not allowed to carry anyfirearms. There is very little armed gang violence in the UK’s cities and towns, which arecommonplace in major cities and towns of the US. The UK has organized and well trainedpolice forces throughout the country, and the police have a very high standing in society. The UK is to introduce a compulsory national identity card scheme to help tackleorganized crimes, prevent terrorist attacks, and protect the identities of their citizens. Usingcutting-edge technology, the cards will link individuals' unique biometric data, to a securenational database. This is an ambitious, controversial, and long-term project. The trial forthe system has already being launched in Scotland. Due to the gun ownership provision
Page 26.616.2more as a metaphor for conveying students’ experience of disappointment than to insinuatemalicious intent.(i)In K-12 engineering programs, the overwhelming curricular emphasis is on engaging, design-based classroom activities: open-ended, hands-on projects requiring creative synthesis acrossmultiple domains of knowledge on the part of the student.1 In university engineering programs,students confront an educational philosophy that can be characterized as exclusionary and builtupon a “fundamentals first” approach to learning:2 analytically rigorous, rote learning of basicprinciples in math and science (e.g., calculus, chemistry, physics) followed by engineeringsciences (e.g. statics, fluid dynamics) followed by engineering analysis
systematic way of thinking havealso been used – leading to student performance being measured by project results [7] [16]. Thismethod of learning is beneficial in face-to-face situations where students may engage in groupactivities. But it becomes more challenging to replicate in online courses. There is evidence thatthe CIQ is widely used in various levels of education [5, p. 177], but there is only limitedevidence of how the CIQ is used in engineering online teaching environments. Keefer describesthe pedagogical value of this type of research: “We want to better understand the experiences and perceptions of the student learners, for the more we can understand them, the more we can teach in ways that may meet their needs” [5
conspicuous, preparing for and conducting good classes, meeting with students individually, supervising individual research projects, serving on committees. This is inherent in the job: college teaching offers tremendous freedom to structure time and channel energy, but it requires commensurate levels of internal motivation, personal organization, self-discipline, and ability to pursue multiple goals.”He goes on to say that faculty have a difficult time deciding how to spend their time and energywhen it comes to their various requirements. He adds that: “It is not the workload per se that most creates discomfort among college instructors but the necessity of deciding how to spend time. To borrow a thought from
the term. Tutors also rate the students,but tutor data is not included in the final score. The final grade is computed as 5 Gi = Gg + (AVi – AVg)/2where Gi is the individual grade, Gg is the grade for the group, and AVi and AVg are therespective average grades.SPARKPLUS [21] is a self- and peer-assessment system developed at the University ofTechnology, Sydney. It is also a rating-based system,where students fill out a rubricassessing their and their teammates’ contributions. It produces two assessment factors.To compute the first factor, it multiplies the project score by a student-specificcontribution ratio (called the “Self- and Peer Assessment, or SPA) to derive
importanceof standards, students entering the workforce within these countries will become an essentialasset to companies in a growing global economy. Examples of the international educationcourses include the “87 standardization courses held at 46 Korean universities” in 2006 which“were attended by 6,681 students,” the Asian Link Project on Standardization Education, and a“secondary school program on standardization education in Thailand (2003-2006), where 2,354teachers were trained and 444,600 students received standardization education” (2). Howeveramong these success stories, there are major roadblocks when considering these approaches inthe United States. The complexity of the US decentralized standards system and the lack of
AC 2011-1396: ATTRIBUTES OF SUCCESS FOR ENGINEERING PH.D.S:PERSPECTIVES FROM ACADEMIA AND INDUSTRYMonica Farmer Cox, Purdue University, West Lafayette Monica F. Cox, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue Univer- sity. She obtained a B.S. in mathematics from Spelman College, a M.S. in industrial engineering from the University of Alabama, and a Ph.D. in Leadership and Policy Studies from Peabody College of Vanderbilt University. Teaching interests relate to the professional development of graduate engineering students and to leadership, policy, and change in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Pri- mary research projects explore the preparation of
described above. Students invariably have a final projectin many courses where they are assigned a design problem. In their senior year, they oftenhave a senior project which entails designing and building a unique prototype. The studentsare required to submit a proposal documenting the requirements, the proposed design, thematerials, the schedule, and the test plan. After review by the professor, the proposal mayrequire changes. Further modifications may be required at any point as unforeseen eventsoccur. In the end the prototype is expected to pass all tests and demonstrate on delivery thatit meets the original requirements. Many of these same steps occur on the job whengraduate engineers pursue engineering projects, so the project course is
