feedback with support from internet tools and resources affect conceptual change and associated impact on students’ attitude, achievement, and per- sistence. The other is on the factors that promote persistence and success in retention of undergraduate students in engineering. He was a coauthor for best paper award in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2013.Dr. Ying-Chih Chen, Arizona State University Ying-Chih Chen is an assistant professor in the Division of Teacher Preparation at Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College at Arizona State University in Tempe, Arizona. His research takes two distinct but interrelated paths focused on elementary students’ learning in science and engineering as well as in-service science
from University of Illinois, Urbana. Her M.S. and Ph.D. degrees are in Materials Science and Engineering from University of California at Berkeley in 1992 and 1994. Following graduate school, Amy worked for Hewlett Packard in San Jose, CA and in Colorado Springs, CO. Amy’s research interests include microelectronic packaging, particularly 3-D integration and ceramic MEMS devices.Pat Pyke, Boise State University Patricia Pyke is Director of Special Programs for the College of Engineering at Boise State University. She oversees projects in freshman curriculum development, retention, math support, mentoring, and women’s programs. She earned a B.S.E. degree in Mechanical Engineering from
, 4) block scheduling of courses, 5) active studentlearning strategies, and 6) strong articulation agreements with regional four-year institutions.This paper will explore these six elements that define the Itasca engineering learning communitymodel. Student graduation rates will be used to compare the success of the model with otherprograms in the region and across the nation.IntroductionThe value of learning communities within higher education is now well documented1. Suchevidence has thrust this concept into curricular redesign efforts across the United States.Numerous publications and the demand for information is so high that a peer-reviewed journalon the subject now exists, The Journal of Learning Communities Research
choice; pedagogically it is a first opportunity to emphasize themultidisciplinary nature of contemporary engineering practice. Therefore, the pilot course wasdelivered with the expectation that it will replace the current introduction-to-major courses.The course objectives address both first-year pedagogy and the overall first-year experience.Accordingly, this paper is presented in two major parts. The first part describes the design andpilot of the new GEEN 1500 Introduction to Engineering course in Fall 2011. The second part isfocused on a broader look at the first-year experience with research from Teaching as Research(TAR) projects supported by the Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning(CIRTL).Part 1: Pilot of the New
-year engineering students. Andrew has had the opportunity to support the General Engineering Learning Community (GELC) and the Boyd Scholar program in University Suc- cess Skills course. His doctoral degree is in Civil Engineering with research interests in Optimization of Porous Pavements based on Aggregate Structure. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Peer Sharing Presentations in a First-Year Engineering Learning Strategies CourseAbstractThis Complete Evidence-Based Practice paper details the use of peer sharing presentations in alearning strategies course designed for first-year engineering students. The learning strategiescourse is a component of
Paper ID #32711Mechanical Engineering Activity-Based Freshman Course Online During aPandemicProf. Dani Fadda P.E., University of Texas at Dallas Dr. Fadda is Associate Professor of Practice in Mechanical Engineering. His background includes two decades of engineering practice in the energy industry where he has held numerous positions. Dr. Fadda has worked in product research and developed patented products for chemical, petrochemical, and nuclear applications. He is an ASME Fellow and a Professional Engineer.Dr. Oziel Rios, University of Texas at Dallas Dr. Oziel Rios earned his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from
. Provide exemplar reports for studies of interest to early career engineering students. c. Document pathway of lab report to research paper to funding to deployment. d. Student product is student interpreting a simple lab and producing a lab report based on the guidelines shared.12. Re-inforce electricity basics involving voltage (V), current (I), and resistance (R). a. Use PhET.colorado.edu to support practices in this area. b. Use the online Tinkercad Arduino website (tinkercad.com/learn/circuits) to encourage electrical product designs. c. Tie parallel resistance evaluation to rational function analysis in precalculus. d. Student product is their work associated with the many
titled programs, for ABET, He is a member of the Board of Governorsof Habib University and Chair of its Academic Committee.Dr. Patrick Linke, Texas A&M University QatarDr. Linke is the Executive Director, Office of Graduate Studies, Texas A&M University at Qatar(TAMUQ), Program Chair of the Chemical Engineering Program, Texas A&M University at Qatar(TAMUQ), Professor of Chemical Engineering, Texas A&M University at Qatar (TAMUQ),Doha, Qatar. Dr. Linke is The Qatar Shell Professor for Energy and Environment of TAMU Qatarwith a mandate to engage around energy and environmental topics in research, teaching and raisingawareness of sustainability issues. He is Co-founder of Humanitarian Engineering workshops incooperation with the
