Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 10

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Cristian Saavedra-Acuna, Universidad Andres Bello, Concepcion, Chile; Monica Quezada-Espinoza, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

variables: type of institution,modality, age, and type of careerFirst, general results about selecting STEM disciplines in men and women between the years2008 to 2020 are shown in Figure 1. Figure 1. Distribution of preferences for first-year students in STEM disciplines concerning gender and women’s participation. Source: Own elaboration based on SIES historical enrolment from 2008 to 2020 [16].As shown in Fig. 1 the number of women who prefer STEM disciplines has gradually increasedfrom 2008 (38,515 students) to 2020 (54,982 students). However, female´s average participationfor the period under review is 19.5%, a fall in participation is seen between 2008 and 2012(Figure 2), where minimum participation of 18.92% was seen. We can see an

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jenna P. Carpenter, Campbell University; Lee Kemp Rynearson, Campbell University; Lynn A. Albers, Campbell University; Michele Miller, Campbell University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

retention.References1) National Academy of Engineering. 2005. Educating the Engineer of 2020:Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century. Washington, DC: The NationalAcademies Press. doi: 10.17226/11338.2) National Science Board. 2016. Science and Engineering Indicators 2016.Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation (NSB-2016-1).3) Garibay, J.C., Hughes, B.E., Eagan, M.K., and Hurtado, S. 2013. Beyond theBachelor’s: What Influences STEM Post-Baccalaureate Pathways, Association forInstitutional Research Annual Forum. Long Beach, CA.4) Chubin, D., May, G.S., and Babco, E.L. 2005. Diversifying the EngineeringWorkforce. Journal of Engineering Education, 94 (1), 73-86.5) Knight, D.W., Calrson, L.E., and J.F. Sullivan. 2007. Improving Engineering

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jia G. Liang, Kansas State University; Rick Evans, Cornell University; Stacey E. Kulesza, Kansas State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

I canfix it because it is my idea, no one else.” She further explained the excitement associated with“real challenges” and “real applications”: “Different from other project teams, we work ondifferent problems each year, so we can’t carry over from year to year. …. All these things arechallenges that NASA hasn’t figured out. What we do actually contributes to something.”Likewise, Annie found her ESPT experience directly shaped “how [she] view[s] environmentalengineering;” she commented, “Water problems are really not very simple and they don’t oftencome just with one problem and solution.”Furthermore, ESPTs offered community. Nickie very much respected the other students that sheworked with, “the people that I have been able to work with

Conference Session

K-12 Programs for Recruiting Women

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ann Beheler, Collin County Community College

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

forwarding information to appropriate recipients, evenif the recipient is not in the high school population. The electronic invitation highlights theactivities of the workshop in the text of the email, and it also includes a flyer for the event thatrecipients are asked to print and post. To allow for ordering appropriate amounts of food forbreakfast and lunch, all invitations require R. S. V. P. responses to the grant office. In addition to the electronic invitation, printed invitational flyers, similar to thoseattached to the electronic invitation itself, are mailed and/or delivered to counselors, career andtechnical teachers, math teachers, science teachers, and principals of the middle schools in theregion. Additionally, a letter is sent

Conference Session

Listening and Negotiation

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Adjo A Amekudzi-Kennedy, Georgia Institute of Technology; Kevin D. Hall, University of Arkansas; Trevor Scott Harding, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Amy J Moll, Boise State University; Janet Callahan, Boise State University

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering, Women in Engineering

. Trevor Scott Harding, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Dr. Trevor S. Harding is Professor of Materials Engineering at California Polytechnic State University where he teaches courses in materials design, sustainable materials, and polymeric materials. Dr. Harding is PI on several engineering education research projects including understanding the psychology of engi- neering ethical decision making and promoting the use of reflection in engineering education. He serves as Associate Editor of the journals Advances in Engineering Education and International Journal of Ser- vice Learning in Engineering. Dr. Harding has served in numerous leadership roles in ASEE including division chair of the

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Lourdes A. Medina, University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez; Saylisse Davila, University of Puerto Rico-Mayaguez; Olga Beatriz Rivera, Amgen Manufacturing Limited; Nolgie Oquendo-Colon, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Maria Angelica Velazquez, Montana State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alexa Rihana Abdallah, University of Detroit Mercy; Diane L. Peters, Kettering University; Gloria Guohua Ma, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Stephanie G. Wettstein, Montana State University; Maryam Darbeheshti, University of Colorado, Denver; Karinna M. Vernaza, Gannon University; Christina Keenan Remucal, University of Wisconsin-Madison

