, P., “Finite Element Learning Modules for Undergraduate Engineering Topics using Commercial Software,” Mechanical Engineering Division, Proceedings of the 2008 American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburg, PA, June 22-25, 2008.2. Brown, A., Wood, K., Kaufman, K., Jensen, D., Rencis, J.J., and White, C., “A Novel Assessment Methodology for Active Learning Modules to Equitably Enhance Engineering Education,” Proceedings of the 2009 American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition, Austin, TX, June 14-17, 2009.3. Coffman, J., Liu, J., Brown, A., Terdalkar, S., and Rencis, J., “Finite Element Learning Module for
ways this is not the idealmechanism of matching expertise. The most experienced person delivers rather standard lectures(close to the text and PowerPoints or lecture notes) with little interactions. The person to whomstudents can take their questions, frustrations and confusions is often far less experienced. Itmight be akin to having the physicians taking medical history and vital signs, while difficultdiagnosis is referred to the nursing staff (or physician assistants). By far, the most expensivecomponent of teaching is faculty time. T.A.’s are usually the second most costly resource sincethere are often as many as four required in larger class). One of the key initial motivations for
Engineering Courses. Proceedings of the 2012 ASEE Congress. 4. Fink, L. D. Creating Significant Learning Experiences: An Integrated Approach to Designing College Courses. Jossey-Bass, 2003. 5. Gross, S. P, D.W. Dinehart, J.R. Yost, and A. Radlinska. Overarching Problems in Sophomore Mechanics Courses. Proceedings of the 2011 ASEE Congress. AC 2011-691. 6. Kachka, P. Understanding the Flipped Classroom. Faculty Focus, Oct. 23/24, 2012. http://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/teaching-with-technology-articles/understanding-the-flipped- classroom-part-1/ Retrieved 1/7/2013. 7. CamStudio. http://www.camstudio.org Retrieved 1/7/2013. 8. Olson, B. W. A Practical Application of Team Based Learning to Undergraduate
/education/18cram.html, May 17, 2009 (last accessed May 19, 2021)S. Freeman, S. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, and M. Wenderoth, "Active LearningIncreases Student Performance in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics." Proceedings of the National Academy ofSciences, vol. 111, no. 23, pp. 8410-8415, 2014.J.Giancola and R. Kahlenberg, "TRUE MERIT: Ensuring Our Brightest Students Have Access to Our Best Collegesand Universities," https://www.jkcf.org/research/true-merit-ensuring-our-brightest-students-have-access-to-our-best-colleges-and-universities/, Jack Kent Foundation, (last accessed May 19, 2021), January 2016.K. Hew and C. Lo, "Flipped Classroom Improves Student Learning in Health Professions Education: A Meta-Analysis
classes. It is hoped that other solidmechanics and machine design instructors will be inspired from this paper and similarly createand share their teaching tools.AcknowledgementThe author would like to acknowledge and thank Dr.Takafumi Asaki for his contribution andassistance in printing several of the learning aids described in this paper and solving manytechnical difficulties.References[1] S. Ford and T. Minshall, "Invited review article: Where and how 3D printing is used inteaching and education," Additive Manufacturing, vol. 25, pp. 131–150, 2019.[2] P. P. Rodenbough, W. B. Vanti and S.-W. Chan, "3D-printing crystallographic unit cells forlearning materials science and engineering," Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 92, pp. 1960–1962, 2015
motioncontrol system. The functionality of each block, such as the user interface, motion controller,feedback sensors, is briefly introduced followed by example hardware used in industry to buildthese blocks.Module 2 Motion Profile - (3 lectures) examines how the motion profile is generated when an axisof a machine makes a move. After an overview of basic kinematics, trapezoidal and S-curvevelocity profiles are explained.Module 3 Drive-train Design - (7 lectures) is on mechanical design of a motion axis. It primarilyconcentrates on proper selection of a motor and gearbox to meet the desired motion profilerequirements of the axis. Concepts of inertia reflection, torque reflection and inertia ratio areintroduced. Five types of transmission mechanisms are
