such a panel assessment. Next,the Design Panel assessment results and their relations with other ABET assessment dataare discussed. Finally, we provide lessons learned and feedback from the Panel membersto improve the “Design Panel” as an assessment tool.1. IntroductionCapstone design courses with substantial student projects are usually one or twosemesters long. Assessment in such courses for the purpose of continuous programimprovement and ABET accreditation is a challenge. At the School of Engineering andComputer Science, we have a mechanical engineering program with a manufacturingoption. For the past two years, our program has been preparing for its first ABETaccreditation visit. As part of this effort, we established a “Design Panel” to
forefoot of an enormous wave of application. Verysmall transportable energy devices are beginning to proliferate. The list is both broad and deep.Frequently, these products are more amenable to manufacture by extrapolation of machiningtechnologies, than by adaptation of lithographic techniques. [1,2,3] The terms ‘nano’, ‘micro’ and ‘meso’ are frequently employed to describe the small world ofmanufacture. These terms are rather imprecise, and there is no universal agreement as to whereone realm stops and another begins. Some writers also employ the term ‘miniature’ in thespectrum.[3] We describe our work at North Dakota State as being with products generally in theminiature and meso realms according to the spectrum suggested in Figure 1. Part
; * creation of competitive advantage through manufacturing planning, strategy and control; * analysis, synthesis and control of manufacturing operations using statistical and calculus-based methods, simulation and information technology; * measurement of manufacturing variables and extraction of technical inferences about the process. Figure 1: Proficiencies Required from Undergraduate Manufacturing Engineering and Similarly-named Programs [11]Manufacturing Education and Research Community: The most recent redirection of SMEhas been the alignment of technical interests into ‘communities’. These are mostly recognizableas the previous ‘association’ structure
was recently modified by the author who is the new instructor. During theplanning stage, the author studied the existing literature 1,2,3,4,5,6 and came up with hisconcept. His initial objective was to present a variety of different control technologies asoptions to prospective manufacturing engineers without contradicting the current coursedescription and the objectives as presented below in Table 1 This course provides an in-depth treatment of the methods and techniques used for the implementation of automated device control, both digital and Course analog. The student will achieve a mastery of both open and closed loop Description control methods and algorithms including
no practical reason why the broadeneddefinition cannot be applied to B4.1 as well, the B4.1 standard is intended for cylindrical partsonly.When utilizing the metric system it is important to provide students with an understanding of thepreferred numbering system. The preferred numbering system in the inch system is a bitconvoluted. The inch system actually has two preferred numbering systems: • Fractional based: We prefer whole numbers to fractions. We prefer 1/2’s to 1/4’s; 1/4’s to 1/8’s; 1/8’s to 1/16’s, etc. • Decimal based: We prefer whole numbers to decimal increments. We prefer .1’s to .01’s; .01’s to .001’s; .001’s to .0001’s, etc.Knut O. Kveneland is the chair of the ANSI B4.2 standard and the author of Metric
, the process involved the following steps: 1) Define Goals: Broad objectives of the session were specified. 2) Collect Ideas: During this phase, the participants were asked to come up with ideas while deferring judgment. 3) Group Ideas: Ideas were grouped according to the objectives that they addressed. 4) Rank Ideas: Participants were asked to review and rank ideas according to perceived value and to vote for the best ideas in each topic area.Ideas addressing the future of manufacturing education generated from this process aresummarized and categorized in the following sections of this paper.MethodsSessions at the SME/CIRP international conference in San Luis Obispo were designed topromote discussion and idea-generation
interactive teaching methodsTTYP In-class DiscussionAccording to the article “How the brain learns” authored by D.A. Sousa [1], differentinstructional methods generate different retention rates in brains. Compared with lecturegenerating 5%, group discussion generates 50%, and teaching others/immediate use of learning90%, which can be achieved by TTYP effectively.TTYP (Turn-To-Your-Partner) is the most often used interactive teaching method by the authors.It can be adjusted a little bit based on different manufacturing courses applied. In IMSE 250,most of students are freshmen and sophomores, and TTYP is given to reinforce students’understanding on the most important concepts for each lesson, and normally TTYP is given nearthe end of class. The
