way to let students knowabout upcoming activities and offer a way to get in touch with us, the mentors. This site is knownas the BSC CyberCenter, and has been entirely designed and developed by the mentors.At this point, the site has grown to include all of these functionalities and more. We continuallyupdate the site to reflect the activities that are coming up soon, and we also use the site as a wayfor students to register for our events. The CyberCenter includes registration/accountfunctionality, so that students who register for the site can receive regular email updates aboutupcoming events and activities. Additionally, members of the site are allowed to register for allof our events before the general registration is opened.In addition
education practices. In this paper, we will discuss the majorcomponents of these pivots, including (i) transitioning existing programming to the virtualenvironment, (ii) reassessing chapter direction and goals by expert elicitation to evaluate chapterniche, (iii) developing new strategies to increase participation and engagement, including theformation of an anti-racism multimedia learning club aimed at promoting awareness of systemicinequity and discussing strategies to combat anti-black racism in higher education, and(iv) continuously adjusting chapter goals and activities through iterative reflection. We will placethis discussion in the context of literature on mental health, well-being, and flourishing ofstudents and educators during this
framework to better understand empathyamong engineering educators. The framework is made up of three mutually dependentdimensions: skills, orientation, and being. The skills dimension includes empathic skills that canbe learned such as perspective taking, mode switching, and affective sharing. The orientationdimension concerns one’s proclivity for being empathetic and includes aspects such as anepistemological openness and reflective values awareness. The being dimension aligns withone’s values and morals as engineers and citizens and how these morals and values define andguide our actions and behaviors. Interviews were conducted with three assistant professors andone professor and these interview transcripts were thematically analyzed using in
students to the technicaland design process aspects of their major through the use of group design projects. These groupprojects simulate the relationships between business partners, consumers, and design engineers.This course was implemented at the start of the 2017 Fall Semester and data collection for thisresearch document was initiated during the 2018 Fall Semester.ProjectsCurrently, the Foundations of Engineering Lab course houses several different project types:Robotics, Fuel Cell, Remote Sensing, Microscope, Speaker, App and Garden projects. Mostengineering disciplines are loosely reflected by at least one of these projects, with the exceptionof medical-related engineering majors. Students choose a project similar to their
that of thestudents’ perceptions of engineering in regard to their own engineering identity and abilities. In a study by M. Besterfield-Sacre in 1997, incoming engineering students were surveyed ontheir perceptions of engineering as a field, their own abilities as engineers, and their confidencein their success [1]. The performance and retention of the students were then tracked for thefollowing three years and related back to their initial attitudes. Students who left engineering ingood academic standing had significantly different attitudes about themselves and engineeringcompared to students who stayed in engineering, or who left in poor academic standing. Theinitial attitudes of students who left in good standing reflected significantly
make it more universal. The modified instrument, as shown in Appendix B, has notbeen validated. All the questionnaire items will be translated to Vietnamese by translators. The NOEinstrument will be distributed to the Vietnamese faculty when they sign the consent form.Participants will have ample time to complete the written questionnaire. This will allowparticipants to reflect on their NOE views in-depth and relate the responses to their current workexperiences. After receiving the written responses, we will conduct a follow-up interview withthe participants to elaborate on their written responses to generate as much detail as possible ontheir NOE views. All NOE items will be used in conjunction with individual follow-upinterviews with
material is consistent with their future career (Wigfield, 1994; Wigfield &Eccles, 2000). The interest component is based on how students perceive course topics andinstructional methods, interesting (Hidi & Ann Renninger, 2006; Renninger, Hidi, Krapp, &Renninger, 2014). Further, the success component is formed on expectancy for success(Wigfield, 1994; Wigfield & Eccles, 2000). This component reflects students’ self-efficacy aboutthe coursework (Bandura, 1986). The caring component is based on students believes thatinstructors care about their success and well-being (Noddings, 1992).Motivation can be perceived as a student’s intention and engagement in learning as student’saction (Christenson, Reschly, & Wylie, 2012). In other
primarily executing theplans of the initiative; each day following through with the schedule created during the planning stage.Because things do not always go exactly as planned, the acting stage required flexibility due tounplanned occurrences and quick responsiveness to unforeseen issues. During the third stage,observation, the detailed written observances and mental reflections of the Program Coordinator inconjunction with those of the mentors was taken into account. The program coordinator noted students’interaction among the mentors and their receptivity to daily scheduled activities. The mentors observedthe personal behind the scenes responses of students and their interactions among each other. Assessingthe observed actions from the planning
results in personal growth: Whendescribing their favorite aspects of out-of-class activities, specifically outside of academic andengineering settings, Michael and Isabel emphasized how "fun" is meeting new people, going todifferent places, and doing a variety of different things. As they were reflecting, they explainedhow being exposed to these experiences helped shape their perspectives. Isabel provided anexample of how she enjoys getting different points of view and learning from her interactionswith the students from German club, making her a well-informed person: In German club, sort of, [pause] a lot of the people in the foreign language department are also international studies majors so, like, talking to them about the news
. interviews 2007 Student Engagement 2015 demographics 2007 9. Etkina and Harper. (2002) Weekly Reports: Student Reflections on Learning. An Assessment Tool Based on Student and Teacher 3a an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering Student surveys Formative Chong Calibrated Peer Review Formative, Carlson Student and community Formative Elrod Feedback. Journal of College Science Teaching, 31 (7): 476
of the product. Results showed that over half of the students believedthat the first solution helped them in answering the second question. Figure 1: Minimum Viable Product (MVP) for Aerospace Sophomore ClassroomWhile the initial learning module was geared to help students bridge the gaps of knowledge toassist them through their engineering courses, our team has begun to pivot the direction of themodules. Interviews from students within the department have suggested that lack of diversity inthe engineering field may be the cause of students switching majors. As of now, our team isworking on how to gear the personal learning module questions so that they reflect the needs ofthe students and professors in regards to diversifying the
5members’ academic success. The research will also be extended to other community collegesthat do not provide opportunities for engineering organizations, and we will compare them to4-year institutions that yield plenty of opportunities for student participation.ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Ruzica Todorovic and Bridget O'Connell This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. DUE-1832553. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Wright College IRB protocol # 108007
member expanding on the pre-workshop materials, then attendees shared theirperspectives in discussion groups while SDEI members served as moderators and note-takers.This paper provides a model for other student groups of the planning, structure, content, andoutcomes of an Unlearning Series. Responses from participant surveys conducted at the close ofthe summer and group reflections amongst SDEI committee leaders are also presented. Thisfeedback has been translated into lessons learned presented at the conclusion of this paper.IntroductionIntegrating diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) topics in university coursework intended toprepare future planners, designers, and builders has proven to be a challenge. Faculty membersin these fields base
counterparts are controlled for socioeconomic status, education, and access [2],[3]. In the U.S., the federal Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities Initiative documented HD in the following areas: infant mortality, cancer screening and management, diabetes, HIV/AIDS, and adult and child vaccinations [4]. Using vision health as an example, this is reflected in U.S. Latinx populations (Mexican-Americans) who have a prevalence of diabetic retinopathy that is 2to 2.5 times greater than other U.S. population groups (Caucasian population), despitediabetic retinopathy arising as a complication of diabetes that can be managed anddelayed with timely intervention [5], [6]. Furthermore, age is a known risk factor forprimary open angle glaucoma
to reflect their new priorities.Evaluation: Following the synthesis and analysis tasks, students must use the requirements andpriorities they determined in order to utilize effective study habits. This is known as theevaluation phase. In the synthesis phase, it became apparent that time was a major constraint.Due to this students must be aware of the fact that they should only take on activities and workthey believe they will be able to effectively complete. Taking on too much will not only leadto a decrease in performance across all of the tasks but will also lead to added unnecessarystress. For these reasons, it is vital to the success of the student to create a plan that takes inimportant system requirements and prioritizes work to
