Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division Technical Session 3 – Course and Program Outcomes

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Zachary David Asher, Colorado State University; Nicole L Ramo, Colorado State University; Thomas H. Bradley, Colorado State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

settings to generalize our findings, identifyingwhich SE principles may be most effective, and investigating the role of previous SE education inmultidisciplinary course outcomes.References [1] George Vachtsevanos [et. Intelligent fault diagnosis and prognosis for engineering systems. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, N.J., 2006. [2] Armando Rugarcia, Richard M Felder, Donald R Woods, and James E Stice. The future of engineering education i. a vision for a new century. Chemical Engineering Education, 34(1):16–25, 2000. [3] Tim King. Millwrights to mechatronics: The merits of multi-disciplinary engineering. Mechatronics, 5(2): 95–115, March 1995. [4] M B Manju, K S Nikhil, D Nishanth, K S Sai Vignesh, B S Anupama, and Madhav Murthy

Conference Session

Capstone Design Projects and Courses

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tim L. Brower, University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineering

-world client into the course. A computer-basedsimulator has been used to provide a learning environment for critical competencies aimed ataccelerating the student‟s learning in systems engineering concepts.5 The introduction of systemsengineering into pre-college education6 was shown to give students a broad perspective withwhich to interact with the world. Systems engineering was used with students as young as fiveyears old to emphasize the kind of interactive and interdependent group learning that fostersgrowth in social skills, giving children the opportunity to think and act critically in society.A systems engineering approach applied in a laboratory setting using an active learning strategycalled Activities, Project, and Problem-Based

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division Technical Session 4 – Systems Thinking Integration and Systems Engineering Skills Evaluation

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Diane Constance Aloisio, Purdue University; Karen Marais, Purdue University; Hanxi Sun, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

Systems Engineering Failures Finding(s) Causal Action Discussion/Explanation The mine operator Pike River Mine explosion: “The original mine plan specified decided to change an two main fans located on the mountainside next to a ventilation aspect of the ventilation shaft. Two planning changes were made. Pike decided to relocate system design

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yue Bi, University of Virginia; Reid Bailey, University of Virginia; Michael C. Smith, University of Virginia

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

Smith (2013). The mean andstandard deviation of the ratings were reported and observations were made. In general,students gave higher ratings on encouraging the future use of Piazza than Praze and Panopto.Students also thought Piazza was easier to use than Praze and Praze was easier to use thanPanopto. When asked to compare SYS 2001 to other courses, students agreed the most withthe statement that ―Compared to other courses, this course used technology to allow moreface-to-face interaction with the instructor(s) and other students.‖ 97% students agreed orstrongly agreed that they received more feedback in SYS 2001 than other courses and 67%agreed or strongly agreed that the structure of the course and the technologies used helpedstudents

Conference Session

Integrating Systems Engineering into the Capstone Project

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Fred J. Looft, Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering, Systems Engineering

Paper ID #15385Systems Engineering and Capstone ProjectsDr. Fred J. Looft, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Prof. Looft earned his B..S, M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering at the University of Michi- gan. After a brief period on industry, he joined the faculty of WPI 1n 1980 where he is now a professor in the ECE department and a founder of, and Academic Head of the Systems Engineering program. His interests include projects based education, curriculum development, international study abroad programs and mentoring, and autonomous robotic systems.. c American Society for Engineering

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Education and K-12

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Reid Bailey, University of Virginia; Joanne Bechta Dugan, University of Virginia; Alexandra Coso Strong, Georgia Institute of Technology; Matthew E. McFarland, University of Virginia

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineering

on curriculum design," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 82, pp. 203-211, 1993.[9] J. T. Klein, "Interdisciplinary Teamwork: The Dynamics of Collaboration and Integration," in Interdisciplinary Collaboration: An Emerging Cognitive Scienc, S. J. Derry, M. A. Gernsbacher, and C. D. Schunn, Eds., ed: Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 2005, pp. 23-50.[10] W. C. Morse, M. Nielsen-Pincus, J. E. Force, and J. D. Wulfhorst, "Bridges and Barriers to Developing and Conducting Interdisciplinary Graduate-Student Team Research," Ecology and Society, vol. 12, 2007.[11] D. Richter and M. C. Paretti, "Identifying barriers to and outcomes of interdisciplinarity in the engineering classroom

