Electrical and Computer Engineeringat the University of Florida. Her research is centered on her advisor’s device and processsimulator, Dr. Mark Law Florida Object Oriented Device/Process Simulator (FLOOD/FLOOPS).She has three major projects of which the applications are radiation effects on AlGaN/GaN HighElectron Mobility Transistors (HEMTs), mechanical stress effects of Silicon based Hall magnetic © American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 2018 ASEE Southeastern Section Conferencesensors, and pH chemical/biological sensors on open-gated GaN-based HEMTs. Maddie plans tograduate in August 2018 and is pursuing postdoctoral opportunities.Jennifer S. CurtisJennifer Sinclair Curtis is a
in Educa- tion Conference, President of the IEEE Education Society, and Associate Editor of the IEEE Transactions on Education (ToE) and the Journal of Engineering Education (JEE). She and her coauthors received the 2011 Wickenden Award for the best paper in JEE and the 2011 and 2015 Best Paper Awards for the IEEE ToE. In Spring 2012, Dr. Lord spent a sabbatical at Southeast University in Nanjing, China teaching and doing research. She is on the USD team implementing ”Developing Changemaking Engineers”, an NSF-sponsored Revolutionizing Engineering Education (RED) project. Dr. Lord is the 2018 recipient of the IEEE Undergraduate Teaching Award.Dr. Laura Ann Gelles, University of Texas at Dallas Laura Gelles is
the preservice teachers’ final project where they wrote andtaught a 20-minute lesson on a topic of their choice. The preservice teachers planned theirlessons using the recommended lesson plan format. Some documented their process bycompleting a written log of their steps and/or a screen capture video. After completing theirlesson planning, the preservice teachers completed a reflection about the process of writing theirlesson plan and presented their lesson to their peers. The purpose of the written log and screencapture video was to see the specific processes used by each preservice teacher to complete thelesson. The aim of the reflection was to gain an understanding of how the preservice teachersviewed their process of writing lesson plans
research assistant.Justin Lee Clough, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Justin Clough received his Bachelors of Science in Mechanical Engineering with minors in mathematics and applied physics from the Milwaukee School of Engineering. As an undergraduate, he has worked on research projects with the National Science Foundation, Argonne National Laboratory, and the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center. He is working on his doctorate in Mechanical Engineering at Rensselaer Poly- technic Institute specializing in computational materials and volunteers with Engineering Ambassadors.Ms. Elizabeth S. Herkenham, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Ms. Herkenham is the K-13 Education Outreach Director of the School of Engineering (SoE) at
, Minority, and Energy Conversion and Conservation Divisions; presenting all of them with the exception of one paper in 2010 when she was double-booked. Albers most recently held the position of project coordinator for the ARRA funded Student Energy Internship Program in the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering department at NCSU. She mentored and coordinated 60+ interns with energy professionals in the private and public sectors and recruited interns to volunteer at Family STEM Nights. Prior to this experience, she was a National Science Foundation Graduate Fellow in K-12 Education working under the direction of Liz Parry, Dr. Laura Bottomley and Dr. Karen Hollebrands in the RAMP-UP program at NCSU. During this
their specific needs. After considerableconsultation with industry human resource representatives, university professors, and theuniversity’s career counselors, a professional development program was formed to address threemain areas of interest: the improvement of core research abilities, the development of skillsrequired for transition from academia to industry, and the necessity of projecting a professionaldisposition in the workplace. The graduate students organized a yearlong series of workshops inwhich university and industry professionals addressed each of the three areas of interest. Theprogram was evaluated through a combination of peer and self-reviews, writing improvementrubrics, and industry representative criticisms. The results
provide input.Limitations The pre-constructed narratives limit these findings because there were constructed todepict their entire navigation towards public-inspired work. Therefore, the stories were notcreated to be analyzed in this paper. They were created to be disseminated to a broad, diverseaudience. This method limits the amount of information that can be extracted from theparticipants. It is also important to note that these personal experiences with public-inspiredscience were early in the students’ graduate career, and that many of the students continued toparticipate in other citizen science projects and later produced documentaries of their work(Battle, 2020; Kriss and Hockman, 2020; Patton, 2020; Purchase, 2020; Lopez, 2021
