Conference Session

New Teaching Pedagogies: Methods and Assessments

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Benjamin W. Caldwell, LeTourneau University; Colleen M. Halupa, LeTourneau University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering, Mechanics

2005, the number of awarded engineering degrees that includedonline components had not significantly increased. They noted a distinct misconception thatonline education in engineering has to be self-paced without clear instructor guidance and littlecollaboration. With the technology available today, that is not the case. The authors also notedno significant differences have been found between online and on-campus students from 1992-2002 as reported by Moore in 2002 in the Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks. Bourneet al.’s key point is the pedagogy must be examined and evaluated. If this is done properly, thenonline engineering education is possible because the addition of synchronous time in a coursepermits nearly the same level of

Conference Session

Attracting, Developing and Retaining Talented ME Students

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ashland O. Brown, University of the Pacific; Daniel D. Jensen, U.S. Air Force Academy; Richard H. Crawford, University of Texas, Austin; Joseph J. Rencis P.E., Tennessee Technological University; Ella R. Sargent, University of the Pacific; Brock U Dunlap, University of Texas, Austin; Rachelle Kisst Hackett, University of the Pacific; Kathy Schmidt Jackson, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Kyle A. Watson, University of the Pacific; Ismail I Orabi, University of New Haven; Jiancheng Liu, University of the Pacific; John J Wood, U.S. Air Force Academy; Christopher Allen Wejmar, University of the Pacific; Paul Henry Schimpf, Eastern Washington University; Chuan-Chiang Chen, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

Conference Session

Student Learning and Assessment

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Raghu Echempati, Kettering University; Enayat Mahajerin, Saginaw Valley State University; Anca Sala, Baker College Of Flint

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

obtained, has always been a challenge. They tend to think of components that are too simple to analyze. Therefore more guidelines have been provided on how to select an appropriate component for the project that addresses all CLOs. Where necessary, an engineering component has been selected for them to work on.As a side note to this, few students always creatively think of a common project topic thataddresses different aspects and requirements to satisfy another course(s) they take during thesame term, for example, a senior capstone design course or another ME elective course such asfailure considerations in design or failure analysis courses. This is a highly desirable as itprovides a total learning experience for the

Conference Session

Teaching Mechanical Systems: What's New

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Camilla Saviz, University of the Pacific; Said Shakerin, University of the Pacific

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

. and Oreovicz, Teaching Engineering, McGraw-Hill, Inc, NY, 1993.19. ExCEEd Teaching Workshop Seminars, 2008. http://www.asce.org/exceed20. Lowman, J., Mastering the Techniques of Teaching, 2nd ed., Jossey Bass, NY, 2005.21. Aref, H., Hutzler, S., and Weaire, D., “Toying with Physics,” Euro Physics News, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 23-26,200722. Guemez, J., Fiolhais, C. and Fiolhais, M., “Toys in Physics Lectures and Demonstrations – A Brief Review,”Physics Education, Vol. 44, No. 1, pp. 53-64, 200923. Turner, R. C., “Toys in Physics Teaching: Cartesian Diver,” American Journal of Physics, Vol. 51, No. 5, pp.475-476, 198324. Connolly, W., “An Automated Cartesian Diver Apparatus,” The Physics Teacher, p. 51, January 198925. Graham, R. M., “An Extremely

Conference Session

Trends in Mechanical Engineering I

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Laila Guessous, Oakland University; Qian Zou, Oakland University; Brian P. Sangeorzan, Oakland University; Xia Wang, Oakland University; Gary Barber, Oakland University; Lorenzo M. Smith, Oakland University; LianXiang Yang, Oakland University; David Schall, Oakland University, Department of Mechanical Engineering; Michael A. Latcha, Oakland University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

recommend scheduling several coffee or lunchtime (pizza)meetings with professionals of varying backgrounds. These were always a great hit and don’trequire too much time on the part of all involved. Depending on the personalities of theindividual students and industrial visitors, faculty may need to take an active role in getting aconversation started. One may for example begin immediately with introductions all around andask each person to tell something personal about themselves (where they’re from, hobbies or sideinterests, etc.) Once the introductions are complete, the faculty member may encourage thestudents to ask questions or ask questions that s/he thinks would be of interest to them to get theconversation going. Depending upon the

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alex C. Szatmary, King's College

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

curriculum to conformto what one may imagine to be on the FE.References [1] NCEES, “Using the Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) examination as an outcomes assessment tool,” NCEES, Tech. Rep., 2014. [2] S. F. Barrett, J. W. Steadman, and D. L. Whitman, “Using the Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) examination as an outcomes assessment tool,” NCEES, Tech. Rep., Feb. 2016. [3] NCEES, “Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) Mechanical CBT exam specifications,” NCEES, Tech. Rep., 2013. [4] N. Nirmalakhandan, D. Daniel, and K. White, “Use of subject-specific FE exam results in outcomes assessment,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 73–77, 2004. [5] G. Bull, M. Armstrong, and A. Biaglow, “Using the Fundamentals of Engineering exam to

Conference Session

Teams, Teaching, Leadership, and Technical Communications in Mechanical Engineering

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Traci M. Nathans-Kelly, Cornell University; Rick Evans, Cornell University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

, oral, visual, electronic) and outcomes(including ABET alignments) as collected by our two years of student survey data. Theincredible success of Year1’s quantitative findings are outlined in full. For example, in responseto our communicative self-efficacy survey, the scores across all communicative modalitiesincreased substantially (changing from low-medium to mid-high range) for all the studentstaking the pilot. In addition, on 17 of the 23 items on the survey, 80% of the pilot students scoredin the high range. We believe that it safe to claim that the pilot has had a profound and verypositive impact on students’ reported communicative self-efficacy in MAE engineering contexts.IntroductionCommunication is ubiquitous in the lives of

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Technical Session: Curriculum and Education

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Chean Chin Ngo, California State University, Fullerton; Sang June Oh, California State University, Fullerton

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

Conference Session

Outstanding Contributions to ME

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Peter Avitabile, University of Massachusetts-Lowell

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

d x dx & EQUATION OF MOTION m - c - kx ? f ( t ) 2 dt 2 dt 1 /|yt NUMERICAL PROCESSING h(t ) ? e sin yd t DISPLACEMENT INTEGRATION / DIFFERENTIATION myd a1 a1* h (s

Conference Session

Undergraduate Research and a Force and Moment Lab

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michelle Audrey Pang, Sandia National Laboratories; Carolyn Conner Seepersad, University of Texas, Austin; Sheldon Landsberger, University of Texas, Austin, Department of Mechanical Engineering

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

another and with their mentor(s). The written charter also allows teamsto agree to a code of conduct with which they are expected to adhere and also to determine teammeeting times. A signed copy of this document is submitted to the teaching staff as a reference forthe duration of the program. (iii) Research Background Presentation. Two weeks after teams are formed and students haveample time to meet with their mentors to discuss the background and project details, they providea 5 minute presentation to the class. This presentation provides background information on theresearch project, details for what they intend to accomplish during the semester, and a briefoverview of their research plan. (iv) Final Research Poster. Teams present their

Conference Session

Outstanding Contributions to ME Education

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ashland Brown, University of the Pacific; Joseph Rencis; Daniel Jensen, U.S. Air Force Academy; Chuan-Chiang Chen, Tuskegee University; Essam Ibrahim, Tuskegee University; Vladimir Labay, Gonzaga University; Paul Schimpf, Eastern Washington University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

Conference Session

How We Tackled the Pandemic

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Ashley J. Earle, York College of Pennsylvania; Alison R. Kennicutt, York College of Pennsylvania

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

Conference Session

Outstanding Contributions to Mechanical Engineering Education

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Wagner, Clemson University; Katie Knaub, National Association of Watch and Clock Collectors

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

Sundial (1500BC) – Early Civilizations Cell Phone (1990s) – German Reunification Water Clocks (1400BC) – Thebes, Egyptian Capital Personal Computer with Clock (1980s) - Poland’s Soldarity Movement Sand Hourglass (300BC) – Construction of Great Wall of China Timex Wrist Watch (1950’s) – Space Race Begins Weight Driven Clocks (1270 AD

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 11

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alex C. Szatmary, King's College

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

New Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2004. [5] ——, Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2005. [6] ASME, 2028 Vision for Mechanical Engineering. ASME, 2008. [7] J. Duderstadt, “A roadmap to the future of american engineering practice, research, and education,” 2008. [8] National Academy of Engineering, US, Changing the Conversation: Messages for Improving Public Understanding of Engineering. The National Academies Press, 2008. [9] S. D. Sheppard, K. Macatangay, A. Colby, and W. M. Sullivan, Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field. Jossey-Bass, 2008.[10] National Academy of Engineering, US

Conference Session

Design Throughout the Mechanical Engineering Curriculum II

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James M. Widmann, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Peter Schuster, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

attitudes and experiences, was gathered through a post classsurvey.IntroductionImportant publications from the last 15 years such as Sheppard et. al.’s Educating Engineers1,Bransford’s How People Learn2, Duderstadt’s Engineering for a Changing World3 and the NAE’sEducating the Engineer of 20204 have all called for a deep and introspective look at howengineering education is currently “delivered” and what changes might be necessary to improvestudent outcomes. One movement that has emerged as promising pedagogy is that of ActiveLearning. Active Learning consists of a set of teaching/learning classroom strategies that engagethe students directly in the learning process and requires them to think about what they are doing.5This is contrasted with the

Conference Session

Thermodynamics, Fluids, and Heat Transfer I

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David C. Zietlow, Bradley University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

the definition of isentropic efficiency(ߟ௦ ሻ since it relates the ideal rate of work൫ࢃሶ࢏࢔ ௦ ൯, where you can find the state of the refrigerantat the outlet, to the actual rate of work ൫ࢃሶ࢏࢔ ൯ as displayed in Equation 8. ࣁ࢙ ൌ ࢃሶ࢏࢔ ࢙ ⁄ࢃሶ࢏࢔ Equation 8 The ideal rate of work is the power required for the ideal compressor where no disorder Page 24.958.8or entropy (s) is created in the process. This can only occur in an isentropic process (s=constant)which is frictionless and without the transfer of heat (adiabatic). The isentropic efficiency wasspecified earlier when

Conference Session

Machine Design Related

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

John A. Mirth, St. Cloud State University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

advertising”. This might require a weekly email to the team managersto remind them of their specific duties and encourage them to guide the team in their roleswithout micromanaging specific roles.On the whole, the METE format has met and exceeded initial expectations for creating astructured environment where students can practice and improve their teamworking skills.References[1] ABET (2020). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2020-2021,https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2020-2021/#GC3, accessed Sept. 9, 2020.[2] S. Sangelkar, B. Mertz, A. Bernal, and P. Cunningham. “Benchmarking Teaming InstructionAcross a Curriculum”, in Proceedings of the ASEE 2019 Annual Conference

Conference Session

Mechanics & Mechanics Related

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Emma Treadway, Trinity University; Jessica E.S. Swenson, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York (CoE); Aaron W. Johnson, University of Colorado Boulder

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri & B.M. Olds, Eds., 2014, pp. 103-118.[2] J. Gainsburg, “The Mathematical Disposition of Structural Engineers,” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 447-506, Nov. 2007.[3] D. Hammer, F. Goldberg, and S. Fargason, “Responsive teaching and the beginnings of energy in a third grade classroom,” Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education, vol. 6 no. 1, pp. 51-72, 2012.[4] J. E. Swenson, A. W. Johnson, T. G. Chambers, and L. Hirshfield, “Exhibiting Productive Beginnings of Engineering Judgment during Open-Ended Modeling Problems in an Introductory Mechanics of Materials Course," in Proceedings of the American Society of

Conference Session

Capstone Design

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Brian J. Novoselich, United States Military Academy; James E. Bluman, United States Military Academy; Rebecca Zifchock, United States Military Academy; Matthew Dabkowski, United States Military Academy

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

Intro to ME course provided anegative impact on the capstone design program. Faculty indicated a need to further integrateelements of the design process across the curriculum. The results provide ME faculty insightsinto how implementation of an Intro to ME course may affect the capstone design process attheir own institutions.IntroductionDesign is an essential element of engineering practice [1]. Early design experiences forundergraduate engineering students in the United States has been an increasing trend since thelate 1980’s, motivated by a recognition that undergraduate engineering students often began theirexposure to this fundamental concept late in their engineering studies [2]. This exposure todesign processes typically happened in a

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Technical Session: Fluid Mechanics

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kamau Wright, University of Hartford; Ivana Milanovic, University of Hartford; Tom A. Eppes, University of Hartford

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

addition, each assignment has Grading Criteria with valuable clues on various simulation aspects such as footnotes, hyperlinks, and an Appendix featuring multiple examples that are relevant to the given simulation. 3. Students’ final grade is determined by performance on simulation assignments and three exams. Assignments have two components: structured (with step-by-step instructions) and unstructured (IBL). We use interviews with students throughout the semester and after the course(s), as well as instructors’ observations to tweak individual assignments and the overall simulation assignment line-up for the upcoming semester. 4. Our online environment is the Blackboard® learning management system (LMS

Conference Session

Accreditation Issues

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kenneth Van Treuren, Baylor University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

significant impact on a student’s attitude and motivation toward heattransfer.Bibliography Page 13.153.91. Berg, R, and Nasr, K., 2002, “Achieving Those Difficult ABET Program Educational Outcomes Through a Capstone Design Course,” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, June 16-19, 2002.2. Robinson, M, and Sutterer, K, 2004, “The ASCE BOK – A Case Study of the Evaluation and Design of a BOK Curriculum, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, June 20-23, 2004.3. Lord, S, 2005, “Fabulous Fridays: Satisfying ABET 2000 Criterion I ad J in an

Conference Session

Innovations in ME Laboratory Instruction

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Guido Lopez, Old Dominion University; Ilya Leipunsky, Russian Academy of Science; Nadezda Berezkina, Russian Academy of Sciences

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

crack is possible due to the concentration of coffee particles at the opening of the crack.In general, Penetrant Testing (PT) involves the following steps: (1) pre-cleaning and surfacepreparation of the part under test, (2) selection and application of visible or fluorescent dyes thatare capable to penetrate discontinuities by capillary action, (3) penetrant dwelling, i.e.: allowingthe penetrant to stay in contact with the surface for a suitable period of time, (4) removal ofexcess penetrant using special solvents and/or emulsifiers, (5) extraction of penetrant by specialdevelopers and, subsequent inspection of discontinuities, and (6) post-cleaning of the part(s)tested in order to remove developer and residual

Conference Session

Student Learning and Assessment

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Raghu Echempati, Kettering University; Enayat Mahajerin, Saginaw Valley State University; Anca Sala, Baker College

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

extent. As mentioned before, several assessmenttools have been identified such as classwork/homework, quizzes/exams and projects.Sincere attempt is made to refer to the CLOs while designing the contents of theassessment tools used. For example, each exam question clearly stated the concept beingtested in that question, and to what extent that question addresses the CLO(s) and how itmaps the PO(s). Students were informed where this information will be used. The statedCLO(s) is/are assumed to be satisfied based on their achieving a certain grade on thatquestion. This is repeated for all assessment tools used in this course, particularly for thefinal project, in which the students used math and CAE tools to a great extent. At first, itlooks like

Conference Session

Capstone Design Projects in Mechanical Engineering

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kelley Racicot, Washington State University; Charles Pezeshki, Washington State University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

/ir/library/pdf/erm0452.pdf7. Olds, B., Moskal, B., & Miller, R. (2005). Assessment in Engineering Education: Evolution, Approaches and Future Collaborations. Journal of Engineering Education. 94(1) 13-26.8. Pellegrino, J.W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (Eds.) (2001), Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.9. Sahney, S., Banwet, D.K., & Karunes, S. (2004). Conceptualizing Total Quality Management in Higher Education. TQM Magazine, 16(2) 145-159.10. Tsoukas, H. (2005). Complex Knowledge: Studies in Organizational Epistemology. Oxford Press

Conference Session

Incorporating Projects into the Curriculum

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shanzhong (Shawn) Duan, South Dakota State University; Li Qian, South Dakota State University; Teresa Hall, South Dakota State University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

11.1433.12Bibliography1. Amirouche, F. M. L. (1992). Computational Methods for Multibody Dynamics. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.2. Anderson, K. S. and Critchley, J. H. (2003). Improved order-N performance algorithm for the simulation ofconstraint multi-rigid-body systems,” Multibody System Dynamics, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2003, pp.185 – 212.3. Anderson, K.S. and Duan, S. Z. (2000). Highly Parallelizable Low Order Dynamics Algorithm for ComplexMulti-Rigid-Body Systems. AIAA Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics. Vol. 23, No. 2, March-April, 2000,pp. 355-364.4. Barrott, J. L. (2001). Why Should Case Studies be Integrated into the Engineering Technology Curriculum.Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &

Conference Session

Teams, Teaching, Leadership, and Technical Communications in Mechanical Engineering

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kenneth W. Van Treuren, Baylor University; Cynthia C. Fry, Baylor University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

Paper ID #19162Teams and Team Building at Baylor University: Why Should We Do This andWhere Should It Occur in the Curriculum?Dr. Kenneth W. Van Treuren, Baylor University Ken Van Treuren is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering at Baylor University. He received his B. S. in Aeronautical Engineering from the USAF Academy in Colorado Springs, Colorado and his M. S. in Engineering from Princeton University in Princeton, New Jersey. After serving as USAF pilot in KC-135 and KC-10 aircraft, he completed his DPhil in Engineering Sciences at the University of Oxford, United Kingdom and returned to the USAF Academy

Conference Session

Undergraduate Research and a Force and Moment Lab

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Xiaobin Le P.E., Wentworth Institute of Technology; Richard L. Roberts, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Herb Connors; Vitaliy Victorovich Saykin, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Mohammed Khalid Alhuwayrini

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

research results.4. References[1]. Xiaobin Le, Masoud Olia, Ali Moazed and Richard L. Roberts, “Design a new set of strength labs for the course of Mechanics of Material,” the 2016 ASEE annual conference, June 26- 29, 2016, New Orleans, LA, USA.[2]. Yeh, C., “Undergraduate Research Projects For Engineering Technology Students”, the 2003 ASEE Annual Conference, June 22-25, 2003, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.[3]. Nambisan, S., “Involving Undergraduate and High School Students In Research: Opportunities, Challenges, And Rewards”, the 2004 ASEE Annual Conference, June 20-23, 2004, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.[4]. Ekenseair, A., & Bayer, C., & Phillips, M., “Impact Of Integration Of Undergraduate Students In An Engineering

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jacob Chapman; Sanjivan Manoharan, Grand Valley State University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

Figure 8: Zoomed in view for inflation layer Table 1: CFD Parameters Chord Length 100 mm Turbulence Model Spalart Allmaras Momentum Second Order Upwind Pressure-Velocity Coupling Simple Inlet Velocity 30 m/s Air Temperature 300 K Air Density 1.225 Kg/m3 Air Viscosity 1.7894x10-5 Kg/(m*s) Outlet gauge Pressure 0 Pa Wall

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gregory Martin Freisinger, U.S. Military Academy; Richard Melnyk, U.S. Military Academy; Brian J. Novoselich, U.S. Military Academy

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

) Andragogy's transition into the future: Meta-analysis ofandragogy and its search for a measurable instrument. MPAEA Journal of Adult Education. 38(1):p. 1-11.13 Caruth, Gail D. "Meeting the Needs of Older Students in Higher Education." Online Submission1.2 (2014): 21-35.14 J. S. Eccles and A. Wigfield, “Motivational Beliefs, Values, and Goals,” Annu. Rev. Psychol.,vol. 53, pp. 109–132, 2002.15 Arnett, J.J. (2000) Emerging adulthood. A theory of development from the late teens throughthe twenties. The American psychologist. 55(5): p. 469-80.16 Arnett, J.J. (2004), Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through thetwenties, New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.17 Arnett, J.J. (2007), Adolescence and emerging adulthood: A

Conference Session

Design Throughout the Mechanical Engineering Curriculum II

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Pamela L. Dickrell, University of Florida; Ira Jerome Hill, University of Florida; Philip Jackson, University of Florida

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

attendance at lectures: Effect on examination performance. In International Conference on Engineering Education (pp. 3-7). 4. Prince, M., & Felder, R. (2007). The many faces of inductive teaching and learning. Journal of College Science Teaching, 36(5), 14. 5. Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of engineering education, 95(2), 123-138. 6. Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2003). Learning by doing. Chemical engineering education, 37(4), 282-309. 7. Kresta, S., (1998). Hands-on Demonstrations: An Alternative to Full Scale Lab Experiments, Journal of Engineering Education, 87(1), 7-9.8. Kober, N., (2015