PLTW foundations courses. Findings include insight into the level ofexplicit integration of math and engineering, and how PLTW experiences influenceteacher’s views about preparing students for engineering careers. Implications forpractice include the importance of creating awareness surrounding the need forinstructors to make explicit connections at an early stage in precollege engineering so thatstudents can improve their academic preparation as well as career readiness. Our studiesof engineering practice indicate that curricula in high school and college give students anincomplete picture of engineering work and what engineers do and often do not developthe full skill set needed to successfully execute increasingly complex, interdisciplinary
both microstructureand composition. The third author researched creep strength in alloys with particular interest inwhether there were significant differences in creep performance between a lever arm apparatusand a direct load apparatus.As a result of the RET experience, we each developed a Legacy Cycle module (curriculum unit)that engaged our high school students in (1) a study of metals and ways to increase those metals’ability to withstand high ambient temperatures (in the context of an airplane crash investigation),and (2) a study of creep, stress, and strain tests and how to apply these tests to investigate theproperties of aluminum foil. These modules placed students in the role of an investigator andrequired them to become researchers
father of the Mu Chapter of Pi Kappa Phi fraternity.Emilie Condon, Githens Middle School Emilie Condon, MA, MAT-ESOL is in her 7th year as an English as a Second Language public school teacher, currently at Sherwood Githens Middle School in Durham, North Carolina. Her classroom’s second language acquisition has had two foci: hands-on science curriculum and literacy—with an emphasis on photography and reading. The former has been a remarkable collaboration with Gary Ybarra, Ph. D. and Duke University’s Pratt School of Engineering, and the latter with the Center for Documentary Studies at Duke University.Gary Ybarra, Duke University Gary A. Ybarra, Ph.D. is a Professor and Director of
ASEE.Ms. Elizabeth A Parry, North Carolina State University Elizabeth (Liz) Parry Elizabeth Parry is an engineer and consultant in K-12 Integrated STEM through Engineering Curriculum, Coaching and Professional Development and a Coordinator and Instructor of Introduction to Engineer- ing at the College of Engineering at North Carolina State University. For the past sixteen years, she has worked extensively with students from kindergarten to graduate school, parents, preservice and in- ser- vice teachers to both educate and excite them about engineering. As the Co-PI and project director of a National Science Foundation GK-12 grant, Parry developed a highly effective tiered mentoring model for graduate and
. Her work also focuses on improving access and equity for women and students of color in STEM fields.Janet Yowell, University of Colorado, Boulder Janet Yowell is the Associate Director of K-12 Engineering Education at the University of Colorado’s Integrated Teaching and Learning Laboratory. Involved in the College’s outreach initiative since 2000, she oversees the ambitious K-12 engineering initiative, including the capacity-building and school partnership programs. She is a collaborator on the NSF-funded TEAMS Program (Tomorrow’s Engineers... creAte. iMagine. Succeed.) and the TeachEngineering digital library for which she is a contributing curriculum writer and editor.Jayne Aiken, University of Colorado at Boulder
Mechanical Engineering 5 david.akopian@utsa.edu, Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringAbstractEducational robotics provides many opportunities to enhance science, technology, engineering,and mathematics (STEM) education for students and teachers by using engineering and computerprogramming techniques integrated into the curriculum. In addition to in-class activities, thereare many programs targeting use of educational robotics in after-school activities. In this paper,we present our experience at the Interactive Technology Experience Center (iTEC) in design,development, and implementation of robotics activities for K-12 students and teachers. iTEC isa K-12 STEM center at the University of Texas at San
theinter-relatedness of ideas across a broad range of modal engagements and realize how conceptsencountered in one form (e.g., an equation) relate to those same concepts encountered elsewhere(e.g., in a 3D device).Yet K-12 students can struggle to see the interrelatedness across these modal engagements thatare often apparent to curriculum developers and instructors. There is some evidence that studentsdo not readily make connections across different modal engagements. For example, in pre-college engineering classes many students struggle to integrate previously encountered geometryconcepts in activities such as computer-aided design (CAD) or measurement activities15 .Analyses of standardized tests also show that many students who take pre-college
