Displaying all 18 results
- Conference Session
- Tricks of the Trade I
- Collection
- 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Adrian Ieta, Murray State University; Thomas Doyle, McMaster University; Arthur Pallone
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
instructor's knowledge of the subjectQ1_12 course is informative and usefulQ1_13 course is interestingQ1_14 class experienceTable 2. Matched categories of factors for Q1. Responses to Question1 10 9 8 7 responses 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Q 0 Q 1 Q 2 Q 3
- Conference Session
- New Engineering Educators: Tricks of the Trade II
- Collection
- 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Claude Villiers, Florida Gulf Coast University
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
quantitatively. In an attempt to do that, Question L (Q-L)(see Appendix A) was included in the survey in an attempt to determine the effectiveness ofusing visual aids as a teaching style. The results for of Q-L are summarized in Fig. 2. In both theMaterials and the Flexible and Rigid Pavements classes, almost all of the students selected theauthor’s teaching method, which included the use of PowerPoint presentations and video clips.During this time, the choice was strictly to select between visual aids and the conventional styleof teaching. In the comments sections from the Rigid and Flexible Pavements course, one studentsuggested a combination of visual aids and a conventional style teaching approach. Theinstructor valued the student’s recommendation
- Conference Session
- Working Together: Approaches to Inclusivity and Interdisciplinarity
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Tawfik Elshehabi, University of Wyoming
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
: Changes in teaching philosophy and teachers’ competencies,” JOTSE: Journal ofTechnology and Science Education, vol. 7, (2), pp. 254-270, 2017.[6] D. Ratnapradipa and T. Abrams, “Framing the Teaching Philosophy Statement for Health Educators: What ItIncludes and How It Can Inform Professional Development,” Health Educator, vol. 44, (1), pp. 37-42, 2012.Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?q=teaching+philosophy&ft=on&pg=2&id=EJ968296.[7] C. O’Neal, D. Meizlish and M. Kaplan, “Writing a statement of teaching philosophy for the academic jobsearch,” Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 2007.[8] N. G. Caukin and T. M. Brinthaupt, “Using a Teaching Philosophy Statement as a Professional DevelopmentTool for Teacher Candidates,” International Journal
- Conference Session
- Tricks of the Trade II
- Collection
- 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Robert A. Chin, East Carolina University; I. Richmond Nettey, Kent State University; Edem G. Tetteh; Philip Weinsier, Bowling Green State University, Firelands
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
planning another Tenure & Promotion Panel discussion and Q&A…. Do you have topics and issues you'd like to know more about? Send me your ideas that can help us plan the content and find the right panelists.The following are the inputs that were received from the member solicitation (E. Tetteh, personalcommunication, October 5, 2011):• Techniques, strategies, etc that have resulted in successful tenure and promotion• Promotion to full Professor• Faculty ~ Reappointment/ Promotion and Tenure• Shared University Governance• TECHNOLOGY Based discipline with respect to the "BOYER'S ~ model", which is Scholarship of "Teaching-Applied Research- Innovation/ Application and Integration"• How to divine [sic] out what my
- Conference Session
- Research on Diversification & Inclusion
- Collection
- 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Erin A. Cech, Rice University
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- K-12 & Pre-College Engineering, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, New Engineering Educators, Student, Women in Engineering
Satisfaction Measures:question was missing). (m) Personal satisfaction from work (n) Satisfaction with quality of work unitSurvey respondents were asked “do you consider (o) Satisfaction with working conditionsyourself to be one or more of the following,” with (p) Employee empowermentthe following response categories offered: (q) Co-workers cooperation“Heterosexual or Straight,” “Gay, Lesbian, (r) Satisfaction with procedures (s) Overall job satisfactionBisexual, or Transgender,” or “Prefer not to say.”Respondents who answered “prefer not to say” were excluded from
- Conference Session
- Perspectives on Engineering Education During COVID-19
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Keven Alkhoury, New Jersey Institute of Technology ; Ahmed Z. Edrees, University of Jeddah & New Jersey Institute of Technology; Jaskirat Sodhi, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Ashish D. Borgaonkar, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Prateek Shekhar, New Jersey Institute of Technology
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
in SPSSas shown in Table 3. Shapiro-Wilk test shows that normality is violated in five of the constructs.However, by visually inspecting Normal Q-Q plots, we notice that the deviations from the normalline are not severe. Additionally, boxplots are visually examined to identify possible outliers.Based on the boxplots, few outliers are identified; however, outliers were not removed since theydid not appear to be significant and because of the small size of the sample. (5) Categorical groupsmust have homogeneous variances: Levene’s test was conducted to test the homogeneity of thevariance as shown in Table 3. The test results show that all constructs, except for participation,have homogeneous variance with a p-value over (0.05). Table 3
- Conference Session
- Size, Civility, and the Classroom Culture: Setting Class Tone with a Student-centered Perspective
- Collection
- 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Jenny L Lo, Virginia Tech; Kacie J. Hodges PE, Virginia Tech Dept of Engineering Education; Wm. Michael Butler, Virginia Tech; Tamara Knott, Virginia Tech
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
should be factored into pairing new GTAs as peer level contacts. mentors. We needed to have Midway through fall 2015, we We allowed instructors to vote on more efficient changed the format so that the format change to gain buyin. weekly training everyone had to review slides Providing documents with meetings. We prior to the meeting and then used annotations (voice and/or spent meetings the meeting time to allow Q&A on significant written notes) that help going through all slides. The new format reduced instructors understand the material common slides and the meeting time by at least 15 is
- Conference Session
- Tips and Tricks for Assessing Student Performance
- Collection
