Asee peer logo
advanced search
Displaying all 13 results

A Systematic Review of Technologies for Providing Feedback and Grades to Students

Conference Session
NEE - 3: Improving Homework and Problem-solving Performance
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rebecca Marie Reck, Kettering University
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators
platforms, which extend or compliment the LMS features and allow the instructorto provide their desired feedback. This paper summarizes the features of eight additional toolsthat can be used to expand feedback and assignments in engineering courses.References[1] M. D. Svinicki, and W. J. McKeachie, McKeachie's Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and University Teachers: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2014.[2] S. Navaee, “Application Of Technology In Engineering Education,” Portland, Oregon, 2005.[3] G. M. Nicholls, W. J. Schell, IV, and N. Lewis, “Best Practices for Using Algorithmic Calculated Questions via a Course Learning Management System,” New Orleans, Louisiana, 2016.[4] A. Jones
Relevance Score: 0.01960256

Improving Creative Thinking in Engineering Students Through Art Appreciation

Conference Session
NEE 1 - Innovative Teaching & Learning Strategies
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Patricia Caratozzolo, School of Engineering and Sciences, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico; Alvaro Alvarez-Delgado, Language Department, School of Social Sciences, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico; Samira Hosseini, Writing Lab, Center for Educational Innovation, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Mexico
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators
). pcaratozzolo@tec.mxAlvaro Alvarez-Delgado, Language Department, School of Social Sciences, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico Alvaro Alvarez-Delgado was born in San Luis Potosi, Mexico. He obtained his PhD in Hispanic Literature from El Colegio de Mexico in 2009 with the thesis, Compa˜neros de viaje (1959): The First Jaime Gil de Biedma. Since 2009, he has been a member of the faculty at Tecnologico de Monterrey, Santa Fe campus, in the Languages Department from the School of Education and Humanities. He is the Coordinator at the Writing Center, Santa Fe Campus. His literary interests are related to literature written by women from the middle ’50’s to the middle ’70’s in Mexico, especially focused on the works by Elena Garro. His
Relevance Score: 0.011880945

Measuring the Effectiveness of Videos for Concept Understanding in a Flipped Engineering Class

Conference Session
NEE 1 - Innovative Teaching & Learning Strategies
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Eliza A. Banu, University of Georgia; Colleen M. Kuusinen, University of Georgia
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators
and engagement in a health professions school," Journal of Academic Medicine, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 236-243, 2014.[7] J. Subbiah, "Using Just-in-Time Teaching in a Flipped Undergraduate Biological Systems Engineering Course," in "Discipline-Based Education Research Group," University of Nebraska- Lincoln Digital Commons 2016, vol. 94.[8] H. Fredriksen, S. Hadjerrouit, J. Monaghan, and R. J. Rensaa, "Exploring tensions in a mathematical course for engineers utilizing a flipped classroom approach," in CERME 10, 2017.[9] S. J. DeLozier and M. G. Rhodes, "Flipped classrooms: a review of key ideas and recommendations for practice," Journal of Educational Psychology Review, vol. 29, no. 1, pp
Relevance Score: 0.011807378

It’s Not Just What TA's Know: Exploring the Role of Teacher Efficacy among Engineering TA's

Conference Session
NEE 2 - Strategies to Improve Teaching Effectiveness
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Joanna Wright, University of Washington; Lauren N. Summers, University of Washington; Denise Wilson, University of Washington
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators
Relevance Score: 0.01150841

Replacing Cheating with Metacognition – Reevaluating the Pedagogical Role of Homework in Foundational Engineering Courses

Conference Session
NEE - 3: Improving Homework and Problem-solving Performance
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Derek Breid, Saint Vincent College
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators
highlight best practices and solution pathways that are moreconsistent with how the material was presented in class.- Engage with the students’ metacognitive responses! Answer questions that they bring up, orcomment on the good realizations that they have. If they write about needing to improve in acertain way, ask them later how this effort is going, and if they need any ideas.[1] P. C. Wankat, “The Role of Homework,” ASEE Conf. Proc., 2001.[2] P. C. Wankat and F. S. Oreovicz, “Testing, homework, and grading,” in Teaching Engineering, 1st ed., McGraw-Hill College, 1993, pp. 213–234.[3] W. Li, R. M. Bennett, T. Olsen, and R. McCord, “Engage Engineering Students In Homework: Attribution of Low Completion and Suggestions for
Relevance Score: 0.009700752

