in Engineering Education from Purdue University.Chrystal S JohnsonSiddika Selcen Guzey, Purdue University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Project DECIDE: A K12 Civics and Engineering Education Curricular Partnership (Works in Progress)IntroductionMany have expressed concern about ethics and civic-mindedness of engineers and theirreflection on their responsibility and public impact of their work[1]. Universities hope tograduate ethical engineers, but may not have intentionality about the education towards civicresponsibility. Lin and Hess[2] argued that civic responsibility requires special attention inengineering education. Hess and Zola[3] found that few youth
) advancing engineering design research by integrating new theoretical or analytical frameworks (e.g., from data science or complexity science) and (3) conducting design-based research to develop scaffolding tools for supporting the learning of complex skills like design. He is the Division Chair Elect for the Design in Engineering Education Division for the 2023 ASEE conference.Dr. Jessica E S Swenson, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Jessica Swenson is an Assistant Professor at the University at Buffalo. She was awarded her doctorate and masters from Tufts University in mechanical engineering and STEM education respectively, and completed postdoctoral work at the University of Michigan. Her current
humanistic approach to engineering education, it is a suitable frameworkto evaluate the impact of sociotechnical engineering courses (i.e., a humanistic approach toengineering education) on students’ attitudes toward and perceptions of engineering.Furthermore, this framework explicitly describes and explains the possible connections betweenstudents’ attitudes toward and perceptions of engineering, making it appropriate for a studyinterested in exploring these relationships. The framework has been used to guide how weconceptualize sociotechnical engineering. The instrument used for this study included items andconstructs that align with all three dimensions of Fila et al.’s [1] framework.MethodsSurvey responses collected from undergraduate
2114242. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions, or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe National Science Foundation.References[1] P. Moen, “The Uneven Stress of Social Change: Disruptions, Disparities, and Mental Health,” Soc. Ment. Health, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 85–98, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1177/21568693221100171.[2] Z. Abrams, “Student mental health is in crisis. Campuses are rethinking their approach,” Monit. Psychol., vol. 53, no. 7, p. 60, 2022, doi: https://www.apa.org/monitor/2022/10/mental-health-campus-care.[3] T. N. Hanh, Peace Is Every Step. Bantam Books, 1992.[4] J. Kabat-Zinn, Full catastrophe living: Using the wisdom of your body and mind to face
modern challenges.References[1] K. Johnson, J. Leydens, B. Moskal, and S. Kianbakht, “Gear switching: From ‘technical vs. social’ to ‘sociotechnical’ in an introductory control systems course,” in 2016 American Control Conference (ACC), 2016, pp. 6640–6645.[2] K. Johnson et al., “The Development of Sociotechnical Thinking in Engineering Undergraduates,” in 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022.[3] B. Friedman and D. G. Hendry, Value sensitive design: Shaping technology with moral imagination. MIT Press, 2019.[4] S. Costanza-Chock, Design justice: Community-led practices to build the worlds we need. The MIT Press, 2020
Press.Blacklock, J., Johnson, K., Cook, R., Plata, N., & Claussen, S. (2021, July). Faculty interpretations of sociotechnical thinking in their classrooms: Techniques for integration. In ASEE Annual Conference proceedings.Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture (Vol. 4). Sage.Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America: Educational reform and the contradictions of economic life. New York, NY: Basic Books.Bronfenbrenner, K. (2023, December 4). For labor unions, 2023 was the year of the strike—and big victories. The Wall Street Journal.Cech, E. A. (2014). Culture of disengagement in engineering education?. Science, Technology, & Human
specificity without the formalized structure required by asystematic review (Arksey & O’Malley, 2005; Borrego et al., 2014; Grant & Booth, 2009;Samnani et al., 2017). ScLRs are particularly useful for quickly mapping out key concepts,existing literature, and evidence to identify gaps in current research defined by a specificresearch question (Arksey & O’Malley, 2005; Samnani et al., 2017). Our study used Arksey andO’Malley’s (2005) ScLR framework (Figure 1), which recommends a five-stage protocol forconducting a scoping review: (1) identify research question(s), (2) identify relevant studies, (3)select relevant studies, (4) chart the data, and (5) summarize and report the results. Figure 1further details the process used in our
methods in STEM education assessment topromote inclusivity, engage learners, and empower underrepresented and marginalizedcommunities. Such research can then inform future pedagogical practices, curriculum design,evaluation plans, and resource allocation to contribute to a more inclusive and diverse STEMlearning environment and resultantly, the future STEM workforce.ReferencesBattel, K., Foster, N., Barroso, L. V., Bhaduri, S., Mandala, K., & Erickson, L. (2021, October).“We Make the Village”-Inspiring STEM Among Young Girls and the Power of CreativeEngineering Education in Action. In 2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1-7). IEEE.Bevan, B. B., Barton, A. C., & Garibay, C. (2018). Why broaden perspectives on
within interdisciplinary tracks may have difficulty navigating the epistemologicalassumptions and expectations of their professors.Conceptual framework In our study, we adopt a modified typology of epistemologies expressed in Cruz et al.’s(2021) work on student epistemologies. While they acknowledge that it is difficult to list allepistemologies (and that what precisely counts as an epistemology is contested), they provide auseful framework for this study. Specifically, they highlight nine epistemological positions: Positivism: A belief that there is an objective truth that can be discerned throughscientific methods. Knowledge is gained by understanding that objective truth. Post-positivism: A relaxed version of positivism
