university studies. This approach provides forthe introduction of important values, concepts and assignments that are “grounded in processeswhich can lead to sustainability”13. This paper also highlights the challenges of teaching in an Page 26.787.2interdisciplinary space located at the crossroads of education for sustainable development (ESD),composition studies, activity theory and community service learning.The described pedagogical approach strives to promote the transition to sustainability throughsocial learning14, i.e., by including community service learning projects that allow students toexplore human and social dimensions of sustainability
interests include interdisciplinary collaboration, design education, communication studies, identity theory and reflective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include exploring disciplines as cultures, interdisciplinary pedagogy for pervasive computing design; writing across the curriculum in Statics courses; as well as a CAREER award to explore the use of e-portfolios to promote professional identity and reflective practice. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Student Persistence Through Uncertainty Toward Successful Creative PracticeAbstract: To increase creative practice among students in engineering and other
research includes in-depth case studies of three programs that seek to educateengineers as liberal learners: the engineering program at Harvey Mudd College (“HMC” Page 24.1374.2hereafter), a liberal arts college for engineers, scientists, and mathematicians; the PickerEngineering Program (“Picker” hereafter) at Smith College, the only ABET accreditedengineering program in a women’s liberal arts college; and the program of Design, Innovation,and Society (“DIS” hereafter) at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, a program that blendsengineering, arts, and critical social studies in design learning.Data for the dissertation research project was collected
be made more truthful and productive. He is the leader of the NSF funded project KredibleNet, whose goal is to set the agenda for computational social science analysis of authorship, leadership, trust and credibility in knowledge markets. He has published papers and developed software that aim to make this into a reality. Among the tools he has created are: KredibleNet: kredible.net Visible Effort: veffort.us Alterpode: alterpode.net Visible Past: visiblepast.net Ubimark: ubimark.com/inDr. Esteban Garcia Page 26.127.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015
education and major programs (AAC&U, 2009). Whether the actual course of study is described as disciplinary or interdisciplinary, American higher education is now engaging students with big questions and real problems. Almost invariably, those problems span conventional disciplinary boundaries. (p. xvi)Klein makes the argument that interdisciplinarity is gaining importance based onincreased requests for information and help from individuals, programs, and institutionsand a 2016 AAC&U report, Recent Trends in General Education Design, LearningOutcomes, and Teaching Approaches states, “[n]early all AAC&U institutions offersignificant integrative or applied learning projects.” (p. 6) The same 2016 reportsummarizes a
-3 Similarly, RIT students working as lab instructors on-campus or participating inteaching activities off-campus report that they viewed teaching experience as a valuable part oftheir college careers.4 However, in order to teach, we must first prepare our students tocommunicate their ideas clearly.Within the mechanical engineering curriculum at RIT there has been past work done tostrengthen the communication abilities of engineering students. Namely, a team-basedpresentation project has evolved within an advanced thermodynamics course as a way tointroduce upper-level engineering students to an engineering outreach opportunity while alsostrengthening communication skills and deepening engineering knowledge.5-6 Formativeassessment results
Purdue University’s ADVANCE program, and PI on the Assessing Sustainability Knowledge project. She runs the Research in Feminist Engineering (RIFE) group, whose projects are described at the group’s website, http://feministengineering.org/. She is interested in creating new models for thinking about gender and race in the context of engineering education. She was recently awarded a CAREER grant for the project, ”Learning from Small Numbers: Using personal narratives by underrepresented undergraduate students to promote institutional change in engineering education.” Page 22.356.1
to elicit and characterize essential components of engineeringliteracy, with the aim of making engineering literacy part of the Curriculum for LiberalEducation. Where the Engineering Cultures course offers engineers an opportunity to developcultural competencies through the CLE, a new course would be designed to offer engineeringcompetency development to non-engineers.The course was designed based on findings from the first year of the project identifying corecompetencies for engineering literacy and characterizing how faculty and students valueexcellence in teaching and active learning within the liberal education curriculum. These weredeveloped from a literature review, a review of CLE course syllabi, teaching evaluation surveys,interviews
