AC 2011-472: OVERCOMING THE CHALLENGES OF IMPLEMENTINGTECHNICAL COMMUNICATION IN A CAPSTONE SENIOR DESIGNCOURSEG. Scott Duncan, Valparaiso University Assistant Professor of Mechanical EngineeringDr. Mark M. Budnik, Valparaiso UniversityJeffrey Will, Valparaiso UniversityProf. Peter E. Johnson, Valparaiso UniversityDr. Shahin S. Nudehi, Valparaiso University Page 22.1135.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Overcoming the Challenges of Implementing Technical Communication in a Capstone Senior Design CourseAbstractNumerous publications have emphasized the importance of technical
University.Prof. Susan S Silbey, M.I.T. Susan S. Silbey is Leon and Anne Goldberg Professor of Sociology and Anthropology, Head, Department of Anthropology.Brian Rubineau, Cornell University Brian Rubineau is an Assistant Professor in Organizational Behavior at Cornell University’s ILR School. Professor Rubineau joined the Cornell University faculty in 2007. Professor Rubineau earned his Ph.D. at the MIT Sloan School of Management, concentrating in Economic Sociology and Organization Studies. His dissertation was entitled, ”Gendering professions: An analysis of peer effects.” Professor Rubineau also earned a Masters degree in Public Health from Harvard University, a Bachelor of Science in Mathe- matics and a Bachelor of
Liberal Learning Revisited: A Historical Examination of the Reasons, Frustrations, and Continued Prospects for Engineering and Liberal Arts IntegrationAbstractIn December of 1968, the American Society for Engineering Education issued a report, LiberalLearning for the Engineer, directed by Sterling P. Olmstead. However, the Olmstead Report wasjust one in a series of organized studies, carried out within the society‟s well honed investigativetradition, which sought to bring about greater integration between engineering and liberaleducation. One subsequent study was the 1975 O. Allan Gianniny Report—which blunted thecritiques found in the 1968 Olmstead Report—while earlier studies included
. This is the case when all team members are involved in the decision making process and participate in problem solving activities. Timely accomplishment of goals is greatly enhanced by having an agreed upon decision making process. Avoiding the “paralysis by analysis” problem is critical to the team‟s success. In some cases, decisions must be made by consensus. Once a decision has been reached, even through consensus, all team members must accept, own and support it. Appreciation and celebration for team‟s success is also important. Human beings want to be appreciated and valued for contributions. It is the leader‟s responsibility, in many cases, to ensure that this need is met. Working in a
equivalent education. In this paper it includes qualifications that correspond to atechnology degree in the United States (Higher National Certificates and Diplomas). All othercourses are defined as third level. The higher education level embraced a university sector(private) and a public sector funded primarily by Local Education Authorities (LEA‟s). It is withdevelopments in higher education in the public sector that this paper is concerned.At that time the education system in England and Wales was highly selective. A simplifiedmodel of the system is shown in exhibit 1. After primary school the student was directed to oneof three types of school. The majority of children went to secondary modern schools as therewere only a relatively small number
many common practice sets do not include them. However,in further work, we intend to include animated details using the same ‘Appear’ animationin the topic-subtopic slides as we used for the assertion-evidence slides.Table 2. Statistics on two slide sets for the experiment.Characteristic Topic-Subtopic Slides Assertion-Evidence SlidesNumber of slides 11 10Total number of words on slides 334 193Average words per slide 30.4 19.3Total length of presentation 6 m 17 s 6 m 17 sProjected words per minute
thisstudy [8]. These studies were examined and contributed to the student‟s overallassessment. Accompanying these developments in the Technical College Sector was therise of an Association for Liberal Education that had its own research officer [9].It will not have escaped the notice of the reader that no mention is made of universitystudents in technological studies receiving such treatment. Why should a person on adegree course be treated differently? The concept of liberal education has a long historythat can be traced back to the Greeks, and Davies provides an all too brief history of thedevelopment of liberal education from those times [8.ch 1]. From the Greeks and theRomans we get the notions of being free to learn, and as Davies notes