://www.asq.org/pub/qualityprogress/past/0403/qp0403alukal.pdf) 1 (two sessions) • Steps for a change: Specify the value, identify the value stream, flow, pull and perfection (Womack, 2003) (two sessions) MASTER BLACK BELTS The Master Black Belt has the highest level of knowledge in Six Sigma techniques.He/she is a professional with skills and expertise not only in technical issues, but also inleadership. Master Black Belts are Six Sigma Quality experts that are responsible for the strategic implementations within an organization. Master Black Belt main responsibilities include training and mentoring of Black Belts and Green Belts; helping to prioritize, select and charter high
theAdvanced Manufacturing Processes Lab course worked closely with faculty and staff inthe CDP to design and fabricate the stations. This paper presents details of organizing andmanaging such a collaborative activity between two different programs. Overall studentexperience and lessons learned in organizing such a project are also discussed.1. Introduction The preparation of skilled engineers requires a comprehensive andmultidimensional approach. “The men and women who will be 21st Century engineerswill exhibit leadership and multi-disciplinary teamwork…. (They) must communicatemore to support and advance their ideas and proposals. To emerge from the “back-rooms”, engineers must be brought-up in a culture of teamwork, collaboration
uncoated copper is tinned using a liquid-tinning solution. Figure 1 is a flow diagram of thecircuit board prototyping process using the laser. Details of the process elements follow. 1. Develop circuit board 2. Create mirror image of artwork using laser enabled artwork. Locate board 3. Place board in drill fixture CAD library; placing entities images in the CAD and pre-drill locating holes. on appropriate layers. workspace. 5. Clean both sides of 4. Place board in fixture, 6. Apply acrylic clear coat board with soap, water and insulation side up; laser with air brush
. Page 11.305.2Exhibit GoalsThe main purpose of the exhibit is to educate visitors about the processes in three fields essentialto industrial production – product design, manufacturing, and marketing – and how these fieldsare intertwined in development of manufactured goods. A secondary goal of the exhibit is tointroduce children, especially girls, to the types of professions found in these areas so they mayconsider them as future career choices.3 For either of these goals to be attained, the proposedexhibit must accomplish three tasks: (1) attract visitors, (2) motivate them to become engagedwith the exhibit, and (3) facilitate the acquisition of the knowledge, understanding, and attitudesthe exhibit is designed to convey.Exhibit OverviewThe
in a lab setting thatcontains 10 engine lathes, 5 manual/CNC vertical mills, 1 horizontal mill, 4 drill presses, 1 turretdrill press, 1 CNC lathe, and 1 CNC bed mill. Starting with measurements, students are givenlab exercises that illustrate the techniques needed to manufacture a machined part. Followingmeasuring, there is a two-week introduction to the machines, which requires individuals tooperate the lathes and teams of two to operate the mills. Next, the students are given a two-weekproject where they individually make a screwdriver using the available equipment. The finalproject consists of making an air motor in teams of five, where each team is responsible forproducing one-half of the parts of the air motor. During the two projects
Properties and Processing was offered for the first time in the departmentin Spring 2006. In this course rather than assigning team based projects, research paper topicswere assigned on an individual basis. The research project was determined as a major learningtool. The students were systematically prepared for taking up this activity. Independent researchactivity develops research aptitude in early career, prepares students for graduate studies,develops independent thinking, and makes students responsible for their learning.Table 1. Enrollment and number of graduates: Bachelors in Manufacturing Engineering 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000Enrollment 93 75 79 74
techniqueswere then implemented to achieve the future state map. These projects have facilitatedexperiential learning through “Hear, See, and Do” cycle by bridging the gap betweenacademia and industry via learning modules in lean manufacturing education. It not onlybenefits students working on the lean project as a practical learning experience, but alsoacts as a lean manufacturing education show case to students on campus.IntroductionLean manufacturing principles represent a radical departure from traditional planttechniques [1]. The employee's roles, skill-sets, process-requirements, and rules havechanged. Team members must operate like an independent business with totalresponsibility for the quality, manufacturing and delivery of the product to
. Social commentators [e.g. 1)] havehighlighted the need for businesses to succeed in a global environment and as such theeducation system must attempt to create engineers with global perspectives. There areseveral solutions to achieve this objective such as internships, co-op programs, studentexchange programs, laboratory-intensive classes and the ever-popular Capstone SeniorDesign Project. This last and the most important topic of integrated design has beenreviewed 2, 3) and discussed extensively in literature and engineering educationconferences. There is considerable variability in the scope; breadth and depth of thesecapstone projects, the team size and composition and the time, and sponsors and budgetfor the projects. Some of these projects
