’ drawings. As with the second year, the two groupsdiscussed their prior experiences with science and engineering. Each team developed a plan tosupport communication throughout the project to promote healthy team development. The planincluded specifics on the responsibilities and practices the group would follow in order tocomplete the project. When the afterschool clubs began, both education students and engineeringstudents were in attendance for almost all club meetings. The largest change during this iterationof the cross-disciplinary project was the process for identifying the club theme. In prior years,teams independently chose their club topic at the first in-class meeting. In the third year, theengineering students on each team identified a
homeworkassignments enables students to develop greater cognitive level problem solving skills. Homework is a very valuable tool in learning engineering. Therefore, we are concernedwith our students whether they are copying the homework solutions available in internet and/orother sources. This has become especially evident when a student gets a perfect or near perfectoverall score for their homework grade, yet their test scores are very low. A study by Wichita StateUniversity [3] mentions that approximately 70% of students in the U.S. were involved directly orindirectly in cheating during exams, homework, term projects, reports, papers and presentationsusing different techniques. According to a paper [4] entitled, “The Theory of Planned Behavioras a
. Thediscussion questions strive to increase the depth of knowledge in each topic. Lastly, the studentinvolvement in discussions teaches critical thinking and aids in developing foresight to moreeffectively plan experiments. Outcomes of the Journal Club activity have been increased studentknowledge of the literature, decreased apprehension in younger students toward understandingtechnical publications, and a slight increase in productivity towards publication goals within thegroup. Including this weekly meeting as an independent study course for credit also encouragesall students to read the articles prior to the meeting and enhances participation in groupdiscussions.IntroductionNew faculty encounter many challenges as they strive to set up their
College BASE was justifiable when used as a general indicator ofachievement for two-year and four-year colleges and universities, but he cautioned againstextrapolating the validity to other instruments and/or across other types of institutions.12An example of institutional useIn order to assess its programs for curriculum improvement, the College of Technology at theUniversity of Houston compiles and analyzes student self-reports of concept and skillachievement just prior to graduation. This has been accomplished largely by the Assessment andContinuous Improvement Committee (ACI), which was formed to plan and implement programassessment for diverse program areas within the College. The ACI developed the GraduatingSenior Survey (GSS) instrument in
, Television, and Film at the University of ______ come and guest lecture to the graduate students about the basics of filmmaking. This hour-long seminar may have helped increase the quality of the video, although it is also possible that the student improved based upon the written feedback they received. During the next semester, the author plans to schedule the
science educators’ teaching effectiveness.Over the next four years, the authors plan to implement this strategy with more new educators.The method presented in this study may be used at other institutions with appropriatemodifications in order to help new educators improve their teaching effectiveness. Page 25.370.9Bibliography 1. Sumner, William (1906). Folkways: A Study of the Sociological Importance of Usages, Manners, Customs, Mores, and Morals. New York: Ginn and Co.. p. 633. 2. Raiskums, B.W., An Analysis of the Concept Criticality in Adult Education (2008) 3. Ennis, R.H., "Critical Thinking Assessment" in Fasko, Critical
include: preparing future engineering faculty, improving teaching and learning, distance education and underrep- resented student success.Shree FrazierDr. Osman Cekic, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Turkey Osman Cekic holds a Ph.D. in higher education and student affairs from Indiana University at Blooming- ton and a master’s degree in secondary school administration from the University of Arkansas at Fayet- teville and a Bachelor’s degree in educational administration and planning from Ankara University in Page 22.267.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011Turkey. He
lecture Page 15.582.3 Figure 1. Approximate template for one hour class (slight modification needed for one and half hour class)specific classes.) The first minute or two was used to make any announcements, addressgeneral concerns (like course website related, test dates, homework dates) etc. The nextfive minutes were dedicated to a review of previous class, any homework relatedquestions etc. This was then followed by what was planned for