responsibilities and long lists of tasks. Some of thesetasks have more immediate deadlines and necessitate frequent attention, while otherresponsibilities are longer-term projects. For example, teaching preparation can consume a largeproportion of a new faculty member’s time; however, one’s research and writing cannot beneglected. New faculty in particular may be faced with teaching, research, and service activitiesall requiring their time and attention at an intensity level that they might not have encounteredbefore. This can lead to a faculty member feeling overwhelmed and trigger self-doubt.This paper presents a research-based, holistic framework and strategies for time management,with an emphasis on taking an intentional approach to allocating time
award.Ms. Sepideh Afkhami Goli, University of CalgaryDr. Ehsan Mohammadi, University of CalgaryMrs. Fatemeh Sharifi, University of Calgary Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Collaborative Autoethnographic Study of a Large-Scale Flipped Classroom Implementation with Multiple InstructorsAbstractThe flipped classroom model is being used in many engineering courses. By guiding students tostudy course material online or outside of scheduled class time, instructors can focus on hands-on assignments and projects during their interactions with students. The flipped classroom modelimplements
interdisciplinary papers the authors have published with faculty from clinicalmedicine, bioengineering, finance, educational psychology, colonial history, business, sportsmedicine, and seismology. The paper includes five reasons to seek opportunities to applynumerical analysis to interdisciplinary problems, three common pitfalls of work in suchinterdisciplinary projects, and ten best practices for conducting numerical analysis ofinterdisciplinary problems.I. Reasons to seek interdisciplinary numerical analysis opportunities Interdisciplinary research often reveals low-hanging fruitAs a graduate student, one of the authors was the lone electrical engineer in a biomedical centerthat had a predominantly molecular chemistry emphasis. His specialty was analog
AC 2012-4757: TAKING MATTERS INTO YOUR OWN HANDS: IS CRE-ATING AN E-TEXTBOOK FOR YOU?Dr. Kathy Schmidt Jackson, Pennsylvania State University Kathy Jackson is a Senior Research Associate at Pennsylvania State University’s Schreyer Institute for Teaching Excellence. In this position, she promotes Penn State’s commitment to enriching teaching and learning. Jackson works in all aspects of education including faculty development, instructional design, engineering education, learner support, and evaluation.Prof. Randy L. Vander Wal, Pennsylvania State University Randy Vander Wal has published more than 100 papers, and has numerous research projects in the areas of energy conversion, storage and efficiency. Related work
Paper ID #27072Improving Creative Thinking in Engineering Students Through Art Appre-ciationPatricia Caratozzolo, School of Engineering and Sciences, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico Patricia Caratozzolo was born in Buenos Aires, Argentina. She received the Ph.D. degree from the Uni- versitat Polit´ecnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain, in 2003. Since 2005 she has been a member of the faculty of Tecnol´ogico de Monterrey, Campus Santa Fe, where she is Assistant Professor of Power Energy Systems in the Mechatronics and Sustainable Development Department. She is leading different projects in the area of educational
delivery that offers students a variety oflearning styles and preferences in interactive ways. In this research project, we implemented atleast two techniques of increasing faculty-student interactivity in alternate educationalenvironments. It engaged students in the online class discussion by interjecting frequentquestions from the covered contents and providing audio/video repository of answered questions.Online students appear to be successful when provided ample opportunities to interact with theinstructor, other students, and the course content. In this project we designed interactive coursecontent for online students and codify them. We then use this as a basis for an “EducatingEducators” program to help online faculty become more effective
engineering FLCmembers were non-tenure track faculty with workloads that consisted primarily of teaching.Experience level ranged from a 2nd-year Assistant Professor of Instruction through mid-careerfaculty. Although service is also part of the workload of each member, participation in this groupwas voluntary, and each member was compensated $500 from the grant for their efforts.The GuidesAn initial list of guides was proposed at the beginning ofthe project (Figure 1) that grew into 12 total: InclusiveTeaching, Active Learning, Motivation & Engagement,Mindset, Rubrics, Learning Objectives, SyllabusCreation, Assessment, Inductive Teaching, DamageControl, Retrieval Practice, and Teams.This work is directly informed by both the scholarship ofteaching