nanotechnology. When the authors learned thatthese courses were offered at the same time in the academic year, they were inspired tostrengthen the learning experience, by creating an interdisciplinary learning experience forstudents in both courses where the students interacted with one another. In the first two years ofthe project during years 2009 and 2010, the authors built interdisciplinary activities into eachcourse. The assignments were asynchronous online discussions based on common short readings.Students were required to both respond to threads and create their own threads. One iteration ofthe assignment involved forming small discussion groups that included students from bothcourses. Student feedback from all iterations of the assignment
junior-level. Collaboration with writing studiesfaculty ensured that the material in the writing guide was consistent with content taught in thosecourses. The writing guide is currently being piloted by civil engineering faculty in selectcourses and by the UMD’s writing center, the Writers’ Workshop, which offers one-to-onesessions led by graduate student or faculty consultants. Lessons learned from this pilot will beused to improve the writing guide before implementation across the civil engineering departmentin the Fall 2015 semester.The following sections first summarize the projects designed to improve writing in theengineering department and then describe the development of the writing guide and assessmentrubric, including the roles of the
engineering course combining liberal education topics andintroductory engineering topics. This course also includes a substantial design project whichincorporates a cultural engagement component through collaboration with international partners.The first offering of this new course revealed that, while some reservations persist, students foundvalue in exploring what it means to be an engineer in a broader global context.IntroductionA traditional engineering curriculum will likely fail to provide students with the critical skills ofcultural engagement necessary to live and work in a globally connected world and profession. Itis not surprising that much of the traditional engineering curriculum has been focused onproviding solutions to the problems of
an end in itself: “Overtime [the Enlightenment] conception was transformed, or partly supplanted, by the now familiarview that innovations in science-based technologies are in themselves a sufficient and reliablebasis for progress.”The technocratic view is clearly on display in the work of Moses who was responsible for muchof New York City’s public works and infrastructure.4 Though originally a popular figure, asMoses’ power grew, his projects continued to displace more and more people and seemed to takeon a life of their own. As Marx noted, the Enlightenment view of progress was that technologyshould be a means to social progress—e.g., the realization of democratic values. To Moses, the
Paper ID #25605Sociotechnical Habits of Mind: Initial Survey Results and their FormativeImpact on Sociotechnical Teaching and LearningDr. Kathryn Johnson, Colorado School of Mines Kathryn Johnson is an Associate Professor at the Colorado School of Mines in the Department of Elec- trical Engineering and Computer Science and is Jointly Appointed at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory’s National Wind Technology Center. She has researched wind turbine control systems since 2002, with numerous projects related to reducing turbine loads and increasing energy capture. She has applied experiential learning techniques in
institutionalarrangements necessary to help students develop these skills have not yet settled into a widelyadopted standard. Many engineering programs have turned to STS to provide students withconceptual tool kits to think about engineering problems and solutions in more sophisticatedways. Some programs feature standalone courses on the sociocultural aspects of technology andengineering, often taught by faculty from outside the engineering school. Others incorporate STSmaterial into traditional engineering courses, e.g., by making ethical or societal impactassessments part of capstone projects. This work in progress paper draws on the research team’s personal experience to examinethe character of an atypical, but potentially very powerful, model: STS
the retention of underrepresented students in engineering. These include:(1) emphasizing the social construction of engineering knowledge, which empowers andliberates students as prospective makers-of-knowledge; (2) emphasizing the social relevance ofengineering content, particularly in engineering projects [e.g. 25]; and (3) emphasizing thecollaborative, creative nature of engineering design.The recent tendency to depoliticize engineering instruction and culture is not simply inaccurate;it has also been shown by Erin Cech to be harmful, particularly to those members of engineeringcommunities who may be marginalized [26]. From Cech and Sherick [26]: Engineering as a profession prides itself on problem identification, evidence-based
