confidence in recognition memory. NeuroImage, 29,1150-1160.[3] Rowe, H., (1988). Metacognitive skills: Promises and problems, Australian Journal of Reading, 11(4), 227-237.[4] Redding, R. E. (1990). Metacognitive instruction: Trainers teaching thinking skills, Performance ImprovementQuarterly, 3(1), 27-41.[5] Hartman, H.H., Sternberg, R.J., (1993). A broad BACEIS for improving thinking. Instructional Science 21,401-425.[6] Schraw, G., (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science. 26, 113-125.[7] Wang, M.C.,Haertel, G.D.,Walberg, H.J., (1993). What helps students learn? Educational Learning 51(4), 74-79.[8] Lawanto, O., (2010). Students’ metacognition during an engineering design project. Performance ImprovementQuarterly
, M. and Schmidt, K. J. “AIM for Engineering: Lessons Learned from a K-12 Project,” Proceedings ofASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Salt Lake City, Utah, 2004.5. Ohland, M. W., Yuhasz, A. G., and Sill, B. L. “Identifying and Removing a Calculus Prerequisite as a Bottleneckin Clemson’s General Engineering Curriculum,” Journal of Engineering Education 2004.6. Budny, D., Bjedov, G., and LeBold, W. “Assessment of the Impact of the Freshman Engineering Courses,”Proceedings, Frontiers in Education Conference 1997.7. Klingbeil, N.W., Mercer, R.E., Rattan, K.S., Raymer M.L. and Reynolds, D.B "Redefining EngineeringMathematics Education at Wright State University," Proceedings, ASEE North Central Conference Ada, Ohio, April2005.8. Venable, W
, Howard University Silas E. Burris is third year Developmental/Experimental Psychology doctoral student at Howard Univer- sity. His research interests include the development of cognitive and comprehension processes in children from underrepresented populations, narrative comprehension processing, narrative media types, and the external validity of psychological research.Dr. Kalynda Chivon Smith, Howard University Howard University in Washington, D.C., and her B.A. in Psychology and English from Truman State University in Kirksville, MO. Dr. Smith has managed a three year longitudinal NSF-funded research project across four campuses, which has included collecting, analyzing/interpreting and reporting data through
Methods ASEE Division in 2009. She also has been an Electrical Engineering Professor for two Mex- ican universities. She is interested in pre-college and college engineering readiness, socioeconomically disadvantaged engineering students, and computer aided engineering instruction. Page 24.668.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Hispanics in Engineering: A Review of the Literature Hispanics or Latinos is one of the minority groups projected to grow its representation inthe most dramatic way; from 15% to more than 30% by 2050. As it is known, currentdemographic
for water, wastewater, and solid and hazardous waste policy issues. Ms. Layne has degrees in environmental and water resources engineering from Vanderbilt University and the University of North Carolina School of Public Health. She spent 17 years as a consulting engineer with several firms, and was formerly a principal at Harding Lawson Associates in Tallahassee, FL, where she managed the office and directed hazardous waste site investigation and cleanup projects. Ms. Layne is an active member of the American Society of Civil Engineers and a registered professional engineer. She served as president of the Society of Women Engineers in 1996-97 and is FY11 Chair of SWE’s Government Relations and Public Policy
Belhaven University and her M.A.T., M.A., and Ph.D. from Vanderbilt University. Page 25.251.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Behavioral Interview Training in Engineering ClassesIntroductionMany engineering educators believe strongly in including both written and oral communicationassignments in their classes because of their desire to prepare engineers to be excellentcommunicators. Oral communication instruction in engineering courses usually preparesstudents for presenting various reports about experiments or projects. Some professors includeassignments that mimic what
AC 2012-5169: THE ROLE MODEL AFFECT AND ITS EFFECT ON UN-DERREPRESENTED MINORITIES PURSUING DOCTORATES IN EN-GINEERING EDUCATIONDr. Rochelle Letrice Williams, ABET Rochelle Williams recently joined the ABET headquarters staff as Educational Research and Assessment Manager in the Professional Services Department. In this role, Williams manages ABET’s educational of- ferings on a global scale and leads technical education research projects. Prior to joining ABET, Williams held two positions at Baton Rouge Community College: Science Laboratory Manager and Adjunct Fac- ulty in the Mathematics Department. In addition, Williams has worked closely with the National Sci- ence Foundation’s Next Generation Composites Crest