/object/uuid:ae3b30e3-5380-4a07-afb5- dafd30b7b433?collection=research.[2] C. L. Dym, A. M. Agogino, O. Eris, D. D. Frey, and L. J. Leifer, “Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning,” IEEE Eng. Manag. Rev., 2006, doi: 10.1109/emr.2006.1679078.[3] V. Taajamaa, S. Kirjavainen, L. Repokari, H. Sjoman, T. Utriainen, and T. Salakoski, “Dancing with ambiguity design thinking in interdisciplinary engineering education,” in 2013 IEEE-Tsinghua International Design Management Symposium: Design-Driven Business Innovation, TIDMS 2013 - Proceedings, 2014, doi: 10.1109/TIDMS.2013.6981258.[4] M. Hannafin, S. Land, and K. Oliver, “Open learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models,” in
. S. Bjorklund and N. Fortenberry, “Measuring Student and Faculty Engagement in Engineering Education”, CASEE Report, National Academy of Engineering, 2005. 2. L. Lattuca, P. Terenzini, and J. Volkwein, “Engineering Change: A Study of the Impact of EC 2000”, Pennsylvania State University, 2006. 3. B. Olds, B. Moskal and R. Miller, “Assessment in Engineering Education: Evolution, Approaches, and Future Collaborationa”, Journal of Engineering Education, V. 94, No.1, 2005. 4. 2003-04 Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, ABET, Baltimore, MD 2002. 5. S. Bjorklund, J. Parente, and D. Sathianathan, “Effects of Faculty Interaction and Feedback on Gains in Student Skills”, Journal of Engineering
toseparate them. Future studies will be expanded to discern students’ motivations behind thesestudy habits.VI. References1. Beichner, R.J., J.M. Saul, R.J. Allain, D.L. Deardorff, D.S. Abbott, “Introduction to SCALE-UP:Student- Centered Activities for Large Enrollment University Physics,” Proceedings 2000 American Society for Engineering Education National Conference.2. Benson, L.C., S. B. Biggers, W. F. Moss, M. Ohland, M. K. Orr, and S. D. Schiff, “Adapting and Implementing the SCALE-UP Approach in Statics, Dynamics, and Multivariate Calculus.” Proceedings of the 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. Honolulu, HI.3. Biggers, S.B. Engineering Mechanics: Dynamics & Statics, an
compare with othervehicles, it is customary to solve for the rolling resistance coefficient(s) and thecoefficient of drag. These values provide insight into the causes of the road load forceand let the designer compare values with other vehicles.Equation 1.1 can then be substituted into equation 1.2, providing a relationship betweenthe two unknown parameters µ 0 and CD, and the vehicle speed and rate of deceleration.By measuring the vehicle speed and deceleration (and by also determining the frontalarea and air density), we can solve for the rolling resistance and the coefficient of drag.These coefficients can then be used to predict the motion of the vehicle in response tovarying tractive effort and conditions.The simplest method to determine
application materials were anapplication form, resumé, statement of purpose essay, transcript, two letters of recommendation,and ranked list of at least two preferred projects. The application form requested student contactinformation, college/university, academic major(s)/minor(s), and GPA. The program wasadvertised through a promotional email message that contained basic program information andreferred potential applicants to the REU website for detailed information. The email wasdistributed to undergraduate engineering students at SMU, contacts at other universities whopreviously agreed to distribute the email at their institutions, and the Women in EngineeringProgram Advocates Network (WEPAN) nationwide list-serve.Participants were selected from
.1,2,11,12 The wind tunnel has a test section measuringapproximately 12 in x 12 in x 24 in (305mm x 305mm x 610mm), and has a maximum air speedof approximately 140 mph (63 m/s). It is instrumented with an electronic strain-gage basedbalance for measurements of normal force, axial force, pitching moment, and pressuredistribution as a function of air speed and angle of attack. Both manual as well as electronicpressure sensing is available on this facility. An electronic pressure scanning unit containing 32individual electronic pressure sensors is also used in conjunction with this facility. This latterunit can be used to provide real-time visualization of the pressure distribution in the wind tunnel,in much the same manner as it has been used to
