Paper ID #40028Engineering Global Competencies through Study AbroadDr. Patrick Tunno, Pennsylvania State University Patrick Tunno is the inaugural Director of Penn State’s Center for Global Engineering Engagement and an Associate Teaching Professor. He has overseen and continues to lead the development and expansion of diverse international initiatives. Under his leadership, the college has established an award-winning Global Engineering Fellows Program, launched Penn State’s first 3+1+1 program for international stu- dents to pursue a one-year master’s degree, and initiated new interdisciplinary faculty-led study abroad
. Aftercalculating the required sample size with the established parameters, the sample was estimatedby groups of educational level. For this purpose, the participation of each group in the analysiswas established as it is displayed in Table 1: Table 1. Sample characteristics Students Total % Sample Ph.D. 58 1.5% 23 Master 1603 42.7% 39 Undergraduate 2096 55.8% 32 Total 3757 100% 94Once the size of the population was determined, the sample size was calculated, using
and add value in the service and knowledge industries [1]. The contribution thatengineering science professionals are able to make in leading these processes is essential.Newly qualified engineers are expected to be able to apply knowledge in order to benefit thequality of life and well-being of communities, bearing a powerful impact on the developmentof the country, generating interactions with the environment or industry from amultidisciplinary perspective and producing new proposals. Within this context, and in risingup to these challenges, a comprehensive training of new professionals is essential and it is thetask of current engineers as well as engineering schools to incorporate this new scenario inthe training of new professionals. In
Paper ID #40031Preparing for Student Success in Global Competency and AwarenessDr. Patrick Tunno, Patrick Tunno is the inaugural Director of Penn State’s Center for Global Engineering Engagement and an Associate Teaching Professor. He has overseen and continues to lead the development and expansion of diverse international initiatives. Under his leadership, the college has established an award-winning Global Engineering Fellows Program, launched Penn State’s first 3+1+1 program for international stu- dents to pursue a one-year master’s degree, and initiated new interdisciplinary faculty-led study abroad programs
engineers to understand social, global, and culturalissues as they enter the workforce[1]–[4]. So much so that ABET accreditation updated their2022-2023 student outcome 2 to state “an ability to apply engineering design to producesolutions that meet specified needs with consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, aswell as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors.”[5] This paper investigateshow a short-term (5 weeks), faculty-led, international program to Brazil, focused on sustainableenergy, encouraged the development of global competency skills in the participating engineeringstudents. Using the OECD Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) globalcompetency framework and assessment questionnaire, to
. Results showed a decrease in theKnowledge and Identity dimensions of the GPI data with statistical significance, but limitedpractical significance with a small effect size. Overall, this study provides a better understandingof students' perceptions of global perspectives pre-and-post COVID-19. Implications for practiceand research are provided, as well as directions for future research. 1. Introduction In our increasingly globalized world, it is important for engineers to develop globalcompetencies needed to work in a diverse environment. Competencies needed for engineeringstudents entering the workforce are interdependent technical and non-technical skills [1]. It isimportant for engineers to develop this sociotechnical thinking and
the recognition of the dignity of the profession of EngineeringEducator.In this paper, the international credentialing functioning is described as well as the roadmapof competencies development to the systematic improvement proposed to the engineeringeducators to build up as faculty to achieve the profession high-level quality global recognition.The bridge with the recognized international accreditation of engineering education programsis also shown to have a symbiotic effect with advantages for the universities and their faculty.1 - IntroductionEngineering education is a crucial aspect of the engineering profession and plays a vital rolein shaping the future of the industry [1]. Engineering educators are the backbone of thisprocess and are
faculty teach engineering and architecture courses at MSU Denver starting in 2014 through present1.1.3 Related sustainability initiativesOver the last decade, the UP and FEIT have introduced concepts of sustainability into thecurriculum [1], and concurrently, MSU Denver has likewise developed and initiated theSustainable Systems Engineering undergraduate program [2]. However, even with theseinitiatives, there remains a demand for graduate education that provides a holistic view ofsustainability of the built environment across multiple disciplines.The arrival of the pandemic and the subsequent transition to online teaching, ironically, providedthe opportunity for greater collaboration in teaching between MSU Denver EAET and UP FEIT,as