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Ruben D. Lopez-Parra, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Tamara J. Moore, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

, "Systems biology: A brief overview," Science (80-. )., vol. 295, no. 5560, pp. 1662–1664, 2002, doi: 10.1126/science.1069492.[5] M. El Karoui, M. Hoyos-Flight, and L. Fletcher, "Future trends in synthetic biology—A report," Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., vol. 7, no. AUG, pp. 1–8, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00175.[6] Royal Academy of Engineering, "Engineering biology a priority for growth," London, England, 2019.[7] C. R. Rehmann, D. T. Rover, M. Laingen, S. K. Mickelson, and T. J. Brumm, "Introducing systems thinking to the engineer of 2020," in Proceedings of the 2010 American Society for Engineering Annual Conference & Exposition, 2011.[8] C. Dym, A. Agogino, and O. Eris, "Engineering

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Pedagogy

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Thomas H. Bradley, Colorado State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), pp.21-40. 4. Bordia, P. (1997). Face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication: A synthesis of the experimental literature. Journal of Business Communication, 34(1), 99-118. 5. Finkelstein, J. E. (2009). Learning in real time: Synchronous teaching and learning online (Vol. 26). John Wiley & Sons. 6. Wang, Y. (2006). Negotiation of meaning in desktop videoconferencing-supported distance language learning. ReCALL, 18(01), 122-145. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 2016 ASEE Conference7. Freitas, F. A., Myers, S. A., & Avtgis, T. A. (1998). Student perceptions of

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Pedagogy

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ashley Bernal, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Scott Kirkpatrick, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Anneliese Watt, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

s Contaminants Power Water Purifier in Retained/Store d Consumer Relocation Assembly Raw Noise of waters

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Education Research

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lin Li, University of Illinois at Chicago; Yong Wang, University of Illinois at Chicago

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

/courses/economics/14-384-time-series-analysis-fall-2008/index.htm2 Michigan Engineering. 2013. Industrial and Operations Engineering Courses. Retrieved February 1, 2013, from http://www.engin.umich.edu/bulletin/ioe/courses.html3 Pennsylvania State University. 2012. Applied Time Series Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2013, from https://onlinecourses.science.psu.edu/stat510/4 The University of Arizona. 2013. Applied Time Series Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2013, from http://www.ltrr.arizona.edu/~dmeko/geos585a.html5 S. S. Rao. 2008. A Course in Time Series Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2013, from http://www.stat.tamu.edu/~suhasini/teaching673/time_series.pdf6 P. Bartlett. 2010. Introduction to Time Series

Conference Session

Methods, Cases, and Directions

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Pil-Won On, University of Missouri, Columbia; Luis Occena, University of Missouri

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineering

(1), 26-39. 3. Rugarcia, A., Felder, R. M., Woods, D. R., & Stice, J. E. (2000). The Future of Engineering Education: I. A Vision for a New Century. Chem. Engr. Education, 34(1), 16-25. Page 25.787.74. Wang, S. C. (2009). In K. Jusoff, S. S. Mahmoud, & R. Sivakumar (Eds.) University Instructor Perceptions of the Benefit of Technology Use in E-Learning. International Conference on Computer and Electrical Engineering (pp. 580-585). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society. Page 25.787.8

Conference Session

Methods, Cases, and Directions

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bidhan C. Roy, University of Wisconsin, Platteville; Osama M. Jadaan, University of Mount Union; Mitchell Dean Cornelius, University of Wisconsin, Platteville

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineering

’s) as described in its income statement is as follows3 –Year 3/2008 3/2009 3/2010 3/2011Total Revenue $20,528 $23,372 $28,147 $31,197Cost of Sales $6272 $6250 $7923 $9372Research & $1487 $1218 $1121 $1269DevelopmentSelling, General, & $2158 $2177 $2414 $2474AdministrativeExpensesIncome Taxes $3892 $4644 $5917 $6330 (a) Based on the above data, calculate the present worth of the company. Use an interest rate of 4% per annum. NOTE: We