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

University Distinguished Faculty Award and 2013-2014 Gannon University Faculty Award for Excellence in Service-Learning. Dr. Vernaza does research in engineering education and high-strain deformation of materials. She is currently the PI of an NSF S-STEM.Dr. Christina Keenan Remucal, University of Wisconsin-Madison Associate Professor Christy Remucal (n´ee Christina Ren´ee Keenan) leads the Aquatic Chemistry group at the University of Wisconsin, Madison. She is a faculty member in the Department of Civil & Environ- mental Engineering, the Environmental Chemistry & Technology Program, and the Limnology & Marine Science Program. She holds an MS (2004) and a PhD (2009) in Civil & Environmental Engineering from

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Pre-college Programs for Women

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Paula Ann Monaco, Texas Tech University; Aimee Cloutier, Texas Tech University; Guo Zheng Yew, Texas Tech University; Maeghan Marie Brundrett, Texas Tech University; Dylan Christenson, Texas Tech University; Audra N. Morse, Texas Tech University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division, Women in Engineering

summer program, students were asked to rate their perceivedinterest and success in math and science activities. Table 1 presents responses from theparticipants and the average rate for students’ math/science interest and math/science success.Students were asked to provide a rate using the scale (1 “Do Not Like” to 10 “Like A Lot”)gauging interest and (1 “Low success” to 10 “Very high success”) gauging level of success.Compared to science, students slightly rated their math skills higher for both interest and successwith an average of 8.28 for both categories. Average rating of science skills for interest andsuccess were 7.97 and 7.92, respectively. More 10’s were selected by students as their perceivedrate for math interest and success (12 and

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Retention Programs for Diverse Students

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rachel Lauren Shapiro, Northeastern University; Emily Olina Wisniewski, Johns Hopkins University; Emma Kaeli, Northeastern University; Tyler Byrne Cole, Northeastern University; Paul A. DiMilla, Northeastern University; Rachelle Reisberg, Northeastern University

Tagged Topics

ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering, Women in Engineering

 Average, and Changes of Major of Female and Minority Students Entering  Engineering," in IEEE Frontiers in Education, Indianapolis, IN, 2005.  [6]   M. A. Hutchison, D. K. Follman, M. Sumpter and G. M. Bodner, "Factors Influencing the  Self‐Efficacy Beliefs of First‐Year Engineering Students," Journal of Engineering Education,  vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 39‐47, 2006.  [7]   F. Aloul, I. Zualkernan, G. Husseini, A. El‐Hag and Y. Al‐Assaf, "A case study of a college‐ wide first‐year undergraduate engineering course," European Journal of Engineering  Education, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 32‐51, 2015.  [8]   T. J. Bowles, A. McCoy and S. Bates, "The effect of supplemental instruction on timely  graduation," College Student Journal

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division: Pre-college Student Experiences

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lynsey Mitchell Kissane, Ryerson University; Liping Fang, Ryerson University ; Ruth Jean Silver, Groundswell Projects

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

for the message and the brand? 5. What images have you chosen to tell your story? Does each image work together and independently to enhance your message? Are they relatable to the audience? 6. How are you incorporating language, images and media to be compelling and contemporary (aka avoiding walls of text)? 7. Is the channel(s) you’ve chosen the most appropriate for the message and the audience? Page 26.772.168. ConclusionAt the graduation ceremony for the YTT, the members stepped up to a podium in front of theirfellow members, parents, friends, and representatives from the engineering community whomthey had interviewed

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division: Student Issues as Related to Culture

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Julie Rojewski, Michigan State University; Katy Luchini-Colbry, Michigan State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

graduate student gatherings, and have found that keeping a “formal”structure to the monthly lunches—invited speakers or specific topics for discussion—seems toelicit more participation than a less formal setting. Yet, the program needs to remain flexibleenough to accommodate students’ conversations and community building.AcknowledgementsFunding for this project was provided by the Michigan State University Office for Inclusion andIntercultural Initiatives through the Creating Inclusive Excellence grant program. Additionalsupport was provided by the MSU College of Engineering. The authors also gratefullyacknowledge the efforts of Theresa Gonzalez, who served as the graduate program assistant andhandled meeting logistics.References1. Sandberg S

