Conference Session

Technology for Faculty Development and Classroom Management

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rustin Deane Webster, Purdue University, New Albany

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

, G. (2016). Strategies and techniques for new tenure-track faculty to become successful in academia. Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, LA, 26-28 June. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.Boice, R. (1992). The new faculty member. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Boice, R. (2000). Advice for new faculty members. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Brent, R., & Felder, R. M. (1998). The new faculty member. Chemical Engineering Education 32(3), 206- 207. Retrieved from http://www.che.ufl.edu/cee/Brent, R., Felder, R. M., & Rajala, S. A. (2006). Preparing new faculty members to be successful: A no- brainer and yet a radical concept. Paper presented at

Conference Session

Technology for Faculty Development and Classroom Management

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rebecca Marie Reck, Kettering University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

committees. I also have a folder for eachcommittee and organization on my Google Drive. I use Evernote and my calendar to trackaction items and upcoming meetings. Additionally, about two or three times a year, I summarizemy service into main points and update my CV.Other TechnologyReis2; Boice8; Lucas and Murry1; and Wankat and Oreowicz3 all emphasize the importance oftime management and efficiency for tenure-track faculty. While time management andefficiency are not directly related collection of tenure artifacts, effective time management meansthat you will produce artifacts worth filing and can plan time to keep documentation up-to-date.In the survey, participants responded with the tool(s) they used to organize their time; see Figure8. In

Conference Session

New Engineering Educators 4: Tips and Tools

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Randy Hugh Brooks, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

., MIT, Cambridge, MA, 2007.[3] S. Bante, and E. Hilton, and K. Talley, and K. Shryock, and J. Linsey, and T. Hammond, “Board 65: Changing Homework Achievement with Mechanix Pedagogy,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, June 2019. https://peer.asee.org/32398[4] B. Williford, and M. Runyon, and J. Cherian, and W. Li, and J. Linsey, and T. Hammond, “A Framework for Motivating Sketching Practice with Sketch-based Gameplay,” in Chi Play ’19, Barcelona, Spain, October 22-25, 2019. doi: 10.1145/3311350.3347175.[5] R. Brooks, and J. Koh, and S. Polsley, and T. Hammond, “Score Improvement Distribution When Using Sketch Recognition Software (Mechanix) as a Tutor: Assessment

Conference Session

Faculty Unite! Effective Ways for Educators to Collaborate Successfully

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gouranga Banik, Oklahoma State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

the E and ET academic career. At the end, I would like to mention that some of these suggestions will work while others may not, based on the faculty’s personality and way of implementation, but it’s always good to try. References Accreditation Criteria from Policy and Procedural Manual, www.abet.org. Adams, Robin S. and Felder, Richard (2008) “Reframing Professional Development: A Systems Approach to Preparing Engineering Educators to Educate Tomorrow ’s Engineers, Journal of Engineering Education, Pp.239-241. Austin, A. E. (2003). Creating a bridge to the future: Preparing new faculty to face changing expectations in a shifting context. Review of Higher Education, 26, 119-144. Boice, R. (1992). The New Faculty Member, San Francisco, CA

Conference Session

Research on Diversification & Inclusion

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jane L. Lehr, California Polytechnic State University; Michael Haungs, California Polytechnic State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, New Engineering Educators, Student, Women in Engineering

the Ninth Annual International ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research, ACM, New York, NY, USA, ICER ’13, ISBN 978-1-4503-2243-0, pp. 19–26.21. Riley, D. (2013). ASEE Distinguished Lecture: Rigor/Us: Merit Standards and Diversity in Engineering Education Research and Practice, Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education, Atlanta, GA.22. Walsh, D. and Breitenbach, S. (2007). A BA Engineering and Liberal Studies Degree at a Polytechnic Institute. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education.23. Traver, C., Klein, J.D., Mikic, B., Akera, A., Shooter, S., Epstein, A. and Gillette, D. (2011). Fostering Innovation through the Integration of Engineering

Conference Session

Encouraging Students to Think Critically

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Royce Woodrow Floyd P.E., The University of Oklahoma; Seamus F Freyne P.E., Mississippi State University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

]. Available: http://woodeducationinstitute.org/. [Accessed 12 Febrary 2017].[2] S. M. Cramer and D. L. Wheat, "Education in Wood Structural Design: Who Needs it?," Structure Magazine, p. 5, June 2011.[3] D. O. Prevatt, J. W. van de Lindt, E. Back, A. J. Graettinger, S. Pei, W. Coulbourne, R. Gupta and R. James, "Making the Case for Improved Structural Design: The Tornado Outbreaks of 2011," Leadership and Management in Engineering, vol. 12, pp. 254-270, 2012.[4] C. Ramseyer, L. Holliday, and R. Floyd, "Enhanced Residential Building Code for Tornado Safety," Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, vol. 30, no. 4, 2016.[5] A. Watts and L. Helm, "Cross-laminated Timber: The Future of Building?," Seattle Business, June 2015