Commendation Medal for his work troubleshooting and repairing the Moored Training Ship 635’s reactor and electrical distribution faults. Following his transition from active duty, Bryan earned his PhD as a member of both the Computation and Advancement of Sustainable Systems Lab, where he developed a new method for distributed system demand estimation, and at the Sustainable Design and Manufacturing lab, where his work focused on increasing System of System resilience. Bryan’s work has been published in the Journal of Industrial Ecology, Journal of Mechanical Design, and IEEE’s Systems Journal. At Embry-Riddle, Bryan’s current work is focused on investigating the use of biologically inspired design to increase the
24 25 24 25 25 25 27 27 272018 29 28 29 24 25 25 25 25 25 27 27 272017 29 27 28 23 24 24 24 25 25 27 27 27Relationships between Spatial Skills and Semantic and Phonemic FluenciesResearchers conducted a study that examined verbal skills, spatial skills, and their relation toproduction of hand gestures [23]. In that study, verbal skills were categorized as semantic, thesize of vocabulary, and phonemic, how effectively an individual can form a cohesive sentence.For example, a semantic task would ask the participant to name animals, and a phonemic taskwould ask the participant to name words that begin with the letter “s.” These tasks are normallytimed (e.g
Psychologist, 34(1), 118-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000005282374Bowman, P. J. (2013). A Strengths-Based Social Psychological Approach to Resiliency: Cultural Diversity, Ecological, and Life Span Issues. In S. Prince-Embury & D. H. Saklofske (Eds.), (pp. 299-324). Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4939-3_21Brooms, D. R., & Davis, A. R. (2017). Exploring Black Males' Community Cultural Wealth and College Aspirations. Spectrum: A Journal on Black Men, 6(1), 33-33. https://doi.org/10.2979/spectrum.6.1.02Burrell, J. O., Fleming, L., Fredericks, A. C., & Moore, I. (2015). Domestic and international student matters: The college experiences of Black males majoring in
Engineering Technology Programs, 2022 – 2023," 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for- accrediting-engineering-technology-programs-2022-2023/. [Accessed 8 2 2023].[2] J. Ford, M. Paretti, D. Kotys-Schwartz, S. Howe and R. Ott, "New Engineers’ Transfer of Communication Activities From School to Work," IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 105-120, 2021.[3] W. Smith and R. Stone, "Improving Students' Sentence-level Writing Skills in a Large Undergraduate Business Management Course," Business Education Innovation Journal, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 38-48, 2020.[4] R. Goldsmith, K. Willey and D. Boud, "Investigating invisible writing practices in the
search inquiry keywords were personal narratives, stories, engineering, classroom,university, college, students, STEM, education, intervention, pedagogy, and psychology. Throughiterative searching using these keywords, some new keywords were added (e.g., expressivewriting intervention) and removed (e.g., students). Ultimately, we ended up using the followingkeywords: engineering, education, narrative(s), personal narrative, storytelling, story, stories, 5psychology, STEM, college, university, expressive writing intervention, pedagogy, curriculum.At the same time, our target samples were post-secondary students in higher education, such thatwe
conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and donot necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. 1Fisher identified significant gender differences in major selection for male- and female-identifiedstudents in computing based on individuals’ attention to “computing with a purpose” [9].However, it is important that we recall Slaton’s cautions against the operation of essentialismwithin this approach to diversity and inclusion and not predicate calls for change on a “naturaldifference” in approaches to engineering, rather we call for a change in values for liberation [10].Our department is at the beginning of a multi-year journey of
structural barriers. Engineering needsto transform into an environment where LGBTQ people can thrive through authenticparticipation if engineering fields hope to benefit in the myriad ways promised by professedvision and value statements throughout the field.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.2046233. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] E. A. Cech and T. J. Waidzunas, "Systemic inequalities for LGBTQ professionals in STEM," Science Advances, vol. 7, no. 3, 2021, doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abe0933.[2] B. E
this way, futurework will allow for development of targeted interventions aimed at improving help seeking in theundergraduate engineering student population.References[1] S. K. Lipson, E. G. Lattie, and D. Eisenberg, "Increased Rates of Mental Health Service Utilization by U.S. College Students: 10-Year Population-Level Trends (2007–2017)," Psychiatric Services, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 60-63, 2019/01/01 2018, doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201800332.[2] D. Eisenberg et al., "The Health Minds Study: 2014 Data Report," 2014.[3] D. Eisenberg, Lipson, S. K., Heinze, J., Zhou, S., Talaski, A., & Patterson, A, "The Healthy Minds Study: 2021 Winter/Spring Data Report.," 2021.[4] D. Eisenberg, M. F. Downs, E. Golberstein, and