engineering curriculum: They exist side-by-side, institutionally parallel as opposed to convergent. Therefore, an element of bait-and-switchremains, but the outlet of creative, synthetic, hands-on design in an intimate, supportive learningenvironment is both present and institutionally legitimated as part of students’ formalizededucational experience. This arrangement challenges the logic of exclusion prevalent within theengineering-only programming by overlaying a logic of engagement on top of the standardfundamentals-first engineering curriculum. Page 26.616.13Since PDI operates outside of Rensselaer’s core engineering curricula, it provides only a
colleges, institutions of teacher education, and otherorganizations, in outreach and programming. In addition to these activities, the EOFNJinitiative has launched an awareness-building effort to disseminate critical messages tovarious stakeholder groups, including school administrators, and the parent community.A research effort, in its early stages, is underway to understand the impact of EOFNJactivities statewide and in several school districts.BackgroundThe adoption of new state K-12 curriculum content standards in 2004 raised awareness ofthe possible role of engineering in K-12 education in the state; however the resultingpolicy documents created ambiguity regarding the requirements for all students to studytechnology education and
science. She believes that the critical thinking skills acquired through STEM education are essential, and wants to inspire the next gen- eration to always query the unknown. Amy is passionate about connecting scientists and engineers with students who might not otherwise have the opportunity to connect one-on-one with STEM professionals.Ms. Tara Chklovski, Iridescent Ms. Chklovski is the Founder and CEO of Iridescent, a science, engineering and technology education nonprofit. Before starting Iridescent, she worked as the principal at a 300 student K-6 school in India. She has founded and grown Iridescent from a one-woman effort to an organization reaching 30,000 un- derserved students globally. With the help of a
ED in classrooms and assist other teachers in this integration. Some challenges toimplementing ED in K12 are the lack of time/space in the curriculum to add timeconsuming projects,lack of physical resources, and perhaps most important, lack of practical experience in engineeringdesign.Very few teachers have engineering degrees, making the connection between teachers and engineersvery important for ED integration. This project was carried out as a pilot to use teacher trainingworkshops and a followup conference to address the core issue of teacher experience in ED and inleadership of curriculum change to assist other teachers in ED implementation.The NGSS derives from an effort an effort by the National Academies of science and
. • Start in the early fall so it is easier for teachers to integrate new plans into their curriculum. Many schools begin in August, so planning could be done at the end of previous year and/or summer • Clarify the process for accessing funds, encourage timely planning for funds, share sources for discounted equipment/supplies, and share ideas for how to use the funds (field trips, supplies, and demonstrations were most common this year) • Add a tutorial component to help students with school workAdditional areas for improvement were derived from volunteers’ comments: • Help teachers realize that part of their obligation in the program is to help the volunteers learn or hone their teaching skills; some
practices associated with the NGSS and CCSS-Math have not been widely adoptedand recognized as part of what K-12 students need to learn and how K-12 teachers need to teach.Thus, it is likely that the lack of exposure and engagement with core STEM practice standards aspart of the curriculum combined with constrained teacher preparation have left many educatorswithout models, motivation, and knowledge of how to teach STEM content aligned to thepractice standards. Regardless, the practice standards provides authenticity and a pathway toincreasing K-12 student knowledge of how STEM related research, projects, and process takeplace in the workplace, and the post-secondary STEM education community plays an importantrole in promoting and supporting core
and Technology(ABET) [7] and provides a continuumfor engineering and technology education in the K-16 system. Development and effectiveimplementation of “Technology Education” curricula based on these standards at theelementary, middle, and high school levels in concert with science and mathematicseducation and their respective standards [8-10] will complete the K-12 STEM educationframework for the new millennium, with appropriate interfaces to higher education inengineering and technology fields in colleges and universities. “Science Education” and “Mathematics Education” have been an integral part of a broadbased school curriculum for all students. “Technology education”, however has beenprimarily associated with “vocational technology” and
(Table 4).Table 4: Classroom and enrichment teacher expertise, taken verbatim from a presentation slidepresented to all pilot year teachers during PD Classroom Teacher’s Expertise Enrichment Teacher’s Expertise • Science Curriculum • Science & Engineering Concepts • Work with ALL Students • EiE Resource in School to ALL Teachers • Differentiation (Advocate of the program) • Teaching Across the • Possible Classroom Support – Co-Planning & Co- Curriculum (Integration) Teaching Model • Higher Level Questioning/Critical Thinking • Provide