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade for Teaching II

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Malicky, University of San Diego; Ming Huang, University of San Diego; Susan Lord, University of San Diego

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

discouraged,and go back to old ways of doing things. Instead, they are advised to select only one or twoideas at a time and try them long enough for the students to acclimate to the new methods....There is no hurry.” (p. 3)Active/engagement pedagogies have significant potential for enhancing student learning. Thispaper provides a framework to guide engineering educators in choosing suitable pedagogies fromamong the myriad of possibilities.Bibliography1. Smith, K. A., S. D. Sheppard, D. W. Johnson, and R. T. Johnson, “Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom-Based Practices,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 94, No. 1, 2005, pp.87-101.2. Kou, Z. and S. Mehta, “Lessons learned from incorporating problem-based learning and Lego systems in

Conference Session

Been There, Done That: Advice for New Faculty

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kevin Dahm, Rowan University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

/Senior Clinic as the capstone design experiences in their programs. While theChemical Engineering and Civil and Environmental Engineering departments haveseparate capstone design courses, these departments also recognize Junior/Senior Clinicas a course that well reflects engineering practice. Consequently Junior/Senior Clinicfigures prominently in the assessment efforts of all four programs. As noted in theprevious section, the Junior/Senior Clinic final reports were included in the portfolios ofstudent work that were reviewed at the end of every year. While the department obtainedvaluable data from the portfolio evaluation, an inefficiency in the process was alsoevident: each paper was being read by the project supervisor(s), who assigned a

Conference Session

Classroom Management

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew E. Jackson, East Carolina University; Sherion H. Jackson, Grand Canyon Univeristy

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

teammember’s efforts throughout the project. Originally these peer evaluations were merely used forfeedback purposes to the instructor, but over time, it became clear that some team members werenot contributing their fair share to the required project activities, therefore, based on theircontribution to the final product(s), the author felt that these students should not receive the samegrade on the project deliverables as other high-performing members of the project team. Withinthe past year, the results of the required Peer Evaluations are now being incorporated directly intothe grading structure for the project.In order to assess the quality and scope of each team member’s efforts within the project, studentsare asked to provide a fair and

Conference Session

Best of NEE

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephen M. Williams P.E., Milwaukee School of Engineering; Robert W. Hasker, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Steven Holland, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Adam Redd Livingston, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Kerry R. Widder, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Josiah A. Yoder, Milwaukee School of Enginering

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

billing. He holds a Ph.D. in Computer Science from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Dr. Steven Holland, Milwaukee School of Engineering Steven S. Holland (M ’13) was born in Chicago, IL, in 1984. He received the B.S. degree in electrical engineering from the Milwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE), Milwaukee, WI, in 2006, and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical and computer engineering from the University of Massachusetts Amherst, in 2008 and 2011 respectively. From 2006 to 2011, he was a Research Assistant working in the Antennas and Propagation Laboratory (APLab), Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Massachusetts Amherst. He was then a Senior Sensors Engineer with the

Conference Session

Training and Support for NEEs

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chirag Variawa, University of Toronto; Sherif N Kinawy, University of Toronto; D. Grant Allen, University of Toronto; Chris Damaren, University of Toronto; Susan McCahan, University of Toronto; Bryan Karney

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

theircollaboration with former teaching assistants who have helped run the program in past years andmaintained reports on seminar topics, student feedback, and performance.BIBLIOGRAPHY1. Norris, P. M., & Palmer, S. C. (1998). Effectiveness of the Woodruff School Doctoral Teaching Intern Program.Journal of Engineering Education, 87(3), 223-226.2. Wankat, P. C. (1999). Educating engineering professors in education. Journal of Engineering Education, 88,471-476.3. Wankat, P. C., & Oreovicz, F. S. (2005). Teaching prospective engineering faculty how to teach. InternationalJournal of Engineering Education, 21(5), 925.4. Utecht, R. L., & Tullous, R. (2009). Are we preparing doctoral students in the art of teaching? Research in HigherEducation Journal

Conference Session

New Engineering Educators 1: Learning Aids

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Wendy Roldan, University of Washington; Schawnery Lin; Yuxin Xu, University of Washington; Andrea Jacqueline Sequeira; Jennifer A. Turns, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

