student’s progress: Assessing student progress in freshman engineering”, Frontiers inEducation Conference, 2012.[5] Kemppainen, A., Amato-Henderson, S., Hein, G., “Work in progress – refining a technicalcommunication rubric for first-year engineering instructors”, ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in EducationConference, 2010.[6] Clua, O., Feldgen, M., “A first course in operating systems with and without rubrics”,Frontiers in Education Conference, 2011.
., Gillet, D., and Huguenin, P., “Introduction to Real-time Control using LabVIEW with an Application to Distance Learning,” Int. J. of Engineering Education, Vol. 16, No. 5, 2000, pp. 372–384. [9] Reck, R. M., “BYOE: Affordable and Portable Laboratory Kit for Controls Courses,” 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2015 , Paper ID: 13467.[10] Schinstock, D., McGahee, K., and Smith, S., “Engaging students in control systems using a balancing robot in a mechatronics course,” 2016 American Control Conference (ACC), IEEE, 2016, pp. 6658–6663.[11] Bay, C. J. and Rasmussen, B. P., “Exploring controls education: A re-configurable ball and plate platform kit,” 2016 American Control Conference (ACC), IEEE, 2016, pp. 6652
/2015/05/E001-15-16-EAC-Criteria-03-10-15.pdf)[4] S. Rabinovich, Measurement Errors and Uncertainties: Theory and Practice, 3rd Edition,Springer, 2005.[5] R. Budynas and K. Nisbett, Shigley's Mechanical Engineering Design, 10th Edition,McGraw-Hill Education, 2014.
peer group is that there are many problems for students towork, and each student throughout the course of a fifty minute class will work three problemsand “host” a problem as a peer tutor. In class, these progressive peer groups are called “FunkyFridays”; they were implemented on a weekly basis as a way to practice the topic(s) of the week.The name gave the cue that this was a regular, ongoing expectation.The progressive peer group is implemented as follows: the instructor prepares at least fourdifferent problems for students to work. Students are randomly grouped in threes and assigned anexercise to work. Playing cards are an easy way to help direct students to minimize time lostduring moves, and are an easy way to continually mix students
: Applications, Analysis &Measurement [per ASME Y14.5-2009],” James D. Meadows & Associates, Inc. and ASMEPress, 2009.[12] www.stratasys.com, "Dimension Elite User Guide," Document #204400-0002, 2007.[13] Ameta, G., Lipman, R., Moylan, S., Witherell, P., "Investigating the Role of GeometricDimensioning and Tolerancing in Additive Manufacturing," Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol.137(11), 2015.[14] Robbins, N. B., Heiberger, R. M., "Plotting Likert and Other Rating Scales," Joint StatisticalMeeting, Section on Survey Research Methods, 2011.
. References1. Canino J. V. 2015. “Comparing student performance in thermodynamics using the flipped classroom and think- pair-share pedagogies.” ASEE Paper ID Paper ID #11,334. 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, June 14–17, 2015.2. Swartz, B., S. B. Velegol, and J. A. Laman 2013. “Three approaches to flipping CE courses: Faculty perspectives and suggestions.” ASEE Paper ID Paper ID #7982. 120th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 23–26, 2013.3. Lape, N. K. and R. Levy. 2014. “Probing the inverted classroom: A controlled study of teaching and learning outcomes in undergraduate engineering and mathematics.” ASEE Paper ID Paper ID #9475. 121st ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Indianapolis, June 23–26, 2014.