these things relate to the course goals?With the answers to these questions in mind, the TA and instructor can think about the purposeof other class assignments (pre-class and post-class homework/projects) that will preparestudents with these skills. Questions to consider while creating these assignments, as discussedin the “Active Learning in STEM Courses” mini-course, are as follows: 1. What kind of questions are being asked in these different categories (pre-, in-, and post- class)? Page 26.755.8 2. How do these questions compare across categories and to the exam questions? How do the formats compare? How does feedback on these
Paper ID #23819Re-envisioning the Role of the Engineering Education Chapter at a Research-I Institution: Lessons from a Cross-disciplinary ModelBeau Vezino, University of Arizona Beau R. Vezino is a Ph.D. student at the University of Arizona’s College of Education. His focus is engineering and science education. Beau currently teaches the science/engineering methods course for pre-service teachers and works on several related research projects. Beau is certified K-12 teacher and holds a MS in Education in Curriculum and Instruction (2009) and a BS in Mechanical Engineering (2005). Beau’s research focus is on teaching
Immediate Past-President of WEPAN, was PI on Tech’s NSF ADVANCE grant, a member of the mathematical and statistical so- cieties Joint Committee on Women, and advises a variety of women and girl-serving STEM projects and organizations. She is a past Vice President of ASEE and current Chair of the ASEE Long Range Planning Committee.Dr. Kim LaScola Needy P.E., University of Arkansas Kim LaScola Needy is Dean of the Graduate School and International Education at the University of Arkansas. Prior to this appointment she was Department Head and 21st Century Professor of Industrial Engineering at the University of Arkansas. She received her B.S. and M.S. degrees in Industrial Engi- neering from the University of Pittsburgh
days, I try to put reasonable effort into winning academic accolades while remembering the manyaspects that can make them arbitrary and biased. I try to think about it pragmatically-- it is certainlyuseful, functionally, to me to win an award. It will help me have social capital to move on to the nextmore impactful project. I do not need to put the measure of my self worth in the academic accolade. Allacademic accolades come down to the decisions of a set of people, who may be very knowledgeable, butare still fallible. I try to remind myself that I do my work for bigger reasons than my own self-promotion.Any academic accolades are tools that help me do that work, not an end in themselves. 4. Collective Findings: Wisdom from the
, and 9 students for method 3. These students came from two sectionstaught by the same faculty instructor. The control group consisted of 187 students from threesections taught by a different instructor. The TAs of these students received only the basictraining provided to all TAs of the Engineering Models course and were unaware of the teachingmethods being implemented by the 6 TAs in the experimental group.The final data presented is the final percentages achieved by the students in the two sections.These grades take into account the lab assignments (20%), homework assignments (20%),midterm exam (20%), final exam (20%), final project (10%), and attendance/quizzes (10%). Labassignments are scored out of 50 points, and the data presented is
subjects that are related to engineering, and provide information regarding the major and field.Because prior experience played a large role in the sample, it could be beneficial to work withlocal schools and Project Lead the Way programs to expose more students to engineering. Theseare just a few ideas that could be implemented in recruitment.There were some limitations in our study, one of which is that this study only occurs at oneuniversity. This is an external validity threat, as this pertains to the generalizability of our study.The demographics from our study are quite consistent with the 2013 national averages found bythe National Science Foundation, indicating that generalizability is possible. As this research iscurrently in-progress, we
Aerospace Engineering from the University of Southern California. Prof. Ahn has extensive research experience in combustion, power generation, propulsion and thermal management. He performed an experimental investigation of catalytic and non-catalytic combus- tion in heat recirculating combustors, solid-oxide fuel cells, micro heat engines, thermoacoustic engines, and thermal transpiration based propulsion and power generation. He has worked on a DARPA project to develop an integrated microscale power generator based on a solid-oxide fuel cell employing hydrocarbon fuels. Currently, his research is conducted in the Combustion and Energy Research Laboratory (COMER) at SU. Prof. Ahn has published over 20 papers in peer
