Design Figure 4: Project Organization for Product Innovation in the Bison Microventure Innovation TeamUp-to-the-Minute: As this paper is being written, the Microventure team is expanding. Afterthe first month of working to the prototype-development tasking, it became apparent thatadditional skill sets are needed. Three new engineering students and two microbiology majorswere added to the Team in January. Two of the new engineering students have assumed theassignment for testing, and the other is partnering in the process design task. The student(s) frombiological sciences support the material, coating and testing groups by providing moreknowledgeable input on such matters as bone growth mechanisms and
the front and Page 13.865.7back end for the team managing the run. Each production run consists of the followingactivities: • Lab (factory) set-up: The afternoon and evening before the production run, the management team takes charge of the lab/s needed for their production run. They reconfigure the lab (as allowed) including moving workstations and selected equipment. They set up all equipment, tooling and processes per their production plan as well as the inventory control system per their materials management plan. The quality control system they designed is set up including measurement and data
reduce the high costs of patternmaking, coremaking,and other tooling requirements of the casting process. The reduction in direct labor requirementsis essential for metal casting to survive in developed nations and the engineers of tomorrow mustbe aware of the capabilities rapid manufacturing in metal casting. Students must be educatedin the rapid manufacturing processes, including metal casting, for the US manufacturing base tosurvive. The Wohlers Report3 indicates that rapid manufacturing will be the main applicationfor additive fabrication whereas currently it is mainly applied for rapid prototyping. Rapid manufacturing concepts can be introduced in the manufacturing processescourse(s) taken by industrial, manufacturing, and mechanical
make manufacturing flow smoothly. 4. DFV determines tolerance using tolerance analysis. Designers have a tendency to arbitrarily assign tolerances to critical components in products. Using scatter plots (Bhote, 2000) tolerances can be decided on critical components that are close enough to achieve the functional requirement and at the same time are not Page 23.664.6 too restrictive to unnecessarily increase the manufacturing cost. An example of 6 how this can be done using Shainin’ s Red X and Green Y ideas (Bhote, 2000) is shown in Figure 3
reported immediately. One Week M Tu W Th F 8- SCHOOL SCHOOL WORK WORK WORK 10 hr s Program work (1-2 hours) Home Work & STUDY Figure 5 (a). Student weekly schedule Figure 5 (b). Student schedule for a two-year spanBesides academic curriculum, the students also have to conduct Manufacturing Core Exercises(MCE) weekly
partners willing to help with curriculum, supplies, technology information, class visits and more. All enjoyed and the celebration of manufacturing in Florida. Partnerships Partners and regional leaders came from a number of expected and unexpected venues. FLATE posted a sign up page on its “Made in Florida” website (http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/WR8NBBT ) for interested parties to sign up including companies wanting to host tours, schools wanting to go on tours, and other organizations who
Project-based learning modules 18 Current STEM research articles/studies from the field Standards from your content area paired with standards from 19 another STEM content area Ideas and resources you learned at professional development 20 session(s) 21 Formative assessments to measure student content knowledge Graphing utilities as software tools to model mathematical 22 phenomena 23 Engineering design concepts 24 Diagrams as tools for problem solving 25 Information about cutting-edge STEM careers Page 23.383.8Teacher Videotapes: As a part of their Letters of Partnership, LEAs participating at the
: 1-15.[5] Kalla, K. D., Corocran, S., Overcash, M., and Twomey, J. (2011) Energy Consumption in Discrete Part Production: Green Manufacturing, Proceeding of the 2011 International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference, ASME, June 13-17, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.[6] Miller, G., Pawloski, J. and Standridge, C. (2010) A case study of lean, sustainable Manufacturing. Journal of Industrial Engineering Management, 3, 11-32.[7] Zuming, B. (2011) Revisiting System Paradigms from the Viewpoint of Manufacturing Sustainability, Sustainability, 3(9), 1323-1340[8] Anityasarl, M. Inserting the Concepts of Sustainable Manufacturing into Industrial Engineering Curriculum—A
