: Maintaining the Strength of Our Science & Engineering Capabilities. Washington, D.C.11. Whelan, K.A; Jones, S. A., An Alternate Paradigm for Undergraduate Engineering: The Bachelor of Arts, Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education12. Sen, S., Goldberg, J.B., Higle, J.L., Ferrell, W.R., The Bachelor of Arts in Engineering: Endless Possibilities, Proceedings of the 1997 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education Page 12.8.11
ideas that are helpful whenthinking about how to redesign the college.IntroductionImpending changes are presenting engineering schools across the country and around the globewith new challenges. Our task force at the UW-Madison COE has been engaged in efforts toassist the college in meeting these challenges. Some of these challenges are specific to the UW-Madison College of Engineering. Many of them, however, are universal. Our hope is that indiscussing the path(s) that we are following, we can broaden the conversation beyond a singlecampus. We do not want to mislead anyone: we do not claim to have the answers, and wecertainly have many unanswered questions, however, we believe that a national dialogue isrequired if engineering education is to
thisgap between educational preparation and practice in the field. It seems clear, based on this workand associated work of others, that to become “more than just engineers,” in the field, ourengineering students require more authentic, situated, and socially complex preparation thanmuch of what the curriculum currently provides.Bibliography1. National Academy of Engineering (NAE). (2004) The Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education tothe New Century. Washington, D.C.2. ABET Criteria for Evaluating Engineering Programs, (2007). Page 15.1391.93. Crawley, E. F., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., & Brodeur, D. R. (2007). Rethinking
education a discipline? In this respectthe nineteen sixties debate between Phenix (an American) and Hirst (an Englishman) are ofparticular interest.40 One thing they are both agreed about is the importance of concepts and itis for this reason that key concept maps are important in determining the curriculum providedthey take into account what engineers do.41Thus, what we think about knowledge and knowing clearly influences the aims of educationwe have and in turn the curriculum, the mode(s) of instruction, and assessment. We have to beclear about what we mean when we talk about knowledge and knowing.In another analysis of important terms Wringe insists that aims are not objectives even thoughthe terms may be more or less synonymous.42 There has
Writing and Presentation Assignments for Freshman Engineering Students". In Proceedings of ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. 1998. Tempe, AZ.2. Aller, B.M. and M.S. Clancey, Creating Communication Modules for an Engineering Enterprise Initiative: Programmatic and Rhetorical Considerations, in Council of Programs in Technical and Scientific Communication. 2000.3. Bommaraju, S. "Effective Writing Assignments to enhance student learning in “Introduction to Circuit Analysis”". In Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. 2004. Salt Lake City, UT.4. Bonk, R.J., P.T. Imhoff, and A.H.D. Cheng, "Integrating Written Communication within Engineering
, he does without rather than make amistake.It is hard to accept seemingly pointless learning, especially in a field that values linearaccrual of knowledge. But as Jobs says, you can’t connect the dots looking forward.Informal, self-directed learning may lead nowhere—or, it may lead to true innovation, asin the design of the Macintosh. If innovation is what we want from a “thinking society,”rather than mere competence, then the challenge for engineering education is to fosterstudents’ ability to engage in lifelong learning in the absence of an immediate payoff interms of grades, certification, or other resume-enhancing qualification. REFERENCES[1] Jobs, S. (2005). Commencement address delivered at
thank the students in all offerings of my course on Engineering and Global Development fortheir feedback in helping develop the course. I thank the reviewers for challenging commentsthat surely improved this paper. This material is based upon work supported by the NationalScience Foundation under Grant No. 0448240. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References1. ABET Engineering Criteria 2007-2008. http://www.abet.org/Linked%20Documents-UPDATE/Criteria%20and%20PP/C001%2007-08%20CAC%20Criteria%2011-14-06.pdf Accessed January 8, 2007.2. Harvey, D. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford
and Wagon in theirannual workshop Rocky Mountain Mathematica. 2 After finishing the different (eight) tutorials,each of the four course modules is introduced. Two weeks of in-class time is devoted to eachmodule. Students are arranged in teams of three or four per group with the group assignmentsalternating between self-selected, random or purposefully chosen. The first period of each two-week block is used to introduce the topic, discuss any new analytical or numerical techniquesthat are relevant and, lastly, talk briefly about the broader societal issue(s) that each modulebrings forth. The remaining two class periods then are used by the students to work on finishingthe module. It should be pointed out that though students are put into
clearly offer corresponding experiences in their chosenconcentration(s). The six week syllabus in Table 2 suggests parallel, but not integrated, efforts inFrench language instruction and chemistry/chemical engineering laboratory practice.While the French language instruction occurred at two levels (for students with low ormoderate prior French experience), the lab was integrative in the sense that instructionswere provided in French, and the US students translated these into English, then wrotetheir lab reports in standard form for our US engineering campus program. Our USstudents downloaded our typical lab manual from our US campus website prior todeparture for France, and followed its designated report format. These practices allowedeasy
– A Survey of Business Leaders. The National Commission on Writing. Retrieved January 11, 2009 from Web site http://www.writingcommission.org/prod_downloads/writingcom/writing-ticket-to-work.pdf4. Crainer, S., and Dearlove, D. (2004). Making Yourself Understood: In an age of technology, writing skills are Page 14.1042.11 more important than ever. Conference Board Review. Retrieved January 9, 2009 from Web site: http://www.conference-board.org/articles/atb_article.cfm?id=2525. D'Alessio, D., & Riley, M. (n.d.). Scaffolding Writing Skills for ESL. The WAC Journal. 13, 79- 89. Retrieved January 12, 2009 from Web site
the results of an informal in-class experiment to see whether educatorshave a valid reason to worry.BackgroundABET 2000’s emphasis on communication skills,4 especially vital in the era of the globaleconomy with burgeoning virtual collaboration among colleagues on distant continents, and theprevalence of email in the engineering workplace, means that engineering graduates have agreater need than ever for effective written communication skills.5 Any emailmiscommunication can be costly in terms of job advancement, time, productivity, andestablishing rapport with unseen recipients. Page 12.800.2Unfortunately, miscommunication appears to be an all
). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. New York, NY: CambridgeUniversity Press.8 Gee, J. P. (2001, 10-13 December). The new capitalism: What’s new? Paper presented at the Productive learning atwork, New South Wales, Australia.9 Gee, J. P., Allen, A.-R., & Clinton, K. (2001). Language, Class and Identity: Teenagers Fashioning ThemselvesThrough Language. Linguistics and Education, 12(2), 175-194.10 Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: an expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). ThousandOaks, CA: Sage.11 Turns, J., & Lappenbusch, S. (2006, June 18-21). Tracing Student Development During Construction ofEngineering Portfolios. Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago, IL.12
profession. Journal of Engineering Education 91, no. 4 (2002): 419-20.8. Harihareswara, S. Politics in modern science fiction [Course Syllabus]. Harihareswara.net. http://harihareswara.net/.html (accessed December 28, 2009).9. Harihareswara, S. Politics in modern science fiction [Course Content]. Harihareswara.net. http://harihareswara.net/.html (accessed December 28, 2009).10. Spinks, C. W. Prophecy, pulp, or punt: Science fiction, scenarios, and values. Paper presented at 5th Annual Conference of the World Future Education Society, Dallas, February, 1983. ERIC Database. http://www.eric.ed.gov///sql/_storage_01/b////.pdf (accessed December 28, 2009).11. Baringer, P., and McKitterick, C. Science, technology, and society [Course
Short Assignments,” Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE National Conference.10. Jacquez, R., Gude, V.G., Auzenne, M., Burnham, C., Hanson, A.T., Garland, J., 2006, “Integrating Writing to Provide Context for Teaching the Engineering Design Process,” Proceedings of the 2006 ASEE National Conference.11. Yalvac, B., Smith, H.D., Troy, J.B., and Hirsch, P.,2007, “Promoting Advanced Writing Skills in an Upper- Level Engineering Class,” Journal of Engineering Education, 96(2), 117-128.12. Lord, S., 2007, “Effective ‘Writing to Communicate’ Experiences in Electrical Engineering Courses,” Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE National Conference.13. Kedrowicz, A., 2007, “Developing Communication Competence: a
