user of English3.1 Articulate effective linguistic choices to each otherThe C-BLI approach posits that for learners to internalize (i.e., they can use the newknowledge on their own) a scientific concept, it is important to have them verbalize in class.Through an instructor’s mediation, learners should explain communicatively theirunderstanding of the concept(s) they are learning to each other. In this spirit, the last tutoringsession was devoted to individual presentations of their understanding and reflection of thefour linguistic concepts and corpus techniques. It was found that every participant wascapable of applying the linguistic concepts to their own writing (see Table 4). While Vihaanand Shyla chose to apply all four linguistic
instrumentdesigned to identify self-determined communication in graduate education. This researchaddresses two key questions: (1) How do the adaptation steps contribute to the theoretical andpractical development of the COMM-FLOWS tool? (2) In what ways do the measures of theCOMM-FLOWS tool differ from those of the original Basic Psychological Needs Satisfaction –General (BPNS-G) scale in capturing self-determined communication in graduate education?Using an adaptation framework informed by Chenel et al. (2018)’s decision-aid methodology,this study modifies the BPNS-G scale to capture the nuances of oral and written communicationin an academic setting. The adaptation process involved seven structured steps: (1) identifying ascale for adaptation, (2
Jr.’s Pro-Black engineeringeducation research framework [14],[15], and Gelles’s work on ethical mentoring [16]-[19]. Thispaper presents a novel process by which conflicts could be managed internally between engineeringlab as well as introduce new methods by which the research process can be both democratized andaffirming of the assets that underserved graduate students and their advisors bring [14].Background: Whether formally structured (i.e., advising) or informally structured (i.e., mentoring),national reports [20] point to the dire need for evidence-based practices and research in not justforming productive relationships but meaningful ones for a graduate students’ profession.Unresolved conflict resolution continues to be among
: Embodied Cognition and Discourse, B. Hampe (Ed), Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press, 2017, pp. 297 – 316.[11] A. Deignan, E. Semino, and S. Paul, “Metaphors of climate science in three genres:Research articles, educational texts, and secondary school student talk,” Applied Linguistics, vol.40, issue 2, pp. 379 – 401, 2019.[12] G.J. Steen, Visual metaphor: Structure and process. Amsterdam: Johns BenjaminsPublishing Company, 2018.[13] E. El Refaie, Visual metaphor and embodiment in graphic illness narratives. New York,NY: Oxford University Press, 2019.[14] C. Reeves, The Language of Science. New York, NY: Routledge, 2005.[15] A. S. Reynolds, Understanding Metaphors in the Life Sciences. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press, 2022.[16] M. Bradie
2014 report indicate thatneurodiverse individuals make up only around 3% of science and engineering doctoral degreerecipients [10].Graduate students face a unique set of challenges when compared to undergraduate students,with faculty advisors playing a large role in student success. Several studies have noted specificchallenges related to advisors, including work-life balance, which may be impacted by facultyexpectations, and hierarchical faculty-student relationships [11]-[13]. Satterfield et al.’s [14]literature review focused on the experiences of graduate students during their studies andexplored how individual factors (the influence of the student’s advisor), programmatic factors(isolation and teaching assistantships), and external
. 2023 ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., Baltimore, MD, 2023.[2] G. D. Bruce, “Exploring the value of MBA degrees: Students’ experiences in full-time, part-time, and executive MBA programs,” J. Educ. Bus., vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 38–44, 2009, doi:10.1080/08832320903217648.[3] S. K. Gardner and B. Gopaul, “The part-time doctoral student experience,” Int. J. DoctoralStud., vol. 7, pp. 63, 2012.[4] M. A. Cohen and S. Greenberg, “The struggle to succeed: Factors associated with thepersistence of part-time adult students seeking a master's degree,” Contin. Higher Educ. Rev.,vol. 75, pp. 101–112, 2011.[5] J. C. Yum, D. Kember, and I. Siaw, “Coping mechanisms of part‐time students,” Int. J.Lifelong Educ., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 303–317, 2005.[6] R. Darolia, “Working
research [3]. Industry-universitypartnership is a requirement of this model, which calls for concerted participation of industryexperts in the training of students through identification of industry-relevant research problems,co-advising about how to approach their practical solutions, and training for other non-technicalskills that are crucial for success in industry. An assessment of student demand and their experience with P3’s non-traditional features,support of university administration, and the challenges felt by interested faculty advisers duringits implementation at Lehigh University were presented previously [3, 4]. This paper completesP3 program’s assessment by analyzing the feedback provided by industry scientists who haveserved
/CBO9780511803932.[12] National Postdoctoral Association, “NPA Core Competencies.” [Online]. Available: https://www.nationalpostdoc.org/page/CoreCompetencies[13] B. S. C. Kwan, H. Chan, and C. Lam, “Evaluating prior scholarship in literature reviews of research articles: A comparative study of practices in two research paradigms,” Engl. Specif. Purp., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 188–201, Jul. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.esp.2012.02.003.[14] S. A. Crossley, D. R. Russell, K. Kyle, and U. R mer, “Applying Natural Language Processing
(3), 285–301. Cabrera, A. F., & La Nasa, S. M. (2000). Mentoring minority students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 441–476. Campbell, Toni A., and David E. Campbell. "Faculty/student mentor program: Effects on academic performance and retention." Research in higher education 38 (1997): 727-742. Chen, X., & Soldner, M. (2013). STEM attrition: College students’ paths into and out of STEM fields (NCES 2014-001). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Chen, X., & Weko, T. (2009). Students who study science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) in postsecondary education (NCES 2009-161
2.0for the upcoming semester(s)? for the upcoming semester(s)?Do you feel GVSU has adequate infrastructure to Do you feel GVSU has adequate infrastructure to 2.2 4.0support minority students? support you as a student?Did you get sufficient personal guidance/counseling Did you get sufficient personal guidance/counselingin socially adjusting to GVSU? 2.0 in socially adjusting to graduate school? 3.5Do you feel like people at GVSU treated you fairly Do you feel like people at GVSU treated you fairly
. References[1] P. Chakraborty, P. Mittal, M.S. Gupta, S. Yadav, & A. Arora, "Opinion of students on onlineeducation during the Covid‐19 pandemic". Human behavior and emerging technologies 3(3),2020, 357-365.[2] S. Oncu & C. Hasan, “Research in online learning environments: Priorities andmethodologies”. Computers & Education 57(1), 2011, 1098-1108.[3] E. Gross & D. Peters, “Comparison of Returning and Direct Pathway Graduate EngineeringStudents”. Journal of Continuing Higher Education 69(3), 2021, 145-168.[4] Tulane University. "Evolution of Distance Learning." School of Professional AdvancementBlog, https://sopa.tulane.edu/blog/evolution-distance-learning#:~:text=In%20fact%2C%20it%20was%20in,correspondence%20learning%20really%20took
, “Stage-based challenges and strategies for support in doctoral education: A practical guide for students, faculty members, and program administrators,” Int. J. Dr. Stud., vol. 11, p. 15, 2016.[3] J. W. Anastas and E. P. Congress, “Philosophical Issues in Doctoral Education in Social Work: A Survey of Doctoral Program Directors,” J. Soc. Work Educ., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 143–153, Jan. 1999, doi: 10.1080/10437797.1999.10778953.[4] A. Johri, A. S. Katz, J. Qadir, and A. Hingle, “Generative artificial intelligence and engineering education.,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 112, no. 3, 2023, Accessed: Jan. 15, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&profile=ehost&scope=site&authtype
‘socially robust knowledge’, ‘societally relevant knowledge’, or ‘societal responsive knowledge’, is designed to describe how socially constructed knowledge in ‘the context of application’ involves the contingent features of contexts as defined by external stakeholders. Far less attention is paid to the internal configurations underpinning interdisciplinary knowledge. [16, p. 473]Against the rising interest in ‘the contextual’, we find Gajary et al.’s recent proposal helpful asthey offered a definition of convergence as a system of systems [5, p. 2, 9]. Their expandeddefinition considers convergence research as an adaptive, dynamic process [5, p. 9-10]. Whileconvergence research is always grounded in specific time and
one another and 14 initialcategories were identified. The categories capture the following meanings of NM1’s learningexperiences: (1) Obstacles and limitations; (2) Motivations; (3) Misconceptions about Ph.D.program; (4) Foundations and Focus; (5) Success/Survival; (6) Program comments; (7) Peer-to-peer learning; (8) Self-directed learning; (9) Mentoring & skill-building; (10) Social mentoring;(11) Goals as a mentor; (12) Mentoring as coaching; (13) Independence; (14) Why-questions. Asimilar coding process yielded 28 meaning units in the interview with a former AP lab mentor,PDM1. The following initial categories reflect PDM’s understanding of their role as a mentor:(1) Students’ independence; (2) Students’ peer-to-peer learning; (3
. Garrison, T. Anderson and W. Archer, “Critical thinking, cognitive presence, andcomputer conferencing in distance education,” American Journal of Distance Education, vol. 15,no. 1, pp. 7-23, 2001, doi: 10.1080/08923640109527071.[3] D. R. Garrison, “Shared metacognition in a community of inquiry,” Online Learning, vol. 26,no. 1, pp. 6-18, 2022, doi: 10.24059/olj.v26i1.3023.[4] A. A. Koehler, Z. Cheng, H. Fiock, H. Wang, S. Janakiraman, and K. Chartier, “Examiningstudents' use of online case-based discussions to support problem solving: Consideringindividual and collaborative experiences,” Computers & Education, vol. 179, no. 104407, 2022,doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104407.[5] J. P. How, “New STEM and Engineering Education Paradigms [From the
Recitation sessions – Methodology November 5 Methodology Due 100 December 1, 2023 Mid-Term Project Reflection 25 December 1, 2023 TOTAL 500 TABLE 3 SPRING – CAPSTONE II Point Description Due Date s Recitation Session - Data Analysis / Solutions / December, January ROI
," International Journal of Management andHumanities, 3(6), 1-5, 2018.[2] V. B. Onk, and M. Joseph, “International student recruitment techniques: A preliminaryanalysis,” Journal of Academic Administration in Higher Education, 13(1), 25-34, 2017.[3] T. Adams, M. Leventhal, and S. Connelly, “International student recruitment in Australia andthe United States”. The SAGE Handbook of International Higher Education, 399-416, 2012.[4] A. Robinson-Pant, and A. Magyar, “The recruitment agent in internationalized highereducation: Commercial broker and cultural mediator,” Journal of Studies in InternationalEducation, 22(3), 225-241, 2018.[5] S. Lomer, “Recruiting International Students in Higher Education Representations andRationales in British Policy London
Engineering and Computing (SPECTRA) program is an NSFScholarship in STEM (S-STEM)(Award # 1834081) based out of Clemson University in SouthCarolina. The SPECTRA program focuses on aiding transfer students interested in anEngineering or Computing degree by offering scholarships, opportunity to form cohorts, andaccess to professional skill-building programs. The goals of SPECTRA are as follows: (1) to provide scholarship opportunities to low-income students who wish to pursue engineering or computing at Clemson (2) to build cohorts of transfer students to support their transition into Clemson while also allowing for the Advisors for Cohorted Engineers (ACE) Fellows program to aid in the
academic and professional interests whilebuilding strong peer and external stakeholder networks. This concept provides support for careerdevelopment through stakeholder involvement [22]. Students are given opportunities to connectwith professionals from the field. The program’s practical and simple design offers a replicablemodel for other institutions. By addressing challenges and expanding on its strengths,universities can ensure graduate education prepares students for both academic excellence andcareer advancement.AcknowledgementsThis work is supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1954946. Anyopinions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the
. 2217640 through a wider initiative and acenter for transforming graduate engineering education. Any opinions, findings, and conclusionsor recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.REFERENCESArtiles, M. S., Knight, D. B., & Matusovich, H. M. (2023). Doctoral advisor selection processes in science, math, and engineering programs in the United States. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), 1-16.Boyce, A. S. (2021). Strategies for mentoring and advising evaluation graduate students of color. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 35(3), 350-362.Bryson, T., Kowalske, M., Wilkins-Yel, K., & Housh, K. (2023). The
/074171361039276322. Reid, J. W., & Weigel, E. G. (2022). Examining perspectives of teaching among biology teaching assistants. Journal of College Science Teaching, 51(3), 67-77.23. R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/24. Fox J, & Weisberg S (2019). An R Companion to Applied Regression, Third edition. Sage, Thousand Oaks CA. https://www.john-fox.ca/Companion.25. Wickham, H., François, R., Henry, L., Müller, K., & Vaughan D. (2023). dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation. R package version 1.1.4, ttps://github.com/tidyverse/dplyr, https://dplyr.tidyverse.org.26. Wickham H, Vaughan D, Girlich M (2024). tidyr: Tidy Messy Data. R
September of 2010, she served as the Outreach Program Coordinator for the Women in Engineering & Science Program at Kansas State University from 2000-2010. She began her work in STEM outreach and student support at Girls to Women, a private not for profit in Kansas City, in the late 90’s. She has also served on the board for WEPAN from 2012-2014. She earned her M.S. in Youth Development from the University of Nebraska and her B.S. in Family Studies at Kansas State University.Dr. Dayna L. Mart´ınez, Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers, Inc. Dr. Dayna L. Mart´ınez currently serves as a Director of Research & Innovation at SHPE. In this role, she oversees the Equipando Padres program, pre-college programming
dominant higher education classroom.References[1] P. J. Palmer, The courage to teach: exploring the inner landscape of a teacher’s life, 10th anniversary ed. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass, 2007.[2] J. L. Huff and M. S. Ross, “Advancing an Integrative Perspective of Identity in Engineering Education,” in International Handbook of Engineering Education Research, 1st ed., New York: Routledge, 2023, pp. 183–198. Accessed: Aug. 08, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781003287483/chapters/10.4324/9781003287483-11[3] A. Patrick and M. Borrego, “A Review of the Literature Relevant to Engineering Identity.,” in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2016.[4] K. L. Tonso
complexity of thestakeholders, the evolving and interactive norms, and resources involved. These complexsystems can include local, state, and federal interdependencies and/or global interdependenciesthat require examination from a systemic and governance approach. These are common in areasof public planning, international affairs, and policymaking relying heavily on modeling thatemploys innovative methods for actual implementation. Figure 1. Engineering Systems, Bilen, S.,2020With the increasing rate of technological innovation and convergence among technologies andsystems—such as Industry 4.0; energy and communication systems; the digitalization of industrythrough automation, machine learning, and artificial intelligence
.1742-1241.2011.02659.x.[8] S. M. Van Anders, “Why the academic pipeline leaks: Fewer men than women perceive barriers to becoming professors,” Sex Roles, vol. 51, no. 9–10, pp. 511–521, Nov. 2004, doi: 10.1007/S11199-004-5461-9/METRICS.[9] R. Ysseldyk et al., “A leak in the academic pipeline: Identity and health among postdoctoral women,” Front. Psychol., vol. 10, no. JUN, p. 1297, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.3389/FPSYG.2019.01297/BIBTEX.[10] N. D. Jackson, K. I. Tyler, Y. Li, W. T. Chen, C. Liu, and R. Bhargava, “Keeping current: An update on the structure and evaluation of a program for graduate women interested in engineering Academia,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings
interviews with each participant is provided below.Participant 1 (P1): P1, a fifth-year architectural engineering graduate student, initially intendedto pursue a master's degree and enter industry but decided to stay for a Ph.D. due to his passionfor research. He learned about the seminar through his wife and enrolled to gain valuableknowledge and feedback without dedicating excessive time. P1's expectations included learningabout the interview process, preparing application materials, and exploring non-academicopportunities. The seminar broadened his understanding of career options, provided insights intocrafting application documents, and facilitated peer review. He believes the seminar surpassedhis expectations to some extent, although he
feedback loop isanticipated to where as students progress in their respective research, the STEM Ed seminarcourse will provide a venue for them to continually give back to the program by allowing themto provide insights to new students.References [1] R. Sowell, T. Zhang, N. Bell, and K. Redd, Council of Graduate Schools, Washington, DC, rep., 2008 [2] Proceedings of the National Conference on Graduate Student Leadership (St. Louis, MO.: Washington University), 2003, 44-47. [3] Nettles, Michael T., and Catherine M. Millett. Three Magic Letters: getting to the Ph.D. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 2006. [4] A. Fentiman and S. Fisher, “Building Graduate Student Communities,” 2009 Annual
: developing entrepreneurialthinking in STEM (Entre-STEM)." Enhancing Entrepreneurial Mindsets ThroughSTEM Education. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 165-194, 2023[11] T. Siller, T., & G. Johnson, G. Curriculum, Pedagogy, And Assessment In EngineeringEducation Reform. In 2004 Annual Conference (pp. 9-366), 2004 (June).[12] I. K. Amalina, S. Suherman, T. Vidákovich, L. Puspita, & N. Supriadi. The Comparison ofHungarian and Indonesian Curriculum: A Case Study of ISCED 2 Mathematics and ScienceCurriculum. Journal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 12(1), 112-122, 2023.[13] Y. Supriani, F. Meliani, A. Supriyadi, S. Supiana, & Q.Y. Zaqiah. The Process ofCurriculum Innovation: Dimensions, Models, Stages, and Affecting Factors. Nazhruna