method applied in improvingeducational programs. The QFD process will be continuously repeated in the future inorder to drive the improvement to embrace the ever-changing customer needs.5. ConclusionsIn today’s competitive world, customer satisfaction is a vital goal to be accomplished atan affordable cost. One important factor in customer satisfaction is the effectiveidentification of customer expectations. In this paper the implementation of QFD isdiscussed in an educational scenario, where the principles of QFD are applied tosystematically improve the Manufacturing Engineering curriculum in a Midwest privateinstitution. The method of QFD is able to integrate the voices of various stake holdersinto curriculum development. The voices of
/process design, and processimprovement. The curriculum restructuring involves the integration of previous laboratoryexercises with new exercises on existing equipment and the new equipment using manufacturingphilosophies such as lean, agile, and 5S. The paper will describe the new laboratory curriculumand how the manufacturing systems techniques were utilized to realize significant beneficialrestructuring.Background and MotivationA robotics course as a technical elective and a required course provide upper-level engineeringtechnology students with an interesting class experience within their desired curriculum atRochester Institute of Technology. Allowing students to gain applied knowledge of some of thecurrent robotics equipment is in the
AC 2011-17: INTEGRATING ENTREPRENEURSHIP INTO MANUFAC-TURING ENGINEERING EDUCATIONNing Fang, Utah State University Ning Fang is an Associate Professor in the College of Engineering at Utah State University, USA. He has taught a variety of engineering courses such as metal machining, design for manufacturing, and engineer- ing dynamics. His areas of interest include computer-assisted instructional technology, curricular reform in engineering education, the modeling and optimization of manufacturing processes, and lean product design. He earned his Ph.D., M.S., and B.S. degrees in mechanical engineering and is the author of more than 60 technical papers published in refereed international journals and conference
AC 2011-580: INTEGRATION OF E-QUALITY CONTROL MODULESWITH ENGINEERING COMPUTER NUMERICAL CONTROL LABORA-TORYRichard Chiou, Drexel University Dr. Richard Chiou’s background is in mechanical engineering with an emphasis on manufacturing. Dr. Chiou is currently an associate professor in the Goodwin School of Technology and Professional Studies at Drexel University. His areas of research include machining, mechatronics, and internet based robotics and automation. He has secured many research and education grants from the NSF, the SME Education Foundation, and industries.Yalcin Ertekin, Drexel University (Engineering Technology)) Dr. Ertekin received his BS degree in mechanical engineering from Istanbul Technical
presents an opportunity for curriculum development where ServiceDesign and Development should become an integral part of the design education. Thetopic of service design and development must be viewed as a very important step increating value, delivering satisfaction to the customer and sharpen the competitive edgefor the manufacturers and therefore should become one of the focal points ofundergraduate engineering education.In accordance with the ideas outlined above, a new curriculum is developed to bridge theidentified educational gap by developing and delivering a three credit course called‘Product and Service Design’ in the Summer 2010 term. The developed coursecurriculum is described in detail in this paper. The curriculum includes the
position that enabled him to lecture in a number Arab countries. In Jordan he served as the Chairman of the Math and Computer Science department at Al-Isra University. In The United States he worked as an adjunct faculty at Wayne State University, University of Detroit Mercy and Oakland Community College. He held a position of the Math program leader at Focus: HOPE for several years. Sabah has been involved in engineering education paradigms since 1996, he coordinated work with university partners to develop new curriculum in engineering education with a support of NSF grant. Dr. Abro has work as a consultant in six sigma training and certification where he was exposed to manufacturing facilities and their practices. He
AC 2011-2717: ACTIVE LEARNING THROUGH SAE BAJA COMPETI-TIONArif Sirinterlikci, Robert Morris UniversityTony Lee Kerzmann, Robert Morris University Tony Kerzmann received both a Bachelor of Arts in Physics from Duquesne University and a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh in 2004. After graduating, Tony Kerzmann enrolled in graduate school at the University of Pittsburgh where he graduated with a Master in Science and a Doctor of Philosophy in Mechanical Engineering, in 2007 and 2010, respectively. Currently, he is an assistant professor at Robert Morris University, where his research goals include, hybrid concentrating photovoltaic systems, energy system life cycle
AC 2011-1492: CLICKER CLICKS ITWayne P Hung, Texas A&M University Dr. Hung is an Associate Professor at Texas A&M University and has a joint appointment with Depart- ment of Engineering Technology & Industrial Distribution and Department of Mechanical Engineering. He is an active member of ASEE, SME, HTEC and enjoys teaching and researching in the field of ad- vanced materials, micro manufacturing, and medical manufacturing. Page 22.330.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Clicker Clicks It!AbstractManufacturing requires
, coach and educator. She has worked over 30 years as a leader in public, private, and non-profit sectors; most recently as the head of Organizational Effectiveness and Leadership Effectiveness at Honeywell, International. She has earned graduate degrees in Educational Psychology, Industrial Relations and Organizational Leadership. She is an author of several publications and two published books. Her specialty is developing leadership capacity to create high performing organizations. She focuses on styles and behaviors that fuel significant and sustainable change in leaders and organizations. She uses an integrated model that balances the inside-out and outside-in to developing leaders
Page 22.558.3assessment from the introduction to engineering course are presented. A brief section on thecurrent state of the summer camps is also covered before the conclusions.ENGR 1010 Introduction to Engineering Course ProjectThis section presents the most recent attempts on integrating animatronics into ENGR 1010Introduction to Engineering course with a semester long project. The main objective of thisopen-ended team project is to design and develop an animated robot or puppet. The teams arecomposed of three to four students and required to follow a process based on product design anddevelopment. Main stages of the process are described below in their actual sequence: Concept Development: Through a brainstorming activity students
LearningAdditional guidance came from an examination of the best practices and curriculum content ofexemplar manufacturing engineering programs in the U.S. These included Brigham YoungUniversity, General Motors Institute (now Kettering University) and Worchester PolytechnicInstitute. Based on the input from the abovementioned sources and the specific stakeholders ofthe Texas State University Manufacturing Engineering program, the mission statement,educational objectives, and educational outcomes were developed.Mission StatementAfter several revisions made in consultation with the program’s stakeholders, the Texas StateUniversity Manufacturing Engineering Mission Statement was created. The Mission Statementfor the program is:Our mission is• To sustain a
inspection sheetsreinforce expectations and provide examples of standard practice. Spring semester experiencesin the CNC lab allow students to focus on sources of variation when operator error is negligible.The entire sequence culminates with design teams designing an assembly prototype which mustbe manufactured to their specifications by another team. The early awareness and experiences encountered by these students during their freshmenyear provide a foundation for future courses and design projects.Some Approaches Recorded in the Literature The literature in engineering technology education provides a rich tradition of integratedexperiential approaches applying the design-to-manufacture process early in the curriculum. In
help students develop an integrated knowledge of a specific subject. In thispaper, we share our experience in achieving these goals by adding a model-building project to Page 22.1220.3the curriculum of an existing course.Manufacturing Automation and Control Course ModificationThe author teaches an undergraduate-level manufacturing automation and control course forEngineering Technology students at a U.S. university. The course covers the following topics:(1) programmable logic controllers and programming, (2) sensor technology, (3) industrialrobots and programming, (4) vision system, and (5) industrial interfaces. These are major typesof
Institute for MetalworkingStandards (NIMS) certified. The PMT has four full time faculty, an extensive machine tool laboratorywhich includes all traditional and CNC machining equipment, and CNC wire and plunger EDMequipment. Restructured entire machine tool curriculum to better align with the VIP model.Keene State College Partner Sustainable Product Design Polycom linkKeene, & Innovation (SPDI) Curriculum developmentNew Hampshire Modeling & Industrial and integration of Design curriculum into Rapid Prototyping
in providing professional development that includes strategies for the engagement and persistence of under represented populations in STEM disciplines. She has received awards from several organizations including the American Association for University Women (AAUW) for her work in addressing the need to increase females in engineering and technology fields as well as for her work in educating students with the skills required for the 21st century workforce.Wesley Francillon, Dr. Wesley Francillon, is an engineer with a Ph.D. in material science from the State University of New York at Stony Brook. He is the Engineering and Technology Curriculum Specialist for the Connecti- cut Community-Technical Colleges’ College
the more established manufacturing industries. Alternative energy and biomedicalmanufacturing were both recognized as very high demand areas. Other areas of recognizedneed were all listed and could be used as a crude ranking of priority nationally, but it does notconsider regional variations. There were a few mismatches between academic and manufacturingpriorities, most notably in automotive and electronics manufacturing. Recommendation: Alternative energy and biomedical manufacturing should be very high priorities. Recommendation: Academics should consider curriculum modifications for automotive and electronics manufacturing.4. Curriculum PrioritiesA complimentary question was asked from an academic perspective
NMSU (Las Cruces) and BS in mechanical engineering from BUET (Dhaka). His interest includes computer applications in curriculum, MCAE, mechanics, instrumentation & control, and fluid power. He is also a Registered Professional Engineer in the State of Ohio and affiliated with ASME, ASEE, SME and TAP. Page 22.1524.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Three Dimensional Surface Model from Laser Scanning of Proving Ground RoadAbstract: This project goal is to creating a 3D surface model from scanning of an existing roadproving ground for