Dean’s Ambassador Program seeks to enhance leadership developmentand foster a spirit of pride among undergraduate as well as graduate students within the Batten College ofEngineering and Technology and the ODU community.● Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE): SAE provides students a hands-on opportunity to applyclassroom knowledge to real-world projects for international competitions.● Student Government Association (SGA): SGA recommends, promotes and advises the development ofrelevant programs and services; a medium between student body and university administration.● VEX U Robotics Team: Students from a variety of majors (not only engineering) who design, build andprogram robots for tournament competitions.● Engineering Makerspace and
, Louisiana State University Adrienne Steele has over 15 years experience in STEM education. Currently, Adrienne works at Louisiana State University, managing all aspects of the STEP project that consists of a large-scale peer mentoring program in the College of Engineering. Previously, she founded and coordinated the Scope-On-A-Rope Outreach Program (SOAR) in the Department of Biological Sciences, where she worked for 10 years. Prior to her positions at LSU, Adrienne was the Science Education Curator at the Louisiana Art and Science Museum in Baton Rouge. Adrienne has a Master of Science degree in zoology from LSU, where she studied in the Museum of Natural Science collections, and an Education Specialist Certification in
proposals or conference presentations, or led discussions on educational research methods. 8. Understand your group’s interests Every institution will have different needs that can be met through a broader community of practice. Finding engaging ideas and projects for members is key to continued membership and attendance.Finding members of the DBER community to form a community of practice can be difficult.Places to look for DBER scholars include: Known discipline-based educational research faculty and their research groups Common educational courses that DBER scholars might take (e.g. research methods courses) Educational research presentations by graduate students
supporting faculty with development of effective learning and teaching pedagogies.Ms. Adrienne Steele, Louisiana State University Adrienne Steele has over 15 years experience in STEM education. Currently, Adrienne works at Louisiana State University in the College of Engineering, managing all aspects of the STEP project that consists of a large-scale peer mentoring program. Previously, she coordinated the Scope-On-A-Rope Outreach Program (SOAR) in the Department of Biological Sciences for 10 years with funding from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. In this position, she led over 175 professional development workshops for K-12 teachers. Prior to her positions at LSU, Adrienne was the Science Education Curator at the
ofdollars each year funding programs in science museums. The people of the worlds nations sharethe feelings of their leaders. Australians overwhelming approve of the work of their Museums6.American Museums recieve about 850 million visitors per year1. Museums in Japan, Brazil, anda score of other nations guide thousands of citizen scientists in their efforts to understandbiodiversity, a project which led to presentations to the United Nations7. Across the globe, theseinstitutions act to establish, support, and promote a culture of understanding in the world. Forscientists and engineers looking to improve public understanding of science, these institutionscan be incredibly effective partners.The Role of MuseumsThe primary mission of museums is to
thestudent at the time, this seemed like a monotonous task of moving documents and sorting thembased on research topics. But after completing the project, the student realized that this was aneffective way of transferring the basic knowledge about how research papers are written, how todistinguish the overall message from a paper, etc. This was a way of transferring the basicknowledge about research, which cannot easily be described, that an undergraduate studentwould not know.The undergraduate classroom and textbook model does not allow for tacit knowledgemanagement because it follows an explicit model. The knowledge is transferred on paper orverbally to the student and the student is expected to learn and be able to reproduce theknowledge at a
developed new methods for imaging and tracking mitochondria from living zebrafish neurons. In her work for the EERC and Pitt-CIRTL, April Dukes collaborates on educational research projects and facilitates professional development (PD) on instructional and mentoring best practices for current and future STEM faculty. As an adjunct instructor in the Department of Neuroscience at the Univer- sity of Pittsburgh since 2009 and an instructor for CIRTL Network and Pitt-CIRTL local programming since 2016, April is experienced in both synchronous and asynchronous online and in-person teaching environments.Morgan V. Fedorchak American c Society for Engineering
What do you wish you would have known going into the process? 6 In what ways do you feel prepared to be a faculty member? Expectations and 7 What do you expect from a typical work week/day? Preparation 8 What are you most excited about regarding starting your position?Interviews were scheduled for a 90-minute period using video conferencing software. Graduatestudents on the project conducted interviews in pairs with a lead interviewer and a co-interviewer. Interviews were both video and audio recorded. Audio files were
presented Other, please specify: Wrote a thesis for a Master's in Education degree; Will publish results and articles in coming year. My project is funded; Currently working on a funded course development.Table 6. Involvement in Scholarship or Research on Teaching and Learning. Objective 2 Students will be aware of curriculum issues… Responses to the question “What would you list as the top three or four curriculum issuesrelated to engineering education today” (114 of the 143) gave a very wide range of responseswith approximately 265 identifiable items. Although difficult to categorize, an emergent typecoding by the author showed that the largest elements dealt with 1) curriculum issues such adepth vs. breath, length of
aqualitative paper outlining our student chapter experiences over the course of 2020’sunprecedented events. We also documented our writing experience, including future paper ideasand their anticipated project timelines, so that future officers will have a streamlined pathway topursue more involved ASEE conference papers.Chapter 3: Executing an informed pivot in chapter roles & responsibilities (June-December 2020)3.1 New strategies for increasing participation/engagementBased on feedback from our expert elicitation, we aimed to improve advertising of our chapter’sevents. Before the start of the academic year, we updated our website with current information(including our mission and values statements) and integrated a calendar on our homepage
] OECD. Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation (4th Edition), The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities[M]. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2018:85-102.[22] Boris Zlotin, Alla Zusman, Len Kaplan, “TRIZ Beyond Technology: The Theory and Practice of Applying TRIZ to Non-Technical Areas”, Jan 2001. [Online]. Available: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/c7d7/653f22df8c3e448b261e2a45a54c2b137cb6. pdf. [Accessed April. 15, 2019].[23] Yang Liexun. Review of Research on R&D Project Assessment [J]. Journal of Management Engineering in China, 2002, 16 (2): 60-65.[24] Yao Wei, Han Xu. A Theory driven Comparison and Enlightenment of TRIZ
Louisiana State University, managing all aspects of the STEP project that consists of a large-scale peer mentoring program in the College of Engineering. Previously, she founded and coordinated the Scope-On-A-Rope Outreach Program (SOAR) in the Department of Biological Sciences, where she worked for 10 years. Prior to her positions at LSU, Adrienne was the Science Education Curator at the Louisiana Art and Science Museum in Baton Rouge. Adrienne has a Master of Science degree in zoology from LSU, where she studied in the Museum of Natural Science collections, and an Education Specialist Certification in science education.Dr. Warren N. Waggenspack Jr., Louisiana State University Warren N. Waggenspack, Jr. is currently
having a goodunderstanding of what engineering is as a major and a field. That understanding itself variesdepending on what type of engineering program the first year student is in, and what gender theyare. The majority of participants however saw engineering as cross functional, responding thatengineers work with people, machines and technology to solve problems and help society. Thismultifaceted view is a positive sign for the freshmen engineers, as they will often have to workon projects and in areas that can span several engineering and non-engineering fields. Regardlessof major, the first year students showed a grasp of the fundamentals of engineering beingproblem solving and improving.Incoming engineering students also have largely
week. This response could bedue to scheduling difficulties around research activities: it can be difficult to take time awayfrom projects for a few days in a row. Therefore, the 2018 retreat will be designed so that eventswill be one day per week for three consecutive weeks in May. We are also hoping to addmodules on topics that were of interest to the graduate community, but could not be organizedwith the current resources available on campus.Assessment tools could also be refined for the 2018 retreat. Self-reported data can bemisleading: participants have different ideas on how to rate themselves, which may explain thevariation of competency and knowledge of specific topics in the “before” survey. Because theinitial ratings were high, it was
phenomenon. One researcheradequately summarized the need to increase female enrollment in engineering into three themes:social, economic, and practical. The social impact of increasing female enrollment is to correctthe historical imbalance created by society historically disallowing women into “masculine”fields. Economically, the United States would benefit from increasing the number of females inengineering because the current system is matriculating fewer engineers than the workforcedemands, which is resulting in the outsourcing of engineering projects to foreign countries.Lastly, it would be practical to increase the number of female engineers in order to increasediversity which has been found to an increase of innovation (Su, 2010).Engineering