higher-level tasks earlier intheir careers, necessitating the development of this judgment in undergraduates. This clearly hasbecome a priority for many programs, as evidenced by the growth of project-based learning.Developing this type of judgment and creativity is challenging, but inquiry-based learning willplay an important role and well-tested tools for inspiring new types of knowledge acquisitionmethods in our students are needed.This paper describes hands-on, inquiry-based learning activities that were recently designed andimplemented in the first mechanics course taken by students in the Department of Civil andMechanical Engineering at the US Military Academy in part to help accelerate the developmentof students’ engineering judgment
multi-year integrated system design (ISD) project for mechanical engineering students. He is a mentor to mechanical engineering graduate teaching fellows and actively champions the adoption and use of teaching technologies. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Effect of a Concept Review Intervention on the Students’ Knowledge Retention and Demonstration of Prerequisite Fundamental ConceptsAbstractStudents achieve functional knowledge retention through active, spaced repetition of conceptsthrough homework, quizzes, and lectures. True knowledge retention is best achieved throughproper comprehension of the
exercise problems,and sparse or incomplete coverage of the material covered in the texts, not to mention theadditional cost students incur for access to these systems.As an alternative, the authors have developed a robust set of integrated Statics and Mechanics ofMaterials exercise problems for use within a free, open-source, online homework delivery toolcalled WeBWorK (webwork.maa.org). This tool has seen wide adoption in mathematics coursesworldwide (now over 1000 institutions) and the authors’ institution has considerable experienceusing it in that context. This work is part of a currently funded National Science Foundation(NSF) funded project aimed at expanding the use of WeBWorK into engineering courses.Problem sets for two other sophomore
exist for only for a few basic shapes, suchas elliptical, rectangular and triangular shapes1.This paper presents the design and development of a basic mobile application, Torsion HPC, to Page 26.1587.2assist students and engineers in calculating torsional stresses for different cross sections of solidbar. The project objectives were two fold. First, the tool needed to provide a method forengineering students to better understand torsional stress in non-uniform bars which are rarelycovered in basic undergraduate solid mechanics courses. Ideally, the tool should accomplish thiswithout adding class time to the course, which means it is important
Paper ID #23342Using FEA as a Pedagogical Tool for Teaching Machine Component DesignDr. Wendy S. Reffeor, Grand Valley State University Wendy Reffeor is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering in the Padnos College of Engineering and Computing at Grand Valley State University. She earned her Bachelors from GMI Engineering & Management Institute, Masters from Purdue University and Doctorate from Michigan State University. Her industrial experience includes designing quality systems for Allison Engine Company in Indianapolis. Since joining GVSU, she has focused on introducing design and build projects in
solving has not been understood orembraced. As a foundational course, difficulties here can impact student academic confidenceresulting in a diminished sense of self-efficacy that is particularly problematic when amplified bygender and under-represented (URM) minorities issues. And such faltering so early in the majorcan cause a student to leave engineering.While difficulties in the course arise for several reasons, our project seeks to address the problemof context. Our hypothesis is that women and minorities particularly, and students generally, aremore likely to do well in statics when the problems are placed in the context of real worldusefulness. An approach to teaching that effectively scaffolds students' efforts at model buildingand
Chrysler Truck Manufacturing Company in Turkey as a project engineer, he received dual M.S. degrees in engineering management and mechanical engineering from Missouri University of Science and Technology (MS&T), formerly the University of Missouri, Rolla. He worked for Toyota Motor Corporation as a quality assurance engineer for two years and lived in Toyota City, Japan. He received his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from MS&T in 1999, while he worked as a quality engi- neer for Lumbee Enterprises in St. Louis, Mo. His first teaching position was at the Architectural and Manufacturing Sciences Department of Western Kentucky University. He was a faculty member at Trine University. He is currently teaching in
using it to determine mastery of more abstractideas. All implementations of a mastery-based learning systems reported in the literature have shownbenefits, but reported outcomes are often quite different, making it difficult to compare the impacts of thevarious approaches.This paper is a follow-up to a previous paper by the authors that described how a mastery-based gradingsystem was implemented in three sophomore mechanics courses, Statics, Dynamics, and DeformableSolids through an effort we call The Mechanics Project [8]. The mastery-based grading system used inthose courses provides data on the progress toward mastery of every student on the objectives in thatcourse during each semester. This mastery progress is fed back to the student in
. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 The ‘Typical Particle’ Approach to Learning Rigid Body DynamicsAbstractRigid body dynamics is a foundational course in all engineering curricula based upon themechanical sciences. It is one of three courses that make up The Mechanics Project, an effort at alarge R1 university in the southwest, to reimagine the learning experience in the sophomore-levelengineering mechanics courses (statics, dynamics, and deformable solids). The conversion ofthese courses to an objective-based system to assess mastery launched a reconsideration of thefundamental strands—the DNA—of the courses. The design objective of
University of Applied Sciences, and he did a second exchange at the Karlsruhe University of Applied Sciences in the Fall of 2017. His engineering education interests include collaborating on the Dynamics Concept Inventory, developing model-eliciting activities in mechanical engineering courses, inquiry-based learning in mechanics, and design projects to help promote adapted physical activities. Other professional interests include aviation physiology and biomechanics.Prof. Peter Michael Becker, c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Teaching Mechanics in Another Country – Reflections on a ProfessorenaustauschAbstractIn an ever-expanding global economy
Mechanics from Virginia Tech, and his Ph.D. in Bioengineering from the University of Utah. He worked in the Air Force Research Laboratories before teaching at the U.S. Air Force Academy for seven years. Brian has taught in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo since 2006. During the 2011-2012 academic year he participated in a professor exchange, teaching at the Munich University of Applied Sciences. His engineering education interests include collaborating on the Dynamics Concept Inventory, developing model-eliciting activities in mechanical engineering courses, inquiry-based learning in mechanics, and design projects to help promote adapted physical activities. Other professional interests
Buffalo’s School of Engineering and Applied Sciences. I am pursing a Bachelors of Science in Computer Science and a Bachelors of Science in Mechanical Engineering.Mr. Nilanjan Kundu, University at Buffalo Nilanjan Kundu is currently a senior pursuing a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering at the University at Buffalo’s School of Engineering and Applied Sciences. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Torsion Tests to Study Plastic Deformation in Ductile Materials ABSTRACTThis project is an experimental study on plastic deformation in ductile materials such as aluminumand steel. The objective is to stimulate interest in engineering
. 2016, Accessed: Mar. 17, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/blended-learning-in-a-rigid-body-dynamics-course-using-on-line- lectures-and-hands-on-experiments.[3] D. O’Connor, “Investigations into Engineering Dynamics Theory: A Student-Led Project to Utilize Smartphone Technology,” presented at the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2017, Accessed: Mar. 17, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/investigations-into-engineering-dynamics-theory-a-student-led-project- to-utilize-smartphone-technology.[4] C. D. Facciolo and A. Behrouzi, “Interactive Physical Experiments in an Advanced Undergraduate Structural Dynamics Course,” presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference &
professor exchange, teaching at the Munich University of Applied Sciences. He is a co-author on the Beer and Johnston dynamics textbook. His engineering education interests include collaborating on the Dynamics Concept Inventory, developing model-eliciting activities in mechanical engineering courses, inquiry-based learning in mechanics, and design projects to help promote adapted physical activities. Other professional interests include aviation physiology and biomechanics.Dr. James M. Widmann, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Jim Widmann is a professor of mechanical engineering at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. He received his Ph.D. in 1994 from Stanford University and has
courses with their pre-course conceptions and misconceptionslargely unchanged. The study by Halloun and Hestenes1 reported that “Common sense notionsabout motion are generally incompatible with Newtonian theory” and that “conventional physicsinstruction does little to change that.” For these reasons considerable effort has gone into developing improved pedagogicaltechniques for the teaching of basic engineering mechanics as well as methods for assessinglearning in these classes. Examples include active learning2, project based learning3, peerteaching4, intrusive advising5, supplemental instruction6 and one-on-one tutoring7 among them.Many of the techniques considered or their core elements, however, have been documented inthe literature
University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown. He received his B.S. degree in Aerospace Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh, and an M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Carnegie Mellon University. His interests include engineering economics, management and leadership development. He has worked as project engineer for Armstrong World Industries, does engineering management and leadership consulting work and presents seminars on effectiveness and leadership at both the individual and corporate levels. He is Colonel (Ret) in United States Marine Corps Reserves. Page 11.646.1© American Society for
projects or activities. During “dynamics in one week,” students are engaged with examplesassociated with interesting videos of dynamic systems in action. Examples were adapted fromthe textbook by Gray, Costanzo, and Plesha [18], who revisit some systems several times indifferent contexts in their back-of-chapter problems.The present paper includes a description of the “dynamics in one week” curriculum, presents anddiscusses student feedback collected via a survey instrument, and offers suggestions for futureimprovements as well as final conclusions.Curriculum DescriptionEach of the 52-minute instructional sessions was organized around one of the three topics:kinetics, kinematics, and simulation. During a session, five major events occurred: (1
evaluations for projects ranging from consumer products to power systems. As a consultant she worked with over 75 different clients ranging from startups to Fortune 500 companies. Prof. Wodin-Schwartz is passionate about teaching core engineering and critical thinking skills that apply to application driven problem solving. She is excited to work with students to help them understand not only the technical skills required of them as engineers but also the social, environmental, and physical implications of implementing technical engineering solutions. Her work with adding context to problems and projects her courses has lead her to receive teaching awards including the Russell M. Searle and Morgan Distinguished
conducting experiments using the BTS whereas those in the control group only performed theanalysis part. Based on the performance of the two student groups on a common exam problem,the experiential learning is found to have a positive impact. Moreover, the students’ responses toan anonymous survey indicate that the students in the experimental group generally showed ahigher degree of satisfaction with the class projects than those in the control group.IntroductionEngineering education in the early to mid twentieth century relied heavily on the use of physicalmodels and experiments to enforce the topics covered in an engineering course. However, overthe years, this important practice was deemphasized as hands-on activities were reduced andrelegated
engineering courses, inquiry-based learning in mechanics, and design projects to help promote adapted physical activities. Other professional interests include aviation physiology and biomechanics. Dr Self obtained his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Engineering Mechanics from Virginia Tech, and his Ph.D. in Bio- engineering from the University of Utah.Dr. James M Widmann, California Polytechnic State University Jim Widmann is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. He received his Ph.D. in 1994 from Stanford University. Currently he teaches mechanics and design courses. He conducts research in the areas of machine design, fluid power control and engineering
Paper ID #7723A Study of Warping of Non-circular Shafts in TorsionProf. Somnath Chattopadhyay, Georgia Southern University Page 23.115.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 A STUDY OF WARPING OF NON-CIRCULAR SHAFTS IN TORSIONABSTRACTThis project is geared towards the study of warping as that takes place in non-circular shaftsunder torsion loading. For this purpose specimens of square cross-sections were used. .Thisactivity constitutes a laboratory unit in Mechanics of Materials course taught at the junior level.The students
the advisor for OSU’s student chapter of the Architectural Engineering Institute. Professor Ramming recently co-authored Civil Engineering & Architecture: Workbook for Project Lead the Way which provides curriculum for sci- ence, technology, engineering, and mathematics education used in middle and high schools. She was also named the Outstanding Faculty Member from the College of Engineering, Architecture and Technology by the The Panhellenic Council and Interfraternity Council in 2010 and 2012 and awarded the Halliburton Young Teaching Award in the College of Engineering, Architecture and Technology in 2013.Prof. John J Phillips P.E., Oklahoma State University John Phillips, a registered engineer and
AC 2011-847: IDENTIFYING AND ADDRESSING STUDENT DIFFICUL-TIES IN ENGINEERING STATICSAndrea Brose, Hamburg University of Technology Andrea Brose earned her Ph.D. in mathematics from the University of Colorado at Boulder. From 1999 to 2008 she was in the Department of Mathematics at UCLA where she taught undergraduate math, led and developed the mathematics teaching assistant and faculty training program, and contributed to other aspects of academic administration. Since 2009, she is involved in a project on ”Active Learning in Engineering Education” at Hamburg University of Technology.Christian H. Kautz, Hamburg University of Technology Christian H. Kautz received his doctorate degree from the University of
) are being employedfor the first time in two courses on statics and strength of materials during the Fall 2010semester. This paper will present details of the development of the tools as well as evaluation ofassessments acquired during use and at the end of the semester. Page 22.1356.2IntroductionThe tools developed for this project are an applied extension of recent work at the LeonhardCenter for the Enhancement of Engineering Education at Penn State. We seek to apply what waslearned about educational research (related to problem solving, transformational representation,prior knowledge, self-explanations, scaffolding, and worked examples
Paper ID #14225Warping Deformation Caused by Twisting Non-circular ShaftsProf. Somnath Chattopadhyay, University at Buffalo, SUNY Page 26.1712.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 WARPING DEFORMATION CAUSED BY TWISTING NON-CIRCULAR SHAFTSABSTRACTThis project is a combined analytical and experimental activity to study warping deformation inshafts of non-circular cross section subjected to torsion. This is a supplemental activity for thejunior level Mechanics of Materials course. The students see the
ability ofpiezo materials to both deform under an electrical stimulus and to generate a voltage under amechanical stimulus allows them to act as both a solid state actuator and sensor. Further, thinsheets of PZT can be surface bonded or otherwise structurally integrated into a system, allowingfor easy implementation in a dynamic system, and the nearly linear proportionality between themechanical strain and the applied/sensed voltage allows for easy control of PZT behavior.The Flexible Beam SystemA horizontal and a vertical flexible beam have been developed as educational tools. The verticalbeam presented here is based on the horizontal beam system developed in previous work 9, 10 andwas developed as a senior capstone design project. The vertical
space in their curriculum for a full MEMS course. To help solve this issue,this project proposed to use the traditional mechanics course and lab to introduce MEMS. Inother words, use a simple MEMS experiment to demonstrate both mechanics (i.e. beam bending)and MEMS concepts electrical induced force on beam).To enable other institutions to benefit from the actual experimental process done at theUniversity of Oklahoma, a website with information and a virtual lab was developed. A typicalpage of the website is shown in Figure 2. Figure 2 The Layout of the MEMS Website Page 13.948.4One of the goals of the NSF grant was to make
Paper ID #18993Homework Methods in Engineering Mechanics: Part 3Dr. Derek James Lura PhD, Florida Gulf Coast University Dr. Derek Lura is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Bioengineering at Florida Gulf Coast University, Fort Myers. He received his PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of South Florida in 2012. He is committed to developing his courses to apply and develop best practices from the scholarship of teaching and learning. Outside of course development, his primary research interests are in biomechanics, rehabilitation, prostheses, and robotics. His current research projects include
projects related to engineering and engineering education: value-added manufacturing (Dr. Katie Whitefoot), taxonomy of engineering education (Dr. Cynthia Finelli), pioneers in engineering education (Dr.Cynthia Atman) and inquiry-based learning in mechanics (Dr. Brian Self).Dr. Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Brian Self obtained his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Engineering Mechanics from Virginia Tech, and his Ph.D. in Bioengineering from the University of Utah. He worked in the Air Force Research Laboratories before teaching at the U.S. Air Force Academy for seven years. Brian has taught in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo since 2006. During the 2011
, and even the measurementscale.2,4 Preliminary work on this project, completed with Yokomoto, examined students’ abilityto assess their performance in Statics and Engineering Ethics.5 In the case of the preliminarystudy, however, students were asked to rate their performance in Statics prior to taking the finalexam and no other factors were considered. This study indicated that there were mild correla-tions between performance and self-assessment (enough to warrant further study).The present study looks to see if comparing students’ self-assessments to performance acrossmultiple problems shows any more correlation than was found in the one question to oneproblem work of Sarin and Headley.1 The analysis is based upon data collected in the