. Regardless, even with one student group, it is possible to gather, record, reviewand report assessments. These seniors may reflect on their educational objectives andmay be able to provide constructive feedback to the department and the university as awhole. The department and faculty may be able revise and remodel their curriculumstructure. A partial list of possible assessment areas is given below: 1. Assessment of oral project presentation. 2. Assessment of written project report. 3. Assessment of written communication skills 4. Assessment of the principles of Miami Plan for Liberal Education. 5. Assessment of reflective essay. 6. Assessment of instructor or project mentor. 7. Assessment of the
economics, and related topics,provide the foundation of knowledge upon which specific skill sets are added depending onemphasis. However, it is critical for engineering/industrial technology to transition fromtheoretical work in the classroom to experiential learning. The main objective of senior projectsor design courses in engineering technology curricula is to bridge the gap between academictheory and real world practice. The proposed senior projects should include elements of bothcredible analysis and experiential proofing such as design and implementation as discussed inABET criteria [1]. Further, the senior design seminar can serve as an excellent culminatingexperience in the program of study when it focuses on research and design projects
interactive ways with lots ofin-class exercises. Moreover, educators argue that the topic based approach has little correlationwith what is the contemporary need of the industry and they suggest the project-based learning tobridge that gap3, 4.This paper presents a framework for student learning that consists of combination of tools thatare used in both topic-based and project-based learning approach. In addition, it also describescourse design and delivery techniques along with recommended timelines for incorporatingdifferent teaching tools during a semester. In the end, it presents results of student surveys thatwere conducted in two different course settings-one each for graduate and undergraduate class.II. Proposed learning frameworkExhibit 1
assembly. The students are expected toconceptualize the workings of a variety of manufacturing processes as well as theinterrelationship of a single process to the other processes involved in the fabrication of acomplete assembly. To accomplish this general objective, a laboratory has been introduced inthe course where the students work on a project individually. The lab (2 hours every week for 15weeks) follows the lecture classes (three fifty minute sessions every week) very closely. Theinstruction in the lecture sessions was primarily from text entitled Manufacturing Engineeringand Technology by Kalpakjian and Schmidt [1], and was supplemented as necessary fromAshby’s text on Materials and Process Selection [2]. The first few chapters of the
of‘manufacturing’. This construct offers a far-reaching method for envisioning the manufacturingsector of the economy that ought to become widely used at all levels in the near future -- fromcrafting of company strategies to formulation of governmental policy. Figure 1: The Four Pillars of Manufacturing (adapted from original)2 More relevant to the current context, this model provides a powerful tool for structuring theeducational curricula in Manufacturing Engineering.3 While the original Four Pillars modelsupports the ultimate objective of the product producing enterprise, the educational process Page 23.585.3culminates in a capstone
perceptions toward thecourse as it relates to course expectations and organization; time spent on course; and attitudesand perceptions of online learning among students enrolled in the online section versus studentsenrolled in the face-to-face section.To compare performance of the students in the two sections, the mean percentage on the threeexams was calculated as well as the overall grade percentage in the course.Table 1 provides a comparison of the time spent on the course and time spent navigating throughthe LMS for both online and face-to-face students. Based on the t-test results, there was asignificant difference between the time spent on the course for online students versus face-to-face students, with the former spending more hours per week
education began with the Florida Career andProfessional Education (CAPE) act for Florida’s high school career academies(1). Thislegislature called for an academic structure that included industry certifications and articulationsusing those certifications along with new learning and teaching strategies such as learningcommunities, problem based learning, hands-on skills based learning for 21st century careers,and more. After high school, students would apply their skills and learning in college and careerssupporting Florida’s advanced manufacturing workforce. During the same time period, theFlorida Advanced Technological Education Center (FLATE), an NSF Regional Center ofExcellence for advanced technical education, had partnered with Florida’s
2IntroductionIt is estimated that around 70% of the cost of a manufactured product is locked in at theproduct design stage as shown in Figure 1, and it is estimated that around 80% of chronicquality problems in manufacturing can be traced to issues in product design. Clearly theimportance of product design on efficient manufacturing and high quality productscannot be overstated. Figure 1. Who Casts the Biggest Shadow? (Munro, 1989)However, product design and quality are not given the importance that we feel theydeserve in industry. The evidence that product design and quality are being deprioritizedin manufacturing can be found in the fact that the body of knowledge for the CertifiedManufacturing Technologist (CMfgT) and the Certified
curriculum to establish a “before” baseline for theirunderstanding of the product design and development process. The survey was later given toassess their responses to the survey questions. Some of the questions included in the survey are: 1. Describe the role of the designer in new product development. 2. Describe the role of the engineer in new product development. 3. Describe the role of the market researcher in new product development. 4. How is qualitative research different from quantitative research? Briefly explain. 5. What is the difference between a prototype and a model? 6. How do aesthetics affect the success of a product? 7. Why is the relationship between the user, the object and the environment in which it is used
projects with components in design, modeling, manufacturing, marketing,testing and packaging. This paper reports the accomplishments and findings of this project fromthe manufacturing perspective.OverviewService learning is becoming one of the most popular teaching and learning techniques in U.S.universities. Students solve real-world problems, build character and support the communityactivities via their coursework projects. ISL combines academic studies, volunteer service andfull cultural immersion to give students a deeper, more meaningful study abroad experience.This initiative provides the linkage between service learning, cultural immersion and the creationof a global learning community [1].In Spring 2012, ISL course was offered to help
would fit on a standard desktop or table,would interface with commonly available CNC / Computer Aided Manufacturing (CAM)software, would be powered by a standard AC outlet, would be easy to use and robust enough foreducational use, and would not be cost prohibitive.Design Constraints Student design team proposed a desktop CNC machine that met a number of requirements tobe considered acceptable for use as a teaching aid for the MET316 course. Some of theserequirements placed additional constraints on the design which may limit its functionality andusefulness (Figure 1). The first significant constraint for the design was that the machine be small enough to fit on astandard desktop or table in a typical classroom. The targeted desktop
originated in 1983 as a result ofKentucky leaders' concern that the state’s "best and brightest" were leaving the Commonwealth Page 23.820.2to pursue educational and career opportunities elsewhere without fully understanding thepotential of their talents at home. Students who are selected attend the Program without charge.In the spirit of partnership, the Office of the Governor, the Kentucky State Legislature, andprivate enterprise come together to provide the financial support for the Program 1.The Program’s mission is to enhance Kentucky's next generation of civic and economic leaders.The first class numbered 230 and was housed on one college campus
numbers to shrinkdramatically, but it did suggest that enrollment growth in this program would be limited. Inorder to best leverage available resources for the program, a complete redesign of thecombinations of course offerings, the physical resources, and the human resources wasundertaken. Although local industry had a vested interest, and supported the redesign, thisrestructuring project was initiated and completed by the program’s faculty.Course Offerings (within the major)Table 1 lists the major course offerings by semester and by lab as they were originally offered.This is a pretty traditional arrangement, and very similar to other programs in the system.Table 1. Initial Course offeringsYear 1 (old lab)Fall
wastecontribute to higher production cost. So is low capacity utilization and shift-to-shift outputvariation [1]. When product line change-over times are too long, the result is low utilization andproductivity. The search for ways for reducing production costs through improved effectivenessand efficiency is never ending. Companies have tried improvements through different initiativessuch as Lean, Lean 5S, Six Sigma, Lean Six Sigma, Total Productive Maintenance, bettertechnologies, layoffs, etc. so as to remain profitable. 5S is a methodology based on 5 simpleconcepts aimed at achieving a clean, organized, and comfortable work environment. It isgenerally believed that 5S initiative is a foundation for more disciplined actions [2] and whenproperly
2013, REU students’ majors shifted greatly towardsmechanical engineering backgrounds majors; especially in 2013, where over 70% of the studentswere mechanical engineers. Page 24.63.7 Figure 1: Gender Breakdown: (Across all years) From 2011 to 2013 in Figure 1, thirty-one students have participated in the REUprogram at Missouri S&T. For each of the three years, about half of the students were male andthe other half were female. 2013 marked a marginal increase of one student between the threeyears; additionally, exceeding 2012’s higher margin of male compared to female. Overall,Missouri S&T has remained