teams as part of his thesis work, and had the opportunity to teach undergraduate ME courses. His previous efforts and experiences in engineering education helped shape his overall goal of fostering human-centered education systems, which led him to pursue his PhD at ASU.Dr. Mayra S. Artiles, Arizona State University Mayra S. Artiles is an assistant professor in engineering at the Polytechnic School of the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. Her research expertise includes engineering doctoral education structure, experiences of underreprDr. Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University Samantha Brunhaver, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor within The Polytechnic School of the Ira A
practices affected student motivation.Dr. Racheida S. Lewis, University of Georgia Dr. Racheida S. Lewis, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor at the University of Georgia in the Engineering Education Transformations Institute (EETI) and the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Faculty Perception of the GRE as a Graduate Admission RequirementIntroductionThe goal of this paper is to describe a study that assesses engineering faculty perceptions of theGraduate Record Examination (GRE) in terms of its usefulness as an application component foradmission into engineering M.S. Thesis and Doctoral programs
Paper ID #37478Facilitating Engineering Faculty Success: Faculty Development ofGraduate Mentoring PracticesHimani Sharma, Arizona State UniversityMiss Amanda Marie Singer, The Ohio State University Amanda Singer is a second-year Ph.D. student in the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University. She graduated in 2021 from Michigan Tech with a Bachelor’s and Master’s of Science in Environmental Engineering. Her current research interests include engineering identity formation, community college engineering education, and mixed methods research.Dr. Mayra S. Artiles, Arizona State University Mayra S. Artiles
bachelor’s degrees may be eager to enter the engineering workforce. However,in many engineering disciplines, individuals have more earning potential and career trajectoryoptions with a master’s degree. In this paper, we identify several categories of barriers and lessonslearned to launching an S-STEM focused on graduate students at a large R1 public institution thatmay be useful to other such programs. These include discussions on recruitment of this specializedpopulation of students into graduate school, especially those from other institutions, can bedifficult because i) there are structural and legal barriers to accessing financial information aboutstudents to identify low-income students and ii) smaller institutions may not have the
topic. It is not enough to do a basicliterature review; we want to be sure that we are broadly and systematically reviewing what isavailable with regard to graduate students in mentoring triads.Systematic literature review. As defined by Borrego and colleagues’ 2014 study on the subject,a systematic literature review follows a set of procedures in order to be reproducible [12]. Theseprocedures are Decision, Identification of Scope and Research Questions, Inclusion Criteria,Finding Sources, Critique of Sources, Synthesis, Limitations/Concerns, and further writing thereview itself. The Decision stage is the first step, in which the researcher(s) must agree to beconsistent and effective “between goals, research questions, selection criteria, and
have been calls to develop and deploy graduate STEM education modelsthat prepare students for careers outside academia. Few innovations have emerged to meet students attheir current skill and preparation levels when entering their graduate studies while also consideringstudents' individual desired career paths. The U.S.'s current approach to graduate STEM education doesnot emphasize preparing students with professional skills and experience outside the lab. Further,students from differing socioeconomic and underserved backgrounds are often not adequatelysupported. Through a National Science Foundation Innovations in Graduate Education (IGE) award, theUniversity of Pittsburgh Swanson School of Engineering is creating and validating a
of some complexity, and case participants need todiscuss and come to some solution(s) or plan(s) for the case. Shapiro’s book [9] lists the basicprocess as: 1. Case learners prepare for the case by reading and analyzing it 2. Optionally - students can perform a deeper preparation by having a priori small group discussions 3. An in-class discussion is done for the case 4. An end-of-class summary is provided by the facilitatorAs there are many books on the case method, our approach uses ideas from Rosenthal andBrown’s book for examples of pedagogically strong cases [10], and Barnes, Christensen, andHansen’s book [11] on how to teach cases (readers should note that this book is not only good forlearning about the case method, but
to cope with stress.References[1] K. Levecque, F. Anseel, A. de Beuckelaer, J. van der Heyden, and L. Gisle, "Work organization and mental health problems in PhD students," Research Policy, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 868– 879, 2017.[2] T. M. Evans, L. Bira, J. B. Gastelum, L. T. Weiss, and N. L. Vanderford, "Evidence for a mental health crisis in graduate education," Nature Biotechnology, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 282– 284, 2018.[3] M. Schmidt and E. Hansson, “Doctoral students’ well-being: a literature review,” International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, vol. 13, no. 1, 2018.[4] J. Hyun, B. Quinn, T. Madon, and S. Lustig, "Mental health need, awareness, and use of