Michael’s retrospective reflections on and systematic analysis of threeencounters he had with various members of his college during his freshman year. It is importantto point out that at the times when these encounters took place, Michael had not yet begunworking on the research project described above [12]. In other words, the encounters took place innatural settings and were not influenced or prompted by the goals and purposes of this study.As described above, the purpose of embarking on this exploratory study was to examine howstories ‘told’ about engineering in the public discourse influence, or “shape and reflect” [12],communications at an institutional level. The focus of the empirical analysis was therefore notthe stories that individuals
AC 2007-606: PERSPECTIVES FROM NEW FACULTY IN A NON-TRADITIONALENGINEERING SETTINGClaude Villiers, Florida Gulf Coast University CLAUDE VILLIERS is an Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering at Florida Gulf Coast University. He received his Ph.D. in Civil Engineering with a concentration in Materials and Construction from the University of Florida in 2004. Previously Dr. Villiers was an Assistant Professor at The City College of New York. Prior to this position, he was employed by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) as a research engineer. Dr. Villiers also was employed by The University of Florida and worked on several projects sponsored by the FDOT and the Federal
the expense of other topics. Try to address the topics found on theFundamentals of Engineering (FE) exam. Add value to each class period.1 Be decisive,confident, and knowledgeable on the subject being taught.2Design assignments, projects, and exams to be both rigorous and fair.3 Gear the lectures to theassignments, and gear the assignments to the exams. Keep the audience in mind, and be mindfulof the scholastic background and maturity of the students in your course.2 Do not make thecourse easy in an attempt to please students, as a course without some difficulty is ultimately adisservice to the students and yourself.Problems can arise when there are multiple sections of the same course taught by differentfaculty members. In these situations
refer back to if conflicts arise.33 Mentor-mentee contracts should be reviewed andupdated regularly; in an academic environment, revising once per year at a minimum – or even atthe start of a new semester – helps to ensure that mentors and mentees remain focused on theircommon goals. Specific elements that may be helpful within a mentor-mentee contract include: Goals. The goals statement should identify (1) the overarching goals for the project or timeframe (e.g., what is the purpose of the research, or what are the key goals to accomplish during the upcoming semester?); (2) the mentee’s personal and/or professional goals for the project/timeframe (e.g., to complete certain experiments, to submit a journal
traditional, summative score-based grade book. Standards-based grading (SBG) is an alternative grading system that has shown potential toprovide a more sound assessment of student learning. Instead of grading student assignments,students are graded throughout the term directly on their demonstrated proficiency in regards tothe course objectives. In the SBG system, student progress toward the course learning objectivesis directly and explicitly assessed using student work, which is monitored throughout theduration of the term. An example SBG gradebook for one project within a larger course is shownin Table 2. Changes in proficiency toward the learning objectives can be observed over time.Final course grades are determined based on students
Broad Agency Announcements, which can easily belocated on the web. Before submitting to these agencies, it’s absolutely necessary todiscuss your idea with a program officer. Their needs are very specific, and you canquickly tell whether the program is worth pursuing. You can find out more about thekind of work they are interested in by offering to serve as an external reviewer forproposals submitted to them. The Sponsored Projects Office at the University ofCalifornia-Berkeley has a useful list of funding opportunities [6] for new faculty frommission agencies as well as NSF.2.3 Industrial funding. Industrial research tends to be more applied, focusing on specificshort-term problems. Personal contact is critical. You can ask to give a talk to
relate to the professional development of graduate engineering students and to leadership, policy, and change in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Primary research projects explore the preparation of engineering doctoral students for careers in academia and industry and the development of engineering education assessment tools. She is a National Science Foundation Faculty Early Career (CA- REER) award winner and is a recipient of a Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE). Page 26.1623.1 c American Society for Engineering
, faculty get more teaching credit for teaching larger classes. For example,the author’s department used to have a rule that a class of more than 100 students counted as 1.5classes. This allows the instructor to focus on fewer classes and do a better job on those, whilehaving more time for research.Large classes are a boon to recruitment. An instructor of a large class becomes known to a lotmore students, and these students are more likely to consider working with them later on. Youmay become their graduate advisor, or advisor for an undergraduate research project. A largeclass is also a great place to recruit for independent-study students who may assist one of yourresearch projects or generate resources for later offerings of the same course. The