FLC (E^2)T: A Faculty Learning Community on Effective (and Efficient) Teaching

Conference Session
NEE 2 - Strategies to Improve Teaching Effectiveness
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Dustyn Roberts P.E., Temple University; Joshua A. Enszer, University of Delaware; Allen A. Jayne P.E., University of Delaware; Sarah Ilkhanipour Rooney, University of Delaware; Amy Trauth, University of Delaware; Andrew Novocin, University of Delaware; James Atlas, University of Delaware
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators
Potential sources of material include your own personal notes where you Present students with made a mistake, or a homework/exam inaccurate work (on a solution that introduces mistakes worth slide or handout) and pointing out have them take a few Make clear something is wrong on your notes on what is wrong, handout, to avoid confusing students Intentional 2-10 then follow up by calling who arrive late or aren't fully paying Mistake(s) minutes on students
Relevance Score: 0.009334552

Progressive Use of Active Learning in Electrical Engineering Courses

Conference Session
NEE 1 - Innovative Teaching & Learning Strategies
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ahmed Dallal, University of Pittsburgh; Renee M. Clark, University of Pittsburgh
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators
., vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 223–231, Jul. 2004.[3] M. T. H. Chi, “Active-Constructive-Interactive: A Conceptual Framework for Differentiating Learning Activities,” Top. Cogn. Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 73–105, Jan. 2009.[4] S. Freeman et al., “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 111, no. 23, pp. 1–6, 2014.[5] C. E. Wieman, “Large-scale comparison of science teaching methods sends clear message,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 111, no. 23, pp. 8319–8320, 2014.[6] R. Felder and R. Brent, Teaching and learning STEM: A practical guide. 2016.[7] M. Stains et al., “Anatomy of STEM teaching in North American universities,” Science (80
Relevance Score: 0.009240735

Collaborative Autoethnographic Study of a Large-Scale Flipped Classroom Implementation with Multiple Instructors

Conference Session
NEE 2 - Strategies to Improve Teaching Effectiveness
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Robyn Paul, University of Calgary; Mohammad Moshirpour, University of Calgary; Emily Ann Marasco, University of Calgary; Sepideh Afkhami Goli, University of Calgary; Ehsan Mohammadi, University of Calgary; Fatemeh Sharifi, University of Calgary
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators
senseof pride of what was accomplished when they are finished.References[1] A. Kolb and D. Kolb. (2005). Learning styles and learning space: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2):193-212.[2] K. Robinson, and A. M. Azzam. (2009). Why creativity now? (interview). Educational Leadership, 67(1):22-26.[3] S. B. Velegol, S. E. Zappe, and E. Mahoney. (2015). The evolution of a flipped classroom: evidence-based recommendations. Advances in Engineering Education, Winter 2015.[4] A. Pears, S. Seidman, L. Malmi, L. Mannila, and E. Adams. (2007). A survey of literature on the teaching of introductory programming. Working Group Report on ITiCSE on Innovation and Technology in
Relevance Score: 0.009240735

Connecting Dots: Coding Multiple Data Sources to Enhance Qualitative Analysis

Conference Session
NEE - 3: Improving Homework and Problem-solving Performance
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Devayan Debashis Bir, Iowa State University; Benjamin Ahn, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Bora Cetin, Iowa State University; Secil Akinci-Ceylan, Iowa State University; Kristen Sara Cetin P.E., Iowa State University; Andrea E. Surovek, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Kristin Lerdal, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Mary Michelle Anton, Iowa State University; Kyle R. Thompson, Iowa State University
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators
2017.Dr. Kristen Sara Cetin, Iowa State University Dr. Kristen S Cetin is an Assistant Professor at Iowa State University in the Department of Civil, Con- struction and Environmental Engineering.Dr. Andrea E. Surovek, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Dr. Andrea Surovek is a research scientist working in the areas of biomimicry for sustainable construction and engineering education at the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology. She is the recipient of the ASEE CE Division Seeley Fellowship and the Mechanics Division Beer and Johnston Outstanding New Mechanics Educator Award. She is a fellow of ASCE and ASCE/SEI. She received her PhD from Georgia Tech, and also holds degrees in both Civil Engineering
Relevance Score: 0.009240735