Created the GRE Exam,” Student Progress. Accessed: Mar. 30, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.studentprogress.org/gre/history/[2] “Wisconsin State Journal from Madison, Wisconsin,” Newspapers.com. Accessed: Mar. 30, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/397344363/[3] “How Does the Old GRE Compare to the Current GRE?,” ThoughtCo. Accessed: Mar. 30, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.thoughtco.com/old-gre-exam-v-gre-general-test-3211977[4] S. E. Woo, J. LeBreton, M. Keith, and L. Tay, “Bias, Fairness, and Validity in Graduate Admissions: A Psychometric Perspective,” PsyArXiv, preprint, Aug. 2020. doi: 10.31234/osf.io/w5d7r.[5] M. C. Yu and N. R. Kuncel, “The Importance of
for this [13], [14]. Lemelinet al. discuss how community building can lead to increased student resilience, which can in turnreduce student resistance to active learning [15]. Zumbrunn et al. found that when studentsperceived the classroom environment to be supportive, their in-class engagement increased [16].Moreira et al. demonstrated that community building in the form of events, retreats, and onlinediscussions contributed to the retention and positive career outcomes for students from groupshistorically minoritized in STEM [17]. Active learning can itself contribute to students’ sense ofcommunity, as evidenced by Parrish et al.’s 2021 study which found that team-based learningfurthered students’ sense of community in both online and face
; for example, Chen et. al. states that “[s]tudents from all backgrounds may find theexperience [of an unexpectedly poor academic performance] threatening to their competence, butstudents from minority groups must also contend with anxiety that this performance ‘confirms’negative academic stereotypes attributed to their group memberships”[10].Often, these biases and stereotypes reflect an automatic judgment without an awareness ofindividuals’ specific abilities or experiences [11] [12]. Thus, the format of assessment, rather thanthe rigor, quality, or intended learning can have undue effect on educational outcomes. Forexample, IGEN performed a case study on a top-ranked physics program which noticed its“passage rate [for a qualifying exam] had
Venkataraman, San Diego State University Satchi Venkataraman, Ph.D., is a Professor of Aerospace Engineering. He has served as Graduate Advisor for the Aerospace Engineering program (17 years) and as an Associate Director at the Computational Sciences Research Center at San Diego State University (11 years). His expertise is in computational mechanics and optimization applied to design of lightweight and durable composite aircraft structures. He has extensive experience in developing programs for student professional development and broadening participation (co-PI and PI on three NSF S-STEM grants). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Exploring Interdisciplinary Identity Formation in
11published research conference papers and scientific journals, and securing one patent,highlighting the importance of engaging with PM training in graduate education.One study conducted by Ravankar et al. [15] did include doctoral students, but this study did notfocus specifically on STEM students. They revealed the applicability and value of PM training,demonstrating that engagement in PM training aligns with graduate students’ career aspirationsand satisfaction across various fields [15]. Despite these studies, Arditi et al.’s [16] review ofcivil management and construction master's programs in the U.S., highlighted a notable gap inPM training within this field. Their survey of 21 world-leading universities indicated a lack ofPM education, which
international students for diverse career paths help to make their academic journey morerewarding. To thrive, one must embrace these multifaceted transformative experiences with anopen mind, a willingness to learn, and resilience that will enrich the academic experience andprepare them for future success beyond the classroom. Finally, after creating a welcomingclassroom environment, if faculty members desire to enhance international students' experienceand their ability to thrive, there must be intentional relationship building to help the studentsbecome more comfortable asking for help when needed.LimitationsThis study utilized a limited sample size in a non-randomized survey; hence, the findings maynot be generalized.References 1. S. K. Gardner
, New York: Guilford Pr., 1999, pp. 403–422.[3] R. Brooks, S. Brooks, and S. Goldstein, “The Power of Mindsets: Nurturing Engagement, Motivation, and Resilience in Students,” in Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, and C. Wylie, Eds., Boston, MA: Springer US, 2012, pp. 541–562. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_26.[4] C. Dweck, “Implicit Theories,” in Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, Sage, 2011, pp. 43–61. Accessed: Sep. 14, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.torrossa.com/en/resources/an/4912667[5] A. K. Gupta and V. Govindarajan, “Cultivating a global mindset,” Acad. Manag. Perspect., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 116–126, Feb. 2002, doi: 10.5465/ame.2002.6640211.[6] C. S. Dweck
advising dynamics of education while highlighting the critical rolesadvisors play in constructing the academic life and future of the international student [5]. Thishas caused a dramatic change in the composition of Ph.D. enrollments in the U.S.The importance of cultural understanding in advising international students cannot be overstated,and several studies have highlighted this fact. For instance, Vakkai et al.'s research has shownthat international students' cultural backgrounds and values cannot be ignored, and havingadvisors who are more attuned to these aspects can significantly impact an individual's academicsuccess [6]. Similarly, Liu et al.'s study highlights the need for increased attention and guidancetowards international students
Our research paper examines the role of climate (e.g., interactions with others) in the skilldevelopment of engineering and physical science doctoral students. Skill development ingraduate school often occurs related to students’ primary funding mechanism, in which theymight interact with a research group or teaching team. Advisors also play a pivotal role in theengineering doctoral student experience; however, less is known about how positive mentoringinfluences skill development for engineering doctoral students. We investigated the followingresearch questions: 1) How, if at all, do interactions with advisor(s), faculty, and peers predict skill development (associated with primary funding mechanism) for engineering and physical
Fellow role(s) interested them and why. All of the candidates wereinterviewed and, based on those conversations, we decided to add two more Fellowship roles: The EnSURE Fellow would help organize the Engineering Summer Undergraduate Research Experience (EnSURE) program The Recruiting Fellow would assist in identifying and connecting with prospective graduate students through on- and off-campus recruiting activitiesIn addition to these six Engineering Graduate Leadership fellows, we decided to partner with theGraduate School’s Leadership Fellows program to co-sponsor two additional roles: a GraduateStudent Life and Wellness Fellow, focusing specifically on the needs of Engineering graduatestudents, and a Women in STEM
Water: Graduate Teaching Assistants in Introductory Science Laboratories at a Doctoral/Research University.,” J Res Sci Teach, vol. 41, pp. 211–233, 2004, doi: 10.1002/tea.20004. [2] G. Marbach-Ad, L. Egan, and K. Thompson, A Discipline-Based Teaching and Learning Center: A Model for Professional Development. 2015. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319- 01652-8. [3] D. A. Schmidt, E. Baran, A. D. Thompson, P. Mishra, M. J. Koehler, and T. S. Shin, “Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK),” Journal of Research on Technology in Education, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 123–149, Dec. 2009, doi: 10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544. [4] P. Mishra and M. Koehler, “Introducing Technological Pedagogical Content
, students, workers, or something in between? Though Ipersonally believe that doctoral engineering students exist outside of this binary discussionbecause of their important societal role in contributing to knowledge, within the binary they docontribute economically and do work that they are not sufficiently compensated for. They dowork, plain and simple.I am not alone in this line of thinking. Legally, the classification of graduate students asemployees has gone back and forth since the 1990’s. At private institutions, this dispute fallsunder the National Labor Relations Act. Specifically, the decision as to whether or not graduatestudents at private institutions are employees falls under the National Labor Relations Boardwhich is a board made up
more freedom to cover both theoretical and practical learning with the assistance of other software" [29]• Student engagement strategies o "An integral part of the curriculum includes three classes that involve real world experiences and partner with local business to ensure relevance and cutting edge expertise: Introduction to Software Engineering partners with Elevator 3 to offer real-world projects and current technology trends. Students learn Database Schemas, API(s) development, and React. The Information Systems (IS) course partners with Envoc. The .Net Core Framework for Windows is used for this class as well as many other
. 199–216, Jun. 2008, doi: 10.1002/j.2334- 4822.2008.tb00509.x.[2] K. Haag, S. B. Pickett, G. Trujillo, and T. C. Andrews, “Co-teaching in Undergraduate STEM Education: A Lever for Pedagogical Change toward Evidence-Based Teaching?,” CBE—Life Sci. Educ., vol. 22, no. 1, p. es1, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1187/cbe.22-08-0169.[3] C. Henderson, A. Beach, and M. Famiano, “Promoting instructional change via co- teaching,” Am. J. Phys., vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 274–283, Feb. 2009, doi: 10.1119/1.3033744.[4] D. Sachmpazidi, A. Olmstead, A. N. Thompson, C. Henderson, and A. Beach, “Team- based instructional change in undergraduate STEM: characterizing effective faculty collaboration,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 15, Apr. 2021, doi
, Florida, 2019.[2] S. Papert and I. Harel, Situating Constructionism: Cambridge, MA: MIT Media Laboratory., 1990.[3] C. Hayes and Y. Graham, "Understanding the building of professional identities with the LEGO® SERIOUS PLAY® method using situational mapping and analysis," Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, vol. 10, pp. 99-112, 2020.[4] C. Nerantzi and S. McCusker, "A taster of the LEGO(R) Serious Play(R) method (LSP) for Higher Enducation," in OER14 Building Communities of Open Practice, Newcastle, UK, 2014.[5] P. Kristiansen and R. Rasmussen, Building a Better Business using the LEGO Serious Play Method: Wiley, 2014.[6] A. R. James, "Lego Serious Play: a
continue to collect data during each semester in which the course isoffered. In future iterations of the course, student performance on course assessments can becorrelated with implementations of active learning and community building strategies.References:[1] S. Freeman et al., “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 111, no. 23, pp. 8410–8415, Jun. 2014, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111.[2] E. National Academies of Sciences, Graduate STEM Education for the 21st Century. 2018. doi: 10.17226/25038.[3] P. Armbruster, M. Patel, E. Johnson, and M. Weiss, “Active Learning and Student-centered Pedagogy Improve Student Attitudes and Performance in Introductory
Charlotte Lisa R. Merriweather is an associate professor at the University of North Carolina, Charlotte. She received her PhD in Adult Education with a graduate certificate in Qualitative Inquiry from the University of Georgia in 2004. Her research focuses on issueDr. Cathy Howell, University of North Carolina at Charlotte Dr. Cathy D. Howell is a Clinical Assistant Professor and Graduate Program Director at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. She received a Bachelor of Science degree in Community Health and Masterˆa C™s degree in Health Education at East CarolinaDilara Yaya Bryson, University of North Carolina at CharlotteDr. Edith Gnanadass, The University of Memphis Edith Gnanadass has a Ph.D. in Lifelong