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Terri Christiansen Bateman, Brigham Young University ; Lisa C Barrager, Brigham Young University; Rebecca Peterson, Brigham Young University; Spencer P. Magleby, Brigham Young University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

in engineering. These institutions may need to have moderate expectations relativeto retention, but could expect other valuable outcomes for their women students.1. Marra, R. M., & Bogue, B. (2006). Women Engineering Students' Self Efficacy--A Longitudinal Multi- Institution Study. Women in Engineering ProActive Network.2. Tsui, Lisa. "Effective strategies to increase diversity in STEM fields: A review of the research literature." The Journal of Negro Education (2007): 555-581.3. Goodman, I. F. (2002). Final Report of the Women's Experiences in College Engineering (WECE) Project. Online Submission.4. Bottomley, L. J., Rajala, S., & Porter, R. (1999, November). Women in engineering at North Carolina

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Retaining and Developing Women Faculty

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gretchen L. Hein, Michigan Technological University; Daniela Faas, Harvard University; Anne M Lucietto, Purdue University; Jacquelyn Kay Nagel, James Madison University; Diane L Peters P.E., Kettering University; Rebecca M. Reck, Kettering University; Mary C. Verstraete, The University of Akron; Deborah J. O'Bannon P.E., University of Missouri, Kansas City

Tagged Topics

ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity, Engineering Deans Council

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy, Women in Engineering

, Susan; Wiens, Gloria J.; Kazerounian, Kazem; Allen, Janet Katherine; and Jacobson, Kathy. Broadening Participation: A Report on a Series of Workshops Aimed at Building Community and Increasing the Number of Women and Minorities in Engineering Design, .Mechanical Engineering Conference Presentations, Papers, and Proceedings 2013, Paper 11.3. Williams, W. M. & Ceci, S. J. National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, 5360-5365, doi:10.1073/pnas.1418878112 (2015).4. Hager, M. A., Engagement Motivations in Professional Associations. Non-Profit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol 43 (2S), Pg. 39S-60S (2013).5. Parker, M., Welch

Conference Session

1st Year Retention Programs for Women Students

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rachelle Reisberg, Northeastern University; Amanda Funai, University of Michigan; Allison Interrante, Northeastern University; Sara Wadia-Fascetti, Northeastern University; Bala Maheswaran, Northeastern University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

already taken the midterm and received a poor grade (18%where class average was in the high 60’s). However, with this extra intervention, she was able topull up her grade and eventually pass with a C- in the class. This one-on-one intervention wasparticularly successful for this student because it helped her look at the problems in a new way.She had been particularly confused about which formulas to use and had used kinematics tosolve every problem on her midterm. With the emphasis in the review sessions on concepts andtechniques and learning how to apply them, she was able to identify which equations to use oneach problem. Thus, by addressing unique learning style needs and by intervening through theCPR program, women who previously would have

Conference Session

Using Teams, Seminars & Research Opportunities for Retention

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Carolyn Vallas, University of Virginia; Anaïs Miodek, University of Virginia; Larry Richards, University of Virginia

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Edge in Science Engineering andTechnology,” Sept. 2000.2 National Science Foundation. “Science and Engineering Degrees by Race/Ethnicity of Recipients: 1992-2001Table 1,” From National Science Foundation Website, http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf04318/sectb.htm, accessedJanuary 2006.3 J.C. Chang. “Women and Minorities in the Science, Mathematics and Engineering Pipeline,” ERIC Clearinghousefor Community Colleges Los Angeles CA. ERIC Digest, 2002.4 S. Fletcher, M.R. Anderson-Rowland, and S. Blaidsdell. “Industry Involvement in the Women in Applied Scienceand Engineering (WISE) Recruiting and Retention Programs,” 1998 Frontiers In Engineering Conference, 1988.5 National Science Foundation. “Bachelor's degrees awarded in engineering, by sex

Conference Session

Retention of Women Students II

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kerry Meyers, University of Notre Dame; Catherine F. Pieronek, University of Notre Dame; Leo H. McWilliams, University of Notre Dame

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

25.556.16References: 1. M. Ohland, S. Sheppard, G. Lichtenstein, O. Eris, D. Chachra, and R. A. Layton, Persistence, engagement, and migration in engineering programs, Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 2008. 2. K. Smith, S. Sheppard, D. Johnson, and R. Johnson. Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom-Based Practices. Journal of Engineering Education. January 2005, pg. 1-15. 3. R. Felder and R. Brent. Understanding Student

Conference Session

Undergraduate Recruitment

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary R. Anderson-Rowland, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