previous work to extend or previouscontacts to build upon. Combined with a lack of experience, such freedom can be detrimental.For example, many projects may seem tempting or even urgent but it would be a mistake toperform a small amount of work in several areas without significant progress in any of them.Additionally, tenure-track problems are usually exacerbated by the fact that the faculty memberis new to the geographic location and starts with a limited social network. Regular discussions with peers in the same situation can accelerate the acclimation andthereby improve the chances of getting tenure.13-15 First, explaining and discussing anydifficulties often provides multiple approaches which can then be considered and debated.Second, and
numberof times in the presentations and papers of Mihail Roco 1 of NSF who has projected thatapproximately 2 million nano-related jobs will be created by 2015 (40% of them in the US) andif typical multipliers are used the number of Nano-related jobs would be substantially more. Thiscorrelated with the predictions made by Lux Research (a well known contract research firm) thatnanotechnology will contribute $3.1 Trillion to the world's economy by 2015. We expect JSNNgraduates to find positions in industrial, academic and government research labs in fieldsincluding pharmaceuticals, defense, materials and electronics companies. The Joint School of Nanoscience and Nanoengineering (JSNN) currently offer twodegree programs (a Professional M.S. in
cooperatively. Googledocs serve much the same function, allowing more flexibility but less uniformity informatting. More powerful features are available through Google sites, which allow theinstructor to set up templates to track student progress, including the time that they havespent on the project. CATME/Team Maker is a tool for creating teams based on studentschedules or other criteria, and collecting feedback from team members on thecontributions of their partners.1. IntroductionOver the last 20 years, there has been a movement to adopt collaborative learning inengineering classes, based upon the results of studies that show it is decidedly moreeffective in promoting student learning. This trend has been coincident with the rise of theWorld-Wide
college students is procrastination. Students tend to wait until thelast minute to work on projects, especially if the project is longer than a day or two in duration.By procrastinating, students often end up rushing at the end to complete the project, resulting inthe student not obtaining the optimal educational benefit from the assignment. This syndromealso leads to long lines outside of the office door on the day or two before an assignment is due,as the students are frantically trying to complete an assignment and have questions that theycannot answer. Those who are able to work effectively under pressure complete the assignment,while those who do not either turn in substandard work or submit late assignments. The lateassignments receive
for removal of emerging contaminants during water and wastewater treatment. At CalPoly, she works with both civil and environmental engineering undergraduate students to to expand her research into application of wastewater reuse for agricultural applications, as well as effective storm water management via Low Impact Development techniques. Before Cal Poly, Dr. Oulton was a consulting engineer at Cannon in San Luis Obispo, where her projects included the Guadalupe Restoration Project, storm water management for Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, water management and wastewater treatment projects for local municipalities, and pollution control design for numerous development and remediation projects throughout
pay) forperforming some TA functions. Projects like this are typically structured for independent-studycredit [12], with duties and deliverables that are very similar to the TA contracts discussed inSection 4.The first time that you teach a particular course, your TA can provide continuity. The TA willknow the material that the previous instructor has covered, and can recommend problems, etc., toassign for homework. Continuity is important in a class taught by multiple instructors, because itassures that students will cover the prerequisites for future courses.2. Duties of a teaching assistantThe instructors responding to the listserv posts mentioned many different tasks that TAs couldperform. The list provided in Table 1 can be used as a
software to manage literature. Most participants indicated that they were using referencemanagement software; Figure 7 shows which software they use the most.In addition to staying organized, Furtak7 suggests maintaining a publication pipeline. Herpipeline includes the following categories: conceiving new ideas, draft proposals, proposalsunder review, data collection, data analysis, manuscripts in draft form, almost ready forsubmission, manuscripts under review, in revisions, revisions under review, and inpress/published. She suggests that candidates regularly check where projects are in this pipelineto prevent stagnation and holdups. She also suggests keeping projects distributed along thepipeline.I personally use Google Drive for storing data