Distinguished Teaching Award.” https://marinebiology.uw.edu/news-stories/2019/04/24/jose-m-guzman-receives-uw- distinguished-teaching-award/ (accessed Apr. 30, 2020).[11] A. J. Franco Mariscal, J. M. Oliva Martínez, and S. Bernal Márquez, “An educational card game for learning families of chemical elements,” Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 89, no. 8, pp. 1044–1046, 2012.[12] J. C. Roberts, C. Headleand, and P. D. Ritsos, “Sketching designs using the five design- sheet methodology,” IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 419–428, 2015.[13] D. Roam, The back of the napkin: Solving problems and selling ideas with pictures. Portfolio, 2013.[14] M. Scaife and Y. Rogers, “External cognition: how

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Waddah Akili, Iowa State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

devise equitable system(s) that allow faculty to gain theengineering experience they desperately need, in order to keep up with newdevelopments in their areas of specialization. Thus asserting the view thatengineering faculty “with practical experience under their belt” would, in general,make better teachers. Administrator (deans, chairs, and decision makers in general)should investigate ways for helping new faculty members gain industrial experienceby spending a semester on-site at a cooperating industry, using summer release timeto work within industry, or allow for a dual appointment, say fifty-fifty, i.e., fiftypercent of faculty time at the College and the other fifty percent at an industry nearby.Perhaps the legal and organizational

Conference Session

Educational Research and the New Engineering Educator

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Malcolm Drewery, National Academy of Engineering; Norman Fortenberry, National Academy of Engineering; Stefani A. Bjorklund

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

, P. D., and Fortenberry, N.L. “Linking Student Learning Outcomes to Instructional Practices – Phase 1.” 2004 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, Session 1630. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education, 2004.[4] Moore, P. D., Cupp, S. M. and Fortenberry, N.L. “Linking Student Learning Outcomes to Instructional Practices – Phase II.” Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, Boulder, CO: ASEE/IEEE, 2003.[5] Bjorklund, S. A., and Fortenberry, N. L.. "Linking Student Learning Outcomes to Instructional Practices -- Phase III." 2005 ASEE Annual Meeting and Exposition, Portland, OR,, Session 3630. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education, 2005.[6] Ouimet, J.A., Bunnage, J.B

Conference Session

But I'm a Loner! Expanding capability and creativity by examining effective alliances

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Waddah Akili, Iowa State University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

increase their commitment to teaching may help, but continuing tohire new faculty whose primary emphasis and interests is in research, inevitably doesreinforce existing cultural norms that favor research over teaching.Facilitate and Support Faculty in Acquiring Relevant Practical Experience:Encourage faculty members, particularly the young, to get involved with the practicein their locale, and devise equitable system(s) that allow faculty to gain theengineering experience they desperately need, in order to keep up with newdevelopments in their areas of specialization. Thus asserting the view thatengineering faculty “with practical experience under their belt” would, in general,make better teachers. Administrator (deans, chairs, and decision makers

Conference Session

Best of the NEE

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Wendy James, Oklahoma State University; Stacee Harmon, Oklahoma State University; Richard Bryant, Oklahoma State University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

, it is not about the technique, it is about understanding the theories from thesciences of learning and teaching that will allow the technique to be powerful. Engineeringeducators could greatly help each other by discovering the overarching characteristics that canguide instructors in their artful choices of implementing these new methods.Works Cited1. Greeno, J. G., Collins, A. M., & Resnick, L. B. (1996). Cognition and Learning. In D.C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (15-29). New York: Macmillan Library Reference.2. Krantz, S. G. (1999). How to teach mathematics (2nd ed.). Providence, RI: American mathematical Society.3. National Research Council. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind

Conference Session

Assessments, Assessments, and Assessments

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Waddah Akili, Iowa State University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

Faculty in Acquiring Relevant Practical Experience:Encourage faculty members, particularly the young, to get involved with the practicein their locale, and devise equitable system(s) that allow faculty to gain theengineering experience they desperately need, in order to keep up with newdevelopments in their areas of specialization. Thus asserting the view thatengineering faculty “with practical experience under their belt” would, in general,make better teachers. Administrator (deans, chairs, and decision makers in general)should investigate ways for helping new faculty members gain industrial experienceby spending a semester on-site at a cooperating industry, using summer release timeto work within industry, or allow for a dual appointment, say

