Paper ID #11424Effective Manufacturing Laboratory Arrangement for Large ClassesDr. Wayne P Hung, Texas A&M UniversityMr. Adam Farmer Page 26.580.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Effective Manufacturing Laboratory Arrangement For Large ClassesAbstractManufacturing requires collective knowledge of material, metrology, and processes. Hands-onlaboratory and lecture helps students to learn, appreciate, and be motivated for further study.Learning effectiveness in a large class
Paper ID #15439A CDIO-Based Social Manufacturing Laboratory: Prototype for CPSS-BasedProduction ProcessesProf. Yanqing Gao, Oregon Institute of Technology Yanqing Gao is an associate professor in the Mechanical, Manufacturing Engineering and Technology Department at Oregon Institute of Technology. She received a PhD degree from the University of Arizona, and MS degrees from the Arizona University and Southern Illinois University respectively. She was a visiting assistant professor in Transportation Active Safety Institute (TASI) at Indiana Purdue University Indianapolis and a researcher and adjunct assistant professor in
Paper ID #12305Experience with Enhancement of Green Energy Manufacturing Learning inCourse and Laboratory DevelopmentDr. Richard Chiou, Drexel University Dr. Richard Chiou is Associate Professor within the Engineering Technology Department at Drexel Uni- versity, Philadelphia, USA. He received his Ph.D. degree in the G.W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering at Georgia Institute of Technology. His educational background is in manufacturing with an emphasis on mechatronics. In addition to his many years of industrial experience, he has taught many different engineering and technology courses at undergraduate and
assignments. The assignmentshave been designed based on the real life ergonomic problems in different areas ofergonomics. The students were challenged with five different assignments coveringdifferent sections of ergonomics, work design and safety. In addition, each student needsto submit a term paper or case study focusing on any specific application area ofergonomics towards the end of the semester. For each assignment, the students wereasked to study and investigate the ergonomic issues from their daily life accessories,classrooms and laboratories and offer possible solutions for the non-ergonomic designsand issues. For each assignment, the students need to prepare a report including the imageand brief description of the non-ergonomic design
Education Training Package contains seven elements presented inFigure 2. Figure 2: Elements of the Education Training Package The course offered at Wayne State University is a four credit-hours lecture/lab course atthe senior level with five contact hours (two hours of lecture and three hours of laboratory) eachweek. Since the proposed course is a multidisciplinary one, it is then suitable for students fromboth engineering and engineering technology majors. The prerequisites for the proposed Page 26.1250.4Robotics Education Training for Manufacturing Automation course is Computer –Aided Design& Manufacturing, or
second floor of the Business Center toaccommodate the faculty and program secretary offices. All laboratory classes are taught in thefollowing rooms, all located in the first floor: BC108, 115, 117, 121, 125. EGT also uses someconventional class-rooms on as-needed basis. The Business Center Building floor plan (first floor), aswell as its location in the campus is depicted in Figure 6 and Figure 7. Student learning opportunitiesassociated with the facilities mentioned above are: Material testing (tension, compression). Material Platting. Materials hardening Rockwell hardness testers. Material processing using Milling and Turning Machines CNC programming using multiple CNC machines Materials fabrications
and Monitoring Test Chips through Manufacturing Processes AbstractCurrent Techniques of diagnostics use expensive laboratory equipment. These costs are leviedupon the patient. Medical costs have increased to astronomical numbers and have crippled theaccessibility to healthcare technology. Simplified miniaturized laboratory processes areconsidered ‘lab on a chip’ medical diagnostics devices. In recent years, microfluidic projectshave proved highly effective in introducing traditional engineering students (electrical,mechanical, and industrial) to clinical diagnostics and the emerging field of point-of- care (POC)tests. This senior design project consisted of students within biomedical, electrical
[www.texastribune.org]. [www.texastribune.org]. This RET Site provides manufacturing experiences to teachers from middle and highschools with large numbers students from underrepresented groups and averaged academicachievement. The program objectives are to: a) Enhance the teachers' professional knowledge by providing unique research experiences in modern and advanced manufacturing, b) Use a design thinking approach to help teachers integrating new research knowledge into their class/laboratory activities while motivating young students to pursue engineering careers, c) Support the school infrastructure for long term partnership, and d) Enhance the schools' quality and
]. Simplylecturing about these steps is insufficient to give students the experience necessary to effectivelyiterate in teams. Failure is one of the main reasons for iteration, but is difficult to teach about.The ability to identify and assess failures or other reasons for iteration can only be properlylearned through hands-on experience. Previous studies have highlighted the ability to teach suchconcepts using hands-on activities such as model building and laboratory exercises. Lemons etal. showed that model building helped students generate ideas, make ties between concept andphysical object, and finally make the students more away of their process-based strategies [6].Mackenchnie and Buchanan have employed hands-on activities in a laboratory class using
technology at Korea Tech in 2008 and a master degree in manufacturing engineering technology at Oregon Institute of Technology in 2014. His research interests are focused on 3D printing of piezo-, pyro-, and dielelectric materials for pressure/temperature/strain sensors and energy storage. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 4D Printing of Pressure Sensors Devices for Engineering EducationAbstractThis paper elaborates on the development of laboratory project modules in the Industrialmanufacturing and systems engineering department at The University of Texas El Paso based onFour-Dimensional (4D) printing technology. These modules are aimed at introducing the studentsto interdisciplinary
Negative ()) of multimedia live instructor? Other (0) laboratory Do you think a virtual facility lab experience would be Better than (1) _________ that of a traditional lab experience? The same as (9) Worse than(2) Are you comfortable with learning technical information Strongly Affirmative (1) over the internet, for instance, using YouTube learn a skill or Affirmative (7) process? Neutral (2
number of insights are gained through thisassessment. These include information regarding students’ achievement of learningoutcomes, effectiveness of instructional methods, quality of instructing faculty, anddeficiencies in areas such as text -books, laboratory equipment, and other facilities. Theassessments done during each year is used to propose recommendations that are acted onduring the following year.Table 3 summarizes the PAR assessment conducted during the academic year 2012. Asillustrated, each PLO was assessed using two direct methods and one indirect method. Evidence Means Collection Fiscal PLO
mill; experimental setup on adesktop with programmable syringe pumps, sensors, and CCD and thermal infrared camera,experimentation, and analysis of images. We study concurrent and countercurrent heat exchangers,various active and passive mixers, heats of mixing between alcohols and aqueous salt solutions, andacid-base neutralization reactions. These laboratory projects provide instructive and accessiblehands-on experimentation, at levels ranging from intuitive and visual to more analytical treatments,in subject areas of fluid mechanics, heat transfer, reaction engineering, image processing andmachine vision, engineering modeling, and rapid prototyping. We emphasize skills and conceptsgained for their relevancy to energy efficiency
thespring semester of their final year. The course is comprised of a 2-credit-hour course lecture anda 1-credit laboratory. Before spring semester of 2017, the course followed a more traditionalstructure. Readings were assigned out of a manufacturing textbook, the manufacturing processeswere described during traditional academic lectures, and tests were proctored to assess studentlearning. The 1-credit-hour lab was used to tour five local manufacturing facilities throughoutthe semester. A comparison between the 2016 and 2017 course structure is shown in Figure 1.Figure 1: Comparative course structure between the 2016 and 2017 version of the course.During the spring 2017 semester, 14 senior-level, male mechanical engineering students wereenrolled in
challenges of university-owned control laboratories has sparkedconsiderable interest in student-owned control experiments 8,9,10 . The focus on student-ownedcontrol experiments has lead to many novel platforms such a small robotic vehicle with a custommicro-controller board 11 and a 3D printed experiment for balancing a ball on a plate 12 . Otherinstructors have used extensive simulations 13 and haptics 14 to enrich dynamic systems andcontrol courses.The abundance of online videos on control-related topics along with the relative ease with whichinstructors can create and distribute their own lecture videos has brought into question how to bestuse face-to-face instruction time. One answer to this question is to "flip" the course by having thestudents