applications of the design process, curriculum development, and fulfilling the needs of an integrated, multi-disciplinary first-year engineering educational environment through the use of collaborative learn- ing, problem-based and project-based learning, classroom interaction, and multiple representations of concepts.Mr. Alexander Danial Manasseh, Prometheus Education, Inc Alexander Manasseh is a developer of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) les- son plans, presiding over the not-for-profit corporation Prometheus Education, Inc. Alexander develops STEM lesson plans, performs STEM pedagogy research, and tailors STEM technology to the K-16 class- room. Prometheus Education, Inc. facilitates efficacy
viaformation, nurturance and sustaining an important targeted school-university urban educationalpartnership. Our university has partnered with large urban school districts to plan, deliver andsustain a targeted inservice teacher professional development and a middle and high schoolSTEM curriculum intervention. The partnership goals are to assist inservice middle and highschool science teachers in: (1) designing and implementing integrated science and engineeringcurricula and (2) development of instructional methods and strategies that enable teachers toeffectively (a) teach challenging content and research skills in middle and high school asdemanded by state/national science standards; (b) generate knowledge and transform practice inhigh school STEM
extensive research and curriculum development experience in STEM disciplines. His research includes the study of thinking processes, teaching methods, and activities that improve technological problem-solving performance and creativity. He has expertise in developing technology and engineering education curriculum that inte- grates science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) concepts. Dr. Deluca is Co-PI on NSF project Transforming Teaching through Implementing Inquiry (DRL 1118942). This project focuses on developing research-proven professional development resources that integrate teacher learning with as- sessment practice. The end product will constitute a professional development and research-proven
AC 2012-4941: BUILDING A FRAMEWORK TO EVALUATE THE IN-CLUSION OF ENGINEERING IN STATE K-12 STEM EDUCATION ACA-DEMIC STANDARDSProf. Tamara J. Moore, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities Tamara J. Moore is the Co-director of the University of Minnesota’s STEM Education Center and an Assistant Professor of mathematics and engineering education in the Department of Curriculum and In- struction. Her research is centered on the integration of STEM concepts in K-12 and higher education mathematics and engineering classrooms. Her research agenda focuses on models and modeling as a curricular approach and working with educators to shift their expectations and instructional practice to facilitate effective STEM integration.Mr
initiative, the National Integrated Cyber Education Research Center(NICERC) curriculum development specialists created middle school elective curricula forgrades 6th, 7th, and 8th. The curricula use science and design projects framed by the engineeringdesign process to engage students. The content is presented in a modularly, increasing indifficulty through the grade levels. Each module consists of a design project lastingapproximately three weeks if presented in a singular class one hour in length.This work in progress assesses the first year implementation of NICERC’s STEM: Explore,Discover, Apply (STEM EDA) curricula at three diverse K-12 schools. Through the pilotschools, the versatility of the curricula is showcased. The curricula are being
integrated within learners’ knowledge bases andskill-sets. One sect of this instructional style, project-based learning, is backed by similarresearch, in particular, an increase in problem-solving abilities, as well as gains in collaborativeskills.10,11But this stance is not unanimous.12,13,14 Due to the vast amounts of relative freedom afforded insuch classrooms environments, a degree of self-regulation – the manner in which students arecapable of monitoring and controlling their own thinking, motivation, and behavior – isnecessary.15 Expert learners, those who possess high self-regulatory capabilities are thus well-suited to project-based learning.13 Conversely, inexperienced learners who lack self-monitoringskills often experience difficulties in
partnershipagreements between the school/school districts and the University.Bibliography:[1] J. Marshall, “Establishing a High School/Engineering Partnership with a Simple Industrial Process Control Module,” Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE conference, Pittsburgh, PA, June 2008.[2] M. Barger et al., “Engineering an Elementary School Environment to Enhance Learning,” Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE conference, Pittsburgh, PA, June 2008.[3] R. Sundaram and Q. Zheng, “STEM-based Projects to integrate the Undergraduate ECE curriculum with the K-12 STEM Curriculum,” Proceedings of the 2010 ASEE conference, Louisville, KY, June 2010.[4] R. Sundaram, Fong Mak, and Sunil Tandle, “Virtual Instrumentation Interfaces for Real-Time Control and Display of Electric
