Darrell Velegol attended West Virginia University for his BS in Chemical Engineering, and he earned his PhD in Chemical Engineering at Carnegie Mellon University in 1997 working with Professors John L. Anderson and Stephen Garoff. In 1998 Velegol won the Victor K. LaMer Award of the American Chemical Society for the best PhD in the field of Colloid & Surface Science. He continued with a post- doc in the Center for Light Microscope Imaging and Biotechnology at Carnegie Mellon, working under Professor Fred Lanni of the Biology Department. In June 1999 Velegol joined the Department of Chemical Engineering at Penn State, where he was promoted to Associate Professor in 2005. Velegol won an NSF CAREER Award in 2000, and
Interdisciplinary Design Skills1 INTRODUCTIONAt the Sunapee State University engineering majors are similar to those at other schools around thenation. Most students choose a specific major in an area of interest to them and their future career plans.Within the engineering major, these students follow a specific track of courses with little variation in theform of electives taken during the third and fourth years. With the only common courses between majorsbeing rooted in math, physics, chemistry, writing and some social sciences, it is unsurprising to find thatgraduates from different programs develop and exhibit a completely different set of technical skills. Theissue in this model surfaces when those graduates leave the university to begin their
IEEE/ACM Super- computing Education Program 2006 and was the curriculum director for the Supercomputing Education Program 2005. In January 2008, he was awarded the NSF CAREER award for work on transforming en- gineering education through learner-centric, adaptive cyber-tools and cyber-environments. He was one of 49 faculty members selected as the nation’s top engineering educators and researchers by the US National Academy of Engineering to the Frontiers in Engineering Education symposium. Page 24.609.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 First-Year
fields. In the first two years of college, and particularly under conditions ofuncertainty and material problems precipitated by a pandemic, STEM students face barriers toattainment of educational and career goals. First-year STEM students may not feel a sense of“belonging” in their chosen major or may not have even selected a program of study [1]. Secondyear students face a “critical juncture” as they approach transfer to a 4-year school [2]. At thispoint, many STEM students change majors or leave higher education altogether [3]. Engineeringeducation research points to feelings of isolation as contributing factors to lack of persistence inthe engineering major [4].One way to promote persistence among students who have selected STEM is to assist
focused on the organometallic chemistry and electrocatalytic reduction of CO2. During his postdoctoral work at Indiana University he continued to focus on small molecule activation using molecular modeling methods under supervision of professors, Baik, Caulton and Mindiola. Jos´e started his teaching career at Lamar University in 2012 and has been part of the teaching faculty at the University of Illinois since 2014. At Illinois, Jos´e has a deep interest in interdisciplinary projects, including study abroad courses and more recently with the Illinois Global Institute.Dr. Olivia C. Coiado, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Dr. Olivia C Coiado Teaching Assistant Professor, Medical Education Facilitator Course
embodied knowledge. As instructorswe have noticed that many students, even after taking multiple courses related to energythroughout their college career, still do not have a broad understanding of energy relatedconcepts and its significance in solving sociotechnical problems. One of the challenges we haveobserved is that students often lack a cohesive definition for energy. Energy concepts are oftentaught to students in ways that do not connect to their lived experience. Many students do nothave a way to relate personally to the subject, and thus struggle to see how these concepts arerelevant to either their personal lives or their future work as an engineer.In this paper, we will begin with a short literature review on energy education followed
humanities, social sciences, naturalsciences, and applied sciences. By the end of the second week, 154 learners were active. Thehighest number of submissions received for an assignment in the first two weeks was 69 (slightlyless than 50% of students on the Credit Eligible Track).Apart from their goal of earning college credit and/or admission to the university, these learnersalso had a variety of other reasons for enrolling in the course. Learners’ interests range fromexpanding their knowledge to advancing their career; from learning about engineering and theGrand Challenges to learning new and creative ways to implement business ideas in the realworld; from gaining insights on effectively innovating for their customers to developing