semester they standardized it [labs], which made itvery hard for just a one credit class, and it's just too much work that you have to put into it.“-DeviBalancing in-class and out-of-classWe asked the students to reflect on how their time is being distributed between being inside andoutside of the class. Out of the ten participants, five students commented on spending more timeoutside of the classroom, mainly dedicated to studying and completion of assignments. Therewere three students who felt that their time balances out between inside and outside of class.One of the students highlighted how the class meeting time is relatively limited, which leaves themajority of the day to the students to spend however they like: “there's definitely a lot more
TechnologyStudies (STS). Throughout the fall 2019 semester, I began to question the ways in which I hadbeen recruited and channeled, as a woman with an interest in science and math, into studyingengineering. Upon taking an introductory STS course, I was introduced to reflecting criticallyabout engineering as a field of study. This led me to enroll in a graduate seminar, EngineeringStudies, which provided me with a much deeper introduction to STS-inflected studies ofengineering, including engineering education. During this time, my professor, along with apostdoctoral fellow, were co-PIs for a study of student experiences in engineering education andhad already convened a group of undergraduate students who were in the process of interviewingtheir peers
few days later and included the two itemsshe had requested. The salary was not quite the level Sarai had hoped for, but given her interestin remaining in the region and her success in receiving funding for both of her requests, shedecided against negotiating for a higher salary. All in all, the negotiation workshop had, in hereyes, paid off. Without it, she reflected, she would have just accepted the verbal offer withoutarticulating what else she needed to help her succeed in this new position.Administrative Level NegotiationsCase 3: College level budget negotiationState U had just hired a new provost. He was a biologist and one of his platforms was to launch anew STEM program. The university had, however, been weathering budget crises for
skillsand primarily the practice of exemplary leadership. It started with a self-refection where eachstudent was given a list of behaviors and actions to reflect if in leadership positions, they preformthem or not. The workshop then went into the five practices of exemplary leadership and how touse them. At the end of the presentation the ambassadors split into groups to create a skit basedon a given scenario and the material covered. The second workshop focused on team building.The workshop started with defining a team and the difference between a group of people and ateam. Then the ambassadors were divided into groups and given a task. After the task wascompleted and presented the group thought back to the first workshop on leadership. Each
distinct from sex. Connellnotes that gender is not a supposedly biologically-obvious division between men and women, butinstead the way human society collectively makes relevant these reproductive distinctions Page 26.1007.5between human bodies in a social context. For us, the context is engineering education. In its simplest form, gender reflects the set of characteristics, behaviors, and practices that we think ofas “feminine” or “masculine” – characteristics that any individual biological male or female mayor may not embody.Race, like gender, is not a biological category but a social one. And unlike sex, race has nobiological basis, despite a
Member searches of professional society databases (e.g. the ASEE Member Database is institution-searchable) Ask departments that commonly participate in DBER to see if there are faculty or student contacts with education-based research interests (e.g. physics, chemistry, math, engineering; departmental secretaries are helpful!)Discipline-based educational research communities of practice will look different at everyinstitution. The boundaries of the domain of interest may change, the community itself will havea different dynamic, and the community’s practices will reflect the differences the membersbring to the organization. The recommendations and experiences presented in this paper focus onwhat has worked
nother first language, yet she explained to me numerous technical matters with effective idiomatic language,humor and clarity. (Young-Me Chung, mentee of Asian origin and European mentor).It is very clear from the above comments that trustworthiness and freedom of thinking are the keys for anefficient and rewarding mentor-mentee relationship.Impact of the studyThis study, using qualitative research method of case studies, reflects the need of mentoring engineeringstudents at the undergraduate level in both local as well as global perspectives. In the local level, such asin Puerto Rico, mentoring helps not only in course works but also in preparation for job interviews, résuméwriting and other broader decisions as practitioners for the outgoing