Competence for Engineering Formation (Work in Progress)1. IntroductionThe purpose of this project is to determine to what extent global engineering competence can bedeveloped in engineering students through the use of four minimally to moderately intensiveglobal engagement interventions. The specific global engagement interventions evaluatedinclude the use of international engineering case studies in a quantitative analysis course, theintentional formation of multinational student design teams within a capstone design course, aCollaborative Online International Learning (COIL) research project in a fluid flow (transportphenomena) course, and an engineering short course coupled to a community engaged project.The specific
, regardless of their engineering concentration and lay theinitial work for future performance enhancements for the students, educators, and policymakersin the STEM areas.IntroductionBangladesh's engineering and technology sectors are expanding as the country's economydevelops. Despite the country's relatively low level of economic growth, its engineering studentshave achieved remarkable academic performance, becoming some of the world's most qualifiedengineers. Researchers have demonstrated that self-efficacy, or the positive attitudes individualshold about their skills to accomplish activities, influences how they operate in a particulardomain, such as mental health and others [1, 2]. Increasingly, research findings indicate thatpsychological and
, point to the efficacy of short-term internationalresearch opportunities as learning, perspective altering, and motivating experiences forundergraduates who identify with underrepresented groups and for undergraduates in general.1. IntroductionThe impacts of short-term study abroad programs are considered in the literature [1, 2, 3, 4] butinformation regarding mentored undergraduate research in STEM disciplines completed throughtwo-week international programs is limited as is material regarding impacts of suchprogramming for students identifying with underrepresented groups. Outcomes from two short-term international programs in STEM, one offered in the Yucatan in collaboration with Mexicanuniversities and the other in Belize, are considered
choices. This information can be used to improveprograms based on student insights and can be helpful when deciding which aspects to highlightin advertising.IntroductionEngineering workplaces, problems, and companies are becoming increasingly global in nature[1], [2]. Studying abroad can transform students into global engineers, with improvementsincluding their collaborative abilities, flexibility, and ability to apply their technical andprofessional skills in a global context [3]–[5]. Though study abroad programs are increasing inpopularity, engineering students tend to be underrepresented [6], [7]. Significant barriers tostudying abroad for students in all degree programs include finances, personal costs, language,and information access [7
other. The groups are Ecuadorian civil engineering students at Universidad SanFrancisco de Quito, a private liberal arts university considered to be the best universityin Ecuador. The survey was translated into Spanish to better understand the users. Theresults supply relevant information about how students perceive aspects of culture anddifferences that were created by Covid-19.IntroductionCulture plays an important role in shaping our identities and how we interact with theworld around us [1]. For Hofstede culture is what we call unwritten rules about how tobe a good member of society or a group [2]. In recent years, there has been an increasedfocus on understanding the role of culture in engineering education, particularly in theUnited
we will propose appropriate supports, such as workshops andgroup activities, to help international students in engineering adjust to the gender-related culturein the U.S.IntroductionInternational graduate students in engineering are a significant presence in the U.S., with manyof them hailing from countries with distinct cultures from that of the U.S. The Institute ofInternational Education reported that 385,097 international graduate students were enrolled inU.S. higher education during the 2021-2022 academic year [1]. In addition, 54% of internationalstudents pursued degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields,with a majority of them enrolled in engineering and computer science programs [1]. In terms ofthe
haveproduced higher caliber work than teams that are not collaborating globally. In addition, COILprojects offer the opportunity for experiential learning, which is valued by employers and harderto come by in a traditional classroom environment (Appiah-Kubi et al., 2020). A COIL programcan take anywhere from five weeks to a whole class period, but the minimum recommendedlength is five weeks to solicit successful cross-cultural interaction. Additionally, an effectiveCOIL module consists of four significant and distinct phases. As shown in Figure 1, a COILprogram is organized into four phases that can take anywhere from five weeks to the entirelength of the semester. Figure 1. COIL Progression: Intro 2 COIL » What is COIL? (suny.edu