Rochester Institute of Technology [5]. It ispurported to be the only technical college for Deaf and Hard of Hearing students, and hasperformed research on best practices in this topic [6]. However, despite being part of atraditional institution, the institute remains separate from traditional students pursuingengineering degrees. Page 25.1037.3Methods The sophomore-level materials balance course was taught during the Fall of 2011with an initial class size of 42. The students met three times a week, at 55 minutes perperiod. For assessment, there were daily quizzes, two exams, and a comprehensive finalexam. There was no team project assigned this year. One of
AC 2011-2091: EXPLODING PIPELINES: MYTHOLOGICAL METAPHORSSTRUCTURING DIVERSITY-ORIENTED ENGINEERING EDUCATIONRESEARCH AGENDASAlice L. Pawley, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Alice L. Pawley is an assistant professor in the School of Engineering Education and an affiliate faculty member in the Women’s Studies Program at Purdue University. She has a B.Eng. in Chemical Engineering from McGill University, and an M.S. and a Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering with a Ph.D. minor in Women’s Studies from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She is Co-PI and Research Director of Purdue University’s ADVANCE program, and PI on the Assessing Sustainability Knowledge project. She runs the Research in Feminist
Q15h. I received useful feedback on course assignments. -0.01 0.04 -0.15 .883 Q15i. My instructors connect class topics to my future career. 0.24 0.05 4.15 .000 Q15j. I could ask my instructors for help if I did not understand course-related material. 0.00 0.06 0.03 .978 Q3a. I see connections between my hobbies and what I am learning in my engineering coursework (e.g., design projects, homework, exams, presentations). 0.10 0.03 2.75 .006 Q3d. I draw on my previous experiences at home when little instruction is given on how to solve an engineering task
) childhood adversity, b) a refusal to quit,and c) prior academic success, which ultimately led to their collegiate achievements.IntroductionEmployment opportunities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fieldsare projected to continue growing, at a rate that demands one million more United States STEMprofessionals by 2022.1 Having a stable and sufficient supply of STEM workers is necessary forU.S. global competitiveness and national security. As the demand for STEM workers grows, theU.S. population is experiencing increased growth among historically underrepresented racial andethnic minorities (URMs), including Blacks, Latinos and Native Americans. Providing equitableeducational and occupational opportunities to an increasingly
Century [5], they confirmed thatNSBE, along with other ethnic student organizations for African American students, providedmuch-needed cultural enclaves on PWI campuses.Both research teams then came together to compare findings. Shannon joined the project afterthe grounded theory data analysis was already underway. As a result, she was able to view thefindings of both investigations from a new perspective with more clarity than the authors whohad been engaged with data analysis for a long time. She leveraged this perspective to helpsynthesize the findings of both studies, pinpointing and articulating commonalities and distinctdifferences in the results. Shannon produced the majority of the writing of the text based ondiscussions between the two
country’s ability to develop competitive quantitiesof engineers, equipped to tackle the complex challenges of the future, has come under question.These challenges are wicked and unknown and will force engineers to use collaborate and usetechnical skills to solve social problems. With this in mind, the National Academies ofEngineering launched the Engineer of 2020 project and charged its Committee on EngineeringEducation to develop a vision for engineering in 2020 and beyond. The Engineer of 2020 will becharacterized by 10 attributes. The descriptions of these skills are vague; many institutions andorganizations have characterized these attributes and created internal metrics by and throughwhich they will develop these attributes in their
Page 22.1357.5degree at her university. She began listing a series of experiences: minority representation in theStudent Senate, comments made, isolation in project teams, etc. Each event separately could beperceived by a majority individual to have a plausible secondary explanation, or be brushed asideas an unfortunate coincidence. However, when viewed collectively, they created a suffocatingenvironment. The lesson here is that while an obstacle may not be insurmountable, repeatedobstacles can become wearying and collectively drag a person down. Talking openly aboutperceptions can help all individuals put events in perspective and realize the impact of theirbehaviors.Obtaining Feedback on Climate in Classes / Departmental CommunityClimates