] with transdisciplinary action research principles [5]. This paper reports on theimplementation of this program in academic-year 2017/18 and is meant to serve as an openroadmap for those interested in developing an interdisciplinary community of practice to supportwriting instruction in STEM.In Section II, we describe our institutional context, project background, and preparatory work. InSection III, we describe the central concepts that informed our activities, namely writing-across-the-curriculum approaches to writing instruction, the community of practice notion of sharedknowledge-making, and principles of transdisciplinary action research. This section brieflyreviews the literature and elaborates on the structure of the WAE program. Section
different levels of emphasis on experiential learning. Those schoolswith less experiential learning courses tended to feature more courses where students learnedconcepts and demonstrated competence through traditional exercises like problem sets andexams. Engineering educators have steadily incorporated problem-based learning exercises,projects and capstone experiences into undergraduate engineering education. Problem-basedLearning (PBL) has been one technique introduced in order to bring ‘real life’ problems into theclassroom. Those educational exercises, particularly PBL, emphasize information-seeking as askill that will be developed through participation in the exercise. What we may see in these datais the payoff of those activities, but as one
that wouldplace fewer burdens on educators, while helping engineering students take the time to understandthe lessons that are afforded by engineering courses through reflective activities.To address these issues, a few researchers in engineering education have successfully designedor developed new methods and tools to support student reflection. For example, Chen et al.combined the use of weblogs and wikis with the creation of portfolios (Folio Thinking) tosupport learning and reflection in an introductory freshman seminar on design engineering atStanford University. Chen et al. indicate that a challenge in project-based design courses is thatstudents “see what they have produced but they do not see what they have learned.” They reportthat
movement organizing theories employed and the networks engaged bothinside and outside of engineering in order to achieve these goals. We then provide detailsregarding our organizing practices and the specific activities that participants engaged in duringthe week of action. Finally, we will share reflections on lessons learned about the process and itsoutcomes, with the expectation that conversation and feedback received from the broaderengineering education community will inform recurring efforts in this domain, and growparticipation in a social movement approach to change in engineering education.IntroductionThe #EngineersShowUp campaign is organized as part of the Relational Organizing/ActionResearch (ROAR) project, which explores the utility
Colorado State University. Her previous careers were as software design and development engineer, project manager, and program manager for Hewlett-Packard Company, and as a management consultant for Personnel Decisions International. She is author of ”Understanding Employee Engagement: Theory, Research, and Practice” and ”Organiza- tional Psychology and Behavior: An Integrated Approach to Understanding the Workplace”. She is the past Editor-in-Chief for the Journal of Managerial Psychology, serves on several editorial boards, and has published in peer-reviewed scientific academic and practice outlets. She frequently consults with organizations across the country, and actively collaborates on grant funded research with
our definitions of public good.Dr. Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Tech Lisa D. McNair is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she also serves as co-Director of the VT Engineering Communication Center (VTECC) and CATALYST Fellow at the Institute for Creativity, Arts, and Technology (ICAT). Her research interests include interdisciplinary collaboration, design education, communication studies, identity theory and reflective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include exploring disciplines as cultures, liberatory maker spaces, and a RED grant to increase pathways in ECE for the professional formation of engineers. c American Society for
- cation with specific emphasis on innovative pedagogical and curricular practices at the intersection with the issues of gender and diversity. With the goal of improving learning opportunities for all students and equipping faculty with the knowledge and skills necessary to create such opportunities, Dr. Zastavker’s re- cent work involves questions pertaining to students’ motivational attitudes and their learning journeys in a variety of educational environments. One of the founding faculty at Olin College, Dr. Zastavker has been engaged in development and implementation of project-based experiences in fields ranging from science to engineering and design to social sciences (e.g., Critical Reflective Writing; Teaching and
Nuclear Science and Engineering. Each individual research project is overseenby a faculty member within their lab, often with direct mentorship from a graduate student orpost-doctoral fellow. Several communication deliverables - a proposal, a conference poster, ajournal article and an oral presentation - are required throughout the year, based on eachstudent’s research.We have two principal challenges. First, our students’ numerous and varied engineeringdisciplines each possess their own underlying and often tacit reasoning patterns, habits of mind,and foundational assumptions2, see also 3-6 - all of which must be taken into account as studentscommunicate their research. Second, the tacit quality of these assumptions and mental processescreates