. Future work will also be performed to construct an adequate propeller to test thegenerator under low-wind speed conditions. 7. Acknowledgements The authors would like to express appreciation to the Office of the Interim Vice Provost forGraduate Studies, Undergraduate Research Initiative program at UTPA for the financial supportto develop this undergraduate research project. 8. References[1] Cho, Chang K.; Yun, Myung Hwan; Yoon, Chang S.; Lee, Myun W. 1999. Ergonomic study on the optimal gear ratio for a multi-speed bicycle. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, v 23, n 1-2, January, p 95-100[2] Reed, Justin; Venkataramanan, Giri; Rose, Jonathan. 2008
excitement about the discipline of mechanicalengineering by itself, and as it intersects other, emerging disciplines.REFERENCES[1] Sweller, J. 1994. Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty and instructional design. Learning and Instruction 4: 295–312.[2] Kalyuga, S., P. Chandler, and J. Sweller.. 1998. Levels of expertise and instructional design. Human Factors 40: 1–17.[3] Pollock, E., P. Chandler, and J. Sweller. 2002. Assimilating complex information. Learning and Instruction. 12, no.1: 61–86.[4] Sweller, J., J. Van Merriënboer, and F. Paas. 1998. Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review 10 no.3: 251–296.[5] Renkl, A., and R. Atkinson. 2003. Structure the transition
and Telecommunications, pp. 3638-3643, June 27, 2005, http://www.alicebot.org/articles/Learner.pdf.27. Ueno, M., “Animated Agent to Maintain Learner’s Attention In E-Learning,” World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, Vol. 1, pp. 194-201, 2004, http://dl.aace.org/16395.28. Domagk, S. and Niegemann, H. M., “The Effect of Pedagogical Agents on Student’s Motivation and the Learning Outcomes,” C. P. Constantinou, D. Demetriou, A. Evagorou, M. Evagorou, A. Kofteros, M. Micheal, C. Nicolaou, D. Papademetriou and N. Papadouris (eds.), Proceedings of the 11th European Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI), University of Cyprus, Cyprus, Greece, p. 200, 2005, http
driven by the machine events start, finish,break, and repair. The combined behavior of multiple finite state machines is generally characterized by anoperation called parallel composition. The idea being that if two machines share an event, thenthe occurrence of that event in each of the machines must be synchronized. If a machine has anevent that is not shared, then that event may occur without regard to the other machines. Page 11.829.4 I f r s W
materials.References[1] L. D. Feisel and A. J. Rosa, The role of the laboratory in undergraduate engineering education, Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 121-130, 2005.[2] E. Crawley, J. Malmqvist, S. Ostlund, and D. Brodeur, Rethinking engineering education, The CDIO Approach, vol. 302, pp. 60-62, 2007.[3] G. D. Catalano and K. Catalano, Transformation: from teacher-centered to student-centered engineering education, Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 59-64, 1999.[4] D. Herzog, V. Seyda, E. Wycisk, and C. Emmelmann, Additive manufacturing of metals, Acta Materialia, vol. 117, pp. 371-392, 2016.[5] J. O. Milewski, Additive manufacturing of metals, Applied Mechanics and Materials
undergraduates in mechanical engineering.To complete this project, students should go through these steps: investigation and survey,conceptual design, modeling and simulation, detailed design, fabrication and assembly,prototype and test. It can be found that these steps are highly in accordance with a generalscientific research or an actual engineering project (Fig. 1). To be more specific, “handwritingrobot” should be capable of drawing lines and arc (for basic level), writing alphabets andsimple Chinese characters (for intermediate level) and writing complex Chinese characters(for advanced level) while lifting and dropping the pen. The main performance indicators arethe stroke not less than 350 mm, speed not slower than 30 mm/s, and largest
institutional ranking as weighted factors in a multi-variate analysis.References[1] H. O. Aintablian and T. Ghirmai, "Correlation of admission data to undergraduate student success in electrical engineering," in American Society for Engineering Education Conference, Columbus, 2017.[2] E. Cohn, S. Cohn, D. C. Balch and J. J. Bradley, "Determinants of undergraduate GPAs: SAT scores, high-school GPA and high-school rank," Economics of Education Review, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 577-586, 2004.[3] T. Coyle, A. Snyder, D. Pillow and P. Kochunov, "SAT Predicts GPA better for high ability subjects: implications for Spearman's Law of Diminishing Returns," Personality and Inividual Differences, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 470-474, 2011.[4] P. Cyrenne and A
Learning and Teaching, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 277-284, June 2009.[8] Harrison, R., and Thomas, M., “Identity in Online Communities: Social Networking Sites andLanguage Learning,” International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society, vol. 7, no. 2,pp. 109-124, 2009.[9] Brady, K., Holcomb, L., and Smith, B., “The Use of Alternative Social Networking Sites inHigher Educational Settings: A Case Study of the E-Learning Benfits of Ning in Education,”Journal of Interactive Online Learning, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 151-170, 2010.[10] Hung, H., and Yuen, S., “Educational Use of Social Networking Technology in HigherEducation,” Teaching in Higher Education, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 703-714, 2010.[11] Chan, P. Graham-Day, K., Ressa, V., Peters, M., and Konrad, M
within the structure or mechanism can these external loads generate a reaction? 3. How can these forces be identified and calculated? 4. Will the weight of a member influence support reactions or the motion generated? 5. Can the orientation of the structural members influence the load distribution? 6. In what direction(s) will loads on members or connectors be generated? 7. What is the configuration of the structural members on the bridge or crane? Will they affect the calculations? 8. What assumptions can be made for the given structure or mechanism in order to carry out specific calculations? 9. Is the type of cross-sectional area of structural members important in design? If so, why? 10. How can a free-body diagram (FBD) be
Northridge were able to graduate as mechanical engineerstrained to think, design, and operate using system-level skills.Bibliography[1] Kirkpatrick, A., & Danielson, S., ASME VISION 2030’S RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MECHANICALENGINEERING EDUCATION. Paper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition[2] Youssef, G., & Kabo, J. M., Machine Design: Redesigned Paper presented at 2015 ASEE AnnualConference and Exposition[3] Katz, R., Integrating Analysis and Design in Mechanical Engineering Education Procedia CIRP, Volume36, 2015[4] Towhidnejad, M., & Hillburn, T., An Overview of GRCSE: Graduate Reference Curriculum for SystemsEngineering Paper presented at World Congress on Engineering Education 2013[5] Lee, T
students abilities and comfort levels in solving open-‐ended design problems. References 1) Simon, H. A., “The Science of the Artificial”, 3rd ed., Cambridge, Mass.s: MIT Press, 1996. 2) Smith, K. A., Sheppard S. D., Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., “Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom-‐Based Practices”, Journal of Engineering Education, (2005) 3) MacGregor, J., Cooper, J., Smith, K., and Rbinson, P., eds., “Strategies for Energizing Large Classes: Page 26.1466.12From Small Groups to Learning Communties”, New
International Design Engieneering Technical Concferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference 2009, pp. 1-11.[4] Grose T. K., 2012 “Wow the Audience”. ASEE Prism, http://www.prism-magazine.org/dec12/tt_01.cfm[5] Nicometo C., Anderson K.J.B., Courter S., McGlamery T., NathansKelly T., “Vital Skills in Engineering: Communication”. School of Education: University of Wisconsin-Madison, http://www.cirtl.net/files/Communication.pdf[6] Lindberg V., 2000, http://www.rit.edu/cos/uphysics/uncertainties/Uncertaintiespart1.html#systematic.[7] Gupta S.V., 2012, Measurement Uncertainties. Physical Parameters and Calibration of Instruments, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.[8] Kandlikar S., Campbell, L.A, 2002. Effect of entrance
Identity: An Organizational Case Study” SA J. Ind. Psychol. Vol. 38 no.2, Caper Town Jan. 2012. 3. Chambers, Z., & Herniter, M., & Callanan, L., and Prabhu, S. (2007, June), Development Of Model Based Design Curriculum Paper presented at 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii. https://peer.asee.org/2018 4. Jovanovic, V. M., & Goris, T. V., Djuric, A. M., Katsioloudis, P. J., Luetke, N. J., Moustafa, M. R., and Matrood, B. (2015, June), Integration of Mechatronics Design Approach into Teaching of Modeling Practices Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.24337 5. Herniter, M.E., Chambers, Z., Prabhu, S,M
, because I had a partner for the quiz. The feeling of letting down my teammate is unbearable to me. Unfortunately, I’ve found that, on occasion, my teammate did not have the same thought process as I did. The last comment above, and those immediately below, show many students found working with a partner motivated them to prepare as well as they could for the quizzes. In my case, i felt more of a responsibility to do well on the quizzes, because it was not only my grade being affected, but someone else’s grade as well I believe that the quizzes helped motivate me to work the practice problems because when taking a small group quiz you have to be able to help your partner(s). When we
notes, they should be prepared toinvestigate other systems to support students with diverse needs.Acknowledgements:This study was made possible because of the work and collaboration of a several important parties. Firstly Dr.Zhaojian Li, who generously provided notes and implemented the intervention into his MechanicalEngineering Analysis class, and Neil Haakenson, who graded, organized and anonymized the data for thisstudy.References:[1] Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering education, 78(7), 674-681.[2] Montgomery, S. M., & Groat, L. N. (1998). Student learning styles and their implication for teaching (Vol. 10). Centre for Research on Learning and
deployed a bomb finding robot named the LynchBot to Iraq late in 2004 and then again in 2006 deployed about a dozen more improved LynchBots to Iraq. His team also assisted in the deployment of 84 TACMAV systems in 2005. Around that time he volunteered as a science advisor and worked at the Rapid Equipping Force during the summer of 2005 where he was exposed to a number of unmanned systems technologies. His initial group composed of about 6 S&T grew to nearly 30 between 2003 and 2010 as he transitioned from a Branch head to an acting Division Chief. In 2010-2012 he again was selected to teach Mathematics at the United States Military Academy West Point. Upon returning to ARL’s Vehicle Technology Directorate from West
, Australian Council for Educational Research volume 9, number 3, 2015. 3. Pedagogical Model, Education and Training, Victoria State Government, Australia. https://www.education.vic.gov.au/Documents/school/teachers/teachingresources/pract ice/pedagogicalmodel.pdf Downloaded on 17th November 2019 4. McLeod, S. A. (2019). What Is the zone of proximal development? . Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/Zone-of-Proximal-Development.html 5. AaVonGlaserfeld, E. (1989). Constructivism in Education. In T. Husen and T.N. Postlethwaite (eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Education, Supplement. Oxford/New York, Pergamon Press. 6. Devdas Shetty, Lou Manzione, and Ahad Ali, Survey of Mechatronic Techniques
faculty members in their discipline andtheir academic unit, and if their requirements are “Comparable” to faculty in their academic unitbut not in their discipline, and “Comparable” to faculty in other departments in their College.Finally, participants were asked to rate the following impediments on their likelihood ofinfluencing the tenure process: • Teaching load requirements, • Expectation of peer-reviewed journal publications, • Service expectations, • Availability of funds for research in their fields • Appreciation for area of research by tenure review committee(s) • Competition within department for funds, • Availability of Teaching Assistants (TA) to assist with grading, • Availability of students to employ as