Conference Session

Pedagogical Advancements in Engineering Management

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mysore Narayanan, Miami University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineering

invaluable input. The author also thanks Dr. Paul Anderson, Director, Roger andJoyce Howe Center for Writing Excellence for his valuable guidance and encouragement Page 25.225.13References:Armstrong, Thomas. (1994). Multiple Intelligences in the Classroom. Alexandria, VA: Association forSupervision and Curriculum Development.Barrows, Howard S. (2000). Problem-Based Learning Applied to Medical Education. Springfield, IL: SIUSchool of Medicine.Barrows, H. S. (1996). “Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview.” In L.Wilkerson & W.H. Gijselaers (Eds.), Bringing problem-based learning to higher education: Theory and practice (pp. 3

Conference Session

SED Technical Session: Instructional Experiences

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Paul T. Grogan, Stevens Institute of Technology; Olivier Ladislas de Weck, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

aseries of one or more rounds, each approximately one hour in total duration, with individualsections for introduction, design, build, disassembly, and debriefing. The 20-minute live playsession shown in Figure 5 is a subset of the one-hour round.The introduction addresses background information specific to the learning objectives andexplains the roles, rules, objectives, and constraints for the simulation activity. Participants splitinto teams and pick a unique team name to establish a common identity.The 10-20-minute design period focuses on the LEGO vehicle(s) to be assembled. Based on theapplication, teams either review the master/blueprint or create a new vehicle design usingsupport tools such as cost models or customer. In addition to

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Learning Outcomes and Assessment

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Oscar H. Salcedo, University of Texas, El Paso

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

use constructs of affect to                                                                                                                i  This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. NSF 14-32426,14-31717, and 14-31609. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in the materialsprovided are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.  understand and assess the students’ STEM affect. Each component of the theoretical frameworkis described in the following paragraphs.STEM-literacy for the 21st Century is multifaceted and includes content knowledge and habits ofmind5. For the purpose of this study, we refer to

Conference Session

Developing Systems Engineering Curriculum, Part II

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alice F. Squires, Stevens Institute of Technology; David H. Olwell, Naval Postgraduate School ; Timothy L.J. Ferris, University of South Australia; Nicole A.C. Hutchison; Arthur Pyster, Stevens Institute of Technology; Stephanie Enck, Naval Postgraduate School

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

Postgraduate School Stephanie Enck is a research assistant at the Naval Postgraduate School’s Systems Engineering Depart- ment. She has a Bachelor of Science in Communication, sales and marketing management experience, and volunteered to assist Army families for several years before joining the SE department at NPS. Her research interests and project coordination efforts include M&S education, project management, and SE education. Page 22.461.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011Developing Systems Engineering Graduate Programs Aligned to the Body of Knowledge and

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

William A Kline, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; William D. Schindel, ICTT System Sciences; Ashley Bernal, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Mario Simoni, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

, and value and enable students and instructors to moreclearly identify gaps and misalignments that may lead to unsuccessful designs.ReferencesABET Engineering Accreditation Commission, Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs,Effective for Reviews During the 2016-17 Cycle, Baltimore, MD, October 16, 2015.Castellion, G. and Markham, S. K. (2013), “Perspective: New Product Failure Rates: Influenceof Argumentum ad Populum and Self-Interest”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30:976–979. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.01009.xCrismond, David P. and Robin S. Adams, “The Informed Design Teaching and LearningMatrix”, Journal of Engineering Education, October 2012, Vol. 101, No. 4, pp. 738–797.Dym, Clive L., Agogino, Alice M., Eris, Ozgur

Conference Session

Capstone Design Courses and Tools in support of Systems Engineering Education

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ravi T. Shankar, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL; Jonathan Paul Dickson, FAU; Carlo A Mazoleny, Florida Atlantic University

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

that prepare graduates to attain theprogram educational objectives.” The criteria are typically met across a number of junior andsenior level courses. We use S/U/- (satisfactory/unsatisfactory/Not Available) notation toidentify whether a student met one or more of these criteria in a given course. An S roughlymaps to grades of C or better, but is not always a given. Thus, each faculty member shouldmanually record these letter grades for each of his/her course students in a given semester. Ourengineering curriculum typically offers 12 courses at junior and senior levels every semester, andhas typical enrollments of 18 per course. A typical student spends 6 or more semesters in ourprogram to satisfy the graduation requirements. We graduate 20 to

Conference Session

Research Projects, Course Development, and Industry Issues

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew Bodenhamer, Missouri University of Science and Technology; Ivan G. Guardiola, Missouri University of Science & Technology; Steven Michael Corns; Cihan H. Dagli, Missouri University of Science & Technology