AC 2007-317: HIGH SCHOOL MATH AND SCIENCE TEACHERS' AWARENESSOF GENDER-EQUITY ISSUES FROM A RESEARCH-BASED WORKSHOPStephen Krause, Arizona State University Stephen J. Krause is Professor and an Associate Director of Undergraduate Studies in the School of Materials in the Fulton School of Engineering at Arizona State University. His teaching responsibilities are in the areas of design and selection of materials, general materials engineering, polymer science, and characterization of materials. His research interests are in innovative education in engineering and K-12 engineering outreach. He has co-developed a Materials Concept Inventory for assessing fundamental knowledge of students in
AC 2010-1998: ARE FRENCH FRIES AND GRADES BAD FOR YOU?CONFLICTING EVIDENCE ON HOW K-12 TEACHERS SEARCH IN A K-12DIGITAL LIBRARYRene Reitsma, Oregon State University RENE F. REITSMA is an associate professor of Business Information Systems at Oregon State University's College of Business. He and his students are responsible for the design, development and maintenance of the TeachEngineering digital library system architecture. Reitsma’s research concentrates on how digital libraries are used and can be improved.Paul Klenk, Duke University PAUL A. KLENK received his PhD in mechanical engineering and materials science at Duke University’s Pratt School of Engineering in 2006. Since then, Paul has
Paper ID #9447Student Videos as a Tool for Elementary Teacher Development in TeachingEngineering: What Do Teachers Notice? (research to practice)Ms. Mary McCormick, Tufts University Mary McCormick is a PhD student in STEM Education at Tufts University. She received a BS in Civil Engineering from University of Massachusetts Lowell and an MS in Civil Engineering from Tufts Univer- sity. Her current research involves exploring how elementary students’ nascent resources for engineering design emerge during integrated engineering and literacy activities.Kristen B Wendell, University of Massachusetts Boston Kristen B. Wendell is
American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, GA.Hynes, M. (2009). Teaching middle-school engineering: An investigation of teachers' subject matter and pedagogical content knowledge. Doctoral dissertation, Tufts University, Medford, MA.Nadelson, L., Seifer, A. L., & Hettinger, J. K. (2012). Teaching by design: Preparing K-12 teachers to use design across the curriculum. In Proceedings of the 119th American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, San Antonio, TX.National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.National
different operatingconditions in order to better understand the internal behavior of the fuel cell. The chemistryteacher focused on improving the efficiency of Direct Methanol Fuel Cells by reverseengineering an alternative proton exchange membrane composite presented in a recent journalarticle. The experience of the two teachers has been challenging but rewarding with greatcontributions highlighted by high potential for being coauthors on technical refereed publicationswith their mentors. A component of the RET experience was the development of a LegacyCycle inquiry lesson unit intended to connect engineering research to high school mathematicsand science curriculum standards. This paper describes one of the mentor’s and teachers’experiences and
Higher Education, 5(3),203-221.6 Rochin, R., & Mello, S. (2007). Latinos in science: Trends and opportunities. Journal of Hispanic HigherEducation, 6(4), 305–355.7 Stevens, R., O'Connor, K., Garrison, L., Jocuns, A., & Amos, D. M. (2008). Becoming an engineer: Toward athree dimensional view of engineering learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 355-368.8 Stevens, R. O’Connor, K., & Garrison, L. (2005). Engineering student identities in the navigation of theundergraduate curriculum. In Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education AnnualConference. Portland, OR: ASEE.9 Aschbacher, P. R., Li, E., & Roth, E. J. (2010). Is science me? High school students’ identities, participation, andaspirations in
was the study director for the NAE and National Research Council project that resulted in the 2014 report, STEM Integration in K-12 Education: Status, Prospects, and an Agenda for Research. He was the study director for the project that resulted in publication of Standards for K-12 Engineering Education? (2010) and Engineering in K-12 Education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects (2009), an analysis of efforts to teach engineering to U.S. school children. He oversaw the NSF-funded project that resulted in the 2013 publication of Messaging for Engineering: From Research to Action and the 2008 publication of Changing the Conversation: Messages for Improving Public Understanding of Engineering
subjects [1]. Reversing this trend requires promoting science,technology, engineering and math (STEM) subjects and professions in a more socially relevant,real-world context and recognition of the differences in learning styles and self-efficacy betweenmales, females and minorities [2, 3, 4]. As STEM teachers and school guidance counselors are aprimary catalysts for introducing students to engineering and technology subjects and careers,the Teaching Engineering to Counselors and Teachers (TECT) professional developmentworkshop has been developed by the University of North Carolina at Charlotte (UNC-Charlotte)to strengthen the way in which high school teachers and counselors approach the integration ofengineering based materials into their courses