the case context. After presenting such context, we address our mainresearchquestionbyanalyzingthecurricularstructureofthecaseunderthe“why-what-who”framework.WeconcludebyhighlightingthephilosophyandmainthemesoftheSFTcurriculumandinformfutureopportunities.Byclarifyingthe“STEPbySTEP”curricularstructure,thispaperintendstosharerecentactivitiesinthefieldofengineeringeducationinChina.Therefore,theaimofthisstudyincludestwofold:(1)toidentifyrecentapproachesinre-designingengineeringeducationcurriculatowardsfuture;(2)andtosharebestpracticesthatinnovatingengineeringeducationinChina.2. Literaturereview2.1.TransformingengineeringeducationcurriculatowardsfuturegloballyFor the past decades, both engineering educators and researchers have been working to
faculty and improvement of curriculum and researchin academic institutes of other member countries.Keywords: Fulbright, Fulbright Scholar Award, Council for the International Exchange of Scholars.INTRODUCTION US Congress in 1946 approved the Fulbright program, which later proved to be a beacon forinternational understanding and collaboration [1]. The Fulbright Scholar Program wasadministered by the Council for International Exchange of Scholars (CIES) a non-profitorganization that was founded in 1947. Later in 1996, the Fulbright Scholar Programadministration transferred to the Institute of International Education (IIE). The Fulbright U.S.Scholar Program offers over 800 awards for US citizens to teach, conduct research and carry
resultantsacrifices. We hope this paper not only provides an overview of some of the unique challengesfaced by international women of color, but also drives more interest in better understanding thisoft-overlooked group in engineering.Introduction "Intersectionality is a lens through which you can see where power comes and collides, where it interlocks and intersects. It’s not simply that there’s a race problem here, a gender problem here, and a class or LBGTQ problem there. Many times that framework erases what happens to people who are subject to all of these things" - Kimberley Crenshaw [1]Bi-directional ignorance of and lack of intentional training on working with people of differentbackgrounds, gross unfamiliarity of the
renewable energy curriculum proposed for higher education institutions anduniversities in the country.IntroductionAbout 770 million people in the world do not have access to electricity [1]. Of this population 597 millionlive in sub-Saharan Africa [1]. The opportunity for providing off-grid access to electricity to ruralcommunities has been demonstrated through solar powered mini-grids [2,3]. These systems typicallycomprise a set of solar panels, batteries to provide electricity when solar power is not available, e.g. atnight, and may employ a fossil-fueled generator to also provide backup power. While mini-grids of thistype are starting to provide access to electricity in communities, there are many limitations that arecurrently limiting their
awareness, audience awareness,and collaborative teamwork and leadership, as specified in ABET criteria 2, 3, and 5,respectively. Effective EC pedagogy and industry partnerships can be an effective andmeasurable approach to supporting these criteria.IntroductionInternational approaches to developing Engineering Communication (EC) skills include carefulassays of industry needs, employer expectations, and a continuous cycle of building career-relevant course content [1]. Researchers studying STEM student employability in East Asiahighlight written and visual communication modes as key opportunities for curriculardevelopment. Not surprisingly, whether internationally or centered in a US context, multi-modalcommunication is identified by both students
. In doing so, barriers of literacy levels,language differences and inexperience with mining technologies were addressed.1. IntroductionThe South African Mining industry consists of four major mining sectors namely Coal, Gold,Platinum and Diamonds. Smaller sectors include operations to mine Titanium, Copper,Chrome and other lesser minerals according to the Minerals Council of South Africa (MCSA)[1] . The industry was reported to have employed 458,954 people in 2021 with a contributionof approximately R480.9 Billion South African Rands (~US$26.8 Bn) to the country’s GDPin that same year [2]. The production output of any operation is heavily reliant on the abilityof the mine management to effectively monitor and control the utilisation of their
incorporated into this program were the ability to examine local,global, and intercultural issues, understand and appreciate different perspectives and worldviews, interactsuccessfully and respectfully with others, and take responsible action toward sustainability and collectivewell-being.[1] Global competencies can be developed through international short-term study abroadprograms designed to offer experiential learning opportunities that students may not get in a traditionalclassroom setting.[2],[3] This program was designed to offer learning opportunities for the students on globalcompetencies through engineering curriculum, culture classes, and tours of various energy infrastructurefacilities around the country which helped the students
internationalstudents around the globe. Despite a decrease in the enrollment rate of new international studentsby 34% for undergraduates and 45% for graduates compared to 2019/2020, close to 1 millionstudents still chose to come to the US for their education [1]. More than 80% of these students arepursuing advanced degrees in STEM [2]. Why has the US been able to attract so many internationalstudents into STEM for higher education? Several reasons have been suggested in the literature -the availability of state-of-the-art research labs, opportunities to embark on ground-breakingresearch, the presence of highly qualified researchers, and the benefits of working withintellectuals from other parts of the world [3]. It is humbling to observe from the literature