minors complementary to the major or participation in the Grand Challenge Scholar Program. Any faculty time not directly related to mentorship efforts is considered non-value-added. Examples include showing thestudents how to register for courses on Self Service, the course management system, orwhere to find the list of Humanities courses, a subset of which are graduation requirements.The overall duration and variance of advising sessions is reduced through two generalcategories of effort. The first focuses on value-added activities, with the goal of capturing thebest practices across the faculty. To demonstrate consider faculty members A and B whodiscuss the benefit of having a Mathematics minor with their advisees. Faculty member Aholds a
, known as the 4 Ss.6Access to or lack of resources in any of these four areas can either be an asset or liability to thestudent. Since its inception, BEST has served as an asset in the area of support by providingAfrican American first-year CoE students “affirmation, aid, and honest feedback” (p. 114)through their mentoring relationship, thus positively impacting the transition process and aidingin the success of their first-year experience.6As Lasser and Snelsire reported, peer mentoring programs like BEST and others aim to“1) to provide an instant support network of minority students with similar goals; 2) to provide asocial outlet; and 3) to give the mentor a forum for communicating the University policies,procedures and unwritten ‘rules’ the
understanding and a disposition that a student builds across thecurriculum and co-curriculum, from making simple connections among ideas and experiences tosynthesizing and transferring learning to new, complex situations within and beyond thecampus”10, 11. The Integrative Knowledge Portfolio Survey was designed “in order to create apedagogy and technology to help students know and articulate what they have learned”9, 11especially valuing how they learn and implementing this in their career choices11. Pizzolato’sSAS is the first tool of its kind to assess self-authorship quantitatively. The capacity to assessself-authorship quantitatively can help institutions create and implement new practices by havinga tool that could be used for assessment. Prior to
for improvingretention include several best-practice components, namely: 1) exposure to engineering practice through two new courses employing multidisciplinary projects6, presentations by practicing engineers, presentations by students involved in co- op education, and presentations by senior capstone design project students; 2) the development of the faculty mentoring program for first-year students; 3) the development of a peer advisor mentoring program for first-year students; 4) the development of an industrial mentoring program for first-year students.We are implementing all four initiatives, and this paper focuses on initiative #4, industrialmentoring.1.3 Other Industrial Mentor ProgramsFreshman
participation in engineering education. He is a Research Scientist and Lecturer in the School of Engineering at Stanford University and teaches the course ME310x Product Management and ME305 Statistics for Design Researchers. Mark has extensive background in consumer products management, having managed more than 50 con- sumer driven businesses over a 25-year career with The Procter & Gamble Company. In 2005, he joined Intuit, Inc. as Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer and initiated a number of consumer package goods marketing best practices, introduced the use of competitive response modeling and ”on- the-fly” A|B testing program to qualify software improvements. Mark is the Co-Founder and Managing
access and success of those traditionally under-represented and/or under-served in STEM higher education.Prof. Eve A. Riskin, University of Washington Eve Riskin received her BS degree in Electrical Engineering from M.I.T. and her graduate degrees in EE from Stanford. Since 1990, she has been in the EE Department at the University of Washington where she is now Associate Dean of Diversity and Access in the College of Engineering, Professor of Electri- cal Engineering and Director of the ADVANCE Center for Institutional Change. With ADVANCE, she works on mentoring and leadership development programs for women faculty in SEM. Her research in- terests include image compression and image processing, with a focus on
, are directed towardexercising and reinforcing these characteristics. Students assess their own preparation andcontribution to class discussion using these criteria. Students also self-assess and peer-assesstheir activities on their team project using these same criteria.2.2 Engineering Projects: The Practice of the ArtIn the second course, each skill is further developed through their application to a larger-scaledesign project with less direct guidance as to the specific skill or characteristic to be invoked at aparticular time. In this course, students are expected to self-manage their design project. Tofacilitate this, more powerful tools for project management and design communication areintroduced and exercised. This is accomplished
2003 to 91.3% in 2006. The concentrated effortsaround high service programs and early academic engagement in engineering have beeninstrumental in assisting us in retaining freshmen students.IntroductionIn today’s environment of declining interests in engineering as a major for high school students,there is a need to be more creative and innovative in order to retain and graduate undergraduatestudents who choose to pursue engineering in college. The trend of “weeding out” engineeringstudents with only “the tough surviving” is a practice of the past. Instead, we need to implementprograms that are supportive and encourage students to succeed in all areas of engineering.Advocates for future engineering challenges agree that the continued success
devices, an optional 4-day course on engineering of musicalinstruments, and an opportunity for students to get together and speak about their experiencesthrough guided storytelling. We will report on the results of these programs at a later date.BibliographyASEE (2014). Going the Distance: Best Practices and Strategies for Retaining Engineering,Engineering Technology, and Computing Students. https://www.asee.org/papers-and-publications/publications/college-profiles.Alon, S. (2005). Model mis-specification in assessing the impact of financial aid on academicoutcomes. Research in Higher Education, 46(1), 109–125.Alon, S., & Tienda, M. (2005). Assessing the “mismatch” hypothesis: Differences in collegegraduation rates by institutional
holistic “cradle to grave” approach Do things right, having decided the right thing to do Beware cost reduction masquerading as value engineering Practice what you preachThe third lecture builds on Egan Review Skills for Sustainable Communities7. This is included tostimulate student thinking about their skills development, the other professions who they may beworking with in the future and to support their year-long first year design project which is Page 14.800.5looking at conceptual design of an eco-town for 20 000 people.The Egan Review presents seven components that are core to realising a sustainable community.They are
Engineering at the University of Texas at Tyler and expects to graduate in 2008. He is a tutor in the Back-To-Basics program and the president of the local student chapter of the IEEE. His other interests include operating systems and electronics design projects. Page 13.1205.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 The Back-To-Basics Peer Tutoring Program: Results and ExperiencesAbstractEngineering institutions nationwide are facing a troika of problems: recruitment, studentpreparedness and retention. The situation has merited national attention due to potential impacton the status of the nation as a global
students that graduated in the first engineering major they choseafter FYE, compared to 78% of DM graduates who stayed with their first major choice. FYE programs also have thequickest path to graduation in engineering, which may be a result of fewer FYE students changing their majors asevery change of discipline within engineering requires an average of two additional semesters.7Motivation theories attempt to explain the relationships between beliefs, values, and goals with respect to action andthus, may be useful for studying major choice. A number of identity and motivation constructs have been associatedwith retention and success within engineering. Specifically, researchers have shown that domain identification, utility,perceived ability, and
. Meyer, Land, R., & Baillie, C. Ed., no. Book, Whole). Leiden U6: Rotterdam ; Boston: Sense Publishers, 2010, ch. Why is geologic time troublesome knowledge?, pp. 117-129.[11] Meyer and R. Land, "Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: linkages to ways of thinking and practising," in Improving Student Learning - Theory and Practice Ten Years On, C. Rust and D. Oxford Centre for Staff Eds. Oxford: Oxford : Oxford Centre for Staff & Learning Development, 2003, pp. 412-424.[12] J. Kabo and C. Baillie, "Seeing through the lens of social justice: a threshold for engineering," European Journal of Engineering Education: Educational research impacting engineering education, vol. 34, no. 4, pp
]. In a survey of Canadian college students, Sandhu et al. found thatamong those affected, there was significant impact on their academic performance with stress (~42%), anxiety (~ 33%), and depression (~21 %) being causes of MED related poor academic [3].While considerable research has been done on undergraduate student wellbeing, very few studiesspecifically target the impact of MED on engineering students.Foremost among the findings of studies on MED in undergraduate is that stigma related to MEDis a barrier to students seeking help [1]. In the design of our program we considered that stigmamay be especially acute for engineering students. Many engineers valorize the toughness ofengineering programs and celebrate high attrition as a sign
introductory materials engineering, polymers and composites, and capstone design. His research interests include evaluating conceptual knowledge, mis- conceptions and technologies to promote conceptual change. He has co-developed a Materials Concept Inventory and a Chemistry Concept Inventory for assessing conceptual knowledge and change for intro- ductory materials science and chemistry classes. He is currently conducting research on NSF projects in two areas. One is studying how strategies of engagement and feedback with support from internet tools and resources affect conceptual change and associated impact on students’ attitude, achievement, and per- sistence. The other is on the factors that promote persistence and
encouraged to draw from their own junior and senior level coursework(especially their senior design projects) to help students gain perspective, and learn how to applyfundamental laws to more difficult and complex circuits. The purpose was to help thesefreshman students understand why EE 302 is a foundational course in the curriculum, and SIleaders participated in weekly professional development meetings to discuss best practices indirecting student learning of both the content and study skills. Leaders maintained detailed lessonplans and were asked to identify content and study skill objectives for each week’s lesson. FourSI sessions were offered weekly and efforts were made to ensure that the sessions did notconflict with lecture or lab timesIII
examine the impact of thelearning community experience on first-year retention in engineering and at the university. Theresults of this analysis, limitations and conclusions are discussed.Engineering Learning Community DesignSeveral published studies have linked learning communities to increased retention of first-yearstudents, higher first year GPAs, and lower incidence of academic probation [3]. Zhao and Kuh[4] indicate the cluster enrollment model featuring a cohort of students co-enrolled in two or morecourses is improved upon when the faculty involved in these courses design activities thatincorporate the curriculum of the courses in cluster. This integrated curricular approach was thebasis for the WTAMU engineering learning community
Paper ID #30254Employment of Active Learning Pedagogy Throughout a Makerspace-Based,First-Year Introduction to Engineering CourseMr. Nicholas Hawkins, University of Louisville Nicholas Hawkins is a Graduate Teaching Assistance in the Engineering Fundamentals Department at the University of Louisville. A PhD student in Electrical and Computer Engineering, he received both his B.S. and M. Eng. from the University of Louisville in the same field. His research interests include power electronics and controls, as well as engineering education for first-year students.Dr. James E. Lewis, University of Louisville James E. Lewis
interest inengineering. Not only do makerspaces offer chances for young students to engage in engineeringendeavors in creative ways, but makerspaces have shown great potential in addressing broadergoals of education, such as the augmentation of first-year engineering student retention. Much ofthe research on makerspace impacts and practices have focused on K-12 and informal education.Little is known about how a well-designed, makerspace-based engineering course can addressbarriers to first-year students’ persistence in engineering, such as the interest in engineering barrierfocused on in this paper.Research also suggest that the makerspace movement provides a beneficial opportunity forstudent development of interests and identity. The structure of
Undergraduate Teaching Fellowsor through Terrascope-administered research projects.In this paper, we describe the structure and evolution of the program over the past four years,outcomes for students, and lessons we have learned in designing and implementing the program.IntroductionThe MIT Earth System Initiative (ESI) is a multidepartmental organization that encourages andfacilitates research and education within MIT on environmental and Earth-system science and Page 11.1245.2engineering (see http://web.mit.edu/esi for details). It is directed jointly by representatives of theDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering and the Department of
face many challenges bothacademic and non-academic9. One widely studied impact of these challenges is transfer shock, adip in the GPAs of transfer students during the first one or two terms after transfer6. Althoughbelieved to be nearly universal, transfer shock is generally not severe10 and Cantrell et al.1 havetheorized that pre-transfer support programs are one technique that can be used to help transferstudents get through their transfer shock and “experience the rewards of their efforts.”We were interested in comparing how well our transfer students were doing in comparison withtheir native classmates. One measure of success is how long a student takes to graduate and dothey ever graduate. The most commonly used metric for graduation and
: Use the works best for your program (e.g. test questions, questionnaire, focus Academic Motivation construct within the "Identity" instrument. group, design presentations, lab reports, etc.) instrument. ESII. (1d) Evaluation (2d) EvaluationFor each assessment measure it is important, a priori, to determine your For each assessment measure it is important, a priori, to determine your goal/standard for each measure. goal/standard for each measure.Figure 1: A proposed framework for assessing a first-year engineering program(1b) Student-Learning Outcomes and