hand calculations over the use of software, but we believe this approach to be a disservice to engineering students in an introductory course because it is in stark contrast to what they will encounter during their careers. A well-designed, relevant, and engaging curriculum will provide ample opportunities for rigorous exploration of the concepts. We believe that aligning the curriculum more closely with modern practices (i.e., emphasis on software, real data sets, etc.) and integrating oral and digital communication principles into this course represents a natural progression for an engineering statistics curriculum. Our goal in thisTable 3 – Redesign Roadmap SM19
bachelor’s degree and postgraduate levels.The objectives of these workshops are to generate enthusiasm and inculcate a sense ofcommunity among current and future MRE educators; promote diversity and inclusivity withinthe community; seek feedback from the community to serve as a foundation for future activities;and identify thought leaders for future community activities. The workshops will benefit a widerange of participants including educators currently teaching in MRE; PhD students seekingacademic careers in MRE; and industry professionals desiring to shape the future MREworkforce. These workshops will significantly contribute to the quality of MRE education andincrease adoption to prepare individuals with a blend of theoretical knowledge and
column of electrical systems courses, is a column whichconsists mainly of courses in mathematics and science. The remaining portions of thecurriculum are electives and general education credits.Power Expertise QuadrantOur first estimation is that we can accomplish many of the goals in the power expertisequadrant with a one-credit embedded module. Remember that we are not trying toproduce an electrical engineer who will pursue a career in utility scale power distribution.Rather, we are focusing on someone who can provide power to the various parts of asmaller system such as a vehicle. The person will need to know how to select an Page
, and may increase unit cost beyond the $149 price point determined by marketing unless the quality of the electronics is downgraded. Given this information, how would you proceed?3. The project is already behind schedule and has no budget slack, and your team is in the hot seat with upper management. Failure to deliver on this project on time would be detrimental to your career with this company. Your proposed material for the helmet and lining has significant performance enhancement (safety!) over the existing design and has just undergone a manufacturing review. The manufacturing engineering group says your design—a new design that you’ve spent months developing, simulating, and
lower than MATH 111 Î College Algebra, such as MATH 100 Î Intermediate Algebra,then those studepvu"ctg"encuukhkgf"cu"Ðrtg-gpikpggtkpiÑ"uvwfgpvu"cv"USI until they can take MATH118 Î College Algebra & Trigonometry.ENGR 101 Î Engineering Orientation Î is a seminar class that all first year engineering studentsare required to take, whether they are in the 4-year program, 5-year program, or pre-engineeringprogram. In this way all first year students intent on pursuing engineering get some exposure tothe study and careers in engineering. Reference 4 describes the details on the ENGR 101 ÎEngineering Orientation course. This course is in the process of being updated, includingchanging from 0 credits to 1 credit to encourage more student
criterion 3 has specific Program Outcomes (POs) for the engineering disciplines6.The multidisciplinary approach to teaching and learning relates directly to Program Outcome D:the graduates have an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams. Teamwork is oftenemphasized in engineering courses, but it is often within a single class or discipline. Byintegrating the Advanced Quality Assurance class with the Polymer Processing class, thestudents are able to gain valuable experience working in multidisciplinary teams much like theywill encounter when they begin their professional careers. The ability to function effectively inmultidisciplinary teams is an important attribute and asset for graduating engineers because mostproblem-solving methodologies
Page 14.1034.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Robotics Engineering: A New Discipline for a New CenturyAbstractIn the spring of 2007, Worcester Polytechnic Institute introduced a BS degree program inRobotics Engineering. The motivation for the program was two-fold: it addresses the needs ofthe rapidly growing robotics industry and provides a professional career path matched togrowing student interest as demonstrated by numerous high school robotics competitions. Theprogram is a collaborative effort between the departments of Computer Science, Electrical andComputer Engineering and Mechanical Engineering and relies in part on already existingcourses. The core curriculum, however, consists of five new “unified
particular attack on a problem) (1 = not willing, 4 = very willing).13. Rate your willingness to change as change is required (1 = not willing, 4 = very willing).14. Rate you willingness and ability to work laterally (switching your thinking from one way or one direction to another) in contrast with vertical work (always driving forward to finish a project without deviation) (1 = not willing, 4 = very willing).15. Rate how well you believe you can form association between distinctly different objects, careers, etc. (1 = not at all, 4 = above average).16. Rate how adept you are at putting judgment on hold (1 = not willing, 4 = very willing).17. Rate how well you incorporate innovative ideas into action (1 = not at all, 4 = above average
, Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering.[13]. Grinter, S. (1955), (chair), “Final Report of the Committee on Evaluation of Engineering Education”, Journal of Engineering Education, 46 p.25-60.[14]. Ashby, E.[1966], Technology and the Academics- An essay on Universities and the Scientific Revolution, London: Macmillan.[15]. Guthrie, B.(1994), The Higher Education Experience Survey : An Examination of the Higher Education Experience of 1982, 1987 and 1992, Canberra: Graduate Careers Council of Australia.[16]. Yorke, M. (1999). “ The skills of graduates: a small enterprise perspective” . in O’Reilly, D., Cunningham, L., & Lester, S. (eds). Developing the Capable Practitioner, pp.174-183, London: Kogan Page..[17]. Harvey
services are information technology-driven. Students are increasingly expected to use statistical tools in order to analyze data,interpret information, and make decisions in their career. Future innovations are expected to increasingly exploit synergies between statisticaltools and business disciplines8. The need to use statistical tools to creatively improveundergraduate education is further stressed by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement ofTeaching2, 3. How has the education establishment reacted to the need for educating business studentson statistical tools? The National Science Board states that the shortage of technically skilled
., Fripp, J., & Fripp, W. (2017), Waterborne Disease CaseInvestigation: Public Health Nursing Simulation Journal of Nursing Education 56(1):39-427. McClelland, M., & Kleinke, D. (2013), Improving Lives Using Multidisciplinary Education:Partnering to Benefit Community, Innovation, Health, and Technology Journal of Nursing Education52(7):406-4098. Noone, J. (2009), Teaching the Three Apprenticeships: Designing Learning Activities forProfessional Practice in an Undergraduate Curriculum Journal of Nursing Education 48(8):468-4719. Penprase, B., Oakley, B., Ternes, R., & Driscoll, D. (2013), Empathy as a Determining Factor forNursing Career Selection Journal of Nursing Education 52(4):192-19710. Davis, M. (2003
disciplines as well as experts in the areas of economics, public policy, andothers. Grand Challenges critically address quality of human life and sustainability but also serveas a challenge to engineers and society by bringing disciplines together to craft the solution. In2015, over one hundred twenty schools had written letters of commitment to President Obama,pledging to produce engineers who were well equipped to tackle these Grand Challenges [2].Grand Challenge Scholars ProgramThe Grand Challenge Scholars Program (GCSP) formed to meet the needs of schools committedto educating engineers trained to tackle these challenges in their future careers. Since itsinception, universities have been free to create their own versions of the program. The
Innovation. He has 150 journal, conference proceedings and technical report publications. He is a Fellow of ASCE and has been inducted into the Connecticut Academy of Science and Engineering.Dr. Brian T. Kench, University of New Haven Brian T. Kench is Dean of the AACSB accredited College of Business at the University of New Haven. Dean Kench has built his career around the specialties behavioral and experimental economics, microeco- nomics, and the economics of organization. He serves as a consultant in the areas of economic damages and economic impact analysis. His works have been published in the Eastern Economic Journal, Journal of Economics and Economic Education Research, Journal of Financial Transformation, and
design of technology with a focus on international health and medical contexts and international online education. Kirk is also an Adjunct Professor of International Health and Medical Communication with the University of Limerick (Ireland) and a Guest Professor of Usability Studies at Southeast University (China). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Structure of Professional Components for a Multidisciplinary REU ProgramProfessional Development NeedsThe professionalism of engineering students is key factor to their career success after graduation.Achieving this objective requires integrating training across hard science skills (e.g., calculus,statistics, and mechanics) and softer
, especially in thetechnical writing and communications course. Here, engineering students from four differentmajors can provide early peer feedback and improve their effectiveness. Using a proven leaderdevelopment model and assessment tool in a technical writing course is novel. Using a tool forearly assessment gives team members a voice. This drives student engagement, as they becomeinvested in the projects, reinforcing the idea that students must continually strive to update theirskills throughout their careers. There are many opportunities to support the institution’s goalsand improve student professional skills. Not everything needs to be accomplished within aparticular program. Incorporating leadership in an engineering curriculum is not easy