design, including the ability to switch between notes and chords,additional instrument voicings, an LCD screen, a shutdown command, and a custom-madeenclosure. The students wish to see variations of this project implemented in hospitals, nursinghomes, and schools so that no matter the stage of life or the physical capability, such as weakmuscle issues or joint-related disabilities, the user enjoys playing the piano. We also hope thisproject will reflect the power of engineering in a liberal arts education through the combination ofmultiple disciplines, experiences, skills, and interests.1. IntroductionThe Cornell College engineering major, established in 2013, focuses on general engineering andprepares students with the knowledge they need for
approach reflects a foundationalmisalignment in educational philosophies resulting in what might provocatively be characterizedas “bait-and-switch.” The bait-and-switch characterization reflects a mismatch between theengagement logics embedded in most K-12 engineering education and the exclusionary logicsunderlying most university engineering education. While we acknowledge from the start thatuniversity engineering programs are increasingly emphasizing student engagement, the rapidexpansion of K-12 engineering programs has outpaced reforms in higher education aroundengagement, thereby magnifying the problems associated with engineering bait-and-switchexplored in this paper.In popular vernacular, bait-and-switch is often associated with fraud or
implicationsthan engineering inherently has.AcknowledgementThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantNo. 1836504. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References[1] U. National Academy of Engineering, The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. National Academies Press Washington, DC, 2004.[2] W. Faulkner, "Dualisms, hierarchies and gender in engineering," Social studies of science, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 759-792, 2000.[3] D. Riley, Engineering and social justice: Synthesis Lectures on Engineers, Technology, and Society
(reflective of the overall idea of its contents) isapplied to a unit of data–– were used to analyze her responses. (Example of Holistic Codeapplied to represent data excerpts from student interview can be found in Appendix F.) Belowwe describe ideas and observations derived from Jamie’s interview which may relate to thequantitative findings.Idea 1: The student faced challenges during the programming portion of the intervention.Jamie discussed some of her experiences programming, stating: That if one tiny little thing is wrong, your whole entire problem could be wrong…I was using different variables because I thought I didn't have that variable [made]. So then I'd have two different variables and then something wouldn't work for
one works as an Engineer by definition. [Instead] we work as a construction commission. So you don’t work as an engineer, pure engineer. So I don’t feel like [projects] would be beneficial. If the professors keep giving you projects, you’re not going to apply it actually at work. Instead they [could] give you calculations to the problems - that might be helpful.As the above example shows, students in the focus group drew upon their understanding of thenature of the workforce in the region in order to determine the relevance of the project. Whilesuch views are not likely to reflect the emerging job functions in the MENA region [15],instructors may garner more student buy-in by engaging with these perceptions of the
developmentcourse at colleges of engineering in the United States. The overall research question in this investigation is, how does gender and spatial skilllevel compare across object manipulation assessments? Two sub-questions reflect specificaspects of the general question: 1. Do assessments of spatial skill level correlate with one another? If so, are the correlations significant? 2. What specific gender differences exist among first-year engineering students’ spatial skill level?Procedure Data was collected across three consecutive semesters, not including the summer session.The same set of assessments, in the same order, were given to all students during normallyscheduled class time for class credit
team throughout the summerprogram. After completion of the summer program, the TexPREP students traveled to take partin a regional science symposium and presented two of their CBI Challenge projects, the Stirlingengine and the Solar Car. The students were very excited to share their projects with over 100other 4th year TexPREP students from around the state.The undergraduate curriculum development team was encouraged that the CBI curriculum thatthey developed was beneficial to fourth year students who used the materials that summer andhopeful that students at all TexPREP sites who benefit from the curriculum in years to come.The team members were asked to reflect on their experience and how they were impactedpersonally. Some of their written