, professors, and students. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 35(2), 179–190.4. Artemeva, N., Logie, S., & St-Martin, J. (1999). From page to stage: How theories of genre and situated learning help introduce engineering students to discipline-specific communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 8 (3), 301–316.5. Bandyopadhyay, A. (2006). Writing in the discipline – A case study in construction management. American Society for Engineering Education. Retrieved January 19, 2008, from http://asee.org/acPapers/code/getPaper.cfm?paperID=101306. Beach, R., & Friedrich, T. (2006). Response to writing. In C.A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 222-234). New York
). Broadening the Appeal by Changing the Context of Engineering Education. ASEE Annual Conference.5. Rippon, S. and Collofellow, J. (2010). Camping the Way to Higher Retention Rates. ASEE Annual Conference.6. Zhang, Q., Vanasupa, L., Zimmerman, J., and Mihelcic, J. (2010). Development and Dissemination of Learning Suites for Sustainability Integration in Engineering Education. ASEE Annual Conference.7. Heun, M. and VanderLeest, S. (2008). Why a Liberal and Multidisciplinary Education is Needed to Solve the Energy Crisis. ASEE Annual Conference.8. Foster, J. and Heeney, A. (2009). The Engineering Science Praxis Sequence: Challenges and Opportunities when Integrating Sustainable Development into the Engineering Design
Communication Curriculum in One Department of CivilEngineering," IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, vol. 51, pp. 313-327, 2008.18 M. T. Davis, "Assessing Technical Communication within Engineering Contexts Tutorial," IEEE Transactions onProfessional Communication, vol. 53, pp. 33-45, 2010.19 L. J. Anthony, et al., "Using Discourse Analysis to Study a Cross-Disciplinary Learning Community: Insightsfrom an IGERT Training Program," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 96, pp. 141-156, 2007. Page 22.1687.1220 S. S. Taylor, "Comments on Lab Reports by Mechanical Engineering Teaching Assistants - Typical Practices
. Occasionally, but rarely, students willdiscover these connections on their own, even though they may be readily apparent toteachers, curriculum designers, and other content experts. Examples of explicit andimplicit math integration in a PLTW course follow.Example 1: Excerpt illustrating explicit integration of math with engineering In this example two students are discussing the design of their project, aballistic device, with their instructor: S: ((At the same time)) Different, different angles. S: A protractor sitting here. With a string with a weight on it. So as you tip it it'll that'll tell you what degree you're tipping it. T: I like that. That's nice. S: So that tells you what degree so we can figure that out. In
personal path led me from a [university] BS/MS in 1969/70 to industry experience in [state]. After balancing family obligations and career motivation in the late 70’s and early 80’s, I returned to school and received my PhD from [different university] in 1985. My continued commitment to education led me to the newly created chemical engineering department at [another university] in 1986, where I started as an assistant professor just before turning 40.” – Diane Dorland, dean, Rowan UniversitySally Ann Keller gained leadership experience at the National Science Foundation and LosAlamos National Laboratory before becoming dean: “When I look back on my career, I can honestly say I did not spend much time planning
Engineering Classroom," European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 34, pp. 29-45, 2009.5. M. Borrego and S. Cutler, "Constructive Alignment of Interdisciplinary Graduate Curriculum in Engineering and Science: An Analysis of Successful IGERT Proposals," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 99, pp. 355-369, 2010.6. M. Borrego and L. K. Newswander, "Definitions of Interdisciplinary Research: Toward Graduate-Level Interdisciplinary Learning Outcomes," Review of Higher Education, vol. 34, pp. 61-84, 2010.7. G. L. Downey, The machine in me: an anthropologist sits among computer engineers. New York: Routledge, 1998.8. G. Kunda, Engineering culture: control and commitment in a high-tech corporation. Philadelphia: Temple
students had four weeks to address the reviewers’ comments. The papers were then peer-reviewed by the same group who provided the first review. After this second peer-review, thepapers were returned to the authors. The authors addressed the final comments and the articlewas submitted to a journal.The Project – PresentationsPresentations were scheduled for the last two weeks of the semester. The class met three timesper week for 50 minutes per lecture. Based on the number of papers, each author(s) had 20minutes for their presentation and five minutes for questions. Each presentation was critiquedonly by the instructor.ConclusionsPaperNone of the papers were accepted. The reasons for the rejections were related to “little or nocontribution to the