diverse disciplinary approaches in a way that is bothpedagogically coherent and immediately relevant to students’ experiences.Introduction [S]ystemic engineering reform, and its [traditional] curricular and programmatic forms…, will only have limited success until the relationship between engineers’ identity and knowledge and method is fully addressed, and an integration of the liberal arts—particularly those areas dealing with the relationship between engineering and culture and politics—takes place.1This paper analyzes Rensselaer’s Product Design and Innovation (PDI) program as a potentialmodel for a new liberal education for engineering students that achieves the high level ofintegration of technical and liberal arts
writing in the disciplines.Bibliography1. W. Zhu, “Faculty Views on the Importance of Writing, the Nature of Academic Writing, and Teaching andResponding to Writing in the Disciplines,” Journal of Second Language Writing, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 29-48, March2004.2. S. Lord. Effective “Writing to Communicate” Experiences in Electrical Engineering Courses. Presented at the2007 Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education, Honolulu, HI, June 2007.3. S. Manuel-Dupont, “Writing-Across-the-Curriculum in an Engineering Program,” Journal of EngineeringEducation, vol. 85, no.1, pp. 35-40, January 1996.4. E.D. Wheeler, G.G. Balazs, and R.L. McDonald, “Writing as a Teaching and Learning Tool in EngineeringCourses,” Proceedings, 1997 ASEE
modern era as well as new ideas which have justrecently been applied to the professions. In the spirit of the Diggers from the 1960’s, thepresent work offers new ‘frames of reference’ from which you can consider your decisions.The Diggers focused on promoting a new vision of society free from many of the trappingsof private property, materialism and consumerism. Our hope is to offer a new vision ofengineering which takes into account many of the elements of our society and our planetwhich have been historically ignored.As described by NSPE, “engineering ethics is (1) the study of moral issues and decisionsconfronting individuals and organizations involved in engineering and (2) the study ofrelated questions about moral conduct, character, ideals
Guidelines for Organization Issues Final Report. US Sentencing Commission. October 8, 2003. Retrieved from http://www.ussc.gov/PRESS/rel100803b.htm.9. Federal Sentencing Guidelines. n.d. Retrieved from http://www.ethics.org/ethicsindex/ fsgo.html.10. “Ethics in the Public Sector: Interview with Stephen D. Potts.” Business of Government (September/October 1998): 3, 11.11. Greenlee, Janet S., and David Bukovinskyln Brief. “Voluntary Compliance: Protection or Self- Incriminating Road Map?” The CPA Journal (August 1997). Retrieved from http://www.nysscpa.org/cpajournal/ 1997/0897/aug/F32897.htm.12. Honeywell, Inc. General Management and Business Skills–Honeywell Values. n.d. Retrieved from http
. Norback, Judith Shaul; Lisa D. McNair; Michael J. Laughter; Garlie A. Forehand; and Beverly Sutley-Fish.“Teaching Workplace Communication in Industrial and Technical Engineering.” Proceedings of the 2004 AmericanSociety for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, June 2004.4. Norback, Judith Shaul; Joel S. Sokol; Garlie A. Forehand; and Beverly Sutley-Fish. “Using a CommunicationLab to Integrate Workplace Communication into Senior Design.” Proceedings of the 2004 American Society forEngineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, June 2004.5. Norback, Judith Shaul; Garlie A. Forehand; Stephanie A. Jernigan; and Alexander B. Quinn. “TeachingWorkplace Communication in Senior Design.” Proceedings of the 2002 American Society
elevated to aposition akin to that of technical bodies of knowledge, could be developed either in technical orHumanities and Social Sciences departments and courses; for accreditation, all that matters isthe quality of student skill outcomes that engineering educators can demonstrate.The EC 2000 approach has now become sufficiently mature to support studies of programachievement under its auspices. ABET, Inc.’s own commissioned review, conducted in 2006 inthe Penn State Department of Education, summarized its key findings in two succinct bulletpoints: ≠ “2004 graduates better prepared than their 1994 counterparts.” ≠ “Professional skills gained; technical skills maintained.”1Our course in technical and professional communication, required
