Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI) Technical Session 10

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lauren Singelmann, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Yuezhou Wang, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Darcie Christensen, Minnesota State University, Mankato

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI)

’, Educational research review, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 130–144, 2007.[4] R. Butler and M. Nisan, ‘Effects of no feedback, task-related comments, and grades on intrinsic motivation and performance’, Journal of educational psychology, vol. 78, no. 3, p. 210, 1986.[5] J. Feldman, Grading for equity: What it is, why it matters, and how it can transform schools and classrooms. Corwin Press, 2018.[6] J. P. Moore and J. Ranalli, ‘A mastery learning approach to engineering homework assignments’, in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2015, pp. 26–64.[7] A. R. Carberry, M. Siniawski, S. A. Atwood, and H. A. Diefes-Dux, ‘Best practices for using standards-based grading in engineering courses’, in 2016 ASEE Annual

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI) Technical Session 3

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Maria Eugenia Cabrera, University of Massachusetts, Lowell; John Raiti, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI)

, 2005.[17] Krystian Radlak and Marcin Fojcik. Integration of robotic arm manipulator with computer vision in a project-based learning environment. In 2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), pages 1–4. IEEE, 2015.[18] Christopher Crick, Graylin Trevor Jay, Sarah Osentoski, Benjamin Pitzer, and Odest Chadwicke Jenkins. rosbridge: ROS for non-ROS users. In International Symposium on Robotics Research (ISRR 2011), Flagstaff, AZ, August 2011.[19] S. Osentoski, G. Jay, C. Crick, B. Pitzer, C. DuHadway, and O. C. Jenkins. Robots as web services: Reproducible experimentation and application development using rosjs. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, 2011.[20

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI) Technical Session 8

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rana Hussein, Boston University; Muhammad Hamid Zaman, Boston University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI)

., Dzombak, R., & Martin, S. (2018). Building 21st century skills through development engineering. International Journal of Engineering Education, 34, 619-631. 9. Passino K. M. (2009). Educating the humanitarian engineer. Science and engineering ethics, 15(4), 577–600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-009-9184-8 10. Baaoum, M. (2018). Humanizing Engineering Education: A Comprehensive Model for Fostering Humanitarian Engineering Education. International Journal of Modern Education Studies, 2(1), 1-23. 11. U.S. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2023, March). Addressing Challenges of Forced Displacement through STEM Education: A Workshop. https://www.nationalacademies.org/event/03-09-2023

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI) Technical Session 7

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Abdullah Ibrahim, Texas A&M University at Qatar; Roudha Saif Al-Khaldi, Texas A&M University, Qatar; Doaa Elamin Emam; Yasser M. Al Hamidi, Texas A&M University, Qatar; Marwan Khraisheh, Texas A&M University, Qatar

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI)

feedback with respect to an improvement ininnovation and creativity especially whilst problem solving. This spoke to the successof the two main aspects of this project/s; a multidisciplinary collaboration thatintegrated the strengths of an engineering-based education with that of an Arts basededucation, and the use of design thinking to produce outside the box thinkers. Despitea positive participant feedback, there were some areas where the collaborative projectscored low. The development of hands-on skills is one such example. It had an averagerating of 3.5 out of 5, with the lowest ratings coming from the Art and design teammembers who answered the survey questions. This can be easily explained, as thepurpose of this multidisciplinary project