AC 2011-1145: COLLABORATING TO PREPARE STUDENTS FOR THEGLOBAL WORKPLACEIsabel Simes de Carvalho, ISEL, Lisbon, Portugal Isabel S. Carvalho received a Licenciatura in Chemical Engineering from the Technical University of Lis- bon. She received her M.S. and PhD degrees in Mechanical Engineering from the Technical University of Lisbon in 1990 and 1996, respectively. Following a year in the aeronautics industry in France (aero engine manufacturer) she is, since 1999, an Associate Professor at the Military Institute and also lectures at the Mechanical Engineering Department at ISEL. Research interests include energy production and efficiency and active and collaborative and blended (online) teaching and learning in
upon work supportedby the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1033111.References1. Berra, Y. (2002) When You Come to a Fork in the Road, Take It!: Inspiration and Wisdom from One of Baseball's Greatest Heroes, Hyperion: 1592. National Academy of Engineering (2008) Grand Challenges for Engineering, http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/Object.File/Master/11/574/Grand Challenges final book.pdf3. Marx, L. (1987) Does improved technology mean progress? Technology Review (January): 33-41; 714. Gray, E. (1988) The World That Moses Built, PBS, The American Experience5. Dolnick, S. (2010) On Bronx Stoops, a Highway’s Traffic Entertains, New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/02/nyregion/02bottleneck.html
traversing of an engineerthrough the world in this context can help define engineering. Bibliography 1. Dall’Alba, G., J. Sandberg. (2006). Unveiling Professional Development: A Critical Review of Stage Models. Review of Educational Research. 76(3). 383-412. 2. Dall’Alba, G. (2009). Learning Professional Ways of Being: Ambiguities of Becoming. Educational Philosophy and Theory. 41(1): 34-45. 3. Florman, S.(1976). The Existential Pleasures of Engineering. St. Martin’s Griffin. New York City. 4. Bonasso, S. G. (2001). Engineering, Leadership, and Integral Philosophy. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education & Practice, 127(1), 17. 5
studentsagree or disagree with a survey question.Question Survey QuestionNumber1 I understand which technical communication skills are needed and how they are used in a STEM (science, technology, engineering, or mathematics) career field.2 I can compose a standard business letter.3 I can compose a standard interoffice memorandum (memo).4 I can create a data spreadsheet and related graph(s) for the data using a typical spreadsheet program such as Microsoft Excel ®.5 I can compose a complete technical report including title page, cover letter, table of contents, and body of the report.6 I understand what skills are necessary for a team to function
documents seemed veryuseful to evaluate any of the 3 skill areas for a pilot. However, an interesting idea surfacedregarding the team status meetings with the instructor in which an interview Q&A style could beused to gather sufficient evidence.A pilot was conducted in spring 2010 involving the capstone for Electrical Engineering as wellas Computer Engineering majors. The face-to-face meetings with the teams provided anexcellent opportunity to evaluate the skill levels. The instructor reported that each teamemployed all 3 skills at one or more point(s) during the semester. The results are shown in Table5 for all 6 teams. Good performance was observed in 2-3 teams for each skill; however, the bestteams were not always the same. No team
Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1986.3. Bandura, A. "Social Cognitive Theory in cultural context." Applied Psychology: An International Review. 51,2002, pp. 269-290.4. Concannon, James P. and Lloyd H. Barrow. "A Cross-Sectional Study of Engineering Students' Self-Efficacy byGender, Ethnicity, Year and Transfer Status." Journal of Science, Education and Technology 18 (2), 2009, pp. 163-172.5. Ponton, Michael K., Julie Horine Edmister, Lawrence S. Ukeiley, and John M. Seiner."Understanding the role ofself-efficacy in engineering education." Journal of Engineering Education 90 (2), 2001, pp. 247-251.6. Pajares, Frank. "Current directions in self-efficacy research." In M. Maehr and P.R. Pintrich, eds., Advances inmotivation and achievement 10, 2007
, “Jail collapse[s], inmates escaped.” Others followed with,“Lucky day for the inmates!”, “need for law enforcement”, and “How do they protect peoplefrom starvation, looting, + prisoners?” These comments suggested a journey into the survivorstories that describes the event within a smaller reference timeframe. This pattern of journalingled to the research question, “What is the nature of the event and its immediate aftermath?”Student InquiryThe second stage extent was about three-quarters of the semester. The two major obstaclesconfronting educators in pursuing classroom discussions are the need for minimum topicalcontent and the lack of a controlled discussion.[10] Topical content is best managed throughinstructor-centered lectures. As
engineering practice. Journal of EngineeringEducation, 96(3), 191-201.9 Anderson, K.; Courter, S.; McGlamery, T.; Nathans-Kelly, T.; Nicometo, C. (2009). Understanding thecurrent work and values of professional engineers. ASEE Conference Proceedings. Retrieved fromhttp://soa.asee.org/paper/conference/paper-view.cfm?id=1018410 Lattuca, L. R., Terenzini, P. T., & Volkwein, J. F. (2006). Engineering change: Findings from a study ofthe impact of EC2000, Final Report. Baltimore , MD : ABET, Inc.11 Aligning educational experiences with ways of knowing engineering; How people learn
Page 22.1104.12Society, S. Jasanoff, et al., eds. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1994.4. Wisnioski, Matthew. "'Liberal education has failed': Reading like an engineer in 1960s America." Technology andCulture 50 (4), 2009, pp. 753-782.5, Azarin, Samira, Nicola Ferrier, Stephen M. Kennedy, Daniel Klingenberg, Kristyn Masters, Katherine D.McMahon, Jeffrey Russell and Susan C. Hagness. "Work in Progress: A First-Year introduction-to-engineeringcourse on society's engineering grand challenges." 38th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2008,Saratoga Springs, NY.6. Aronowitz, Scott. "Duke and NC State Launch Joint Program to Stimulate K-12 STEM interest" CampusTechnology. March 55, 2010. Available at: http://campustechnology.com
fun to attend a PK style presentation than a traditional one.Student’s commentsThe survey included a section with open-ended questions. This section was optional for thestudents. Here are some of the comments: 1. Please write any issues encountered using the PechaKucha style. ⋅ “No issues, just more preparation.” ⋅ “The biggest issue was trying to decide what info was most important to put in the presentation.” ⋅ “Keeping time with the 20 s slides.” ⋅ “I don’t believe PK style works well for groups.” ⋅ “I thought PK was really cool.” 2. Was it helpful for you? How? ⋅ “Yes. It really forces you to really know the material since you have no bullets, just images. It made me
contemplative activities into the Page 22.1582.7course, a socio-cultural theory offered by Cole and Engstrom22 shall be used as the theoreticalframework for the study. Vygotsky conceived socio-cultural theory23 in the early 1920’s. Itemphasizes the central role of social relationships and culturally constructed artifacts inorganizing thinking. It attempts to theorize and provide methodological tools for investigatinghigher cognitive processes by which social, cultural and historical factors shape humanfunctioning. Cole and Engstrom’s model provides several dimensions along which one can studythe classroom as an activity system. They identify factors
. Krishnamurthi, M. Enhancing Student-Teacher Interaction in Internet-Based Courses. Proceedings of the 2000 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. 5. Paterson, K. Student Perceptions of Internet-Based Learning Tools in Environmental Engineering Page 22.642.9 Education. Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 88, No. 3, pp. 295-304, July 1999.6. Starrett, S. A Beginner’s Approach to Teaching with the Internet. Proceedings of the 1996 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.7. Wallace, D., Mutooni, P. A Comparative Evaluation of World Wide Web-Based and Classroom
. Ford, J. D., & Riley, L. A. (2003). Integrating communication and engineering education: A look at curricula,courses, and support systems,” Journal of Engineering Education, 92, 325-328.3. Russell, J. S., & Stouffer, W. B. (2005). Survey of national civil engineering curriculum. Journal of ProfessionalIssues in Engineering Education and Practice, 131, 118-128.4. Sack, R., Bras, R. L., Daniel, D. E., & Hendrickson, C. (1999). Reinventing civil engineering education.ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings, session 13d3.5. Jensen, J. N. (2003). A case study approach to engineering courses. ASEE Conference Proceedings, session 2653.6. Schlosser, P., Parke, M., & Merrill, J. (2008). Decision-making in the design