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade in Teaching II

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Beverly Jaeger, Northeastern University; Corey Balint, Northeastern University; Christopher Wishon, Northeastern University; Colleen Fritze, Northeastern University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

approaches described in the earlier Collaborative and Team-BasedLearning section. Further, traditional peer-assisted teaching is not typically conducted bycontemporaries/classmates of the enrolled students. This arrangement has been operationallydefined as “the use of undergraduate teaching assistants, usually students who recently weresuccessful in the course, and are useful because they provide a means to supplement large lecturecourses with small discussion groups.”11 Historically, first reports of students teaching studentsappeared in the 1960’s when faculty dissatisfaction emerged in response to large lecture coursesin which the student’s role was largely passive. Similar to the historical use of archons describedabove, undergraduate students

Conference Session

Tools and Strategies for Teaching Online Courses

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

John Alexander Mendoza-Garcia, University of Florida

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

. …, 2007.[10] H. S. Fogler and S. E. LeBlanc, Strategies for Creative Problem Solving, 1st ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc, 1995.[11] M. Svinicki, “New directions in learning and motivation,” New Dir. Teach. Learn., vol. 80, pp. 5–30, 1999.[12] T. J. D’Zurilla, A. M. Nezu, and A. Maydeu-Olivares, “Social Problem Solving: Theory and Assessment.,” Soc. Probl. solving Theory, Res. training., no. 1971, pp. 11–27, 2009.[13] R. Wertz, “Towards a New Model Within the Community of Inquiry Framework: Multivariate Linear Regression Analyses Based on Graduate Student Perceptions of Learning Online,” Purdue University, 2014.[14] Tulane University, “Accessible Syllabus,” 2015. [Online]. Available: https

Conference Session

Classroom Strategies – New Engineering Educators Division

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ralph Ocon, Purdue University Northwest

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

.  Background information on the problem.  The “Problem Statement” (state the problem as a set of facts).  The “Creative Challenge” (state the problem as a question).  The best creative solution to the problem.  The alternative solution (second best solution) to the problem.  A written description of the physical model representing the problem and solution.  The main idea generation technique(s) used to stimulate the imagination for solving the problem.  A sketch of the physical model.(2) Second, students were required to visualize and create a Physical Model (made primarily ofPopsicle Sticks) representing the problem and solution to that problem. The requirements for theModel: 1. 70%-100% of the Model must be

Conference Session

But I'm a Loner! Expanding capability and creativity by examining effective alliances

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Waddah Akili, Iowa State University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

their search for theright type of practitioners, to enrich the academic process by bringing the practice into the classroom. After Foundation Engineering was over, and the final course grade was out, a“questionnaire” was sent to those who enrolled in the class seeking their opinions, evaluations,and any comment(s) they may wish to offer. Twenty six out of a total of 30 students returned the“questionnaire” on time! The opinions expressed and comments made were, by and large,positive to say the least. After regrouping, and rephrasing to correct the English language; thecomments offered by the ex- students, could be summarized as follows:  The adjunct was easy to approach every time and everywhere, and was always helpful,  His

Conference Session

New Engineering Educators 3 - Grading: Grate or Great

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Derek Breid, Saint Vincent College; Tara Gupte Wilson, Ohio State University; Ann D. Christy P.E., Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

, while eliminating its most unpopular portion and reducing the workload associated withgrading.[1] A. Kolmos and E. de Graaff, “Problem-Based and Project-Based Learning in Engineering Education,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri and B. M. E. Olds, Eds. Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 141–160.[2] J. W. Thomas, “A review of research on project-based learning,” 2000.[3] P. C. Wankat, “The Role of Homework,” ASEE Conf. Proc., 2001.[4] P. C. Wankat and F. S. Oreovicz, “Testing, homework, and grading,” in Teaching Engineering, 1st ed., McGraw-Hill College, 1993, pp. 213–234.[5] J. Widmann and K. Shollenberger, “Student use of Textbook Solution Manuals : Student and Faculty

Conference Session

Been There, Done That: Advice for New Faculty

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Melissa Roberts, Michigan Technological University; Amber Kemppainen, Michigan Technological University; Gretchen Hein, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

of the feedback from the write-in questions of the semester evaluations iscompiled below.Question 1: “As I, the instructor, prepare to teach this class again, what aspect(s) of thiscourse should I preserve that effectively furthered learning?”Sampling of Student Responses: ≠ “This class has a friendly and open classroom atmosphere [that] helps students relax around the professor and ask necessary questions.” ≠ “You are always enthusiastic about what you teach, even if it is really boring material. You also make time to help students whenever needed. You are also really easy to talk to and can always offer help when needed.” ≠ “I thought she was a very good teacher mostly because I wanted to come to class, she made