. Madon, and S. Lustig, “Graduate student mental health: Needs assessment and utilization of counseling services,” Journal of College Student Development, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 247–266, 2006.[4] S. K. Lipson, S. Zhou, B. Wagner III, K. Beck, and D. Eisenberg, “Major Differences: Variations in Undergraduate and Graduate Student Mental Health and Treatment Utilization Across Academic Disciplines,” Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 23–41, 2016.[5] K. Beddoes and A. Danowitz, “In Their Own Words: How Aspects of Engineering Education Undermine Students’ Mental Health,” presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Minneapolis, MN, 2022.[6] K. J. Jensen and K. J. Cross
provided an example of how “bigdata” and algorithms determine credit scores: “The algorithm that's used to determine that is so mysterious. No one really knows what's going into it and how different companies aggregate that data and make a determination on someone[’s score]. A lot of people say the algorithm isn’t going to discriminate, but [it can]” (P02 White man domestic student).The concern regarding the inner workings of AI models and smart devices was intensified amongECE students who, reflecting on their own lengthy training, realize that most users lack thisexpertise and might unknowingly expose themselves to risks. “All of us are using small AI toolsat home with Siri and Alexa, and I feel all these tools are
calls withinengineering for civic engagement, diversity, equity, inclusion, and social and environmentaljustice.IntroductionAn engineering instructor recently told us, “For those of us who were trained as engineers in the1980's and have taught the past 20 years, there's a bit of a Pavlovian response thatcommunication means writing.” Indeed, “communication = writing” is a widely accepted proofamong engineering instructors and is confidently echoed by engineering students when asked,“What is communication?” Those with broader perspectives include “and presenting” to theequation, but even some of the most experienced and open-minded engineers and engineeringprofessors we have met stop there. Engineering students, becoming competitive in
and virtual international project experiences.” Jour. of Int. Engineering Education, vol. 3, no. 1, article 5, 2021.[6] Reddy, E. A., Kleine, M. S., Parsons, M., Nieusma, D. (2023, June) Sociotechnical Integration: What is it? Why do we need it? How do we do it? In 2023 ASEE Conference & Exposition.[7] M. D. Patton, "Beyond WI: Building an Integrated Communication Curriculum in One Department of Civil Engineering," IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 313-327, 2008[8] J. L. Craig, N. Lerner, and M. Poe, "Innovation Across the Curriculum: Three Case Studies in Teaching Science and Engineering Communication," Professional Communication, IEEE Transactions on
carry cultural and historical meaning,shaping our practices, thinking, and interactions with the world. When navigating conceptssuch as technological stewardship, clear definitions enable us to critically engage with themand to communicate our own ideas more effectively. Without a clear understanding of thehistory and contexts of technological stewardship, it can be challenging to make sense of itsdynamic and evolving nature, and to engage in meaningful scholarship or critique of theconcept. We argue that understanding the roots and contexts of the term, including itsmultiple intended purpose(s) and audience(s), is essential to realizing the potential oftechnological stewardship approaches in engineering education.We find the TSPP – a program
Effective & - Build connections with peers in the course via discussion. Enduring Advocacy - Provide feedback on course outline (first opportunity for co-creation). - Discussion on critical pedagogy as it pertains to the How We instructors’ advocacy framework, both as an example of Conceptualize what they will be asked to do (with a framework of their 2 Advocacy: choice) and to deepen their understanding of the current Frameworks & course’s guiding principles. Scholars - Opportunity to dive deeper into particular framework(s
Cultural Anthropology),particularly experiences I had had analyzing material culture in an archaeological methodscourse, (3) my experiences studying the anthropology of ethics and poststructural theory duringmy Master’s program in social anthropology at a postcolonial university (University of CapeTown), and (4) my experiences conducting design anthropology methods throughout my doctoralresearch, which forms the basis for this paper. I was and remain interested in examining therelational process of learning, especially as it relates to ethics, and the modes by whichdesign(er)s change and grow. In other words, my aim in my doctoral research was to interrogatethe relational process of becoming in the context of design.I am primarily concerned in
ideologies [3]; these perspectives are also alignedwith Radoff et al.’s description of narrow thinking [13]. Previous research has looked at howundergraduate engineering students align with these common narratives in interviews and focusgroups with students [10, 13], surveys [19], student classwork [15], and whole class discussions[7, 14]. The four common narratives that are pertinent to this study are technocracy, free marketidealism, technological neutrality, and technological determinism.Technocracy is a decision making approach guided by the belief that all problems can andshould be solved through technology [21]. Here, technological solutions are privileged, oftenwith little consideration of the social, political and historical context of the
interpersonalconflicts.Acknowledgements: This work is supported by the National Social Science Fund of China(AIA220013).References Brown P R, Matusovich H M. Career Goals, Self-Efficacy and Persistence in Engineering Students. IEEEFrontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2016. Chenchen Zhu and Luze Han. 2021. CV chatbot based on “STAR” method. In Proceedings of HumanInterface Technologies 2020/21 Winter conference (CPEN541). ACM, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 6 pages. Choi D S, Loui M C. Grit for Engineering Students. IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2015. David D. Woods. Four concepts for resilience and the implications for the future of resilience engineering [J].Reliability Engineering and System Safety,2015(141):5-9. French B.F, Immekus J C, Oakes