engineering majors of interest to the larger project (namely, biomedical,chemical, mechanical, and electrical and computer engineering). Potential participants weregiven a link to an online survey, asking them to help the university prepare the next generation ofengineering students [27].Survey InstrumentThe survey instrument was divided into three sections: (1) characterizing the participants' post-baccalaureate pathways; (2) describing their experiences with and beliefs about engineering; and(3) collecting personal information about participants, including their demographics. First, tocharacterize career pathways, we asked participants to identify the number of career positionsthat they have experienced, including educational opportunities and
interviews, andother relevant college relations activities. Milliken has found that being a member of our MEP board has been a tremendous benefit inhelping meet their recruiting goals on an annual basis. Our Minority Engineering Program hashelped Milliken get closer to the students in order to identify new leaders that will fit Milliken’sculture and passion for excellence. Company representatives spend time in the classroom,support student group activities, and work with faculty to provide students with real worldexperience on challenging engineering and business-related projects that will result in full timeemployment after graduation.During our 2006 Summer Transition Program, our MEP office worked with Milliken and sent agroup of approximately 60
who was not aSEAGEP Scholar, the responses show the high value they placed on the mentoring and financialsupport they received from the program and the opportunities for networking and professionaldevelopment, as shown below:• Someone who is a SEAGEP scholar gets extra help, extra push, and feels she is not alone• The support network provided by SEAGEP was irreplaceable. We formed a network with faculty and students within UF as well as outside UF. There was also support in terms of providing laptops, sending us to conferences, and providing us a venue to showcase our work. We also received opportunities to mentor undergraduate students.• Funding - ability to select project of choice, exposure to research, networking, support
York:National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering, Inc.17 Good, Jennifer, Glennelle Halpin and Gerald Halpin, “A Promising Prospect for Minority Retention: StudentsBecoming Peer Mentors,” Journal of Negro Education, Volume 69, No. 4, Fall 2000.18 Gattis, Carol and Bryan Hill, “A Successful Peer Mentoring Program,” Proceedings of the 114th Annual ASEEConference & Exposition, June 24-27, 2007, p. 7-8.19 Tinto, V., Love, A. G., and Russo, P., Building Learning Communities for New College Students: A Summary ofResearch Findings of the Collaborative Learning Project, National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning anAssessment; University Park, PA, 1993.20 Shapiro, Nancy S., Levine, Jodi H., Creating Learning Communities: A Practical
they could have fun and be creative with everydayitems to build and design projects that worked. During the GiSWA, we were also intentional in engaging the families of the students.Parent support and influence can significantly impact their children’s’ self-confidence in STEM.11, 12 This was done to increase the awareness in families for how to support their daughters inpursuing STEM courses in high school, college, and the future careers. Figure 7. Families involved in designing egg protection vessel with their daughters Role Play Each year, our participants have been interested in acting out the case “stories
mathematics from Spelman College, a M.S. in industrial engineering from the University of Alabama, and a Ph.D. in Leadership and Policy Studies from Peabody College of Vanderbilt Univer- sity. Her teaching interests relate to the professional development of graduate engineering students and to leadership, policy, and change in STEM education. Primary research projects explore the preparation of graduate students for diverse careers and the development of reliable and valid engineering education assessment tools. She is a NSF Faculty Early Career (CAREER) and Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) recipient.Dr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette Joyce B. Main is an Assistant
Business-Higher Education F. Increasing the Number of STEM Graduates: Insights from the U.S. STEM Education & Modeling Project. Business-Higher Education Forum;2010.5 Church, A. STEM Mentoring--Aspiration to Achievement. NCSSSMST Journal. 2010;16(1):13-14.6 Strayhorn, T.L. & Terrell, M.C. The Evolving Challenges of Black College Students: New Insights for Page 26.1146.10 Policy, Practice, and Research. ERIC; 2010.7 Snead-McDaniel, K. Exploration of the Lived Experiences of Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Minority Students, ProQuest LLC; 2010.8 Redmond, S.P
. According to the2011 American Association of Community Colleges report, 44% of African American studentsattend community colleges. Many community college students hope to transfer into 4-yearinstitution to complete a baccalaureate degree.There is a desire and determination to facilitate student transfer from community colleges into 4-year institutions. That being acknowledged, it is hard to miss the deficit lens through whichAAM student populations are viewed. AAM students are often portrayed as victims; blamed fortheir lack of success, persistence to degree, or not transferring to a 4-year institution; orportrayed as academically underprepared and require taking academic developmental courses1,2.These unsuccessful performances, project blame or
days before they are due 1 5. Talk about concepts with study group 1 6. Study sessions with other students 1 7. Outlet for stress 1 8. Create constantly updated to do list 1 9. Work on personal projects outside of school 1 10. Internship 1 11. Be flexible 1Several of these activities are closely related to 4.0 Plan principles.Discussion of Survey ResultsTable I shows
students to engage inSTEM careers.References1. Hartman, H., & Hartman, M. (2006). Leaving engineering: Lessons from Rowan University's college ofengineering. Journal of Engineering Education,95(1), 49-61.2. Bottomley, L. (2015). Assessing the Success of Programs for Women in Engineering. Proceedings of AmericanSociety for Engineering Education. Seattle.3. Felder, R. M., Felder, G. N., Mauney, M., Hamrin, C. E., & Dietz, E. J. (1995). A longitudinal study ofengineering student performance and retention. III. Gender differences in student performance and attitudes. Journalof Engineering Education, 84(2), 151-163.4. Goodman, I. F. (2002). Final Report of the Women's Experiences in College Engineering (WECE) Project. OnlineSubmission
engineering students, specifically women and underrepresented minorities. He is working towards a M.S. in Industrial & Systems Engi- neering and he received his B.S. in Industrial Engineering from Clemson University.Ms. Kelly J Cross, Virginia Tech Kelly Cross earned her Bachelor of Science in Chemical Engineering from the Purdue University in 2007. She earned her Master’s of Science in Materials Science and Engineering from the University of Cincinnati in 2011. Ms. Cross is currently in the third year of the Engineering Education PhD program at Virginia Tech. She is currently involved with multiple educational research projects with faculty at Virginia Tech. Her research interests include assessment, diversity
ofOccupational Statistics and Employment Projections, Bureau of Labor Statistics, May 2002, Vol.125, No. 5.[4] May, G. S., Chubin, D. E., “A Retrospective on Undergraduate Engineering Success forUnderrepresented Minority Students,” Journal of Engineering Education, January 2003.[5] Treisman, U., “Studying Students Studying Calculus: A Look at the lives of minoritymathematics students in college”, The College Mathematics Journal, Vol. 23, o. 5, pp. 362-372. Page 25.730.12[6] Bonsangue, M., “An efficacy study of the calculus workshop model,” CBMS Issues inCollegiate Mathematics Education, Vol. 4, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI,1994. pp. 117
Investigator or Co-principal Investigator on more than $7 million in external funding, most from the National Science Foundation for educational projects. She is the author of numerous publications and several textbooks.Dr. Susan L. Amato-Henderson, Michigan Technological University Susan Amato-Henderson is an Associate Professor of psychology in the Department of Cognitive and Learning Sciences at Michigan Technological University, earning her Ph.D. in experimental psychology from the University of North Dakota. Her research focuses on assessment of educational outcomes in higher education as related to STEM learning, with a focus on the effects of various experiences on in- dividuals’ self-efficacy, entrepreneurial
, Boulder: Westview Press, 1997.[12] Chubin, D.E., and E. Babco, ""Walking the Talk" in Retention-to-Graduation: Institutional Production of Minority Engineers - A NACME Analysis," 2003.[13] Hughes, Q.S., and R.L. Shehab, "WHAT THEY SAY MATTERS: PARENTAL IMPACT ON PRE-COLLEGE ACADEMIC IDENTITY OF SUCCESSFUL AFRICAN AMERICAN ENGINEERING STUDENTS," Proceedings of the 2010 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Louisville, KY, 2010.[14] Jackson, L.A., P.D. Gardner, and L.A. Sullivan, "Engineering persistence: Past, present, and future factors and gender differences," Higher Education Vol. 26, 1993, pp. 227-246.[15] Morning, C., and J. Fleming, "Project Preserve: A Program to
experimental and quasi-experimental research. Most of her work involves examination of the social and cognitive indicators predictive of educational success, along with the measurement of educa- tional outcomes. She is currently serving as Co-PI for several funded projects examining the impact of various engineering education models on student persistence, intentions, attitudes, etc.Sheryl A. Sorby, Michigan Technological University Sheryl A. Sorby is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering-Engineering Mechanics and Director of Engi- neering Education and Research. She is the former Associate Dean for Academic Programs in the College of Engineering at Michigan Technological University and previously served as a rotator to the