- 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Edward F. Gehringer, North Carolina State University
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
personality and social psychology, 77(6), 1121. 7[3] Piech, C.; Huang, J; Chen, Z.; Do, C., Ng, A., Koller, D. "Tuned models of peer assessment in MOOCs,” Proc. 6th International Conf. on Educational Data Mining, Memphis, TN, July 2013.[4] Boud, D. and Falchikov, N., “What does research tell us about self-assessment?” Chapter 12 of Boud [1].[5] González, J.C. and Murthy, A., “Including peer and self-assessment in a continuous assessment scheme in electrical and electronics engineering courses,” Frontiers in Education 2014, Madrid, Spain, Oct. 2014.[6] Liang, Y.; Wang, Q.; Lu, Y.; Qian, R.; and Yiqing, Y., “Using a web-based system to explore peer, self, and tutor assessment in
- Conference Session
- New Engineering Educators 3 - Grading: Grate or Great
- Collection
- 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Jennifer Pascal, University of Connecticut; Troy J. Vogel, University of Notre Dame; Kristina Wagstrom, University of Connecticut
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
, “Grading rigor in counselor education: A specifications grading framework,” Educ. Res. Q., vol. 39, no. 4, p. 21, 2016.[4] B. Blackstone and E. Oldmixon, “Specifications grading in political science,” J. Polit. Sci. Educ., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 191–205, 2019.[5] J. Ring, “ConfChem conference on select 2016 BCCE presentations: specifications grading in the flipped organic classroom,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 94, no. 12, pp. 2005–2006, 2017.[6] John A. Mirth, “A Specifications-Based Approach for the Design and Delivery of a Statics/Dynamics Course,” 2019.[7] L. B. Nilson, Teaching at its best: A research-based resource for college instructors. John Wiley & Sons, 2016.[8] “ABET | ABET accreditation.” [Online]. Available: https
- Conference Session
- Tricks of the Trade II
- Collection
- 2009 Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Srikanth Tadepalli, University of Texas, Austin; Cameron Booth, University of Texas, Austin; Mitchell Pryor
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
technique, or if the error appears to result solely from question interpretation.Units 1-3 present basic programming concepts in C, followed by a comprehensive Review Test,R1. While unit tests are completed anywhere and graded online, Review Tests are taken duringoffice hours to ensure the course is completed in good faith. Students must also pass a Q&A aftereach Review Test which provides an opportunity for personal feedback. Units 4-7 coveradvanced C concepts. Units 8-10 introduce MATLAB and units 11-13 introduce Object-OrientedProgramming in JAVA. The final Review Test, R4, must be completed before the last class day.This implementation has proven a viable solution to the issues described above. Novices havecan learn material at a slower
- Conference Session
- Enhancing Teaching and Research
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Kweku Brown P.E., The Citadel; Dimitra Michalaka P.E., The Citadel; Nandan Hara Shetty, The Citadel; William J. Davis P.E., The Citadel
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
- Conference Session
- Developing New Engineering Educators
- Collection
- 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Amy B. Chan Hilton, University of Southern Indiana
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
-time_management_AAPT- NFW_June2013-final.pdfTorosyan, R. (2011). Time Management Reminders that Boost Efficiency, Peace of Mind. http://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/teaching-careers/time-management-reminders-that- boost-efficiency-peace-of-mind/University of South Carolina CTE. Tips for Time Management. https://www.sc.edu/about/offices_and_divisions/cte/teaching_resources/maintainingbalance/t ime_management/Vincens, Q. Ten Simple Rules to Combine Teaching and Research. http://cgi.stanford.edu/~dept- ctl/cgi-bin/tomprof/posting.php?ID=948Time Management ToolsBlock Site https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/blocksite/ and https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail
- Conference Session
- Encouraging Students to Think Critically
- Collection
- 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Rebekah Oulton PE, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
- Conference Session
- Scaling class size and technology – New Engineering Educators Division
- Collection
- 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Peggy C. Boylan-Ashraf, San Jose State University; John R. Haughery, Iowa State University
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
- Conference Session
- NEE 2 - Strategies to Improve Teaching Effectiveness
- Collection
- 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Dustyn Roberts P.E., Temple University; Joshua A. Enszer, University of Delaware; Allen A. Jayne P.E., University of Delaware; Sarah Ilkhanipour Rooney, University of Delaware; Amy Trauth, University of Delaware; Andrew Novocin, University of Delaware; James Atlas, University of Delaware
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
: Class Time Activity Needed Description Take a short break and invite students compare their notes with a Comparing neighbor, filling in any gaps. Afterward, optionally follow up this Notes 1-2 min activity with a short Q&A session based on any confusing points. End class 2 minutes early and ask students to write down Minute Paper (anonymously or not) the main point of today's class, and/or the / Muddiest most pressing question or confusing point from today's class. Begin Point 1-2 min the next class by addressing any common questions
- Conference Session
- New Faculty Development
- Collection
- 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Cheryl B. Schrader, Boise State University; Seung Youn Chyung, Boise State University; William L. Hughes, Boise State University; Kotaro Sasaki, Boise State University; Teresa Cole, Boise State University, Computer Science Department; John N. Chiasson, Boise State University
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
- Conference Session
- Tricks of the Trade in Teaching II
- Collection
- 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Michael Foster, George Fox University; Justin R. Vander Werff P.E., Dordt College
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators
= = (W _ p =m) _ (h4 ¡ h3 ) x Condenser: _ in Comment [M5]: Q _ 1 ¡ h4 ) = m(h _ Comment [M6]: Qout = m(h
- Conference Session
- NEE 2 - Strategies to Improve Teaching Effectiveness
- Collection
- 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Joanna Wright, University of Washington; Lauren N. Summers, University of Washington; Denise Wilson, University of Washington
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators