struggles against all forms of domination andoppression.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (Award#2233622). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.The authors would like to thank Max Skorodinsky for his helpful comments on a draft of thismanuscript. References[1] A. Menier, R. Zarch and S. Sexton, “Broadening gender in computing for transgender and nonbinary learners,” 2021 Conference on Research in Equitable and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT
projects within engineering courses toteach our students about the effects of technology on others. At LUC, this is possible because all27 U.S. Jesuit universities possess a core (general education) curriculum based on socialjustice. In 1974, Jesuit General Congregation (GC) 32 decided to take a more active role inalleviating poverty and injustice. In 2008, GC35 called on Jesuit universities “to promote studiesand practices focusing on the causes of poverty and the question of the environment’simprovement” [26, 27]. At the 12 U.S. Jesuit universities with ABET-accredited engineeringprograms, the mean number of core curriculum courses is 11 ± 2 courses. At 9/12 of these Jesuituniversities, including at LUC, a social justice-based ethics course is
theme, the Engineering and Humanities SIG hosted a roundtable“collaboratorium” consisting of four discussion topics related to transdisciplinary modes ofthought and practice in engineering education. These topics were: Sociotechnical thinking, whichis an approach to engineering work that recognizes engineering as simultaneously social andtechnical (e.g. [4]); Sociotechnical leadership, which acknowledges the opportunity forengineers to embrace positions of leadership to positively configure the technology-societyrelationship (e.g. [5]); STEAM, which is an educational paradigm that integrates arts practice intoscience, technology, engineering, and mathematics instruction (e.g. [6]); and Decolonization,which calls for radical transformations of
complete the same General Education sequence.The articulation of engineering with the liberal arts was considered from two perspectives. Thefirst is the obvious benefit of a liberal arts education to the engineering student [15]. Whileadvances in knowledge and technology are creating excitement in science and engineeringeducation, tomorrow’s engineer must also be able to write and communicate well; considerethics and social responsibilities; understand business; and live and work in teams as a globalcitizen. They must be able to think critically and problem-solve. The faculty of RMC pridesitself on producing graduates with all of these so-called “soft skills” as well as the breadth ofknowledge obtained by completing a large General Education
, gender and sexuality studies(WGSS) or ethnic studies empowers minoritized engineering students to develop criticalconsciousness relative to the culture of engineering. Our work investigates the influence of twosuch courses on student attitudes and motivation by gathering both qualitative and quantitativedata from students in two STEM-themed courses in WGSS and ethnic studies, “Gender andSTEM” and “Race and Technology.” We argue that in these courses students acquire skills thatenable them to critically reflect on both the socially constructed nature of STEM and on thehistorical patterns within engineering culture that exacerbate existing inequities and injusticedespite claims of “neutral” objectivity. In preliminary data, students report that
academic success and optimal emotional development of their students. Unfortunately,engineering students often do not have access to such relationships. Were engineering educatorsto better recognize the importance of these relationships and contribute to creating such acommunity, they could help to ensure engineering students were able to thrive academically andemotionally.C. Absence of Harassment and Expression without FearIn the United States, harassment is a growing problem in science, technology, engineering, andmathematics (STEM) fields [14]. Harassment can be verbal, physical, or sexual and include anyunwelcome or unfavorable behavior due to one’s identity (e.g., gender, race, age, religion).Harassment has adverse impacts on career outcomes
Paper ID #42156The Power of Place: A Critical Examination of Engineering Enculturation &Identity FormationDr. Timothy Duane Reedy, University of Maryland, College ParkDr. David Tomblin, University of Maryland, College Park David is the director of the Science, Technology and Society program at the University of Maryland, College Park. He works with STEM majors on the ethical and social dimensions of science and technology. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 The Power of Place: A Critical Examination of Engineering Enculturation and Identity FormationAbstract
tobranching out beyond their discipline. Speaking of interdisciplinary research integrating socialand technological innovation, Leo said “This needs to not be something that people are doing off the side of their desk as one more thing, as is so often the case with academia. So, it’s to recognize that we need a structure that enables folks who are serious about doing this [non-traditional research], to be able to not do some other things for a while, while they engage in doing this.” (00:10:55–00:11:10)In an example of a later phase of a problem-solving mindset, after defining this structural problemfor engineering faculty, Leo went on to suggest possible solutions to encourage more faculty toget involved with cross
, 22 Patrick et al,23 and Johnson24 propose cultural change strategies for engineering educatorsand practitioners. Tonso calls for cultural change in engineering education based on feminist critiquerather than “cosmetic changes,”19 Riley urges us to strengthen cultures of accountability and fidelity tocore public and professional values in the wake of high profile engineering scandals,20 Kim and hercolleagues call for shifts in engineers’ moral formation to foster ethical practice in industry, 22, 25-27Patrick and her colleagues advocate for educational reform to replace technical silos withinterdisciplinary collaboration between engineers and STS (science and technology studies) scholars,23and Johnson urges us to grapple with the inherent
Paper ID #38721Beyond uncritical blindness: How critical thinking about engineering forcommunity development could lead to socially responsible and sustainableprojectsDr. Juan C. Lucena, Colorado School of Mines Juan Lucena is Professor and Director of Humanitarian Engineering Undergraduate Programs at the Col- orado School of Mines (CSM). Juan obtained a Ph.D. in Science and Technology Studies (STS) from Virginia Tech and a MS in STS and BS in Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering froMateo F. Rojas, Colorado School of MinesSofia Lara Schlezak, Colorado School of Mines MS in Humanitarian Engineering and ScienceEmma Chapman
Practices Related to Sociotechnical Thinking in the Teaching of Undergraduate Engineering StudentsAs a global society, we face significant challenges, including environmental degradation andclimate change, increasing economic inequity, rapid urbanization and population growth, theexclusion of individuals and groups from different forms of social engagement, and concernswith privacy and security. Given the omnipresent nature of technology and its influence on ourlives, engineers must consider the ethical, environmental and sociological impacts of their work,and some engineering programs are considering new pedagogical methods and broaderframeworks to engage students in macroethics, sociotechnical thinking and engineering for
Paper ID #43601Left on their Own: Confronting Absences of AI Ethics Training among EngineeringMaster’s StudentsElana Goldenkoff, University of MichiganDr. Erin A. Cech, University of Michigan ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Left on their Own: Confronting Absences of AI Ethics Training amongEngineering Master’s StudentsAbstractAlthough development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies has been underway fordecades, the acceleration of AI capabilities and rapid expansion of user access in the past fewyears has elicited public excitement as well as alarm. Leaders in government and academia, aswell as members of the
Paper ID #42803Countering Passive Engagement: STS Postures and Analyzing Student Agencyin Everyday EngineeringDr. David Tomblin, University of Maryland, College Park David is the director of the Science, Technology and Society program at the University of Maryland, College Park. He works with STEM majors on the ethical and social dimensions of science and technology.Dr. Nicole Farkas Mogul, University of Maryland, College Park Nicole Mogul is a professor of engineering ethics and Science, Technology and Society at the University of Maryland, College Park.Christin J. Salley, University of Michigan
Paper ID #39193Board 121: Using Tutor-led Support to Enhance Engineering StudentWriting for AllJohanna Bodenhamer, Indiana University Purdue University IndianapolisDr. Robert Weissbach, Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis Robert Weissbach is currently chair of the department of engineering technology at IUPUI. From 1998 - 2016 he was with Penn State Behrend as a faculty member in Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology. His research interests are in renewable energy, energy storage, and engineering education.Ms. Ruth Camille Pflueger, Pennsylvania State University, Behrend College Ruth Pflueger has been
Director of First-Year Engineering at Youngstown State University. He completed his B.S. and M.S. in Industrial & Systems Engineering from Virginia Tech, and his PhD is in Engineering Education, also from Virginia Tech.Dr. Aditya Johri, George Mason University Aditya Johri is Professor of Information Sciences & Technology and Director of Technocritical Research in AI, Learning & Society Lab (trailsLAB) at the College of Engineering and Computing at George Mason University, USA. He studies how technology shapes learning across formal and informal settings and the ethical implications of using technology. He publishes broadly in the fields of engineering and computing education, and educational technology. His
is a Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she also serves as Director of the Center for Educational Networks and Impacts at the Institute for Creativity, Arts, and Technology (ICAT). Her research interests include inte ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Moralizing Design Differences in the North: An Ethnographic AnalysisThis multiple source case study tracks the “social life” (Appadurai 1986) of the “integrated trusssystem” – a prefabricated frame assembly that has been used to build homes in emergencycontexts in Alaska. We combine data from three years of ethnographic research among Alaskanengineers, builders, housing advocates, and residents of remote Alaska
Paper ID #44381Project DECIDE: A K12 Civics and Engineering Education Curricular Partnership(Works in Progress)Dr. Tamecia R. Jones, North Carolina State University Tamecia Jones is an assistant professor in the Technology, Engineering, and Design Program of the STEM Education Department at North Carolina State University College of Education with a research focus on K-12 engineering education, assessment, and informal and formal learning environments. She has a BS in Biomedical Engineering from Johns Hopkins University, a MA in Learning, Design, and Technology from Stanford University, a MDiv from Boston University, and a PhD
understand students’experience of the integration of the engineering and liberal arts, which is a focus of the ASEE LEESdivision.Rationale and BackgroundIn the pursuit of promoting the integration of the liberal arts and engineering, a voice that is often missingis of the students who are actually experiencing the convergence of the two during their collegeeducation. Framing engineering as a humanistic vocation which can be a notable function of a liberal artseducation, has the potential to develop and sustain pro-social beliefs among students and also contributeto their holistic formation as individuals and professionals.There have been voices predicting that engineering will be the liberal arts of the 21st century given theincrease in technology
visible to the range of stakeholdersbeyond the students we support in the classroom to ensure its continuation.References[1] Accreditation Board for Engineering Technology. “Criteria for accrediting engineeringprograms, 2019-2020.” [Online]. Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2019-2020/# [accessed February 10,2023].[2] Accreditation Board for Engineering Technology, “The value of accreditation: How ABEThelps STEM programs adapt to industry’s evolving needs,” An ABET Issue Brief, Spring 2020.[Online] Available: https://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/ABET-Issue-Brief-The-Value-of-Accreditation.pdf [accessed February 10, 2023].[3] L. Landry, “Six business skills
during the pandemic. In addition, the interviewees noted uncertain prospect of the industry as one of the crises theywere facing. Industrial transformation and technological upgrading that threaten traditionalindustries, as well as the slowing down economy due to the Covid pandemic, caused anxietiesamong early career engineers about their job security.Crises resulted from personal strugglesThis dimension mainly illustrates the incompatibility with work that resulted from early careerengineers’ own physical and psychological reactions, including physical repulsion, grievance, andself-confusion. First, some early career engineers noted their physical repulsion at the work environment. Forexample, a process development engineer said
Paper ID #39144Pedagogical Workshops for Interdisciplinary Trading Zones with Facultyand Students: Insights from an Engineering-focused UniversityDr. Elizabeth A. Reddy, Colorado School of Mines Elizabeth Reddy is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering, Design and Society at Col- orado School of Mines. Reddy is a cultural anthropologist and science and technology studies scholar and Associate Director of the Humanitarian Engineering and Science program.Courtney Van KirkMarie Stettler Kleine, Colorado School of Mines Marie is currently an Assistant Professor at Colorado School of Mines in the Department of
researchers can disrupt the chilly, heteronormativeculture of STEM by modeling inclusive classroom and lab practices. Additionally, we offerinsights on how students negotiate their identity visibility in a chilly, heteronormative, and silentculture. Introduction Despite efforts to increase diversity and inclusion on college and university campuses,Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) programs continue to be largelycisgender, male, heterosexual, and white [1]–[3]This continued lack of diversity is largely due tothe heteronormative, racist, and sexist culture that serves to make STEM spaces inhospitable formarginalized students, and results in high levels of attrition for these groups [1], [4]. In order toaddress this, we
) from inception to 2023. The FSEE serves as a hub for theatre technology, engineering and innovation at Purdue University, and is a recognized leader in education at the nexus of entertainment and engineering within the broad community of entertainment practice.Prof. Rich Dionne, Purdue University, West Lafayette ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Three-year Capstone Design - An innovative interdisciplinary preparation for authentic engineering practiceAbstractEvery engineering student enrolled in an ABET-accredited engineering program encounters aculminating design experience that is formulated to require the use of engineering standards,present a context with
Paper ID #38512Charting a Research Direction to Explore Development of SociotechnicalThinking in Engineering DesignDr. Benjamin David Lutz, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Ben D. Lutz is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering Design at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo. He is the leader of the Critical Research in Engineering and Technology Education (CREATE) group at Cal Poly. His current research interests include engineering design learning and communication, sociotechni- cal thinking in engineering, interest and motivation in engineering, conceptual change and understanding;; and school-to
Paper ID #38514Learning the Impact of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Modules in anUndergraduate Electrical Engineering ClassroomDr. Nina Kamath Telang, University of Texas, Austin Nina Telang is a senior lecturer in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the Univer- sity of Texas at Austin. She received the B.Tech degree in Engineering Physics from the Indian Institute of Technology, Mumbai in 1989, and the M.S. and Ph.D. from the University of Notre Dame in 1992 and 1995.Mr. Ramakrishna Sai Annaluru, University of Texas, Austin Ramakrishna (Sai) Annaluru is a 5th year graduate student in electrical
solu7ons in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts a. Recognize mutual impact between engineering designs and global, economic, environmental, or social contexts b. An7cipate the likelihood of engineered solu7ons impact on global, economic, environmental or social sefngs c. Acknowledge how ethics expecta7ons vary across contexts d. Redefine ethical solu7on requirements in rela7on to variable contexts (user empathy, professional responsibility, pahern recogni7on)These performance indicators provide a variety of alignments between SO4 and ourthoroughgoing approach to integration. First is a fundamental insight from STS about the natureof the relationship between technology and society, namely that these are
networks, their experiences of in/authenticity,and different educational and vocational outcomes in engineering. This may also offer insightinto how students organize their networks into environments where they are more likely toexperience state authenticity. Implications for practice include helping LGBTQ students findcommunity in engineering and other STEM fields through organizations like Out to Innovate andoSTEM.IntroductionThis theoretical paper proposes a framework to understand LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual,transgender, and queer/questioning) participation in STEM (science, technology, engineering,and mathematics) that reveals how heterosexism and cissexism operate in engineering. Agrowing body of research is demonstrating that LGBTQ people
Student Award and the United States Department of Defense SMART Scholarship.Dr. Bryan Watson, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Bryan Watson, PE earned his Ph.D. at the Georgia Institute of Technology and his B.S. in Systems Engineering at the United States Naval Academy in 2009. After graduating, Bryan joined the nuclear Navy, serving as a submarine officer onboard the U.S.S Louisville and at the Naval Prototype Training Unit from 2009-2017. Significant milestones include earning the Master Training Specialist Certification (the military’s highest instructor accreditation), Nuclear Professional Engineer Certification, two Naval Achievement Medals, the Military Outstanding Volunteer Service Medal, and a Naval
Paper ID #37415”Studies in the Strategies of Overcomers”: Literature Review of theExperiences of High-achieving Black Male Undergraduate EngineeringStudentsDr. Royce A. Francis, The George Washington University Dr. Royce Francis is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Management and Sys- tems Engineering. His overall research vision is to conduct research, teaching, and service that facilitates sustainable habitation of the built environment. This vision involves three thrusts: 1.) infrastructure management, including sustainability, resilience, and risk analysis; 2.) regulatory risk assessment and
Press.D’Souza, C. (2017). Topics in Inclusive Design for the Graduate Human Factors Engineering Curriculum. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 61(1), 403–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601583Figard, R. & Carberry, A. (2023). A Law of Diminishing Returns: Quantifying Online Accessibility for Engineering Students with Disabilities in the Wake of the COVID-19 Pandemic. IEEE Transactions on Education, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2023.3326760Figard, R. & Mercado Rivera, A. (2023). STEM Education’s Misalignment to Proactive Accessible Design: Policy Recommendations for Realignment. United Nations Multi-stakeholder Forum on Science, Technology and