, 2008, Farmindale State Colle - SUNY, Farm-ingdale, NY, http://www.merconline.net/wiki/index.php?title=Farmingdale_Forum_Program.3. Jack, H., (editor) Manufacturing Education Transformation Summit Proceedings, Austin, TX,June 2009, http://claymore.engineer.gvsu.edu/ocs/index.php/smetexas2009/METS2009/sched-Conf/presentations.4. Jack, H., “The State of Manufacturing Engineering Education”, An SME Technical Paper,November 20055. Danielson, S, Georgeou, T, “The State of Manufacturing Engineering Technology Education”
presentation to faculty andpracticing engineers from industry. Since this is a capstone project course, many ABET StudentOutcomes are assessed each quarter as indicated in Table 1. Written, oral and studentcontribution rubrics were developed specifically for the capstone project course and are usedduring assessment and evaluation. Assessor body include Engineering Technology programfaculty, sponsoring company engineers and invited Drexel University faculty.Table 1. ABET Students Outcomes assessed per quarter offering. ET COURSES OUTCOME(s) MET 421 Project Design I a-k MET 422 Project Design II a-h, j, k MET 423
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
contractors were awardedcontracts to build F-16s [ii] using the exact same design and drawings. The parts were made tostrict specifications. Naturally, as the blue prints used by both were the same, equivalentperformance was anticipated from both. But this was not the case when the field history resultscame in after some use of the jets in the field.What was found was that the Japanese built planes had a mean-time-between-failure (MTBF)reliability that was twice as that of the U.S. F-16’s! Such a difference in performance cannot beattributed purely to chance. There has to be an uncommon cause that resulted in this. Onconducting an analysis, it was found that the U.S. manufacturers used the full spectrum oftolerance that was available to them, whereas
develop alternative designs for their project. They need to visualize their design ideas using sketches. A problem statement explaining their design idea must also accompany each alternative design. They choose from at least two alternatives based on certain constraints including costing, marketability, and manufacturability. For extra credit, they can carry their best design into the CAD environment using SolidWorks. Armature and Mechanical Design: The students are given VEX structural components. They combine VEX parts with the custom parts they choose to design and fabricate. Once they determine the material type(s) to be utilized, fabrication can be done manually using machine tools in the
engineering through a microfabrication project, Proceedings of the ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Nov 11-15, Seattle, WA, USA. 2. Carlson, L., Sullivan, J., Poole, S., and M. Picket-May. (1999). Engineers as Entrepreneurs: Invention and Innovation in Design and Build Courses, 29th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Juan, Puerto Rice. 3. Hein, G.L., S.A. Sorby, (2001). Engineering Explorations: Introducing First-Year Students to Engineering, 31st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, October 21, Reno, Nevada, USA. 4. Carlson, L.E., Sullivan, J.F. (1999). Hands-on engineering: learning by doing in the integrated teaching and learning
: Effectively Teaching Large-Enrollment Online Classes”, Online Classroom, May 1, 20134. “Strategies for Teaching Large Classes”, Published on Office of the Executive Vice President and Provost of the University5. Natarajarathinam, M., “Redesigning a course on Electronics Distribution Networks to meet the contemporary industry needs”, Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education, Vancouver, British Columbia, June 26 – 29.6. Dunn, C. K., Batts, D. L. and Friend, S. L., “How educational institutions can handle more students with fewer faculty members”, Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education, Vancouver, British Columbia
because of their concern over the decline of surface water quality as a result of runoff from urban, agriculture, industry and other human activities. They wanted to contribute to the efforts in the Public Lab community to develop low-cost, DIY open source water quality monitoring devices. They began the project by investigating the open source water temperature, conductivity measuring instruments already being developed and documented on the Public Lab website including the Riffle (http://openwaterproject.io) and Riffle-ito (https://github.com/p-v-o-s/riffle-ito). Over the course of the semester, the team implemented their own Riffle-ito
Page 12.1472.9Technology programs in 2007 and was generated from responses to the spring 2007 METsurvey. The 2007 MET survey added four additional questions to the 2005 survey. One of theadditional questions asked MET programs to list their perceived strength(s), particularly thosestrengths attracting new students. We hope these strength data provide information about whattype of manufacturing curriculum attracts students to MET programs. A question pertaining tograduate level degrees was also added to the survey, as the 2005 survey did not specifically askprograms if a M.S. in Manufacturing Engineering Technology was offered.The graduate starting salary question was modified from a two-part question where a yes/noquestion was followed by a
Priority s turers Priority Priority Priority Priority Top Top Priority Priority Advanced processes 16 12 11 4 25 18 23 18 Advanced theoretical methods 1 4 0 1 5 6 1 3 Automation and controls 33 19 16 17 36 19 36 22 Basic science and mathematics 11 3 3 8 16 6 18 8 Basic processes 11 6 5 5 5
automated systems for use as a learning tool and reference.AcknowledgementsThis material was supported by a National Science Foundation grant no. 0238269. Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those ofthe author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography1. Hsieh, S. "Automated Manufacturing System Integration Education: Current Status and Future Directions," Proceedings of 2005 ASEE Annual Conference, June 12-15, 2005, Portland, OR.2. Schank, R.C. and Abelson, RP. (1977). Scripts, Plans, Goal and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.3. Abelson, R.P. (1981). Psychological status of the script
Style Innovations to Improve Retention,” Proceedings of the 1995 ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education 95 Conference, Atlanta, Georgia.7. Sleeman, K., Sorby, S., 2007, “Effective Retention Strategies for Engineering Students,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Education-ICEE 2007 Conference, Coimbra, Portugal, September 3-7, 2007.8. Lamancusa, J.S., Jorgensen, J.E., Zayas-Castro, J.L., 1997, “The Learning Factory-A New Approach to Integrating Design and Manufacturing into the Engineering Curriculum”, Journal of Engineering Education, April, pp. 103-112.9. De Ramirez, L.M., Lamancusa, J.S., Zayas-Castro, J.L., Jorgensen, J.E., 1998 Supplement, “Making a Partnership Work: Outcomes Assessment of the
attitudes and beliefs of the millennial generation. Journal of College and Character, 2. http://collegevalues.org 4. Wilson, M.E. (2004) Teaching, learning, and the millennial student in New Directions for Student Services (106), pp59-71. 5. DeBard, R. (2004). Millennials coming to college in New Directions for Student Services (106). pp 33-45. 6. Davis, Douglas A. (January-February, 2003) Academe (89)1 9-22. 7. SAGSET, The Society for the Advancement of Games and Simulations in Education and Training. Site last accessed May 10 2005. http://www.simulations.co.uk/sagset/ 8. Poggenpohl, S (2003) “Communication Spaces: Games - a transactional context.” Creating Communicational Spaces Conference
leader and has lead and contribute to Peer Evaluation leading the project successfully? Commitment to deadlines (20%): did the team member attended all the meetings? Was s/he committed to deadlines? Workload (40%): did the team member contributed to the project satisfactorily and performed all the tasks required from him/her successfully?5. ConclusionsThe collective experience of the authors with this one-semester industry project that wasincorporated into the undergraduate manufacturing systems course has shown that the projectwas beneficial to both students and industry. Data collected from student survey has shown thatthe industry project helps
teaching delivery in manufacturing engineering education." UICEE Annual Conference on Engineering Education, Australia. 2003. 6. Frost, G. S., & Foster, J. A., & Irish, R., & Sheridan, P. K. (2012, June), The Development of a DfX Paper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference, San Antonio, Texas. https://peer.asee.org/22042
