Asee peer logo
Displaying results 91 - 120 of 128 in total
Conference Session
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
John Krupczak Jr., Hope College; A. Mehran Shahhosseini, Indiana State University
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
Management at Indiana State University. He has published over 45 articles in different journals and conference proceedings. He has served as an investigator for research projects sponsored by National Science Foundation, Ford Motor Company, and the US Army. Before working at Indiana State Univer- sity, he was a faculty in the University of Louisville for 10 years. He also has over four years of industrial experience. He received his D.Eng. degree in Mechanical Engineering from Lamar University (USA) in 1999, M.Sc. in Materials Engineering from Isfahan University of Technology (Iran) in 1991, and B.Sc. in Metallurgical Engineering from Tehran University (Iran) in 1988. He is a member of ASEE, ASME, SAE, and ATMAE
Conference Session
Innovations in Promoting Technological Literacy II
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
J. Douglass Klein, Union College
Tagged Divisions
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
tools that dwarf human abilities. Page 25.476.3 Moore’s law, which states that the number of transistors on a standard chip will double everytwo years, has held since 1970. It is, of course, a law in neither the political nor the scientificsense, but rather is a pattern of technological evolution, spurred by human ingenuity andcompetitive spirit. The human genome project, predicted to take 15 years to complete in 1990,was finished in only ten and the life-cycle of technology products gets shorter and shorter.McKibben talks about our moment in technological history as being at the “knee of the curve” ofexponential growth in technological
Conference Session
Innovations in Promoting Technological Literacy II
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
William R. Loendorf, Eastern Washington University
Tagged Divisions
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
. Initiallythe teaching methods included lectures, discussions, videos, exams, and written projects(Loendorf6, 2004). Over time the teaching methods have been expanded to include recreatedartifacts (Loendorf & Geyer9, 2008), demonstrations (Loendorf & Geyer10, 2009), othercollections of technologies (Loendorf & Geyer11, 2010), and innovative visual content(Loendorf8, 2011).An additional teaching method was incorporated right from the very beginnings of the course butwas so tightly integrated into the course that it was almost overlooked. That method wasstorytelling. Stories with a historical perspective as well as personal experiences abouttechnology are intertwined throughout the entire course. These stories, in many ways, help thestudent
Conference Session
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 4
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Tejita Rajbhandari, Gannon University; Mark Blair, Gannon University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
and interest include NationalGirls Collaborative Project, Girls in Tech, Association for women in science and Society ofWomen Engineering (SWE). There are so many examples of the populist attitude in the modernworld that extensive justification is not needed. It shows that society not only wants its youngpeople to learn this knowledge, but it needs them to, in order to sustain and progress the humancondition.The Open Source CommunityThe Open Source Community (OSC) may at first seem like a Marxist organization demandingthe distribution of knowledge and intellectual property. However, the opposite is true. It putsforth a radical free-market ethos, in that it asserts the protections afforded to large multi-million-dollar companies should be
Conference Session
Interactive Panel on Perspectives and Practical Skills for Men as Advocates for Gender Equity
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lawrence J. Genalo, Iowa State University; Roger A. Green, North Dakota State University; Beth M Holloway, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Archie L Holmes Jr., University of Virginia; Brian P Kirkmeyer, Miami University; Klod Kokini, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Daniel Lopresti, Lehigh University; Adrienne Minerick, Michigan Technological University; Beena Sukumaran, Rowan University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Leadership Development Division, Minorities in Engineering, Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering, Women in Engineering
. As part ofthis group, I regularly train men, both on- and off-campus, to better serve as gender equity allies.I am a member of the Commission on the Status of Women Faculty, a committee that works todevelop and enhance gender-equitable policies at North Dakota State University. I am primaryauthor of a series of broadly distributed advocacy tips, have participated in a national webinar onengaging male faculty as gender equity allies, and have given several conference presentationson the same topics. Additionally, I currently serve on the planning committee for the NSF-funded project Transforming Undergraduate Education in Engineering (TUEE), which has thegoal of enhancing women participation and success in engineering programs.Dr. Holmes: I
Conference Session
Experience in Assessing Technological Literacy
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Denise M Wilson, University of Washington; Cheryl Allendoerfer, University of Washington; Ryan C. Campbell, University of Washington; Elizabeth Burpee; Mee Joo Kim, University of Washington- Seattle
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
) for one class (n=9) and Page 23.1369.5between 2.6 and 3.9 for another class (n=13). Problem areas are shown to vary depending on thegroup, but for both classes as a whole, the lowest mean score occurred for the basic literacy issueindicating the writing’s “closing synthesizes the elements, supports the main idea and finalizesthe paper”.Additional conference papers include Rhoulac and Crenshaw’s 2006 study[15] of 15 technicalreports written by seniors in civil engineering at Howard University, as well as Poltavtchenkoand Tingerthal’s 2011 study[16] of 9 group project reports written by construction managementstudents at a public middle-sized