. FultonSchools of Engineering is located on ASU’s Tempe Campus, the largest single US campus with59,794 students. There are over 4,400 undergraduates and 2,100 graduate students inengineering and computer science. In this paper, “engineering” includes computer science, butnot construction.In Fall 2010, ASU had three NSF grants which supported transfer upper division and graduatestudents. The primary scholarship funding for transfer students was an NSF S-STEM grant(#0728695) called CIRC/METS (Collaborative Interdisciplinary ResearchCommunity/Motivated Engineering Transfer Students) for 2008-2012. If transfer students in thisCIRC/METS Program graduated and continued on to graduate school full-time right aftergraduating, they could receive a scholarship

Conference Session

Environmental Engineering Technical Session 4: Environmental Issues and the Impacts of Intersectionality

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado Boulder; JoAnn Silverstein P.E., University of Colorado Boulder

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Environmental Engineering, Women in Engineering

Conference Session

Issues of Diversity

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Moshe Hartman, Retired; Harriet Hartman, Rowan University; Jennifer Kadlowec, Rowan University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

72.4 95.2* 90.6 83.1 93.9 88.11 bOther relative or sibling 57.1 80.0* 53.1 52.8 50.5 57.9Best friend(s) 50.0 71.4 56.3 54.5 52.2 53.7Boyfriend/girlfriend 56.0 72.2 64.3 56.3 58.9 52.1Most influential high school teacher 72.4 71.4 81.3 75.6 71.9 73.3High school guidance counselor 55.2 57.1 62.4 64.6 65.5 63.4 (n) (29) (21) (33) (133) (112) (298)a In this and subsequent tables, Chem=chemical engineering major; Civil/Env =civil

Conference Session

Potpourri II

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Betsy Homsher, Kettering University; Janet Brelin-Fornari, Kettering University; Terri Lynch-Caris, Kettering University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

exposure to the field’s potential can impact interest andmatriculation. We can further substantiate this claim with data from post-program surveysconducted among former participants who matriculate elsewhere. Nearly 65% of them major inmechanical engineering at other colleges and universities (92% major in various engineeringfields). Retention rates among LITE matriculants are significantly higher than those of otherstudents, including women students. We have retained nearly 100% of all LITE matriculants, ahighly favorable number by any standard. Only one student has left the University beforecompleting her degree. Four (4) have graduated. Among them are two women who intend tocomplete Ph.D.’s in STEM disciplines. One attends graduate

Conference Session

The Academic Environment

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Monica Young, Syracuse University; John Tillotson, SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

uc o l e c tur in en m h e c a s u e m m g t r M e o c si d h a om M ero gri c (g g. P iron iron a N te d /C Me C uf Bi an Pe c hi ut

Conference Session

WEPAN and WIED Joint Panel: Life after Tenure--Leadership Roles in Academia

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Donna Reese, Mississippi State University; Priscilla Nelson, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Patricia Davies, Purdue University; Cheryl Schrader, Boise State University; W. M. Kim Roddis, George Washington University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

AC 2009-505: LIFE AFTER TENURE: LEADERSHIP ROLES IN ACADEMIADonna Reese, Mississippi State University Donna S. Reese. Professor Reese is currently the Associate Dean for Academics and Administration for the James Worth Bagley College of Engineering at Mississippi State University and a Professor of Computer Science and Engineering. She has been on the faculty at MSU since 1989. She may be reached via email at dreese@engr.msstate.edu.Priscilla Nelson, New Jersey Institute of Technology Dr. Priscilla Nelson. Dr. Nelson is Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering and International Program Director, and former Provost and Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs, at the New

Conference Session

Gender Bias in Student Evaluations of Teaching

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Agnes G d'Entremont, University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Hannah Gustafson, University of British Columbia

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering, Women in Engineering

of Teaching. Innov High Educ. 2015;40:291–303.11. Arbuckle J, Williams BD. Students’ Perceptions of Expressiveness: Age and Gender Effects on Teacher Evaluations. Sex Roles. 2003;49(9–10):507–16.12. Sprague J, Massoni K. Student Evaluations and Gendered Expectations: What We Can’t Count Can Hurt Us. Sex Roles. 2005;53(11–12):779–93.13. Miller J, Chamberlin M. Women Are Teachers, Men Are Professors: A Study of Student Perceptions. Teach Sociol. 2000;28(4):283–98.14. Terkik A, Prud’hommeaux E, Alm CO, Homan C, Franklin S. Analyzing Gender Bias in Student Evaluations. Rochester Institute of Technology; 2016.15. Fandt PM, Stevens GE. Evaluation Bias in the Business Classroom