the homework was: enjoyable, intellectually stimulating, relevant to the material of the course, relevant to the exam material, relevant to real life situations, relevant to your plans for the future, critical to your learning process of the material, fairly graded, graded and returned in a timely manner (see Figure 1 for layout). c. Finally, students were asked to type out what specific strategies the course used that made it a successful experience for the student.3. Negative Homework Course. All of the same questions as above, but relating to a homework experience in a STEM course that the student would describe as “negative.”4. Homework Grading. Questions about grading in courses in the STEM
% strongly agreed; 60% agreed). We plan to conduct additional mentor and mentee surveys so that we can evaluate and trackchanges in faculty attitudes and perceptions. We are seeing the following results of our juniorfaculty cohort mentoring program: higher retention of faculty. better understanding of the factors that lead to the retention of faculty, by gender. lower levels of stress and isolation reported by faculty, especially women and faculty of color, in our campus climate surveys. positive experiences reported for both mentors and mentees (lower stress, less isolation, greater networking and community building, greater productivity). (positive) differences in self-reported attitudes of chairs and
dynamics and vibrations for thirty years. Eighty-one students were enrolled in this section of Dynamics & Vibrations, and it was held in atraditional “lecture-style” amphitheater classroom with tiered rows of fixed tables. Dynamics &Vibrations was selected for observation because Professor DV was known to heavily employactive learning activities in class, and because the class was held in a traditional classroom.Professor DV used the whiteboard at the front of the classroom every day, and occasionally didpre-planned or spontaneous demonstrations for students.MethodsDuring the fall 2016 semester, we collected data from the Aerodynamics and Dynamics &Vibration courses in the form of 1) pre- and post-semester interviews with each
Chair or Chairperson To man (verb) to staff, to run, to operate Man-hours Work hours, hours worked, staff hours, person hours, hours Mankind Humanity, human race, human beings, people Manmade Artificial, synthetic, manufactured, crafted, machine made Manpower Work force, labor force, personnel, workers Guys Everyone, people, folks● Plan ahead. Include statements about inclusion and diverse learning needs in your syllabus.● Embrace diversity in content and practices ○ Assume students are diverse in ways you can’t see. Race, national origin, socioeconomic status, ethnicity, physical and
AC 2010-1298: ATLAS - ACADEMIC TEACHING AND LEARNING ASSISTANTSSTUDY: THE USE OF PEERS AS ‘QUALITY MANAGERS’ IN ENGINEERINGCLASS INSTRUCTIONBeverly Jaeger, Northeastern University Beverly K. Jaeger, PhD is a member of Northeastern University’s Gateway Team, a select group of full-time faculty devoted to the First-year Engineering Program at Northeastern University (NU). While she concentrates on first-year engineering courses and instructs across all engineering disciplines, Dr. Jaeger also teaches specialty courses in the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at NU in Digital Simulation, Facilities Planning, and Human-Machine Systems.Corey Balint, Northeastern University
problem-solving process was included in the SLOs.These are the final course goals included in the syllabus:• Students will use Excel, Word, and PowerPoint to aid in their problem-solving process.• Students will write a plan on how they would address an open-ended problem using the language of the problem-solving framework.• Students will analyze real-world data, such as applying business statistics techniques and mathematical models and create data visualizations for problem-solving.In addition to the course goals, I define a set of student learning objectives that will provide partialevidence of fulfilling the third course goal (see the list above). For example, these are two of thosestudent learning objectives: "Calculate
, left more time for student questions andinteractions; and limited course preparation time, when teaching courses for a second time ormore, to less than 1.5 hours of preparation for each hour of class.Based on this and additional research, the SUCCEED Coalition developed a model programdesigned to help new faculty in all aspects of their career, including effective teaching.1 Ateaching mentorship is part of their program. Ideally, the mentor and the mentee would co-teacha course with the mentor taking the lead on the course at first. The mentor and mentee meetbetween class periods to plan and to discuss the teaching in the last class. The mentee slowlytakes on the responsibilities of planning and teaching and making up and grading
, introductory biology, ecology and environmental studies, evolution, evolutionary medicine, and research practices in science.Dr. Julia M. Williams, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Julia M. Williams is Executive Director of the Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assess- ment & Professor of English at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Her research areas include technical communication, assessment, accreditation, and the development of change management strategies for fac- ulty and staff. Her articles have appeared in the Journal of Engineering Education, International Journal of Engineering Education, IEEE Transaction on Professional Communication, and Technical Communi- cation Quarterly, among
are or what their future plans may be. He strives not tomake assumptions about students or stereotype them.He felt that everyone’s diversity statements were unique and no single statement could sum up theviews of the entire group. These unique statements came from different experiences, emphases,attitudes, approaches, and values. He claimed that the diversity statement was actually a goodexercise because he felt that diversity is becoming more of an issue, even though he chose not toinclude his diversity statement in his teaching portfolio.Participant JI102JI102 had a negative experience with diversity, which influenced how she communicated aboutdiversity. During a university wide workshop discussion about diversity a panelist
preparation for real-world applications of knowledge such as group collaboration.They also appreciated the focus on student and faculty dialog versus traditional lecturing. Thefacilitators of the Active Learning Faculty Fellowship are currently working on compiling data topresent a full assessment of the classroom space in the future.With regard to this particular MSE introductory course, the indirect assessment of the classroomindicates that the active learning space is both functional and exciting for student learning. Thisconclusion comes from instructor journaling, student interviews, and outsider shadowing duringteam-based learning activities. The initially planned course structure only included active-learningactivities every other Friday, but
. Page 24.223.2There are many behaviors that characterize a successful leader. However, most successfulleaders have certain behavioral characteristics in common2. At the same time, whencomparing the behaviors of effective leadership with the various aspects of classroommanagement, similarities appear.Define Classroom ManagementClassroom management is a very complex issue. As a result, there are many ways ofdescribing the various aspects associated with classroom teaching. For example,descriptions of classroom management include the following: • “Classroom management, as applied to teaching, involves everything that a teacher must do to carry out his/her teaching objectives. It includes preparation of plans and materials
students to share their experiences. Other optionsmight include presenting a poster or giving a talk at a campus or regional symposium, or evengiving a formal presentation to the research group or department. Distilling their experiencesinto a poster or oral presentation gives students valuable experience in communicating technicalcontent, and encourages students to reflect on the their contributions to the larger researchproject.Example ProjectsThis three-step method for mentoring undergraduate researchers is easy for faculty to implementand scaffolds students’ introduction to the research domain. Highly motivated students have theopportunity to gain skills and responsibility as they move through the three stages of thismentoring plan. For
technicalwriting skills. On a slightly different note, the student leader encountered some limitations in thestudent version of OrCAD (Cadence) and observed that Visio was a more flexible tool forgeneric engineering components.Additional lessons involved project management issues. They both discovered how easy it is tounderestimate the magnitude and/or complexity of a real-world project, the challenges ofcoordinating efforts between multiple parties, and the importance of planning beforehand andmanaging their time throughout. The second student added that he learned the importance ofkeeping an open mind when working in a group environment. Page
currently stands, we believe Recap’s technology glitches hinder true learninggains and have decided not to implement Recap during the spring 2017 semester. Plans to revisitthe technology later in 2017 to see what improvements have been made will determine future useand implementation decisions.References1 Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L. & Cocking, R. R. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School. (National Academy Press, 2000).2 Fisher, D., Frey, N. & Rothenberg, C. Content-Area Conversations. (ASCD 2008).3 Brookfield, S. D. & Preskill, S. Discussion as a Way of Teaching. (John Wiley and Sons, 2005).4 Alexander, R. J. Towards Diologic Teaching: rethinking classroom talk. (Dialogos, 2017).5 Dreyfus
professional skills and abilities. This could imply that group discussions of their portfoliosmay help students reflect. Page 11.1000.11Surveys and interviews in Christy’s studies revealed student reticence in self-directed learning.9This obstacle could greatly hinder students’ motivation to direct their own learning and maybeeven their motivation to create thoughtful portfolios. Students in this study suggested thatinstructors should explain how and why portfolios enhance learning, provide an appropriate levelof structure, and integrate portfolios into curriculum planning.9 In designing a portfolioassignment for mechanical engineering students, Guan
a junior facultymember. Over the years I will be able to refine my teaching style and learn to be firm andeffective when dealing with difficult students. Time will also allow me to have connected withmore people and to have a larger network of support. Women supporting other women is oneroute to success that I will continue to pursue. The challenges that female faculty face in a maledominated field of study are difficult, but if faced head on and with a plan can be effectivelydealt with.References1. J. Burrelli, Info Brief: Science Resource Statistics,NSF 08-308, July 2008. [Online] Available: .http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/infbrief/nsf08308/2. Digest of Educational Statistics, National Center for Educational Statistics, 2008
class also appreciates the pop culture I am planning to reference. Onereason the Avengers worked so well in this class was that it was a shared universe. Not everyonein the class has to be a diehard fan of the universe, but most need to feel positive about it and atleast be familiar with it. I’ve found the best way to discover what fandoms are represented in theclass is to ask. It’s a great icebreaker discussion as students are coming into the class, and alsohelps demonstrate that I’m interested in them.Third, I always make sure to provide an introduction to the specific feature I am discussing tomake sure no one feels left out. For example, when discussing whether Iron Man’s suit violatesthe laws of thermodynamics, first we reviewed what his
expectations explicitly stated starting in year one, using annualevaluations and frequent feedback to help them develop desirable track records.Ongoing institutional support: As described in Section 5, the common comments that the COENfaculty members made about environmental or administrative support that they need from thedepartment, college and university for effective teaching and successful scholarly activities canbe categorized into 5Ps: personnel, place, policy, procedure and professional development. TheCOEN has initiated several action plans that would make improvements on providing support tofaculty on the areas of policy, procedure and professional development. The COEN‟s TLC is developing more comprehensive guidelines for documenting
amount of text productioncan increase along with their knowledge. Professors can talk about the similar kinds of writing thatthey do and the ways in which they handle the writing tasks. Students should also be required tobegin the process of oral presentation early in their academic careers. Professors should give theirstudents every chance available to speak of the technical knowledge that they are learning. Asinterest grows, planned seminars and workshops can be provided that will emphasize the importanceof the engineering faculty as the catalyst for improvement. Page 22.1263.4The structure of unified technical knowledge and communication
number of discussion messages and success of teams for the test class.Revision is an essential part of the process. Plan for and provide fast overnight feedback on the drafts. Schedule time for this in the week before the due date, to prevent faculty overload. Be brief and fix only a few things in each draft, not everything. Students will also fix what they find when they re-read it. Avoid giving feedback 30 minutes before the final deadline. It will be too late. Avoid rewriting student’s documents even if they are nonsensical jargon gibberish. Give a little feedback, edit one sentence, and trust that it will improve in the next draft.The goal of the revision process is to get students hooked on rewriting.It is
both a formative and summative evaluation plan for their teaching.Obj. 5 - Students will have developed their own philosophy of teaching statement. Format of the courses is based on one three-hour session, one evening per week for 10weeks (academic quarter). Primary leadership has been by the study author, however selectedtopics are addressed by colleagues from a range of units across campus and from otherUniversities. The course is highly interactive, frequently using collaborative learning techniques.Formative and summative assessment is modeled throughout course and with end of term tools.Each segment (topic and presenter) is assessed independently at the end of the course. Thirtyminute individual exit interviews are used in
, these labels are illegible. Page 15.372.3 4. Content from multiple sequential slides could be not displayed in a row or a column. For example, there is no flexibility in PowerPoint for printing five slides on one page, two on the second page, three across the width of a third, with strategically planned whitespace. 5. Homework assignments were limited to what would fit easily on a slide, which made it difficult to assign wordy problems, or problems using graphs or pictures. 6. Supplemental handouts were stapled to the back of the packet, because PowerPoint will only print slides from the slideshow itself. If the