(both fromengineering and literature) to begin developing the assessment method(s) that best fit HU’sneeds.ConclusionAlthough work on the English for Engineers program is in its early stages (active work less thanone year old), progress has been made in analyzing the situation and beginning to develop coursematerials and approaches to teaching that will steadily improve students’ reading comprehension.Key to ongoing work will be the development of an assessment mechanism as well as ensuringlocal capacity is available to continue the work into the future.References1. Azar, B. Understanding and Using English Grammar. Third edition. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education, 1999.2. Burnett, R. E. Technical Communication. Sixth edition. Boston, MA
Also Available at: prism- magazine.org/feb02/research.cfm (Accessed December 2006) 2. American Society for Industrial Security, “Academic Institutions Offering Degrees and/or Courses in Security”, asisonline.org/education/ universityPrograms/traditionalprograms.pdf (Accessed December 2006.) 3. Rogers, B., Palmgren, D., McHenry, A., Danielson, S. (2006) A Rigorous Foundation for Security Engineering Programs , ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, Chicago, IL 4. Garcia, Mary Lynn (2001) The Design and Evaluation of Physical Security Systems, Butterworth/Heinemann. 5. Garcia, Mary Lynn (2006) Vulnerability Assessment of Physical Protection Systems, Butterworth/Heinemann. 6. Rogers, B
specialization.References 1. The Earth Charter, http://www.earthcharterinaction.org/content/pages/Read-the-Charter.html 2. Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, http://www.unep.org/Documents.Multilingual/Default.asp?DocumentID=78&ArticleID=1163 3. Agenda 21, http://habitat.igc.org/agenda21/ 4. Arrow, K.J. and Fischer, A.C. (1974), "Environmental preservation, uncertainty and irreversibility", Quarterly Journal of Economics 88(2):312-319. 5. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_cycle_assessment 6. Nair, I., Life Cycle Analysis and Green Design: A Context for Teaching Design, Environment, and Ethics, JEE, October 1998, 489-494. 7. Nair, I., S. Jones and J. White, A curriculum to enhance environmental
Instructor Designed Questionnaire AHS1130 Seeing and Hearing1. Have you met with the TA (name)? ___Yes ___No. If yes, please indicate area of tutorial help ___ digital photography ___ audio ___video Please indicate in a few words your level of satisfaction:2. Have you met with the writing tutor (name) or(name)? (Circle the name(s)). If yes, please indicate in a few words your level of satisfaction.3. Regarding the writing section of the course, did you find the workshops helpful? Did you think there were enough writing assignments? How could the teaching of writing be improved?4. In retrospect would it have been more useful to read the history of documentary early in the course rather than near the end?5
think critically about theirtechnical challenges but also “to apply [their] knowledge to broader societal needs.” 2 His co-authors echo his sentiments in their repeated emphasis on the importance of analysis inengineering education. As communication instructors we can think of no better way to teachanalysis and critical thinking skills than by teaching rhetoric and argumentation. John Ramageand John Bean note in their watershed textbook that the purpose of argument is not simply tosway the audience, “but also to help the writer clarify his or her own thinking on an issue.”Argumentation they tell us “[i]s not an end in itself: rather, it is a means to achieving gooddecisions.” 3 If teaching argumentation can help students to clarify their
that are part of yoursolution, and be prepared to explain your reasoning to the rest of the class, including any assumptions you makeabout incomplete story details (these assumptions should obviously be exceedingly logical). Consider well whichdetails are essential and which ones are not. Think carefully about what your responsibilities are in this situation aswell as to whom you are responsible. Do not waste time worrying about anything “farfetched” – handle the problemas it lies. Figure 1. Content for the Pendergrass Circuits E-mail ExerciseAs Figure 1’s “ASSIGNMENT” paragraph shows, we typically use Pendergrass as acollaborative in-class exercise, where students work in instructor-created teams deciding how
, S. (Re)designing the college ofengineering at the University of Wisconsin-Madison for 2010 and beyond. ASEE 2006 Annual ConferenceProceedings (Chicago, IL, USA, June 2006) ASEE.4. Berkowitz, P. Liberal education: then and now. Policy Review (December 2005/January 2006, Issue 140) 47-67.5. Cronon, W. Only connect … the goals of a liberal education and beyond. American Scholar (Autumn 1998, Vol. Page 12.928.1167 Issue 4) 73.6. The Engineer Of 2020: Visions Of Engineering In The New Century (2004) The National Academies Press.7. Board of Directors of the Association of American Colleges and Universities. Our Students Best