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kelsey Morgan Irvin, University of Missouri, Columbia; Elizabeth Hiteshue, Bain & Company; Samantha Laurel Swanson; Caroline Missouri Wochnick, Augsburg College; Hannah Bech, AmeriCorps VISTA; Amanda Marie Kapetanakis, Augsburg College; Mary Yvonne Lanzerotti, Air Force Institute of Technology; Derrick Langley, Space and Missile Center, Enterprise Ground Services Office (SMC/ADZS); Michael Geselowitz, IEEE History Center at Stevens Institute of Technology; MaryAnn C. Hellrigel, IEEE, IEEE History Center; Gregory Alan Good, American Institute of Physics

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

ofdistinguished STEM leaders has had on their career paths. 5|P a g e Table 1. Participating Undergraduate Students who collected Oral Histories19-26Student Participation Dates Graduation Date Institution(s)Kelsey Irvin 2013-2016 May 2016, cum Washington University laude in St. LouisElizabeth Hiteshue 2013-2015 May 2015, magna University of cum laude PennsylvaniaHannah Bech 2014-2016 April 2016, summa Augsburg

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Laine Schrewe, Tolles Career and Technical Center

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

degree in Workforce Development (from the Ohio State University). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 S EM: Customized for Them How to attract students toward education’s latest trendBringing STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) into the classroom is thelatest craze in educational strategies. And what is more trendy in education than STEMinitiatives? Well, pretty much the same thing, but with special guest letters like STEAM (+ Art)and STREAM (+ Reading). Acronyms aside, STEM courses are still a tough sell for a lot ofstudents who don’t excel in the traditional math and science courses. Tailoring our curriculumsand course offerings

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division: Retention of Undergraduate Students

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elaine Zundl, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey; Laura Stiltz, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey; Helen M. Buettner, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

feedback about specific elements of the LLC program. Wehave found that our first two cohorts of female engineering students, currently in their secondand third years, express significantly higher levels of career expectations, self-efficacy, feelingsof inclusion and coping towards engineering than when they first entered. !IntroductionEngineering remains an academic area where women obtain a small fraction of bachelor degrees,and this trend does not seem to be changing in the near future. A recent report by the NationalStudent Clearinghouse found that although more students are pursuing S&E degrees, women’sshare of these majors has failed to increase over the last ten years.1 Researchers’ assumptions thatas women claimed more of the

Conference Session

WIED: Curricular Undergraduate Student Programs

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kristen B. Coletti, Northeastern University; Emily Olina Wisniewski; Rachel Lauren Shapiro, Northeastern University; Paul A. DiMilla, Northeastern University; Rachelle Reisberg, Northeastern University; Melinda Covert, Northeastern University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

out supplemental instruction in a required generalchemistry course and what factors affected whether a student used a form of supplementalinstruction.1 However, data were unavailable to correlate with grades.In order to understand a student’s pre-disposition and ultimate choice to participate insupplemental instruction as well as to determine correlations with grade distribution, honors andnon-honors students in a required general chemistry course were given pre-surveys at thebeginning and post-surveys at the end of the semester. Analysis of pre-surveys allowedidentification of a student’s predisposed “trigger point” at which s/he decides to seek extra helpupon entering college. The availability of data for different types of course

Conference Session

ADVANCE Grants and Institutional Transformation

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anna M. Zajicek, University of Arkansas; Shauna A. Morimoto, University of Arkansas; Joseph Rencis, University of Arkansas; Valerie H. Hunt, University of Arkansas

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Conference Session

Survival Tips from the Trenches

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Susan Lantz, Trine University; Adrienne Minerick, Mississippi State University; Donna Reese, Mississippi State University; Beena Sukumaran, Rowan University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

. Page 15.1151.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Survival Tips from the Trenches Susan A. Lantz, Ph.D.; Trine University; Adrienne R. Minerick, Ph.D., Michigan Technological University; Donna S. Reese, Ph.D., Mississippi State University; Beena Sukumaran, Ph.D., Rowan University Abstract: Panel Discussion: Four women in academia---one with 5-10 years of experience, two with 10-20 years of experience, and one with 20-plus years experience---will offer advice, suggestions, and discuss tips and techniques that worked (or did not work) for them. The panelists include a woman who left academia

Conference Session

WIED: Strategies Beyond the Classroom

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cate Samuelson, University of Washington; Elizabeth Litzler, University of Washington; Candice L. Staples, University of Maryland; Paige E. Smith, University of Maryland, College Park; Catherine T. Amelink, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering