Conference Session

Materials Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sean Maass, Arizona State University; Stephen J Krause, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Materials

other engineering disciplines, both for understanding the underlying fundamental reasons for the impact, as well as to test the breadth of possible impact. The authors acknowledge the support of this work from NSF Grant #1226325. References1. ABET (2006-2007). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology.2. Donovan, M. S., Bransford, J. D. & Pellegrino, J. W. (Eds.) (1999). How people learn: Bridging research and practice. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.3. Salomon, G., & Perkins, D. N. (1989). Rocky roads to transfer: Rethinking mechanisms of neglected phenomenon. Educational Psychologist, 24(2), 113–142.4. Krause, S., Decker, J., Niska

Conference Session

Materials Division Technical Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Zhihua Xu, University of Minesota Duluth; Victor Lai, University of Minnesota - Duluth; Ping Zhao, University of Minnesota Duluth

Tagged Divisions

Materials

good complement to the instructor’slectures for engaging students in the class.At the end of the semester, we assessed teaching and learning effectiveness through aquestionnaire handed out in class, which included three questions directly related to the groupproject: 1. Do you agree that the group project is a good way to learn the fundamental concepts of materials science? a. Strongly agree b. Agree c. Neutral d. Disagree e. Strongly disagree 2. Which of the following has been the best source(s) for you to learn the course materials? a. textbook b. Lectures c. Homework d. Group project e. Quizzes and midterm exam 3. Which of following has been the most useful in helping with self

Conference Session

Materials Science and Engineering of 2020

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jonathan Stolk, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Alexander Dillon, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

Materials

Conference Session

Innovations in Materials Education

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Surendra K. Gupta, Rochester Institute of Technology; Steven John Kosciol, Rochester Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Materials

, JaredDodge, Bradley Ling, and Markus Holzenkamp in conducting the torsion tests during thepreparation of this manuscript.References1. S. K. Gupta and S. Kosciol, Measuring Angle of Twist in a Torsion Experiment, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference in Vancouver, BC (June 2011). AC 2011-77.2. Plaincode Software Solutions, Clinometer on iPhone / iPod Touch, accessed on March 8, 2012. HTML.3. STMicroelectronics, Datasheet on LIS302DL 3-axis MEMS Motion Sensor, accessed on March 8, 2012. PDF. Page 25.1416.8

Conference Session

Teaching Materials Science Using Innovative Methods

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Craig Johnson P.E., Central Washington University; Charles O. Pringle, Central Washington University; Nathan Davis EIT, Central Washington University

Tagged Divisions

Materials

                            Page 23.892.7Appendix B Survey Assessing ‘Student Experience’ Student assessment instrument regarding ‘Student Experience’YOUR NAME:_________________________________________________________________________IN THE LAST TWO YEARS, HAVE YOU DONE AN ENGINEERING INTERNSHIP? If so, please provide name(s):__________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________IN THE LAST TWO YEARS, HAVE YOU HAD AN ENGINEERING JOB/POSITION? If so, please provide name(s):__________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________IN THE LAST TWO YEARS, HAVE YOU PARTICIPATED IN A DESIGN EVENT? This includes ASME RC

Conference Session

Emerging Issues in Materials Education

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Senay Purzer, Purdue University; Stephen Krause, Arizona State University; Jacquelyn Kelly, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Materials

the Computer Age G. Forman and P. Pufall, Ed.4. Chi, M.T.H. (1992). Conceptual change within and across ontological categories: Examples from learning and discovery in science. In R. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science ( pp.129–186). Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota Press.5. Streveler, R.A., Litzinger, T.A., Miller, R.L., and Steif, P.S. (2008). Learning conceptual knowledge in the engineering sciences: Overview and future research directions. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 279-294.6. Posner, G.J., Strike, K.A., Hewson, P.W., & Gertzog, W.A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211–227.7. Vosniadou, S. & Ioannides

Conference Session

Advanced Materials Education

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ajit Kelkar, North Carolina A&T State University; Ronnie Bolick, North Carolina A&T State University

Tagged Divisions

Materials

, strength etc. Furthermore, it is also stressed that the cost ofmaterials and manufacturing, is comparable to the parts that are being reengineered.Session 3: Reengineering of an actual engineering component made out of AluminumIn the lectures 1 and 2 of Session 3, a replacement for a typical aerospace part made out ofAluminum 2024- T3 is considered as a reengineering project. First students are provided withphysical properties of the aluminum and fiberglass/carbon composites. In general students followthe following procedure for reengineering the component using composite materials.Reengineering procedure≠ Tape properties are calculated using classical micro-mechanical theory for S-Glass fibers and Carbon fibers with Epoxy resin system

Conference Session

Materials Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sabrina Jedlicka, Lehigh University; Gregory Mark Skutches, Lehigh University; Siddha Pimputkar, Lehigh University

Tagged Divisions

Materials

-traditionalartifact) may be better received by younger educators. We will continue to explore thishypothesis in the future, as active learning approaches permeate more classroom settings. Component Assessment Score Sophisticated Competent Not Yet Competent 3 2 1 Identifies pertinent technical information about the material(s) All important major and minor

Conference Session

Materials Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Spencer Seung-hyun Kim, Rochester Institute of Technology (CAST)

Tagged Divisions

Materials

m-POGIL-based laboratory is tomove away from the more “cookbook” structured lab, where students are typically told stepwisewhat to do in order to collect certain data and to conclude the experimental work. Then, studentsperform the lab experiment within the groups by desirable criteria for the m-POGIL lab-activity.The key desirable criteria for the m-POGIL lab activity are: 1. Making agreements, roles, and responsibilities, as a team-contract, for the teamwork. 2. Requiring generating experimental goal(s) and producing the outcomes. 3. Promoting active decision-making within the group. 4. Evaluating the individual and group performance. 5. Encouraging students to develop questions/or problems for further

Conference Session

Materials Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Oscar Sanchez-Mata, McGill University; Mathieu Brochu, McGill University; Genaro Zavala, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico and Universidad Andres Bello, Chile

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Materials

Teacher, vol. 30, pp. 141-158, 1992.[2] D. P. Maloney, T. L. O'Kuma, C. J. Hieggelke, and A. Van Heuvelen, "Surveying students' conceptual knowledge of electricity and magnetism," Am. J. Phys., vol. 69, no. S1, pp. S12-S23, 2001, doi: 10.1119/1.1371296.[3] S. Krause, J. C. Decker, and R. Griffin, "Using a materials concept inventory to assess conceptual gain in introductory materials engineering courses," presented at the 33rd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Boulder, CO, 2003.[4] R. Rosenblatt and A. F. Heckler, "The development process for a new materials science conceptual evaluation," presented at the 2017 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Indianapolis, IN, 2017.[5] S

Conference Session

Hands-on Materials Science and Engineering

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Otto Wilson, Catholic University of America

Tagged Divisions

Materials

the bottle on the right contains Page 12.1095.4only hydroxyapatite.Bibliography1. Hogg R, Healy TW, , Fuerstenau DW, Mutual coagulation of colloidal dispersions, Trans Farad Soc, 62, 1638(1992).2. Kim S, Zukoski CF, A model of growth by hetero-coagulation in seeded colloidal suspensions, J Colloid InterfaceSci, 139, 198 (1990).3. Borum L, Wilson, Jr. OC, Surface modification of hydroxyapatite. Part II. Silica. Biomaterials 24, 3681 (2003). Page 12.1095.5

Conference Session

Teaching Methods for the 21st Century: Part 2

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephen Krause, Arizona State University; Amaneh Tasooji, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Materials

. This is especially important in the interpretationof the effect of thermal treatment on phase behavior and the correlation of the resultantmicrostructure to materials’ properties.References 1. Donovan, M. S., Bransford, J. D. & Pellegrino, J. W. (Eds.) (1999). How people learn: Bridging research and practice. National Academy Press, Washington, DC. 2. Hestenes, David, Wells, Malcolm, Swackhamer, and Gregg (1992). “Force concept inventory.” The Physics Teacher, 30(3): 141-151 3. Hestenes, David, Wells, and Malcolm (1992). “A mechanics baseline test.” The Physics Teacher, 30:159- 166 4. Hake, R.R. (1998). “Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand survey of mechanics test

Conference Session

Clearing up Student Misconceptions in Materials

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew Heckler, Ohio State University; Rebecca Rosenblatt, Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

Materials

difficulties, however, here we briefly describe a preliminarypilot sample exercise to help students address a small subset of these difficulties. The exercise isintended to be completed by students in small groups of 3 or 4 in a “recitation” type format. Therecitation instructor(s) do not lecture, rather leave the students to complete the task and posequestions to individual groups when they have problems.The exercise focuses on student understanding of the potential energy of two metal atoms as afunction of separation. We chose this topic for several reasons. First, a basic (and we stressbasic) conceptual understanding of the major features of the potential is fundamental tounderstanding the nature of atomic bonds and this can be used throughout the

Conference Session

Novel Approaches to Teaching Materials

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jacquelyn E. Kelly, Arizona State University; Stephen J. Krause, Arizona State University; Dale R. Baker, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Materials

, for studentslearning science or engineering, it must be made explicit that, if they are going to becomepractitioners of a discipline using its foundational knowledge, then they too must learn thelanguage associated with the courses and subjects upon which that discipline is built.AcknowledgementThe authors acknowledge the support of this work from NSF CCLI Grant #0737146 and IEECIGrant #0836041. Page 22.1166.11References 1. Corkins, J., Kelly, J., Baker, D., Robinson Kurpius, S., Tasooji, A., & Krause, S. (2009). Determining the Factor Structure of the Materials Concept Inventory. 2009 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings. 2

Conference Session

Interactive Approaches to Teaching Materials Fundamentals

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephen J Krause, Arizona State University; Omowunmi Isaacs-Sodeye, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Materials

treatment(s) were statistically significant. Resultsfrom the two semesters under study are presented in Tables 1, 2, 3, and 4. A normalized form ofthe result, Hake Gain 30, was calculated for both years. as well as for Krause 24. Other studies inthis paper did not calculate Hake Gain; hence were not included in this comparison. These resultsfor 2012 and 2011 classes will be compared with each other and with those of prior similarstudies.Exit post tests scores for both visual matching and written explanations were higher in 2012 than2011 (Tables 1 and 2). On the schematic matching (Visual) section, Hake Gain values for 2012were .65, .48 and .35 while those of 2011 were .14, .26, and .37 for unsaturated, saturated andsupersaturated solutions

Conference Session

Hybrid and Online Learning

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Alison K. Polasik, The Ohio State University; Anastasia Marie Rynearson, Campbell University

Tagged Divisions

Materials

questions about the student’s perceptions ofthe visits from GLs. To encourage meaningful responses, the students were offered extra crediton one of the course exams for providing complete and thoughtful responses. 27 students (of apossible 28, 96%) participated. Survey questions are listed in Table 2.Table 2: Questions asked in the survey. Subset Q Question(s) # Word Cloud 1 List 3 words to describe the experience of having presentations and Analysis of video interviews from visiting engineers and scientists during this overall tone class this semester. Benefits of the 2 What were the benefits, if any, of these visits

Conference Session

Materials Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yi Hu P.E., Tatung University; Amy Shumin Chen, Tatung University, Center for General Education; Yung-Yu Chen; Chao Yang Yang, Tatung University; Ching-Long Yeh

Tagged Divisions

Materials

creativity with implementationplatform for engineering education” (MOST 104-2511-S-036 -005 -MY3).References1. C. L. Dym, A. M. Agogino, O. Eris, D. D. Frey, L. J. Leifer 2005. Engineering Design Thinking,Teaching, and Learning. Journal of Engineering Education. 94(1), 104–120.2. M. Lammi and K. Becker 2013. Engineering Design Thinking,” Journal of Technology Education, 24(2): 55-77.3. I. Rauth, E. Köppen, B. Jobst, and C. Meinel 2010. Design Thinking: An Educational Model towards Creative Confidence. in Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Design Creativity (ICDC2010), Kobe, Japan.4. Richard N. Savage 2006. The Role of Design in Materials Science and Engineering,” Int. J. Engng Ed., 22(5):917-924.5. M. Cardella, C. Atman

Conference Session

Materials Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kendra A. Erk, Purdue University; Jerome Jamal Nash, Purdue University; Hannah K. Woods, Purdue University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Materials

their specimens, a benchtop mechanical tester (MTestQuattro; ADMET,Inc., Norwood, MA, USA) was used by the students to deform their specimens in tension at afixed deformation rate of 0.5 mm/s until failure was observed. Engineering stress-strain curveswere constructed from the resulting data, and the students determined the Young’s modulus (E),yield stress (σy), and strain at failure (εf) for each specimen. A full list of materials, step-by-stepinstructions, discussion questions and a glossary of engineering terminology is publicallyavailable.8 While only one deformation rate is investigated here, activity extensions could beperformed to investigate the effect of rate on the deformation response. As many polymericmaterials are viscoelastic

Conference Session

Hands-on Materials Science and Engineering

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Seung Kim, Rochester Institute of Technology; Bok Kim, Div. of Advanced Materials Engineering, Chonbuk National University

Tagged Divisions

Materials

AC 2008-18: A LABORATORY SESSION DEVELOPMENT: STUDY OFMECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF PETROLEUM-BASED PLASTIC COMPOSTBAG AND BIODEGRADABLE PLASTIC COMPOST BAGSeung Kim, Rochester Institute of Technology Dr. Spencer Seung Kim is Associate Professor in Manufacturing and Mechanical Engineering Technology/Packaging Science Department and works as Associate Director in American Packaging Corp. Center for Packaging Innovation at RIT. His research areas are in composite materials synthesis and characterization. Dr. S. Kim graduated with M.S. (1989) and Ph.D. (1993) from University of Illinois at Chicago.Bok Kim, Div. of Advanced Materials Engineering, Chonbuk National University Dr. Bok H. Kim is Professor

Conference Session

Interdisciplinary Approaches to Teaching and Outreach

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David B. Lanning, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Prescott; Wahyu Lestari, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Prescott; Shirley Anne Waterhouse, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona

Tagged Divisions

Materials

version of this concept inventoryexam. Be aware that this is a work in progress. Please send inquiries to the David Lanning(lannind@erau.edu) or Wahyu Lestari (lestariw@erau.edu).Acknowledgements This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0837009. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Page 22.645.9The authors also wish to thank student assistants Matt Bender and Brad Pols for their

Conference Session

Materials Lab Experiments and Demonstrations

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lori Rosario, Rochester Institute of Technology; Elizabeth Dell, Rochester Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Materials

. University of Mauritius. Reduit Mauritius. Elsevier Ltd. 2006.2. Casey, L. Growth forecasted for biodegradable polymer market. Packaging Digest. February, 2010.3. Bastioli, C. Handbook of Biodegradable Polymers. Chapter 1. Rapra Technology Limited. Shawbury, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY4 4NR, UK. 2005.4. Taggart, S. Two words: Biodegradable plastic. 25 April 2002. Wired.com. Accessed December, 2009. 5. Platt, D.K. Biodegradable Polymers. Rapra Market Report. 2006.6. Nolan-ITU Pty Ltd. Biodegradable plastics - Developments and environmental impacts. Report prepared for Australia Department of Environment and Water Resources. October 2002. Accessed December, 2009. .7. Narayan, R. and Pettigrew, C. ASTM standards define

Conference Session

Innovations in Materials Education

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Cottrell, University of North Carolina, Charlotte; Chung-Suk Cho, University of North Carolina, Charlotte; Na Lu, University of North Carolina, Charlotte; Robert Swan, University of North Carolina, Charlotte

Tagged Divisions

Materials

AC 2010-1890: INNOVATIVE COLLABORATION TO PROVIDE HANDS-ONEDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES FOR ENGINEERING STUDENTS:INTEGRATING "HABITAT FOR HUMANITY" INTO A FIRST YEARCONSTRUCTION MATERIALS COURSEDavid Cottrell, University of North Carolina, Charlotte DR. DAVID S. COTTRELL is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Technology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte. He graduated from the United States Military Academy in 1978 and retired in 2000 after more than 22 years of service with the US Army Corps of Engineers. Studies at Texas A&M University resulted in an MS Degree in Civil Engineering in 1987 and a PhD in 1995. He is a registered Professional Engineer with the Commonwealth

Conference Session

Materials Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nancy Ruzycki, University of Florida

Tagged Divisions

Materials

used within the course.These preliminary studies indicate the promise in purposeful inclusion of disciplinary literacy practiceswith engineering classrooms to support core content ideas, and sketch out a few possible model practicesand tools for use in classroom settings by instructors. These activities build sense making, reflectivepractice and engineering habits of mind within materials science courses, and show promise in helpingstudents to move from a novice level of understanding towards expertise through the use of writing,speaking and communicating.References1. McConachie, S. M., & Petrosky, A. R. (2009). Content matters: A disciplinary literacy approach toimproving student learning. John Wiley & Sons.2. Shanahan, T., &

Conference Session

Materials Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alina Kononov, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Pascal Bellon, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Timothy Bretl, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Andrew L. Ferguson, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Geoffrey L Herman, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Kristopher Alan Kilian, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Jessica A. Krogstad, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Department of Materials Science and Engineering; Cecilia Leal, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Robert Maass, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Department of Materials Science and Engineering; Andre Schleife, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Department of Materials Science and Engineering; Jian Ku Shang, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Dallas R. Trinkle , University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Matthew West, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Divisions

Materials

implementation. Computer Physics Communications, 91(1-3):43–56, 1995. [4] M. Borrego and C. Henderson. Increasing the use of evidence-based teaching in stem higher education: A comparison of eight change strategies. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(2): 220–252, 2014. [5] C. H. Crouch and E. Mazur. Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69, 2001. [6] A. Dorogoy and D. Rittel. Determination of the johnson-cook material parameters using the scs specimen. Experimental Mechanics, 49:881–885, 2009. [7] P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, and et al. Quantum espresso: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 21(39

Conference Session

Teaching Materials Science Using Innovative Methods

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephen J Krause, Arizona State University; Dale R Baker, Arizona State University; Adam R Carberry, Arizona State University; Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University; Bill Jay Brooks, Oregon State University; Debra Gilbuena, Oregon State University; Cindy Waters, North Carolina A&T State University; Casey Jane Ankeny, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Materials

performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 101-124). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. 5. Miller, R.B., DeBacker, T., & Greene, B. (1999). Perceived instrumentality and the incentive value of academic tasks. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 26, 250-260. 6. Wigfield, Allan L., and Jacquelynne S. Eccles. 2002. "Motivational beliefs, values, and goals." Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109-32. 7. VanderStoep, S., Pintrich, P. R., & Fagerlin, A. (1996). Disciplinary differences in self-regulated learning in college students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 345–362. 8. Simons, J., Dewitte, S., & Lens, W. (2000). Wanting to have versus wanting to be: the influence of instrumentality on

Conference Session

Introduction to Materials Courses

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kathleen Kitto, Western Washington University

Tagged Divisions

Materials

Conference Session

Materials Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Aisling Coughlan, Purdue University, West Lafayette; David R. Johnson; Kerrie A Douglas, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Tanya Faltens, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Materials

the aim of this preliminary study into the integration of a molecular dynamicssimulation into a traditional tensile test lab. Students’ ability to use the presence or absence ofdislocations or the formation and motion of dislocations as the basis for explanations fordifference in macroscale and nanoscale sample stress-strain behavior varied, but was generallylimited and fragmented. Recommendations for better integration of the lab components focus ona reduction of concepts in the tensile test lab, increased analysis of simulation data for easiercomparison across samples, and re-sequencing of topics before and after this the tensile test lab.Bibliography1. Krause, S., Decker, J., Niska, J., & Alford, T., & Griffin, R. (2003

Conference Session

Materials Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hui Shen, Ohio Northern University; Vishal R. Mehta, Ohio Northern University

Tagged Divisions

Materials

. Scott Cottle, the machinist at Ohio Northern University.Bibliography[1] Núñez J. S., Lascano S. F., Esparragoza, I. E. A project-based learning approach for a first-year engineering course, Eleventh LACCEI Latin American and Caribbean Conference forEngineering and Technology (LACCEI’2013), Cancun Mexico, August 14 - 16, 2013.[2] McLoone, S.C., Lawlor, B. J., and Meehan, A. R. The Implementation and Evaluation of aProject-Oriented Problem-Based Learning Module in a First Year Engineering Program. Journalof Problem based learning in Higher Education, 4(1), 2016.[3] Anwar, S and Granlund, E. Enhancing a Freshman Level Engineering Design Course throughProject Based Learning. Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering EducationAnnual

Conference Session

Materials Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

R. Danner Friend, Norwich University

Tagged Divisions

Materials

the new course format in acquiring those skills.Bibliography1. National Academy of Engineering, The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century (Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press, 2004).2. National Science Board, Moving Forward to Improve Engineering Education (Arlington, VA.: National Science Foundation, 2007).3. Gretar T. and Diran A., Re-Engineering Engineering Education for the Challenges of the 21st Century, Journal of Engineered Materials (JOM), pg. 14, (2006).4. Sheppard, S. D., Macatangay, K., Colby, A. & Sullivan, W. M., Educating Engineers: Designing the Future of the Field, (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2008).5. Howard, I. and Smith, B., Hands-on Development of Communication

Conference Session

Teaching Methods for the 21st Century: Part 2

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary Vollaro, Western New England College

Tagged Divisions

Materials

focus on materials selection and multiple constraints, the factors involved in materials processing and design, and the use of data sources. The students completing this course will have useful solutions to standard problems in industry and a working knowledge of the materials selection software. The methods of assessing students include homework, quizzes, a midterm exam, design project report(s) and a final exam.“ 3 cr.The students were required to have the following text, software and ancillary materials. Text – Ashby, Michael F., Materials Selection in Mechanical Design, Third Edition, Elsevier Butterworth Heinemann © 2005 Software - CES EDUPack 2005; Virtual Classroom account