simulated extraterrestrial terrain. The simulated terrain contains 5-15-inchboulders, a 6-inch-deep gravel bed, and erosion grooves and crevasses that vary in depths andwidths [1]. The standard for each competition includes both a male and female driver. During the1/2-mile terrain competition, teams earn points based on stages successfully passed, within an 8-minute time limit. Points are also earned through pre and post challenges that depend on theassembly of the vehicle, and the design of the rover. To add more complexity to the race, andencourage students to think critically, they are required to carry the un-assembled vehicle to thestarting line and are evaluated on assembly time. The competitors also get two attempts at thecourse with the
toward implementing active learning strategies. At a high level, case studiesacross Botswana (Tabulawa, 2003), South Africa (Harley et. al, 2000; Nykiel-Herbet 2004), andTanzania (Vavrus, 2009) highlight four salient barriers to curricular change: 2 1. Educators’ training on and personal experiences in learner-centered approaches is often limited (Coultas and Lewin, 2002; Schweisfurth, 2015); 2. A lack of available resources in physical learning environments can inhibit implementation of learner-centered approaches (Schweisfurth, 2015) 3. Cultural expectations at the institutional and national level (eg., appropriate educator
Education, 2023 Workshop on Global Engineering Design for Low-Resource SettingsBackgroundGlobal engineering is becoming more prevalent as technology increases communication andcollaboration worldwide [1]. To keep up with the ever-evolving society, global engineers mustwork on cross-cutting issues and bring a diverse mindset to work nimbly across differentenvironments with changing resources [1,2]. This adaptability requires being comfortable withdesign skills and being open to new ideas and international relations [3]. The design process iscrucial for students to experience and understand how to meet a population’s needs and iteratethrough feasible and culturally appropriate solutions.Undergraduate engineering curricula have significantly
non-IVE teams from An-Najah.The evaluation in this study focused on (1) global competencies, (2) value of the experience, and(3) team dynamics.The influence of the experience on the global competencies of the students in IVE and non-IVEteams was assessed quantitatively and qualitatively using pre- and post-program surveys basedon the Stevens Initiative and RTI International’s Common Survey Items as well as survey itemsdeveloped for this IVE to measure whether the program promotes gender equity. The value ofthe project experience for all students (i.e., IVE and non-IVE) was evaluated using a mixedmethods assessment based on the “value-creation framework” of Wenger-Trayner et al. Fourcycles of the value-creation framework were included in this
critical contributor towards the development of aglobally competent scientific and engineering workforce. The Open Doors report published bythe Institute of International Education, the leading not-for-profit educational and culturalexchange organization in the United States has shown that over the decade pre covid-19 therewas a steady increase from 273,996 students participating in Study Abroad in 2010/2011 to347,099 in 2018/2019, a 27% increase in the number of US studying abroad. The percentage ofSTEM students have also increased over that period from 19.0% in 2010/2011 to 26.8% in2018/2019. All minority students and STEM students accounted for 28% and 25% respectively,in 2015/2016, and increased to 30.9% pre pandemic [1]. The 2023 Open Doors
Innovation:Course Vision: Our Global Engineering course is deeply rooted in the vision and values of theSchool of Engineering at the University of Mount Union. The School of Engineering is committedto providing a holistic engineering education that prepares students for the challenges of aglobalized world while fostering their leadership and communication skills. Our institution's visionfor engineering education is encapsulated in our four pillars of engineering education, which areguided by the National Academy of Engineers' principles [3] and Mount Union's tradition as aliberal arts institution. These pillars are: 1. Providing Extensive Hands-On Real-World Engineering 2. Nurturing Global Engineering Competence 3. Integrating Engineering
accreditation for theirengineering programs on both local and global scales.Program Accreditation and AssessmentWorldwide, multiple accreditation systems and procedures are in place, with a predominantfocus on outcomes-based models. For example, in India, the National Board of Accreditation(NBA) evaluates the qualitative competence of engineering programs by emphasizing outcomes-based education (OBE) [1]. Another significant system, the EUR-ACE, is described as “aframework and accreditation system that establishes a set of standards identifying high-qualityengineering degree programs in Europe and beyond” [2]. Additional systems include theEngineering Council (EC) in the UK, the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) NationalAccreditation Board