internet-based system for generating and delivering homework problems. Presentation and Mini-course at the Joint Meeting of the American Mathematical Society and the Mathematical Association of America (New Orleans, LA, January 2001).9. Moodle https://moodle.org (accessed in January 2016)10. Hauk, S. and A. Segalla. 2005. Student perceptions of the web-based homework program WeBWork in moderate enrollment college algebra classes. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching. 24(3): 229–253.11. Adak, M.F., Yumuşak, N. (2013). Hpcs: A Web based Homework & Project Control System, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (special issue: 4th International Conference on New Horizons in Education
making the inverted format work for a large undergraduate course.Bibliography1. Bligh, D.A., What’s the use of lectures?. San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass, 2000.2. B. Morin, K. M. Kecskemety, K. A. Harper, P. A. Clingan, “The Inverted Classroom in a First-Year Engineering Course,” 120th ASEE Conference & Exposition, June 23-26, 2013, Atlanta.3. G. S. Mason, T. R. Shuman, K. E. Cook, “Comparing the Effectiveness of an Inverted Classroom to a Traditional Classroom in an Upper-Division Engineering Course,” IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 56, No. 4, November 2013.4. Bishop, J.L. and M.A. Verleger. The Flipped Classroom: A Survey of the Research. in 2013 ASEE Annual Conference. 2013. Atlanta, GA: American Society for Engineering
students are formed by random assignment. Each team member's agreed-upon task(s) must be clearly defined and well documented in a group report that accompanies thefinal deliverables.Each team must create a 3-D CAD model of the p-v-T surface in any CAD software package thatis royalty-free for the public, open source, or commercially available with free student license.Packages from AutoDesk, for example, have been made available for all students without cost,while TurboCAD offers free trial period, and Google SketchUp is freely available to the public.Specialized commercial software such as SolidWorks and Creo are also allowed if it has alreadybeen installed on campus computers, so that no additional licensing cost will be incurred.Proficiency in
size reeducation and quick response time, to the system. This projectcovered major technical disciplines of mechatronics engineering. It also provided a real-worldengineering design practice for students. The successful completion of the project confirmed theeffectiveness of the Mechatronics curriculum for students’ multidisciplinary learning and practicalcompetence. Moreover, the ground work established in this project provides a valuable bench-marking system for Mechatronics students and classes in which various control designs areempirically evaluated. Page 26.518.12References[1] Norman S. Nise, Control Systems Engineering 6th edition, ISBN
Page 26.564.13a freshman through capstone product development sequence.Bibliography 1. Cooper, Robin. Kaplan, Robert S. “Profit Priorities from Activity-Based Costing”. Harvard Business Review. PP 130-135. May-June 1991. 2. Charney, Cyril. “Time to Market: Reducing Product Lead Time”. Society of Manufacturing Engineers. 1991. 3. “Vocational Education in the United States: The Early 1990s”. Institute of Education Sciences. U.S. Dept. of Education. 4. “Reality Check: The U.S. Job Market and Students' Academy and Career Paths Necessitate Enhanced Vocational Education in High Schools”. NFA Research. March 2012. 5. Sirkin, Harold L. “To Ease the Skills Shortage, Bring Back the Vocational High School
department and is an advocate of using hands-on-learning tools to help develop strong math, science and engineering foundations.Dr. Joel M Bach, Colorado School of Mines Associate Professor, Mechanical Engineering, Colorado School of Mines Page 26.1089.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Letting students learn through making mistakes: Teaching hardware and software early in an academic career.IntroductionIt is difficult in today’s society to teach students that it is indeed acceptable to fail at something,as long as you can learn from that initial (or many) attempt(s
used to evaluate each individual milestone.A high weighting factor was assigned to “Degree of Completion” to encourage the team to stayon track and not let the project fall behind schedule. This milestone system added structure tothe project and increased timeliness, but the instructors were confronted with an unanticipatedside effect. If a milestone was completed poorly, and the student(s) received an appropriatelylow grade, there was no motivation to fix the problematic issues. Later, another student wouldneed to put in extra work to compensate for the first weak performance. A corrective action wasnecessary to hold the original student responsible for completing the task without letting the teamfall behind. In the year following the
curriculum on graduation rates and studentsatisfaction: A fundamentals of engineering design course. Proceedings of the 2001 American society ofengineering education annual longitudinal study. Journal of engineering education (Washington, D.C.).2004;93(1):23.[5] Knight DW, Carlson LE, Sullivan J. In: Improving engineering student retention through hands-on,team based, first-year design projects. Proceedings of the international conference on research inengineering education; 2007.[6] Tinto V. Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. University of ChicagoPress, 5801 S. Ellis Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637; 1987.[7] Anderson-Rowland MR. In: Understanding freshman engineering student retention through a survey.Proceedings
determinethe best techniques.References[1] Davis, Barbara G., Tools for Teaching, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, CA, 1993.[2] Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F., (1991) Applying the Seven Principle for Good Practice inUndergraduate Education, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.[3] Brown, B.L., “New learning strategies for generation X”. ERIC Digest, 1997, 184.[4] Swartz, B., Velegol, S., and Laman, J. “Three Approaches to Flipping CE Courses: Faculty Perspectives andSuggestions”, American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2014,p.23.1249.1-14.[5] Berrett, Dan, “How ‘Flipping’ the Classroom Can Improve the Traditional Lecture.” The Education Digest 78.1,2012: 36-41. ProQuest Education Journals. Web. 13 Mar 2013
workshop,although most responses described some aspect of the hands-on engagement.Finally, students reported the workshops did not need to be changed, as one studentnoted, “everything was perfect and clear”. In summary, based on the data reviewedto data, students were engaged and learning through participation in the workshops.Acknowledgement:NASA-MUREP Grant # NNX16AN19A and NSF grant # 1601522ReferencesEyers, D., Dotchev, K., 2010. “ Technology review for mass customization usingrapid manufacturing”. Assembly Automation, 30 (1), pp. 39 – 46.Lipson, H., 2012. “ Frontiers in additive manufacturing. The shape of things tocome”. The Bridge, 42 (1), pp. 5 – 12.Kondor, S., Grant, C., Liacouras, P., …etc, 2013. “ Personalized surgicalinstruments”. ASME
presented at 2010 Annual Conference &Exposition, Louisville, Kentucky. https://peer.asee.org/16462[7] Mikhail, M., & Engle, C. D. (2017, June), Enhancing Machine Design Course with anIntegrated Vending Machine System Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. https://peer.asee.org/28277[8] Kiefer, S. F. (2014, June), Machining Experience in a Mechanical Engineering CurriculumPaper presented at 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana.https://peer.asee.org/22812[9] Lin, C. (2002, June), Using Spreadsheet In Teaching Machine Design Paper presented at2002 Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada. https://peer.asee.org/10127[10] Vavrek, E. (2003, June), Using Computers In Machine Design
Hindrance to Student Learning,” Developments in Business Simulations and Experiential Learning, 32, 364- 370, 2005.11. Rutz, E., “Educational Technologies: What Works, What Doesn’t Work, and Why,” Proceedings of the 2006 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Chicago, IL, 2006.12. Felder, R. M. & Brent, R., “Understanding Student Differences,” Journal of Engineering Education, 94 (1), 57- 72, 2005.13. Zywno, M. S., “Instructional Technology, Learning Styles and Academic Achievement,” Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, retrieved 1-15-07 at http://www.asee.org/conferences/annual/pdf/upload/2002-Best-Overall-Paper-and-PIC-V-Best
Conference 2007 of the American Society for Engineering Education 5. M. Huang, S. Lord, D. Malicky, ‘Problem, Project, Inquiry, or Subject-based Pedagogies: What to do?’, Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, Annual Conference & Exposition 2006 Page 12.4.11
” ,Mechatronics vol.12, pp.207-215, 2002.[11] http://www.vishay.com/company/brands/measurements-group[12] Kelly, G. S., Fundamentals of Mechanical Vibrations, McGraw Hill Inc., New York, 2002.Biography Professor Ioana Voiculescu received a Ph. D. degree in Mechanical Engineering from PolitehnicaUniversity, Timisoara, Romania, in 1997 in the field of Precision Mechanics. She finished her second doctorate in2005, also in Mechanical Engineering, but with the emphasis in MEMS. She has worked for five years at the U.S.Naval Research Laboratory, in Washington, DC in the area of MEMS gas sensors and gas preconcentrators.Currently, she is developing a MEMS laboratory in the Mechanical Engineering Department at City College of NewYork. She is an IEEE
States.Published by The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET), Baltimore MD. 1997. Available:http://www.abet.org/EAC/eac2000.html.2. Mak, F., Frezza, S., “Process to Identify Minimum Passing Criteria and Objective Evidence in Support ofABET EC2000 Criteria Fulfillment,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, June 2004.3. Cutts, Q., Carbone, A., van Haaster, K., “Using an Electronic Voting System to Promote Active Reflection onCoursework Feedback,” Proc. Of the Intnl. Conf. on Computers in Education, Melbourne, Australia, November2004.4. Vernaza, K.M., “Instructional Innovation of Mechanical Engineering Core Courses with Technology,” FacultyDevelopment Grant in Instructional Innovation with Technology, Center for
AC 2007-832: TEACHING HEAT TRANSFER THROUGH INDUSTRIALPARTNERSHIPSeifollah Nasrazadani, University of North TexasReza Mirshams, University of North Texas Page 12.1361.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Teaching Heat Transfer through Industry Partnership S. Nasrazadani and R.A. Mirshams College of Engineering University of North Texas Denton, TX 76203Abstract In this research project, a heat transfer course was taught to senior undergraduate studentsin a new way that involved an industrial engineer as a
Systems, John Wiley and Sons, 1987.4. Hodge, B. K. and Taylor, Robert P., Analysis and Design of Energy Systems, 3rd ed., Prentice-Hall, 1999.5. Jaluria, Yogesh, Design and Optimization of Thermal Systems, McGraw-Hill, 1998.6. Janna, William S., Design of Fluid Thermal Systems, 2nd ed., Thomson Learning, 1998.7. Stoecker, W. F., Design of Thermal Systems, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, 1989.8. Suryanarayana, N. V. and Arici, Öner, Design and Simulation of Thermal Systems, McGraw-Hill, 2003.9. Hodge, B. K. and Taylor, Robert P., The Impact of MathCad in an Energy Systems Design Course, Proceedings of the 1998 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, WA, June 28 -July 1, 1998.10. Hodge, B. K. and Steele, W., Computational
. The Harvard Assessment Seminars”, Forum for the Future of Higher Education, EDUCASE, Forum 2006, Aspen, Colorado8. Fayerweather, C., Cioc, S., and Oliver, D., “Power Plant Proposal and Feasibility: A Student Project for a Thermodynamics Course” ASEE 2006-897, presented at the 2006 ASEE Annual Conference, Chicago, Illinois. Page 12.999.9
research presentation were usedto focus on using nanotechnology to create a unique solution a human health issue. The teamrecalled previous research and decided on suggesting improvements of a “nano-nose” to aidasthma suffers based on information about the duckbilled platypus and its sensory abilities.Nearing the weekend of the state competition, the coach added an hour to team meetings. Thisextra hour became useful for many of the youth because of program changes and testing. Whena pair had finished their mission(s) successfully and with repeatability, each youth was given thechoice to program a new mission or work on new team posters. Given this choice, most of theyouth decided to create new team posters, with a few who would help with
an invaluable teaching tool used by the Mechanical Engineering Faculty to learn from theoriginal structure and design, which is equivalent to going backwards through the development of theproduct. The main issues handled by the RE teaching technique reviewed here are: knowledge generatedby the practical assembly of an experimental airplane; generation of reliable, complete and fully detailedmodels describing the airplane behaviour as well as its parts and subsystems; development ofspecifications for techniques, methods and procedures for manufacturing aircraft componentsKEYWORDS: Reverse Engineering, Active Learning, Mechanical Engineering Education1. INTRODUCTION. As part of its 2015’s mission aiming at developing values, attitudes
Monolingual and Bilingual Classrooms,” Creativity Research Journal, Vol. 14, Issue 3-4, pp. 373-386.6. Ghosh, S., 2003, “Triggering Creativity in Science and Engineering: Reflection as a Catalyst,” Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems, Vol. 38, Issue 3-4, pp. 255-275.7. Hopper, C., 2007, Practicing College Learning Strategies, Houghton Mifflin (http://www.mtsu.edu/~studskl/hd/hemis.html).8. Kim, J. and Michael, W.B.., 1995, “The Relationship of Creativity Measures to School Achievement and to Preferred Learning and Thinking Style in a Sample of Korean High School Students,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 55, Issue 1, pp. 60-74.9. Moehrle, M.G., 2005, “How Combinations of TRIZ Tools Are Used
, Page 11.770.8reference data, and its engineering calculator. If the learner has a problem in getting a finalanswer or gives an incorrect answer, the PST rolls one step back and offers to help performinterim auxiliary calculations. If the learners still has a problem the PST provides a template ofthe formula that has to be used. If all of that does not help, PST opens or points to the lessontopic that must to be learned before completing the assignment.An example of the PST is shown in the Figure 9. Figure 9. The Problem Solving Tutor helps the student to calculate a Rankine cycle turbine efficiency. The problem is presented in a format that is easily associated with a submarine engine and T-s diagram studied earlier. The problem description
Mechanical Engineering, The City College of CUNY (CCNY), is the principalinvestigator of the grant. The author also would like to express his sincere thanks to Dr. AnnitaAlting, an Associate Higher Education Officer of School of Engineering, CCNY, for the help ofanalyzing the ABET course survey results.References[1] Burchett, B., Four hardware experiments for advanced dynamics and control, 2006 ASEE Annual Conference, Paper No. 2006-1008.[2] Henry, J. and Zollars, R., Learning-by-doing and communications within a process control class, 2006 ASEE Annual Conference, Paper No. 2006-1686.[3] Panda, A., Wong, H., Kapila, V. and Lee, S.-H., Two-tank liquid level control using a BASIC-STAMP microcontroller and a MATLAB-based data
AESCI 430 – ANALYSIS AND CONTROL OF LINEAR SYSTEMS –PROBLEM BASED LEARNING ASSIGNMENT – FALL 2012Problem Title: Landing Gear Controller Design for SAE AircraftStudent Learning Objective(s)1: Reinforce the concept of mathematical modeling of physical systems, transfer functions, system performance analysis and system stability.2: Design and simulation-based verification of a linear controller based on the given performance criteria.3: Determine design parameters considering the societal context (i.e customer requirements, available resources, etc.)Brief Abstract/Description of ProblemThe SAE Aircraft Design Team has designed and built a 55 pound aircraft for thecompetition. The designed landing gear has a linear spring (to absorb impact