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

resources system problem. In the intervening years, he continued work on large scale system based problems. He has expertise in model- ing architectures for complex engineering systems such as transportation, infrastructure, water resources, and energy distribution using computational intelligence techniques He is the Founder of the Missouri S&T’s system engineering graduate program. Dagli is the Director of the Smart Engineering Systems Laboratory and a Senior Investigator in the DoD Systems Engineering Research Center-URAC. He is an INCOSE Fellow 2008 and IIE Fellow 2009. He has been the PI, Co-PI, or Director of 46 research projects and grants totaling more than $29 million from federal, state, and industrial

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Education and K-12

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Pablo Biswas, Texas A&M International University; Runchang Lin, Texas A&M International University; Ramesh Hanumanthgari, Texas A&M International University; Sri Bala Vojjala

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineering

social-cognitive perspective,” Theory into Practice, 43 (3), 189-196.[6]. Cohn, M., User Stories Applied: For Agile Software Development, Addison-Wesley Professional, 2004, Boston, MA 02116.[7]. Cooper, H., Lindsay, J. J., Nye, B., and Greathouse, S., (1998), “Relationships among attitudes about homework, amount of homework assigned and completed, and student achievement,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 90 (1), 70-83.[8]. Eren, O., and Henderson, D. J., (2011), “Are we wasting our children's time by giving them more homework?” Economics of Education Review, 30 (5), 950-961.[9]. Ferreira, J., Sharp, H., and Robinson, H., (2011), “User experience design and agile development: Managing

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

John Alexander Mendoza-Garcia, University of Florida; Andrea Goncher, University of Florida; Mengyu Li, University of Florida

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

thinking skills in the context of earth system education,” J. Res. Sci. Teach. Off. J. Natl. Assoc. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 518–560, 2005.[5] B. Cameron, E. Crawley, and D. Selva, Systems Architecture. Strategy and product development for complex systems. Pearson Education, 2016.[6] P. Checkland, Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. New York, New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 1981.[7] P. Checkland, “Soft systems methodology: a thirty year retrospective,” Syst. Res. Behav. Sci., vol. 17, no. S1, pp. S11–S58, 2000.[8] K. Y. Hiller Connell, S. M. Remington, and C. M. Armstrong, “Assessing systems thinking skills in two undergraduate sustainability courses: a comparison of teaching strategies,” J

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bungo Shiotani, University of Florida; Dante Augustus Buckley, University of Florida; Amy Elizabeth Bumbaco, University of Florida; Norman G. Fitz-Coy, University of Florida

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

Management: Models and Frameworks forMastering Complex Systems.” Third Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2005.6 Blanchard, B. S., and Fabrycky, W. J., “Systems Engineering and Analysis,” 5th edition, Pearson Education, Inc.,2011. Page 26.567.127 “NASA Systems Engineering Handbook,” NASA/SP-2007-6105, Dec 2007.8 “Defense Acquisition Guidebook Chapter 5 Life-cycle Logistics,” DoD, May 15, 2013.9 “Operations of the defense acquisition system,” Interim DoD instructions 5000.02, November 25, 2013.10 “Madison Public Schools Science Program: A Framework for Integrated Teaching and Learning,” Madison PublicSchools, Madison, CT.11

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Greg Bartus, Stevens Institute of Technology; Frank T. Fisher, Stevens Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

/educate-innovate (2) NGSS Lead States. 2013. Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. (3) Yasar, S., Baker, D., Robinson-Kurpius, S., Krause, S., Roberts, C. 2006. Development of a Survey to Assess K-12 Teachers' Perceptions of Engineers and Familiarity with Teaching Design, Engineering, and Technology. Journal of Engineering Education. (4) www.teachengineering.org, www.tryengineering.org (5) Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., Rogers, C. 2008. Advancing Engineering Education in P-12 Classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education. (6) Frank, M., Elata, D. 2005. Developing the Capacity for Engineering Systems Thinking (CEST) of Freshman

Conference Session

Developing Systems Engineering Curriculum and Programs

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Polinpapilinho Katina, Old Dominion University; Joseph M Bradley, Leading Change, LLC