entrepreneurialmindset in engineering education: Project approach. Proceedings - Frontiers in EducationConference. 121-126. 10.1109/FIE.2013.6684799.[6] A. Huang-Saad, "Fostering the entrepreneurial mindset in the engineering classroom," 200939th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Antonio, TX, 2009, pp. 1-6.doi: 10.1109/FIE.2009.5350763.[7] Erdil, N. O., & Harichandran, R. S., & Nocito-Gobel, J., & Carnasciali, M., & Li, C. Q.(2016, June), Integrating e-Learning Modules into Engineering Courses to Develop anEntrepreneurial Mindset in Students. Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.25800.[8] Mikesell, D. R., & Chen, T., & Ma, J., & Ali, A. (2015, June), Improving
training sessions was not only to raise the level atwhich the teaching assistants use the workflow, but to also ensure they could accurately conductPre-CAM Consultations.Pre-CAM ConsultationsPrior to beginning formal work on a CAM project, students must consult with a member of theAFL staff. During the Pre-CAM Consultation, the staff member views the model(s) provided bythe student and discusses the manufacturing approach that will be used to machine the part. Thisincludes a discussion on the proper stock size, the proper fixturing approach, the order in whichprocesses should be applied, among other topics. The purpose behind this consultation is toprovide the student with a starting point to begin the CAM work. Also, it ensures they alsofollow
make a profit on this order and many orders to follow. (Sample just enough cards to make a confident well- informed decision and give the right answer)Bibliography 1) Kalpakjian, S., and Steven R. Schmid. "Chapter 4." Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2008. Print. 2) Control Chart Constants and Formulae. Institute of Quality and Reliability, 2013. Web. 4 Mar. 2015. .Appendix: Homework assignment as given to students. ME323 – Spring 2015 Tell me by THIS FRIDAY… if you wish take the Bet! M. Schaefer Plan how you would
. Akbar S, Ding CY, Yousaf I, Khan HM, E- glass/phenolic prepreg processing by solvent impregnation, Polym Polym Compos, 16, 19- 26, 2008.8. Healy, Kate. (2014). Environmental Health and Safety Needs for a Lab-Scale Continuous Prepreg Manufacturing Process. Department of Engineering Technology, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA9. Hadley, Chris. "Bismaleimide Volatiles." Personal interview. Apr. 2014.10. Carlton, Gary. “Volatile Ventilation.” Personal interview. Apr. 201411. Harper, Mark. Personal Interview. Oct. 2014. Page 26.528.20
Challenge”, IEEE Robotic andAutomation Magazine, June 2015[10] Allison S. Liu, et al, “The role of physicality in rich programming environments”, ComputerScience Education, Published online: 21 Oct 2013 [11] Amy Eguchi, “Robotics as a Learning Tool for Educational Transformation”, 5thInternational Conference Robotics in Education Padova (Italy), July 2014.[12] Dimitris Alimisis, et al, “Robotics in physics education: fostering graphing abilities inkinematics”, 5th International Conference Robotics in Education Padova (Italy), 2014[13] Leonardo M. Greene, “Inventor ship: the art of innovation”, John Wiley & Sons, 2001.
, microprocessors and PLCs, control system designs and Robotics. She has published more than 45 journal and conference papers in these research areas.Dr. Hossein Rahemi, Vaughn College of Aeronautics and Technology Dr. Hossein Rahemi is a professor and department chair of Engineering and Technology at Vaughn Col- lege of Aeronautics & Technology. He is the author of two books, Vaughn College Journal of Engineering and Technology (VCJET), numerous conference papers in the areas of solid mechanics, computational mechanics, vibration analysis, fracture mechanics and reliability analysis. He is also a principle investi- gator for the NSF S-STEM grant and the HIS-STEM grant and a student adviser for a number of technical
.jpg8. SparkFun GPS Shield. Retrieved February 28, 2015. from https://cdn.sparkfun.com//assets/parts/5/0/9/4/10530- 01c.jpg9. Sparkfun Sunny Buddy. Retrieved March 1, 2015. from https://www.sparkfun.com/products/1288510. L298 Ardumoto Motor Shield [Online image]. Retrieved March 1, 2015. from https://www.creatroninc.com/2489-large_default/l298-ardumoto-motor-shield.jpg11. large 2.5 W solar panel. Retrieved March 1, 2015. from https://cdn.sparkfun.com//assets/parts/1/4/6/07840-04- L.jpg12. 2000 mAh LiPo battery. Retrieved March 1, 2015. from https://www.sparkfun.com/products/848313. Singh, S. (2015, February). Critical reasons for crashes investigated in the National Motor Vehicle Crash Causation