Conference Session

Classroom Management

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Juan C. Morales, Universidad del Turabo; Michael J. Prince, Bucknell University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

serves as the framework on which to transformthe course. It forces each faculty member to take a broad and comprehensive view of the coursesthat they will address in the SFIP. At this stage there is no innovation. Setting the panoramicoutline as a prerequisite leaves more time for innovation, a lesson learned during the 2012 SFIPsession. Table 2: Template used to create a panoramic outline of 30 sessions of 1.5 hours each (a prerequisite to start the SFIP in June) Course: Professor: Session Topic(s) Instructional Objectives – By the end of this session students shall be Real-World

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade I

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jerry Samples, University of Pittsburgh -Johnstown

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

administrators need to see this as a positive direction for the organization. Theymust agree on the definitions, the process for implementing the model and the rules for therewards system. Changing culture can be risky – making a positive change is cause forcelebration.This is not an easy or even rapid process, but it s a worthy one that is necessary in today’sacademic world. New educators can demonstrate the model and encourage the administration tomove. Junior faculty studies are often the basis for change, especially when the university ismoving forward to a new academic level. Be a voice, use technology, demonstrate excellence inteaching and scholarship – this is leadership and it will be recognized.ConclusionIn McKeachie’s book [10] he provides an

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade I

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Adrian Ieta, Murray State University; Thomas Doyle, McMaster University; Arthur Pallone

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

]. However, there is disagreement regarding theimplementation of SET corrections [9]. The validity of SET as measure of teachingeffectiveness was strongly questioned in the 1970’s [10]. More recently, it was arguedthat student ratings are of little help to instructors willing to improve them if notsupported by professional advice [11]. The hypothesis that the instructor’s look is arelevant factor to SET was dismissed by a recent study [12]. More general concerns arerelated to how effectively SET ratings are actually used [9]. Page 13.469.2A vast amount of research on SET topics tends to support that there are different practicalissues related to its

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade II

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tanya Kunberger, Florida Gulf Coast University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

theprovided comments, discussed more fully in the next section, as well as the survey responsespresented here, the author believes that the sheets are a beneficial addition to the course(s).A second implementation of the sheets in Soil Mechanics and Engineering Mechanics (under adifferent instructor) and an initial offering in Geotechnical Engineering are currently in progressso no final assessment data is available. Due to timing, the author neglected to collect data fromthe Fluid Mechanics courses. The data presented above includes only students that have seen thePPF sheets for the first time in a course. Students enrolled in Soil Mechanics this semester wereexposed to the sheets in Fluid Mechanics last semester (same sheets with two

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade II

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

William Baer, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

’ learning experience was enhanced by the Page 14.384.5process.Synergistically improved learning experiences are common results of such partnerships. Bhatt,Ferroni, Kackley, and Rose reported on creative partnerships at Drexel University and theUniversity of Maryland. Faculty and librarians collaborated extensively on the projects withgreat success. “The mutual bond that evolved contributed to learning experiences among all theparticipants involved in the project18.” Kearns and Hybl add, “Collaboration between library andteaching faculty is crucial to the vitality of information literacy program[s] incorporating bothcurricular objectives and

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade for Teaching I

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Chesney, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

material.However, story-telling can often be used to complement, rather than detract from, the coursecontent that we are attempting to communicate to the students.When you have time, ask me about ‘The Legend of the Pink Pearl’. It is a very good story!References[1] Singh, S. The Code Book: The Evolution of Secrecy from Mary, Queen of Scots to Quantum Cryptography.Doubleday Publisher, 1999.[2] Wingfield, R. Narration of the Last Days of the Queen of Scots.[3] Felder, R., and Brent, R. Effective Teaching: A Workshop. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 10-11March, 2000.[4] Durant, R. You Mean the World to Me: Story Telling and Leader Listening in Organizational Learning. Ph.D

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade in Research

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jason Keith, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

. 12. Carriere, P., “Overview of NSF Programs that Strongly Promote Integration of Research and Education,” Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. 13. Pimmel, R., “Programs for Engineering Education in the National Science Foundation’s Division of Undergraduate Education,” Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. 14. Keith, J. M. “A Student-Driven Enterprise in Fuel Cells and Alternative Fuels,” Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. 15. Keith, J. M., Miller, M. G., Opella, K. C., King, J. A., Meldrum, J., Green, C., Gwaltney, G , Bradley, S. “Engineering Education in Alternative Energy,” Proceedings of the 2006 ASEE