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

RAND, 1948-1967 (No. RAND/N-2936-RC) (p. 4).Santa Monica, CA: RAND.20 Gibson, J. E., Scherer, W. T., & Gibson, W. F. (2007). How to do systems analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.21 INCOSE. (2011). Systems engineering handbook: A guide for system life cycle processes and activities. (H.Cecilia, Ed.) (3.2 ed.). San Diego, CA: INCOSE.22 Blanchard, B. S., & Fabrycky, W. J. (2006). Systems engineering and analysis (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson - Prentice Hall.23 Churchman, C. W., Ackoff, R. L., & Arnoff, E. (1957). Introduction to operations research. New York, NY:Wiley.24 Forrester, J. W. (1961). Industrial dynamics. Cambridge, MA: MIT press Cambridge, MA.25 Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Radu F. Babiceanu, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

the IEEE Std 830-1998 Recommended Practice for SoftwareRequirements Specifications.” In addition, the students’ submissions should also address thefollowing tasks: • Identify the section(s) of your Requirements Document where the information related to the requirements’ customers and stakeholders is to be presented. Provide the customers and stakeholders information as part of the document or as an Appendix. • Identify the section(s) of your Requirements Document where, besides the natural language requirements, the requirements analysis and specification process would benefit from the use of diagrams (use cases, data flow diagrams, state-machine-diagrams, etc.) to better understand the needed

Conference Session

Capstone Design Courses and Tools in support of Systems Engineering Education

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Pablo Biswas, Texas A&M International University; Runchang Lin, Texas A&M International University

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

Conference Session

Developing Systems Engineering Curriculum, Part II

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ricardo Pineda, University of Texas, El Paso; John E. Weaver, Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company; Oscar H. Salcedo, University of Texas, El Paso; Jose Luis Falliner, The University of Texas, El Paso; Richard T. Schoephoerster, University of Texas, El Paso

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

defense acquisition life cycle and address the rootcause of program failure during the early phase of the program. In some of its findings, theNational Research council states: “There is a need for an appropriate level of SE talent andleadership early in the program, with clear lines of accountability and authority. Senior SEpersonnel should be experienced in the product(s) domain, with strong skills in architecturedevelopment, requirements management, analysis, modeling and simulation, affordabilityanalysis, and specialty engineering disciplines (e.g., reliability, maintainability, survivability,system security, and technology maturity management”). It continues to state: “. . . there are nolonger enough experienced systems engineers to fill the

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mohammed BOUGAA, CentraleSupelec and EISTI; Stefan Bornhofen, EISTI; Alain RIVIERE, SUPMECA; JEAN-CLAUDE TUCOULOU, AFIS ASSOCIATION FRANCAISE D'INGENIERIE SYSTEME

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

National Agency of Research-ANR-. Authors would like tothank Mr. Ismail Mansour, for the web development tasks of this solution and Mr. SylvainCerny for the 3D virtual environment development.References [1] C. L. Dym, A. M. Agogino, O. Eris, D. D. Frey, and L. J. Leifer, “Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 103–120, 2005. [2] D. D. Walden and G. J. Roedler, INCOSE Systems Engineering Handbook: A Guide for System Life Cycle Processes and Activities. no: Wiley, 4 ed., 2015. [3] C. S. Wasson, “Ac 2012-3389: System engineering competency: The missing course in engineering educa- tion,” INCOSE International Symposium Journal, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 21–36, 2010. [4] G.-S

Conference Session

Engineering Economy Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Bradley James Schmid, University of Saskatchewan

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineering

, and S. Vanderby, “ENGINEERING ECONOMICS TASK FORCE - FINAL REPORT,” 2015.[4] V. Clinton and S. Khan, “Efficacy of Open Textbook Adoption on Learning Performance and Course Withdrawal Rates: A Meta-Analysis,” AERA Open, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 1–20, 2019.

Conference Session

Methods, Cases, and Directions

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joseph C. Hartman, University of Florida

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineering

thismaterial can be covered in a large-class setting, including how it can be examined. Our datasuggests that spreadsheets must be incorporated into quizzes and or examinations in order toassess student abilities in these areas. Thus, while our teaching has evolved to includespreadsheets, so must our examination procedures.IntroductionCapital investments require analyses by engineers with tools and insight into whether theinvestment is sound. The field of engineering economy provides these tools. In order to make asound decision, a three-phase approach to evaluate the risk of a project is necessary: 1. Identify the risk, or risks, of an investment project. 2. Analyze the identified risk(s) of the project. 3. Assess how the identified risks