Work In Progress: From Face-to-Face to Online Learning Environments: A Transition to a Learner-centered Approach

Conference Session
NEE 1 - Innovative Teaching & Learning Strategies
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
John Alexander Mendoza-Garcia, University of Florida; Heather Maness, University of Florida
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators
).Future workThe course development support offered by the UFIT Center of Instructional Technology andTraining has the following phases: Design and Development, Implementation, and Evaluate andRevise. We are currently in the design and development phase and will do the implementationsoon. In the future, the ID and I will conduct surveys with students and review the coursefeedback to find other short-term and long-term opportunities to improve the online students’learning experience. References[1] J. A. Barker, Paradigms : the business of discovering the future. HarperBusiness, 1993.[2] S. Coyner and P. McCann, “Advantages and challenges of teaching in an electronic environment: The accommodate
Relevance Score: 0.0074676415

Adoption of an Online Queue App for Higher Education: A Case Study

Conference Session
NEE 1 - Innovative Teaching & Learning Strategies
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Karin Jensen, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Jennifer R. Amos, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Lawrence Angrave, University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign; Karle Flanagan; David Mussulman, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Christopher D. Schmitz, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Wade Fagen-Ulmschneider, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators
identified the following benefits of the Queue system.Save time for both students and instructorsTime is at a premium for students, instructors, and staff. The Queue organizes both students andinstructors to maximize student learning when time is restricted.Group Formation and Peer LearningNumerous studies have shown the benefits of peer learning, but this can be challenging tofacilitate in large courses with several hundreds of students. The Queue allows students toidentify other students or groups who have the same or similar questions. This could be used tohelp students form small groups to discuss their question(s) and then work with an instructor.Similarly, the Queue could also be used to facilitate students answering other students
Relevance Score: 0.00528042

Designing and Enacting Weekly Micro-reflections as a Means of Professional Development of Early Career Educators: Voices from the Field

Conference Session
NEE 2 - Strategies to Improve Teaching Effectiveness
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Taryn Shalini Bipat, University of Washington; Jennifer A. Turns, University of Washington; Mitchell Fajardo; Yuliana Flores, University of Washington
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators
(pp. 3-17). Springer, Dordrecht. 13Hill, H. C., Beisiegel, M., & Jacob, R. (2013). Professional development research: Consensus, crossroads, and challenges. Educational researcher, 42(9), 476-487.Korthagen, F. (2017). Inconvenient truths about teacher learning: towards professional development 3.0. Teachers and teaching, 23(4), 387-405.Kreber, C., Klampfleitner, M., McCune, V., Bayne, S., & Knottenbelt, M. (2007). What do you mean by “authentic”? A comparative review of the literature on conceptions of authenticity in teaching. Adult Education Quarterly, 58(1), 22-43.Sepp, L. A., Orand, M., Turns, J. A
Relevance Score: 0.003960315

Adding the Extra 5 Percent: Undergraduate TA's Creating Value in the Classroom

Conference Session
NEE - 3: Improving Homework and Problem-solving Performance
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Alicia Baumann, Arizona State University; Stephanie M. Gillespie, Arizona State University; Nicolle Sanchez, Arizona State University
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators
becurious about techniques for connecting with students and creating new value, studies need to bedone to evaluate if UGTAs recognize if they gain the skill of entrepreneurially minded thinkingin a professional setting.7. References[1] Kern Engineering Entrepreneurial Network (KEEN), “The Handbook for EML,” KEEN’zine Engineering Unleashed, vol. 5. [Online]. Available: http://online.fliphtml5.com/zyet/ykie/#p=1. [Accessed Jan. 28, 2019].[2] S. J. Krause, J. A. Middleton, E. Judson, K. R. Beeley, and Y. Chen, “Factors Impacting Retention and Success of Undergraduate Engineering Students,” in Proceedings of the 122nd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, WA, USA, June 14-17, 2015.[3] J. Crowe, R. Ceresola, and T. Silva
Relevance Score: 0.003960315