action.Critical reflection is embedded within a program that recruits both engineers and non-engineers,with teaching and learning strategies drawn from the social sciences and humanities andintegrated with engineering management and problem-based learning. The program connectsstudents to a project partner in Sierra Leone or Zambia, the students work to understand theirpartners’ needs and assets and then develop an intervention plan consistent with the aims of theSDGs.In this paper, we provide results of a critically reflexive thematic analysis to explore the nature ofstudent reflections within the context of this interdisciplinary program. Evidence suggests arange of student interpretation of the purpose and application of critical reflection. Some are
Jonathan M. Tisch College of Civic Life and the Center for Engineering Education and Outreach at Tufts. His current engineering education research interests focus on community engagement, service-based projects and examining whether an entrepreneurial mindset can be used to further engineering education innovations. He also does research on the development of reuse strategies for waste materials. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Faculty Perceptions of the Most Effective Settings and Approaches for Educating Engineering and Computing Students About Ethics and Societal ImpactsAbstractTeaching students about ethical responsibilities and the societal
at the University of New Haven where she is currently teaching in the Tagliatela College of Engineering and coordinating a college-wide initiative, the Project to Integrate Technical Communication Habits (PITCH).Jenna Pack Sheffield, University of New Haven Jenna Sheffield holds a PhD in Rhetoric, Composition, and the Teaching of English from the University of Arizona. Sheffield is currently an Assistant Professor of English at the University of New Haven where she also directs the Writing Across the Curriculum program. Her research in composition pedagogy and theory and writing program administration has appeared in publications such as Computers and Com- position International, Computers and Composition Online
Educational Experiences with Ways of Knowing Engineering (AWAKEN): How People Learn” project. She is Professor Emeritus in the Department of Engineering Professional Development and Wendt Commons: Teaching and Learning Services. Her area of research is engineering education including assessment of student learning. She taught technical communication courses to undergraduate engineering students and currently consults with faculty and teaching assistants. She earned her Ph.D. in educational administration at UW-Madison.Mitchell J. Nathan, University of Wisconsin-Madison Mitchell J. Nathan, BSEE, PhD, is professor of Educational Psychology, with affiliate appointments in Curriculum & Instruction and Psychology at the
conference.COVID-19 has both exacerbated and made more obvious the unevenness and inequities in oureducational practices, processes, and infrastructures. This paper is an extension of a broadercollaborative research project that accounts for how an exceptional group of engineeringeducators have taken this opportunity to socially broaden their curricula to include not just publichealth matters, but also contemporary political and social movements. Engineering educators forchange and advocates for social justice quickly recognized the affordances of diverse forms ofdigital technologies, and the possibilities of broadening their impact through educationalpractices and infrastructures of inclusion, openness, and accessibility. They are makers of whatGary
certain aspects of your identity with thegoal of being perceived as non-LGBTQ+ in certain settings) demands on both students andfaculty. With regard to faculty, when comparing academic climate and career consequencesamong LGBTQ faculty in various fields, Partridge, Barthelemy, and Rankin found that those inSTEM fields reported the highest level of discomfort on campus, in departments, and inclassrooms; those who faced discomfort were more than twice as likely to consider leaving theirinstitution [5].This project builds on the success of a previous exploratory phase [title deleted to maintain theintegrity of the review process] and aims to support engineering departments’ efforts to createLGBTQ+-inclusive environments. While our project focuses
at the Australian National University, Jeremy has worked on introducing a range of humanitarian engineering and service-learning projects into engineering undergraduate studies, covering both international and domestic opportunities. In 2015 he delivered the first later year dedicated humani- tarian engineering course in Australia, supported by Engineers Without Borders Australia. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Evolution of Humanitarian Engineering in AustraliaIntroductionThe role of engineering within short- and long-term humanitarian action and human developmentactivities is well established. In such practice, engineers can be undertaking post-natural