University Reginald DesRoches is the Karen and John Huff School Chair and Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technology. As School Chair, he provides leadership to a top- ranked program with 100 faculty and staff and 1,100 stProf. Stephen P. Mattingly, University of Texas at Arlington STEPHEN MATTINGLY is a Professor in Civil Engineering and the Director of the Center for Trans- portation Studies at the University of Texas at Arlington. Previously, he worked at the Institute of Trans- portation Studies, University of California, Irvine and University of Alaska, Fairbanks. His most recent research projects address a variety of interdisciplinary topics including developing an app
nature of Black STEM and engineering students’encounters with faculty in this institutional context.MethodsSite of StudyThe broader project from which this current study draws was conducted at the A. James ClarkSchool of Engineering at the University of Maryland, College Park. The University of Maryland,College Park is a large, more selective Mid-Atlantic public university with a CarnegieClassification of “Doctoral University/Highest Research Activity” and a current enrollment of37,430 students as of the spring of 2017 (University of Maryland, Institutional Research,Planning, and Assessment, 2017). In the fall of 2018, 4,370 students were enrolled in its ClarkSchool, of whom 54% were White, 22% Asian, 8% Black, 7% Hispanic, 8% undisclosed
. As part ofthis group, I regularly train men, both on- and off-campus, to better serve as gender equity allies.I am a member of the Commission on the Status of Women Faculty, a committee that works todevelop and enhance gender-equitable policies at North Dakota State University. I am primaryauthor of a series of broadly distributed advocacy tips, have participated in a national webinar onengaging male faculty as gender equity allies, and have given several conference presentationson the same topics. Additionally, I currently serve on the planning committee for the NSF-funded project Transforming Undergraduate Education in Engineering (TUEE), which has thegoal of enhancing women participation and success in engineering programs.Dr. Holmes: I
with disabilities2. Background2.1 Computing’s Diversity ScorecardComputing is a high growth field with well-paying career opportunities, but the percentage ofwomen and minorities in careers in computing is well below their percentages in both theworkforce and in society. With a 19% projected job growth in computing between 2016 and2026, employment prospects and compensation levels in computing are both excellent; the paygap between men and women is also low compared to other engineering disciplines.2 Yet overthe past decade, women have held only 25% of computer and mathematical (C&M) jobs whilecomprising 56%-58% of the total workforce [11]; in 2016, Blacks made up only 7.9% percent ofC&M workers while comprising 11.9% of all workers
Society and the American Society for Engineering Education.Cindy Foor, University of Oklahoma Assistant Director/Research Associate at the Research Institute for STEM Education (RISE) at the University of Oklahoma. Cindy received her M.A. in Anthropology from Western Michigan University. As an anthropologist, her research interests include ethnography of marginalized populations, cultural theory, issues of gender and underrepresented populations in STEM education and the cultural/historical construction of women’s cultural identities and roles in past and present societies, with special focus on emerging nationalist projects
sense of the projects that we worked on together. He gave me a lot of freedom to do things on my own…He would give me good input and fair appraisal…He and I got along very well because he always valued my opinion highly, as opposed to me trying to just compete to see who’s going to win.Jason also identified his faculty adviser as a factor to completing the doctorate. According to Page 15.1252.14Jason, “He was definitely instrumental to me finishing. He would say positive things about mewhen I needed to hear it.” Jason also revealed that his faculty adviser was “determined toincrease the number of underrepresented people in
” and values of the profession.20 Through interaction with facultyand peers and experiences inside and outside the classroom, students engage in anticipatoryprofessional behavior as they begin to master professional competencies, gain comfort withuncertainty, identify with valued symbols, enact expected norms, espouse professional truismsand learn to project a confident, capable image to others.10,11,17,18,21Socialization includes, then, assimilating the profession‟s “myths,” or the symbols, norms, andtruisms of engineering. Building on the centrality of scientific method, engineering embodies acommitment to meritocracy: an anchoring point of engineering‟s “folk wisdom” is thatindividuals who work hard and have the appropriate skills in math
identity and simply taught at a level and in a manner that supported the learner,then the content could be mastered [4]. This idea of supporting the pre-engineeringstudent in a culturally appropriate manner was a significant factor of the origin story ofthe four tribal colleges involved in this project, and for all of the TCU’s in existencetoday. In this way it was believed that between TCU's and the mainstream institution thestudents would get more personalized and therefore effective engineering educationwhile they had the opportunity of developing and maintaining their cultural identity goingforward in their chosen careers. How that initial rationale was refined and applied fromthe end of the first funding cycle to the beginning of the lockdown
Chair’s award for Rookie Researcher of the year in the Computer System Technology department. Dr. Sowells is the lead investigator of the Females in Technology (FiT) summer boot camp grant project for academically gifted low income rising senior and junior high girls for recruitment into the technology degree areas. She is also the co-PI of the Aggie STEM Minority Male Maker grant project focused on early exposure to technology to stimulate interest in technology of middle school minority males. Evelyn is not only outstanding in teaching and research, but also in service. She recently received the 2013 Chair’s Award for Outstanding Service in the Department of Computer System Technology and is a member of Upsilon Phi
involves the quantification and integration of human-centered considerations in engineering systems and/or the design process. Her research program has received funding from the National Science Foundation, Procter & Gamble, Air Force Office of Sci- entific Research, and many others. Her projects that involved the intersection of diversity and mechanical engineering have been featured in media sources including National Geographic, NBC’s Today Show, Essence Magazine, Reuters, National Public Radio and many others. A highly sought out role model for the younger generation, Dr. Reid Smith’s story about her double dutch jump rope invention is featured in two children’s books and was on the 2017 New York State English
:________________________ Classification: _____________________ GPA: ______ Indicator Points GPA – 4.00 (30 pts.); 3.75 (27 pts.); 3.50 (24); 3.25 (21 pts.); 3.00 (18 pts); 2.75 (15 pts.); 2.50 (12 pts.): 2.25 (9 pts.); 2.0 (6 pts.); less 2.00 (0 pts.) Personal Statement – Consider grammar, clarity of ideas and how well applicant wrote statement based upon the following instructions, as well as other information found in application: On a separate paper describe the academic and professional goals you would like to achieve. Be as specific as possible about research projects of particular interest to you. Be sure to include the route that you have taken to date to reach these goals, including
spent time in industry holding technical and operations-based roles and has experience with outreach projects focused on STEM education and mentoring.Tina L. Fletcher, University of Pennsylvania Tina L. Fletcher holds a Bachelor’s degree in Political Science and African American Studies from the University of Arkansas and a Master’s degree in Secondary Teacher Education from Harvard University. She served as a U.S. Government teacher at Anacostia Senior High School in Washington, D.C. where she was named the 2010 Teacher of the Year. She then served as a fundraiser and successfully raised over $20 million for President Barack Obama’s 2012 re-election campaign in addition to raising over $300 thousand for St. Jude
Development Division of the American Society for Engineering Education. Dr. Springer received his Bachelor of Science in Computer Science from Purdue University, his MBA and Doctorate in Adult and Community Education with a Cognate in Executive Development from Ball State University. He is certified as a Project Management Professional (PMP), Senior Professional in Human Resources (SPHR & SHRM-SCP), in Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR), and, in civil and domestic mediation. Dr. Springer is a State of Indiana Registered domestic mediator. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Tenure as a Closed System: Subconscious Behavioral Characteristics of Coercion, Groupthink, Bias
agents of the social norms that privilegewhite students in engineering classrooms and organizations. In a study of African-Americanmale experiences on multiracial student engineering teams, Cross and colleagues found that thesocial norms of the engineering community decreased African-American students’ sense ofbelonging.18 Contributing factors included but were not limited to indifferent faculty interactions.The authors recommended that multiracial team projects should be monitored carefully byfaculty to ensure positive experiences of all team members.A study of Asian and Asian-American students in engineering showed that many students facedstereotypes from peers and faculty that detrimentally impacted their education, including that ofbeing the
as a social experience particularly in terms of gender and race among underrepresented college students in STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics). He has presented his scholarship at research conferences organized by the American Educational Research Association, Association for the Study of Higher Education, and Out in STEM Incorporated. Luis holds professional experience in various STEM student support initiatives at Rutgers University including the STEM Talent Expansion Program, Upward Bound Math-Science, and Project Advancing Graduate Edu- cation. He is a certified K-12 mathematics teacher in New Jersey with a Master’s degree in Mathematics Education and Bachelor’s degree in Mathematics from
Paper ID #13824Developing an Intensive Math Preparation Program to Enhance the Successof Underrepresented Students in Engineering ˜Prof. Denise Hum, Canada College Denise Hum is an Associate Professor of Mathematics at Ca˜nada College in the San Francisco Bay Area. She received her M.S. in statistics at California State University, East Bay. Her academic interests in- clude accelerated math pathways, Reading Apprenticeship, and increasing the number of women and underrepresented groups in STEM.Ms. Anna Marbella Camacho, Canada College As Project Director for a $5.9 million Hispanic-Serving Institution
important for womenof color. The importance of faculty-student relationships has also been explored more broadly interms of its impact on student motivation32, learning in situated (problem- and project-based)environments e.g., 33, 34, 35, and graduate education e.g., 36, 37. Similarly, Ong et al.’s 2011 reviewof the literature found that women felt that “professors played a critical role in making a STEMcareer a reality”38 for undergraduate and graduate women. Maton and Hrabowski III39 found thatinteraction with faculty, and particularly minority faculty, in and outside the classroom candecrease the feelings of isolation among minority students and contribute to positive outcomessuch as academic achievement, confidence, and persistence.“Mentoring
whowere NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program (GRFP) recipients and PROMISE peermentors while pursuing their doctorates co-developed and continue to facilitate the fundingworkshops.The workshops, which began as a two-hour seminar conducted on one day in the fall semester,have expanded to include a range of formats: a three day (2-hours per day) workshop series, aone day (3-5 hour) workshop, and short panel presentations with other participants who providefinancial information from their particular departments or organizations. In addition toencouraging the students to utilize advice from their faculty research mentors and peers, theworkshop facilitators in our project served as experienced graduate fellowship recipients andreviewed students
students’entire educational experience. Students indicated their level of satisfaction using a 4-pointLikert-type scale that ranges from 1 (“poor”) to 4 (“excellent”). Similarly, the NSSE elicitsinformation about students’ grades in college. Students reported their GPA based on an 8-pointscale ranging from 1 (“C- or lower”) to 8 (“A”).The primary independent variables assessed the frequency and nature of African American andHispanic STEM students’ engagement with faculty members and peers. This includedengagement inside classes (e.g., worked with other students on projects during class) and outsideclasses (e.g., talked about career plans with a faculty member). Specifically, five items measuredthe frequency with which students worked on a research
engineering. A critical component of this research isexamining the intersection of how the current virtual learning environment and pre-existingfactors impact a student’s engineering state of mind. Ultimately, this research will provide adeeper understanding of the correlation between student support and belonging within theirrespective engineering discipline.The specific pre-defined aims or research objectives of this project are:1. Understanding how a student affiliated or non-affiliated with a scholar program can impact astudent’s engineering mindset and motivation to persist within an engineering discipline.2. Examine and understand the correlation between a virtual learning environment and the effectit has on a student’s sense of belonging in
better serve all graduate students.Bibliography1. Chicago, T. N. O. R. C. a. t. U. o. Retrieved from http://www.norc.org/ On November 15, 2006.2. Hermond, D. (1995) Measuring the Retention Strategies of a Minority Engineering Program: A Service QualityPerspective. Journal of Engineering Education3. McAfee, L.C., Ferguson, D.L. (2006) Status and Experiences of Minority Graduate Students, PostdoctoralFellows, and Faculty in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Disciplines." American Society forEngineering Education Annual Conference in Chicago, IL (June 19, 2006, ASEE Paper 2006-2177).4. National Center for Education Statistics. Projections of Education Statistics to 2015 (NCES 2006–084). U.S.Department of Education. Washington, DC
opportunity to work in the faculty mentor’slaboratory. eight out of twenty two students were successful in securing a research opportunity ina laboratory. Students worked as researcher assistants in laboratories on a variety of projects,such as stem cells, speech recognition, and tissue regeneration. The goal was to expand theirknowledge in the research fields in their departments and train students on professionalcommunication.During the program three guest speakers were invited, experienced scientists and engineers, totalk about their career experience and the variety of opportunities for students once they aregraduated. The guests were; Dr. Charlene Crawley, a chemistry professor at VCU; Mr. TonyMoss, a mathematician at Dahlgren NSWC; and Ms
, a growing diversity of the workforce.Demographic projections show the traditional pool that supplies today’s technological workforce isshrinking, while untraditional pools such as under-represented groups are growing proportionally,making them the new majority. If the United States is to remain competitive and continue toflourish in the competitive global marketplace, it must draw on the talents of all the population. Theneed for a highly skilled technical labor force, the new majority, and the aging population areseveral factors that are driving the need for a comprehensive look at changing the culture of scienceand engineering.The underutilization of women and minorities in science and engineering is a problem of nationalpriority [4]. Not
=Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Sure) for participants to rate their opinion of experiences inSTEM majors at their HBCU. Survey items were developed to reflect the common reasons forstudent departure as outlined in the published text Talking About Leaving and the experiences ofsenior leaders on the project from STEM fields and at HBCUs [4]. To ensure the survey focusedon the intended areas and that the researchers engaged in a comprehensive approach, each surveyitem was aligned with a research thrust area and compared with the theoretical framework. Toaccount for differences in demographic information needed, two parallel surveys were createdfor each group (Group 1 and 2).Data Collection Data were collected from students (Group 1
) and projected (2016+)female enrollment in the orthopaedic residency class. “Baseline” represents model withparameter values reflecting our current program evaluation results. “Worst-Case” reflects worst-case assumptions for parameter values in terms of recruitment and retention in the orthopaedicspipeline. Considering the duration of our programming efforts (Figure 3), if we were to cease allprogramming immediately (2015), our past programming efforts would yield a peak diversity of27% female in 10 years (2025) before declining back to the 14% baseline within 12 years (2027).Similarly, if we were to continue programming only for 5 more years (until 2020), we wouldexpect an identical peak of 27% female within 10 years. This peak would
and beliefs about engineering? 2. Do engineering perceptions or personal career values correlate with commitment to an engineering major? 3. Are these relationships present in a latent model?Methods This study used a causal-comparative quantitative design to compare differences in thefocal constructs (values, perceptions of engineering, and commitment to engineering) betweenmen and women. We administered a survey on engineering attitudes to a large sample of first-year students enrolled in a pre-engineering introductory course at a large four-year, researchfocused institution. The survey, which was administered as part of a larger project, includedscales related to students’ attitudes about engineering. In addition
, subject to areview of academic progress and financial eligibility. Some students were offered less than twoyears of support due to limited availability of project funds near the end of a grant period, and asmall number of students left the program.Activities. All S-STEM program activities were run or coordinated through the CoE’s EventsOffice with assistance from the Diversity Programs Office (DPO). The mission of the DPO is toprovide academic and non-academic support to increase enrollment, retention, and graduationamong under-represented minorities and women, but DPO services are available to all CoEstudents. The DPO collaborates with the university’s Learning Resource Center (LRC) toprovide academic support services and essay writing support
barriers: putting knowledge & skills/techniques to work – what works bestfor you? Part 3 –Supporting colleagues/the next generation of engineers (engineeringstewardship opportunities). In addition to peer coaching sessions (5 total) and journal entries (8totals), the final grade was also based on class participation and a final project (chosen by thestudent based on their interests related to a course topic). Class was structured so as to be mostlydiscussion-based with students reading articles and completing assignments before class to aid indiscussion led by the instructor or a content-expert guest facilitator. The course was taught withthe Four Frames12 as an overarching lens to view topics such as imposter syndrome, stereotypethreat
to provide an opportunity for mentors,mentees, and mentoring facilitators to educate each other and have fun doing so. The second goal isa deliverable: we intend to produce a Proceedings of the workshop including summaries of the talksand discussions, a document distilling the best practices, resources, and other important issues.(2) General Electric (GE) funded the web site for the Faculty for the Future [3].FacultyForTheFuture.org is a website dedicated to linking a diverse pool of women andunderrepresented minority candidates from engineering, science and business with faculty andresearch positions across the country. The major components of the website are describedincluding lessons learned and the project evaluation
AC 2012-4060: IDENTIFICATION WITH ACADEMICS AND MULTIPLEIDENTITIES: COMBINING THEORETICAL FRAMEWORKS TO BET-TER UNDERSTAND THE EXPERIENCES OF MINORITY ENGINEER-ING STUDENTSMs. Kelly J. Cross, Virginia Tech Kelly earned her bachelor’s of science in chemical engineering from Purdue University in 2007. She earned her master’s of Science in materials science and engineering from the University of Cincinnati. Cross is currently in the second year of the engineering education Ph.D. program at Virginia Tech and is currently involved with multiple educational research projects with faculty at Virginia Tech.Dr. Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is an Associate Professor of engineering education at Virginia Tech