Conference Session
The Philosophy of Engineering and Technological Literacy
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jonathan S Weedon, Case Western Reserve University
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
engineering students engaged in a design project and pays particular attention to howstudents make judgments. The analysis concludes that the practice of engineering judgmentrelies on displays to recognize and construct rhetorical tactics to satisfy the requirements of atask. This study connects to recent research in engineering education on the importance ofdisplays 15, 16 for learning the design process, and reveals the dynamics of displays for carryingout engineering judgment. Engineering judgment is a core competency for engineering practice. Philosophers,educators, practitioners, and historians agree that engineering judgment is necessary for ethical,sophisticated, and professional engineering practice1, 2, 3, 4, ,5. While scientific and
Conference Session
Developing Technological Literacy in Students
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Justin Lee Clough, University of Southern California; Patricia Chaffey, University of Southern California; Gautam Salhotra, University of Southern California; Colin G. Cess, University of Southern California; Rey Pocius, University of Southern California; Katie Mills, University of Southern California
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
al. describe ProfessionalDevelopment (PD) sessions aimed at providing teachers ways to incorporate engineering and CSconcepts into non-technical courses 13 . When teachers blend technology with traditional subjectssuch as math and language arts, students find creative and novel ways to utilize engineering andcomputer science. Through teacher surveys, Hamner et al. found that PD sessions improvedteacher confidence in implementing robotics and programming projects into theirclassrooms.Cortina and Trahan describe a five-day workshop aimed at providing teachers ways to incorporateCS into their classrooms without having to make major changes to their curricula. For example, amath teacher could use a short computer program to display a geometric
Conference Session
Promoting Engineering and Technological Literacy
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
James W Malazita, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Dominic Francis Gelfuso; Dean Nieusma, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
was effectively over—quite a change from thehours or days of sitting that a figure model could expect to endure in a traditional sculptingstudio.The 24 trans-planar slices were then projected, one by one, onto a screen using a magic lantern.21Artisans and shop workers would trace the outline of the silhouette, using a mechanical devicethat would carve the contours into a piece of clay. Rotating the clay and repeating the process 23times resulted in a mostly-defined bust that featured a photographically-exact representation ofthe subject. Workers in Willéme’s shop would add final touches to the bust, mostly in order tosmooth out the gaps in-between the 24 carved slices, and often to cast the sculpt in a layer ofbronze. Importantly, these final
Conference Session
Dimensions of Engineering Literacy and Engineering in General Education
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
John Krupczak Jr, Hope College; Mani Mina, Iowa State University; Kate A Disney, Mission College
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
engineering as well as exciting students through open- ended projects and applications. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 A Framework for an Engineering Reasoning Test and Preliminary Results.The work reported here describes the development and initial testing of a framework to helpassess the broad understanding of technology by individuals who are not specifically educated asengineers. It is generally accepted that technology is essential to our current lifestyles and well-being, and the importance of engineering to economic prosperity is commonly acknowledged.However limited work has been done determine the extent to which undergraduates possess ageneral understanding of the principles, products
Conference Session
Technological Literacy and Technological Policy
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
John Heywood, Trinity College, Dublin
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
2015. The US Bureau of Labor Statistics projects an11% growth in the need for nuclear engineers in the period up to 2018” [16]. A parallel examplecomes from the UK where in respect of a large underground rail development in London(Crossrail) the contractor reported that it will require 1000 tunnellers. But there were only 500tunnellers in the whole of the UK whose average age is 55 years. Unfortunately it did not saywhat qualifications were required [17].More generally in the United States recent evidence on the demand for personnel seems tosuggest that the pattern of demand is changing. So is there a changing pattern in the demand forpersonnel with technological skills
Conference Session
TELPhE Division Technical Session 1: Expanding Technological and Engineering Literacies
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
John Krupczak Jr, Hope College; A. Mehran Shahhosseini, Indiana State University; Darin R. Stephenson, Hope College
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
- agement and director of the PhD Program in Technology Management at Indiana State University. He has published over 50 articles in different journals and conference proceedings. He has served as an investi- gator for research projects sponsored by National Science Foundation, Ford Motor Company, and the US Army. Before working at Indiana State University, he was a faculty in the University of Louisville for 10 years. He also has over four years of industrial experience. He received his D.Eng. degree in Mechanical Engineering from Lamar University (USA) in 1999, M.Sc. in Materials Engineering from Isfahan Uni- versity of Technology in 1991, and B.Sc. in Metallurgical Engineering from Tehran University in 1988. He is a
Conference Session
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Huiming Fan, East China University of Science and Technology
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
Abilitycultural differences and being able to 4.11 (0.905) 0.513conduct cross-cultural cooperationBeing able to organize and lead a team to 4.39 (0.849) 0.719expand the work Leadership andManaging one or more projects 4.38 (0.835) 0.749 Decision-Makingeffectively AbilityBeing able to make effective decisions in 4.41 (0.819) 0.661engineering and managementBeing equipped with good verbal ability 4.40 (0.825
Conference Session
Developing Technological Literacy in Students
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Neelam Prabhu Gaunkar, Iowa State University; Mani Mina, Iowa State University of Science and Technology
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
lectures, homework, projects, and laboratory activities. However, inevery engineering discipline the curriculum is growing, and there seems to be so much thatneeds to be covered. Classes are packed with material and assignments and do notnecessarily have the creative overlap to promote synergy of the material and understanding.Our research question is whether student autonomy (even if it is partial for selected parts of theclass) and engagement of inquiry-based approach would be more beneficial for students andwould help facilitate the journey of an engaged student with a connected knowledge base.Would an inquiry-based approach, with providing students’ autonomy to create their connectedknowledge and an ability to create their story and path of
Conference Session
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
David Clippinger, Penn State Erie, The Behrend College; Kathleen Jernquist, U.S. Coast Guard Academy; Steven Nozaki, Penn State Erie, The Behrend College; Fredrick A. Nitterright, Penn State Erie, The Behrend College
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
centers [9] and courses staffed by personnel with STEM-specificwriting expertise to ensure that effective communication is integral to undergraduates developingtheir professional identities [10].The value of teaching undergraduates the “five domains of writing knowledge” – genre,discourse community, process, content, and rhetorical [11] – is well established. Research onways to facilitate students’ abilities to transfer that knowledge among core and major coursesopens possibilities for developing coherent writing curricula [12]. As students developunderstanding of disciplinary genres, such as lab reports and design projects, and addressdifferent audiences for those genres, they can refine their ways of thinking and expression ofdisciplinary
Conference Session
Communication Across the Divisions II: Communication and Transdisciplinary Pedagogies
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kathryn A. Neeley, University of Virginia
Tagged Divisions
Civil Engineering, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, Mechanical Engineering, Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
onlyinterest in the topic (and a passionate one), but an education in the humanities” (Kynell, p. 96).Harbarger played several leadership roles in the English Division of the Society for thePromotion of Engineering Education (SPEE) and published widely on the subject of technicalcommunication instruction for engineers. In an article titled “The Qualifications of a Teacher ofEnglish for Engineering Students” (1920) and summarized in a June 1929 report, Harbargerdelineated what might be described as a pyramid of qualifications for success as teacher ofEnglish to engineering students: 1. the personality of the teacher, which obviously affects, 2. the presentation of the material, or the project, and 3. the cooperation of the instructors of the
Conference Session
Promoting Engineering and Technological Literacy
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
John Heywood, Trinity College-Dublin
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
engineering and technological literacyled the Technological Literacy Division seek to incorporate engineering literacy within in itstitle. They sought to define by examples the differences between the two (see exhibit 2). Oneapproach offered by Krupczak et al was to distinguish between the two literacies as processand project which is the approach adopted here. Technologies are the products of the processof engineering. If that is in anyway correct, then while useful to engineering educators inschool and higher education it is no wonder that the public is confused about the differencesbetween “technologists” and “engineers,” and no wonder the media tend to use the term“technologist” more often than they do the term “engineer.” The thinking is easy
Conference Session
Exploration of Broad Issues and Promotion of Engineering and Technological Literacy
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Joseph F. Camean P.E., U.S. Coast Guard Academy
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
very proud to show them, letting first-hand experiencebuild enthusiasm for a career path enabling an independent and prosperous adult life. Observingbig and small engineering works raises interest, e.g., seeing the awesome scale of a 1,000 MWpower generator or watching a pipefitter annealing copper tubing by heating it to a glow andrapidly quenching in cold water. Hard copper magically becoming malleably soft. Today’s bestanalog are the robotics-mechatronics programs, which provide a limited bandwidth that ought tobe much broader. With appropriate planning and supervision, middle and high school agestudents holding interest in engineering need to experience more than science projects, and seereal things being made.Although the most significant
Conference Session
Exploration of Broad Issues and Promotion of Engineering and Technological Literacy
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Carl O. Hilgarth
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
papers. In light of the fact that we are living in an increasingly created world, weshould begin to see these literacies as social processes in the sense that they are pushing societyforward through unknown waters to arrive at some destination, hence the need to transform theseliteracies beyond a pedagogy to a broader understanding within the technical community andwithin a technologically oriented society.References1. Chenea, Paul F., Engineering management challenges, Engineering management International, Volume 1, Issue 1, 1981, Pages 7-11, ISSN 0167-5419, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/016754198190003X.2. International Technology Education Association, Technology for All Americans Project
Conference Session
Innovations in Promoting Technological Literacy II
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Vazgen Shekoyan, Queensborough Community College, CUNY; Todd Holden, Queensborough Community College, CUNY; Raul Armendariz Ph.D., Queensborough Community College, CUNY; Helio Takai, Brookhaven National Laboratory; Sunil Dehipawala, Queensborough Community College, CUNY; Dimitrios S. Kokkinos Ph.D., Queensborough Community College, CUNY; Regina Sullivan, Queensborough Community College, CUNY; George Tremberger Jr, Queensborough Community College, CUNY; Paul J. Marchese, Queensborough Community College, CUNY; David H. Lieberman, Queensborough Community College, CUNY; Tak Cheung, Queensborough Community College, CUNY
Tagged Divisions
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
. Lieberman, Queensborough Community College, CUNYProf. Tak Cheung, Queensborough Community College, CUNY Tak Cheung, Ph.D., professor of physics, teaches in CUNY Queensborough Community College. He also conducts research and mentors student research projects. Page 25.1267.2 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012Technological literacy in required science courses for non-STEM students in acommunity college with extension to junior high school environmentAbstractTechnological literacy is an important outcome for a non-STEM student taking a requiredscience course to function effectively in our
Conference Session
TELPhE Division Technical Session 2: The Broadening Face of Engineering Education
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Corey T. Schimpf, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York (CoE)
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
practices within technological literacy.Game-Based Learning in Engineering EducationIn the realm of education, games have been gaining prominence as a medium for supportingstudents’ development and growth [9], [10]. Games can act as powerful learning tools that offerseveral benefits for learning including: developing professional identities [9], [32], providing asimulated project environment and context for learning professional skills and practices [9], [33]–[35], providing immediate and continuous feedback [7], [17], and inspiring new interests andenhancing motivations [10], [36], [37]. Much of the research in this area focuses on gamesdeveloped specifically for learning or educational contexts, often called serious games [38],although some work
Conference Session
The Philosophy of Engineering and Technological Literacy
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Gary P. Halada, Stony Brook University; Peter H. Khost, Stony Brook University
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
technologies evoke a visceral response. This is dueprimarily to two factors, the degree to which they or their effects are unknown, and the potentialfor dread that their impact may create. These psychological factors have been cited by Slovic andWeber 13, among others, as the source of perceived risk form technology (figure 1).Figure 1: Psychological factors affecting perception of risk, adapted from Slovic and Weber.In a study by Kahan and Rejeski associated with the Woodrow Wilson International Center forScholars Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies, they determined that members of the publicform a rapid, visceral, emotional response when evaluating nanotechnology risks 14. When askedto consider balanced information about nanotechnology risks and
Conference Session
TELPhE Division Technical Session 1: Expanding Technological and Engineering Literacies
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
to argue that because they are by their nature contingent, an informationgiving curriculum based on a collection of traditional disciplines is unlikely to developtechnological competency. The most likely curriculum to develop technological competencywill be problem/project based, accompanied by a study of qualitative engineering. Because itis likely to require students to obtain knowledge independently, and because individuals andorganizations learn, its base should be an active understanding of the nature of learning.Some examples of transdisciplinary programmes are mentioned together with sometransdisciplinary texts, but they err on the side of information giving rather than problemsolving and critical thinking which lie at the heart of
Conference Session
TELPhE Division Technical Session 2: The Broadening Face of Engineering Education
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Y. Curtis Wang, California State University, Los Angeles; Jim Kuo, California State University, Los Angeles; He Shen, California State University, Los Angeles; David E. Raymond, California State University, Los Angeles; Mathias J. Brieu, California State University, Los Angeles
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
- efficacy? The case of project-based learning in Korea,” vol. 85, pp. 45–57, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2019.05.005.[15] J. K. Liker, The Toyota way: 14 management principles from the world’s greatest manufacturer. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2004.[16] J.-H. Thun, M. Drüke, and A. Grübner, “Empowering Kanban through TPS-principles – an empirical analysis of the Toyota Production System,” vol. 48, no. 23, pp. 7089–7106, Dec. 2010, doi: 10.1080/00207540903436695.[17] M. G. (Mark) Yang, P. Hong, and S. B. Modi, “Impact of lean manufacturing and environmental management on business performance: An empirical study of manufacturing firms,” vol. 129, no. 2, pp. 251–261, Feb. 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.10.017.[18] R. Shah and P
Conference Session
The Philosophy of Engineering and Technological Literacy
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
John Krupczak, National Science Foundation; Mani Mina, Iowa State University
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
technologicalsystems. The approach emphasizes that components provide specific capabilities or functionsand are combined using the design process into technological systems. Initial results of thiswork-in-progress are encouraging. The FCSD framework has been used in engineering literacyand introductory courses. In preliminary studies students are able to articulate main conceptsand conduct a design project following an FCSD approach.AcknowledgementThis work was supported by the National Science Foundation under awards: DUE-1121464 andDUE-0920164. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.Bibliography 1. Pearson G
Conference Session
Dimensions of Engineering Literacy and Engineering in General Education
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mani Mina, Iowa State University
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
., Haynes, A., & Redding, M. (2007). Project CAT: Assessing critical thinking skills. In Proceedings of the 2006 National STEM Assessment Conference, Deeds, D, and Callen, B.(eds) Springfiled, MO: Drury University.24. Stein, B., Haynes, A., Redding, M., Harris, K., Tylka, M., & Lisic, E. (2010). Faculty driven assessment of critical thinking: national dissemination of the cat instrument. In Technological Developments in Networking, Education and Automation (pp. 55-58). Springer Netherlands.25. 26.
Conference Session
The Philosophy of Engineering and Technological Literacy
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
John Heywood, Trinity College-Dublin
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
understood by learning. For each school subject there must be a corresponding academic discipline as represented in the universities. Because the disciplines are dynamic they are concerned as much with “what will be” as with “what was” [14]. That this is so, is illustrated by the great curriculum projects that were undertaken in the sixties and seventies because in the U.S. teachers did not have the resources to undertake such developments which normally be considered to be part of the role of the teacher functioning in this ideology [15]. The scholar academic ideology is teacher centred. Information is conveyed to the mind which reasons about it, as required. Learning is the result of teaching [16]. Because each
Conference Session
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Neelam Prabhu Gaunkar, Iowa State University; Mani Mina, Iowa State University
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
in our FreshmanEngineering program. The objective of the project is to see if the engineering students will alsodevelop their deeper learning and cycle of questioning and reflecting. In addition, we would liketo know if the process helps them developing self awareness in their learning practices and if thishelps them be more successful in their growth as engineers.As instructors, these bring us new challenges. Generally, students tend to repeat what theymostly did in their classes: memorize and repeat what they know well to achieve good grades. Inmost classes, tests are also designed around such learning practices. However, there aren’t manyways for students to communicate their learning methods, their thoughts, and their reflection onhow
Conference Session
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin; Michael Patrick Lyons, Michael P. Lyons & Associates
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
without cladding and was upgraded for heat insulation in 2016 with a rain claddingsystem added to the exterior, and the new windows located outside the plane of the originalconcrete wall panels. The over-cladding created vertical voids over the projecting structuralcolumns. There was no sprinkler system for firefighting, the stairwell was not pressurized andthe strategic advice to occupants was based on a Stay-In-Place advisory, due to the non-combustible construction and the presumption of adequate fire brigade intervention.In normal circumstances, it would be expected that a fire could be contained within the flatenclosure and that it would not spread to the stairwell enclosure at all. The building was builtwith that purpose in mind. The fire
Conference Session
The Philosophy of Engineering and Technological Literacy
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Bill Williams, CEG-IST Universidade de Lisboa; Jose Figueiredo, IST, Universidade de Lisboa
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
prepared for work in industry. European Journal of Engineering Education, 30(2), 167-180.Mayo, E. The human problems of an industrial civilization, Cambridge, MA: HarvardMukerji, C. (2009). Impossible Engineering: Technology and Territoriality on the Canal du Midi. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Nagel J. K. S., Pierrakos O., Zilberberg, A. and McVay S. (2012) Understanding industry experiences: from problem solving to engineering students’ learning gains. Proceedings Frontiers in Education Conference, 2012, 927 – 932.ASEE/IEEENakamura T., Taguchi E., Hirose D., Masahiro I. , Takashima A., "Role-Play Training for Project Management Education Using a Mentor Agent" vol. 3, pp.175-180, 2011 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on