manufacturing preferences. A generic manufacturing engineer isharder to educate and to fit into the workforce generic mechanical engineer. These regionalpreferences are best identified through the inclusion of a vibrant Industrial Advisory Committeethat collaborates with the faculty and helps to guide their decisions on curriculum.Finally, a third major challenge to creating a Manufacturing Engineering program is establishingworking laboratory and fabrication spaces and facilities to support the curriculum. Since bydefinition manufacturing requires the fabrication of a product, tool or system, by definition thereneeds to be equipment and technical staff to support fabrication activities.Overview of the programs at Western Washington University and
Paper ID #11385MAKER: Whack-a-Mole for PLC ProgrammingDr. Sheng-Jen ”Tony” Hsieh, Texas A&M University Dr. Sheng-Jen (”Tony”) Hsieh is Professor in the Dwight Look College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. He holds a joint appointment with the Department of Engineering Technology and the De- partment of Mechanical Engineering. His research interests include engineering education, cognitive task analysis, automation, robotics and control, intelligent manufacturing system design, and micro/nano manufacturing. He is also the Director of the Rockwell Automation laboratory at Texas A&M University, a state
. 2Workshop objectives and general description:The two-week camp is part of a consortium project that includes research, education andoutreach programs. More specifically, this program has several objectives:1) Train high-school students to use the Autodesk Inventor™ 3D CAD computer program, tocreate technical designs, and teach them how to print designs in 3D using 3D printers.2) Improve students' STEM skills and Improve students' communication skills3) Bridging the gap in industry and research laboratories in terms of human resources andqualified personnel.4) Introduce high-school students to advanced manufacturing (AM) applications to increase theirinterest in pursuing university degrees that would prepare them for careers in AM.Each year, the
Director of the Rockwell Automation laboratory at Texas A&M University, a state-of-the-art facility for education and research in the areas of automation, control, and automated system integration. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Research Projects and Lessons Learned from Research Experiences for Undergraduates Program in Automated System DesignAbstractAutomated systems affect the way we do things and impact our daily lives. Designing andbuilding automated systems is complex and requires an integrated skill set. The knowledgeneeded cuts across multiple disciplines of mechanical engineering, control/electrical engineering,and manufacturing engineering. U.S. manufacturers are
, ingenuity, and utility of printedobjects, as well as the students’ sophistication in using additional machines and techniquessupporting 3D printing processes. A number of examples from an engineering department’s 3Dprinting laboratory are provided to illustrate the various stages of 3D printing evolution. Introduction Experiments and other hands-on activities are well-known cornerstones of education andare highly supported by the experiential education philosophy established by Dewey1, and theexperiential learning cycle developed by Kolb2. Designs, physical models, and prototypes areaccepted as an integral part of engineering education in both education research3-5 and engineeringcurricula6, 7. Furthermore, engineering texts address 3D
learning and with respect toprograms and courses, they describe how will the successful learner be changed. Theresponsibility of the course provider or instructor is to formulate (i) objectives (ii)instructional activities and materials and (iii) assessments as defined below: i. Objectives: Objectives thoroughly clarify and narrow the outcomes to specific and measurable goals. They identify what is to be accomplished in terms of comprehension, application and integration. ii. Instructional Activities and Materials: Instructional Activities refers to teaching and teaching-related activities such as preparing for and conducting class meetings, including laboratory work and developing instructional materials. iii
including design and development of pilot testing facility, mechanical instrumentation, and industrial applications of aircraft engines. Also, in the past 10 years she gained experience in teaching ME and ET courses in both quality control and quality assurance areas as well as in thermal-fluid, energy conversion and mechanical areas from various levels of instruction and addressed to a broad spectrum of students, from freshmen to seniors, from high school graduates to adult learners. She also has extended experience in curriculum development. Dr Husanu developed laboratory activities for Measurement and Instrumentation course as well as for quality control undergraduate and graduate courses in ET Masters program. Also
what they expected.5. ConclusionsUtilization of AM technologies is continuously increasing in every aspect of the life lately.Although there are a number of professional development activities available in this advancingtechnology, cost and time related concerns make it difficult to attend for anybody who has aninterest to learn the impact of this technology for the classrooms and laboratories. AM-WATCHprovides a hands-on Studio type learning environment for the STEM educators who want toimplement this technology in their classrooms and laboratories. This paper presents the successstories of the AM Studios delivered in Knoxville and Seattle in 2017. Attendees’ grasp of ABETStudent Outcomes and Continues Improvement was an essential part of the
as designing and testing of propulsion systems including design and development of pilot testing facility, mechanical instrumentation, and industrial applications of aircraft engines. Also, in the past 10 years she gained experience in teaching ME and ET courses in both quality control and quality assurance areas as well as in thermal-fluid, energy conversion and mechanical areas from various levels of instruction and addressed to a broad spectrum of students, from freshmen to seniors, from high school graduates to adult learners. She also has extended experience in curriculum development. Dr Husanu developed laboratory activities for Measurement and Instrumentation course as well as for quality control undergraduate
holds a joint appointment with the Department of Engineering Technology and the De- partment of Mechanical Engineering. His research interests include engineering education, cognitive task analysis, automation, robotics and control, intelligent manufacturing system design, and micro/nano manufacturing. He is also the Director of the Rockwell Automation laboratory at Texas A&M University, a state-of-the-art facility for education and research in the areas of automation, control, and automated system integration. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 MAKER: Designing and Building a Prosthetic Hand for a High School Engineering Design CourseAbstractThis
Engineering Teacher, pp. 30-35, May 2014.[2] International Technology Education Association, “Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the Study of Technology,” 3rd ed., 2007. [Online]. Available: http://www.iteea.org/TAA/PDFs/xstnd.pdf. [Accessed: 01- Apr-2015].[3] D. Sianez, M. Fugere, and C. Lennon, “Technology and Engineering Education Students’ Perceptions of Hands-On and Hands-Off Activities,” Research in Science & Technological Education, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 291- 299, Nov. 2010.[4] M. Milojkovic, M. Milovanovic, D. Mitic, S. Peric, M. Spasic, and S. Nikolic, “Laboratory CNC Machine for Education of Students on Control Systems Engineering,” Facta Universitatis, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 117-125, 2014.[5] D. Rijmenants
part of the consortium DOE project. This programhas several objectives:1) Through active teaching early college, as well as high-school students the modeling andmodels development and production using computer programs, as well as 3D-printing.2) Contribute to the success of existing STEM programs, by giving them case studies andapplications that Improve students' learning and communication skills3) Preparing skilled and qualified technicians that industry and research laboratories are inhuge need, after this revolution created by 3D-printing and new manufacturing.4) Make the early-college and high-school students aware of what happening in advancedmanufacturing (AM) applications to increase their awareness and interest in trackinguniversity
6 1 3.42 Modeling Laboratory Science 1 1 6 4 2.92 Collecting/Analyzi 3 6 3 4 ng Data Hypothesis 2 4 6 3.67 Development Problem Solving 3 6 3 4 Motivations for program experience Contributes 2 5 5 3.75 significantly to field of interest Desire to improve 2 4 5 1 3.58 my skills working with people from diverse backgrounds My academic
students developing insect-size mechanisms at SmallMechanism Applications Laboratory (SMAL) at California State University, Sacramento. Ourgroup focuses on a class of millimeter-size mechanisms larger than micro-electro-mechanicalsystems (MEMS) but much smaller than ordinary mechanisms seen in our daily life. Seeing thetechnological trend of electro-mechanical products getting more and more minitualized, webelieve this class size of mechanisms has a wide range of future applications in manufacturing,bioengineering, the military, and many other areas. One of the difficult challenges to buildingthis class size of mechanism is a lack of actuator technologies for miniaturization. Today'scommonly used actuators for industrial automation, such as
, process development and product development. - See more at: https://www.asee.org/public/person#sthash.WaxuWfqL.dpufDr. Michael Langerman, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Dr. Michael Langerman is professor and Head of the Mechanical Engineering Department and Co- Director of the Computational Mechanics Laboratory at the South Dakota School of Mines and Tech- nology (SDSM&T). Before academia, Dr. Langerman was employed at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory either as a member of the technical staff or as a closely aligned consultant. He has conducted applied research for LANL, ORNL, and several universities and companies. He has over 80 technical publications and conference presentations. He was