac- tive research interests center around the intersection of engineering, education, and sustainability. Yamile plans to pursue a PhD in Environmental Engineering.Dr. Meagan R. Kendall, University of Texas at El Paso An Assistant Professor at The University of Texas at El Paso, Dr. Meagan R. Kendall is helping develop a new Engineering Leadership Program to enable students to bridge the gap between traditional engineer- ing education and what they will really experience in industry. With
undergraduate respondents, the largest portion (26.3%)were from Environmental Engineering Program. Also, our college is unique to have AppliedSciences combined with Engineering, we had 3.5% of the respondents from Physics.7. Future WorkWe plan to continue with additional surveys, and seek responses from broader student body todetermine and rank the behaviors establishing rapport in engineering classrooms. In addition, ourgoal is to further develop the blended faculty professional development and educate our facultyon the behaviors that establish rapport. To understand the real impact on students, we willcontinue to study the instructor behavior, and student feedback correlating the impact of rapporton student resilience and retention in a longitudinal
success [40]. Previous researchhas found that it is not uncommon among senior women faculty to plan their pre-tenurepregnancies to give birth in May, to postpone becoming pregnant until having reached tenure, orto limit the number of children they have based on the tenure-track limitations [12], [41], [42].Confirming to the view of academia as a gendered space, since men do not experience suchlimitations. As a result, the new generations of Ph.D. graduates are less attracted to facultypositions. A study from the University of California system found that the proportion of graduatestudents wanting professor positions at research intensive institutions was reduced during theirdoctoral training from 45 to 36% and from 39 to 27% among men and women