coursedirector and senior faculty independent assessor. Each minor arc contains two teams with aninstructor and one or more advisors. The dots inside each segment represent students on the team,color-coded by discipline. The faculty names are also color-coded by discipline. There were 13teams ranging in size from four to 12 students. 12 teams were multidisciplinary and fourcontained students from multiple departments. The largest project, Swarms, contained studentsfrom five disciplines and three different departments. One of the external judges at our annualEECS Projects Day, a former faculty member from the 1980s who served a career in industryafter his faculty service and who has extensive involvement with ABET remarked, “The diversityof the teams
describe the project setup, the teamcomposition and its structure. 3.1. Project GoalsThe project was developed independent of exiting courses and degree requirements within the College ofEngineering and was focused on two primary goals: 1. Facilitate independent student research in the context of customer defined solution requirements 2. Facilitate collaboration between students with different specialties on developing solution componentsThis project was meant to develop the following set of skills useful to future graduates in their industry,research or entrepreneurial careers: 1. Collecting, understanding and analyzing customer requirements 2. Project planning within and across teams 3. Effectively employ iterative
asuccessful interdisciplinary program.To provide a collaborative learning platform and break down disciplinary barriers, during thetraining process, students are required to participate in a learning community, writingcommunity, coffee talks and seminar series also designed to enhance professional and technicalskills (see Table 1). Students are mentored through the use of an Individual Development Plan(IDP), which facilitates student self-reflection, goal setting, and career planning supported byannual discussions of the student and advisor [2, 3].Table 1. Desired Skills. Professional Skills Technical Skills TS1 Application of core knowledge to
. Improve your oral and written communication skills for use throughout your engineering career. 3. Create a technical design proposal that satisfies the project sponsor needs. 4. Learn the role of engineering management skills and their applications in a structured design process. 5. Experience the life cycle of a typical design and build project in a structured interdisciplinary team environment.SLO #1 is met through the fact that these projects require implementation of the latesttechnology to be realized, with challenges on both the mechanical and electrical sides.While the projects are not industry-sponsored, the client (in this case, the NRMdepartment) mimics this role for the students, and there is no
-school girls in computer programming. Will has been an active member of ASEE throughout his professional career, serving as an officer in his local section from 2002-2007 (Chair in 2005) and attending and publishing at national and sectional conferences. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Effects of Service-Learning Projects on Capstone Student MotivationAbstractMany engineering programs incorporate project-based, service learning into traditional classesand capstone experience. These projects focus on service-related challenges that impact the local,national, or international community and could be described as “humanitarian” or “for thegreater good”. While these projects have shown
research.ConclusionEnough cannot be said about the value and importance of the Maybeck Chapel research project.It was a perfect fit for undergraduate research, bringing together students from four differentengineering career fields who developed a disciplined, well-organized collaborative workingenvironment and functioned as a well-coordinated team in completing assigned tasks andbringing the project to a successful conclusion.The students were involved in every aspect of the project: identifying the main focus of theresearch; developing a plan and methodology for achieving the research goals and objectives;selecting and operating the UAVs that were critical to gathering the raw data, i.e., the photoimages needed for analysis; conducting the analysis and
learners annually). Dr. Madhavan was the Chair of the IEEE/ACM Supercomputing Education Program 2006. In January 2008, he was awarded the US National Science Foundation (NSF) CAREER award for work on learner-centric, adaptive cyber- tools and cyber-environments. He was one of 49 faculty members selected as the nation’s top engineering educators and researchers by the US National Academy of Engineering to the Frontiers in Engineering Education symposium. Dr. Madhavan leads a major NSF funded effort called Deep Insights Anytime, Anywhere (DIA2) that attempts to characterize the impact of NSF and other federal investments in the area of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education using interactive knowledge